|
|
Post by Entendance on Nov 22, 2023 7:27:46 GMT -5
Improvvisamente il governo israeliano, dopo scontri con la fazione più radicale di un esecutivo già radicalmente di destra, ha accettato un accordo per un cessate il fuoco temporaneo con Hamas che comporterebbe lo scambio di ostaggi. Non è difficile capire come si sia determinata questa decisione che fino a qualche giorno fa appariva lontanissima: le forze israeliane non stanno avanzando significativamente a Gaza, anzi stanno subendo perdite in uomini e mezzi del tutto impreviste ancorché ufficialmente nascoste mentre si profila un’estensione del conflitto a cui Israele non è preparata. Ma anche gli Stati Uniti hanno compreso di non essere preparati e dopo aver mostrato i muscoli si sono accorti che perché essere palestrati non significa automaticamente essere forti,
Ma principalmente la decisione di raffreddare un po’ il clima deriva dal fatto che le stragi indiscriminate compiute a Gaza stanno alienando sempre di più le simpatie dell’intero pianeta da Israele e dagli Usa che coprono stragi brutali e del tutto ingiustificate. Se si contrappongono le bugie dei media israeliani agli orribili crimini commessi a Gaza, non si troverebbe alcuna logica plausibile che possa giustificare in modo convincente l’omicidio di massa, lo sfollamento, la fame e il genocidio di una popolazione indifesa. In realtà mai la propaganda israeliana ha fallito in modo così sorprendente e mai i media mainstream hanno fatto fiasco nel proteggere Israele dalla rabbia globale per l’ignobile regime di apartheid che il sionismo ha costruito. Le ripercussioni di tutto ciò avranno sicuramente un impatto sul modo in cui la storia ricorderà la guerra israeliana contro Gaza, che finora ha ucciso e ferito decine di migliaia di civili innocenti in maggioranza bambini a cui di certo non può essere attribuita alcuna colpa.
Questa è la ragione per cui la propaganda israeliana non è più in grado di influenzare efficacemente l’opinione pubblica, anche se i media mainstream continuano a schierarsi con Israele, pure quando quest’ultimo sta commettendo un genocidio. In primo luogo, i palestinesi e i loro sostenitori sono riusciti a “oscurare ” Israele utilizzando i social media che, per la prima volta, hanno sopraffatto le campagne di propaganda organizzata spesso architettate per conto di Tel Aviv nei media occidentali. E questo nonostante l’impennata di censura che si abbattuta su alcuni social come quelli di Meta e del loro capo sionista. Hamas è sempre sembrata più credibile rispetto alle fonti israeliane vaghe, imprecise e palesemente propagandistiche. Un’analisi dei contenuti online sulle popolari piattaforme di social media è stata condotta dalla piattaforma di influencer marketing israeliana Humanz. Lo studio, pubblicato a novembre, ammette che “mentre il mese scorso sono stati pubblicati su Instagram e TikTok 7,39 miliardi di post con tag filo-israeliani, nello stesso periodo sono stati pubblicati sulle piattaforme 109,61 miliardi di post con tag filo-israeliani”. Insomma le opinioni filo-palestinesi sono 15 volte più popolari di quelle filo-israeliane,
Una classifica come questa potrebbe sembrare di poca importanza vista la volatilità della rete, ma il divario è tale che un’intera generazione, se non di più, ha già costruito la percezione di Israele come un regime genocida e nessuna bugia futura, film di Hollywood o diffusione di Maxim Magazine potrà mai attenuarla. Tra l’altro una sorta di cieca idiozia che proclama l’identità del sionismo con l’ebraismo concludendo che ogni critica sarebbe antisemitismo, spinge il resto del mondo a considerare le stragi non come la disperata mossa di un leader e di un governo di estrema destra, ma come il prodotto di tutta Israele. Gli squallidi giochetti intellettuali che percorrono le vie più stupide dell’occidente alla fine si rivelano quanto mai dannose, perché adesso non è più questione di un governo, ma di un ritorno alle ambigue radici della formazione di Israele. La nuova nuova percezione che si sta creando probabilmente costringerà le persone, non solo a riesaminare le loro opinioni sul presente e sul futuro di Israele, ma anche sul passato – il fondamento stesso del regime sionista, a sua volta basato su nient’altro che interpretazioni ingannevoli e giochi di prestigio sulla pelle dell’Onu e dei palestinesi. |
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Nov 27, 2023 13:04:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Dec 7, 2023 6:06:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Dec 10, 2023 6:16:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Dec 12, 2023 6:45:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Dec 14, 2023 6:48:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Dec 17, 2023 8:54:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Dec 20, 2023 8:41:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Dec 21, 2023 17:13:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Dec 24, 2023 4:46:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Dec 25, 2023 5:43:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 2, 2024 8:22:46 GMT -5
  They're Calling Ethnic Cleansing "Voluntary Migration" Now
Israeli officials are now openly admitting that they’re working on “encouraging” the migration of Palestinians from Gaza, ridiculously claiming that this migration would be “voluntary” despite their having deliberately made the enclave uninhabitable over the last three months.
The Times of Israel reports:
“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s two senior far-right partners endorsed the rebuilding of settlements in the Gaza Strip and the encouraging of “voluntary emigration” of Palestinians on Monday, while hawkish opposition MK Avigdor Liberman called for Israel to reoccupy southern Lebanon.
“Speaking during their parties’ respective faction meetings in the Knesset, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich presented the migration of Palestinian civilians as a solution to the long-running conflict and as a prerequisite for securing the stability necessary to allow residents of southern Israel to return to their homes.
“The war presents an ‘opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza,’ Ben Gvir told reporters and members of his far-right Otzma Yehudit party, calling such a policy ‘a correct, just, moral and humane solution.’
“‘We cannot withdraw from any territory we are in in the Gaza Strip. Not only do I not rule out Jewish settlement there, I believe it is also an important thing,’ he said.
“The ‘correct solution’ to the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict is ‘to encourage the voluntary migration of Gaza’s residents to countries that will agree to take in the refugees,’ Smotrich told members of his Religious Zionism party, predicting that ‘Israel will permanently control the territory of the Gaza Strip,’ including through the establishment of settlements.”
The repeated use of the word “encourage” stands out in these remarks, given that encouraging Gaza’s inhabitants to flee their homeland is exactly what Israel’s actions since October have been doing. Once you’ve made 90 percent of Gaza’s inhabitants homeless with internal displacement, forced half the population into starvation via siege warfare, destroyed the enclave’s entire healthcare system to the point where disease is now running rampant, all while raining death and destruction from above in a wildly unpredictable manner with airstrikes routinely hitting designated safe zones, you’re offering the population some very strong “encouragement” indeed to vacate the region as soon as possible.
This obviously makes the argument for the “voluntary migration” of Gazans completely nonsensical, since violently coercing someone into doing something and ensuring that they’ll die if they don’t do it is the exact opposite of what the word “voluntary” means.
But that’s the slogan we’re seeing pop up again and again as Israel draws closer to its final solution to the Palestinian problem in Gaza. Netanyahu and his cohorts have been repeatedly uttering phrases like “voluntary resettlement” and “voluntary migration” to describe the plan for Gaza’s Palestinian inhabitants to either move to refugee camps set up in the adjacent Sinai Peninsula in Egypt or to be taken in by other nations around the world.
Netanyahu has said that a team must be established to “ensure that those who want to leave Gaza to a third country can do so.” Iraq invader Tony Blair was reportedly being eyed as a potential leader of such a team by Israeli officials, though Blair has denied this.
Mitchell Plitnick wrote the following on the absurdity of the “voluntary migration” talking point in an article for Mondoweiss last month:
“The term ‘voluntary emigration’ is likely to be heard quite a lot in the coming weeks and months, and it is one of the most cynical, dishonest terms one can imagine. There is, of course, nothing voluntary about people leaving Gaza. Israel has made the place unlivable, and that was before the current bombardment.
“Now, they are essentially being forced to leave under the threat of imminent death. The people of Gaza did not suddenly lose their attachment to Palestine. They will die if they stay, as will their children. If you cut off water, electricity, food, and medical care, destroy all the shelter, and then ask a person, ‘Would you still like to stay?’ their decision to leave is obviously not voluntary.”
But that’s the narrative they’re going with apparently.
And it’s nothing new; Israel has been falsely claiming for generations that its violent forced expulsion of Palestinians known as the Nakba was voluntary as well. In 2000 Palestinian academic Ghada Karmi wrote that “The Israeli version of history — that the Palestinians left voluntarily or under orders from their leaders and that Israelis had no responsibility, material or moral, for their plight — has been successfully marketed to the world community for decades.”
The plot to relocate Palestinians from territories desired by Israel is also far from new. In a 2002 article for The Guardian titled “A new exodus for the Middle East?”, Israeli historian Benny Morris writes that the agenda to “transfer” Palestinians to other countries has existed for as long as modern Zionism:
“The idea of transfer is as old as modern Zionism and has accompanied its evolution and praxis during the past century. And driving it was an iron logic: There could be no viable Jewish state in all or part of Palestine unless there was a mass displacement of Arab inhabitants, who opposed its emergence and would constitute an active or potential fifth column in its midst. This logic was understood, and enunciated, before and during 1948, by Zionist, Arab and British leaders and officials.
“As early as 1895, Theodor Herzl, the prophet and founder of Zionism, wrote in his diary in anticipation of the establishment of the Jewish state: ‘We shall try to spirit the penniless [Arab] population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our country … The removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.’”
This is a very, very old agenda, being presented as something brand new that is only just occurring to Israeli officials just now. They didn’t just come up with this. It’s been fantasized about for as long as Israel was a twinkle in its founding fathers’ eyes.
This is the real objective in Gaza. Not the “elimination of Hamas” (whatever the hell you want to pretend that would look like in practice), but the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip.
Hamas is not the target in Gaza. Hamas is just the excuse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 4, 2024 9:16:59 GMT -5
That's a pretty stunning illustration of the double standards at play when the US criticize China's 9-dash line, having effectively transformed the entire Pacific ocean into "the American lake". -Arnaud Bertrand |
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 6, 2024 8:11:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 7, 2024 9:31:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 9, 2024 2:27:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 12, 2024 1:22:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 17, 2024 17:33:45 GMT -5
'...Western credibility has been shredded irrevocably.
Of course, Western hypocrisy is nothing new. According to Western governments, the world should be up in arms about Russian aggression but should be perfectly happy with Israeli brutality and flouting of international norms. Ukrainians who throw Molotov cocktails at Russian occupation forces are heroes and freedom fighters, while Palestinians (and others) who dare to speak out against Israeli apartheid are terrorists. White-skinned refugees from Ukraine are more than welcome, while black and brown-skinned refugees from conflicts in the Middle East, Asia and Africa (most of which the West are behind) can sink to the bottom of the Mediterranean. The Western attitude has truly been: rules for thee, not for me.
The Western position towards China exhibits the same insincerity. China is virtually encircled by American and allied military bases, armed to the hilt. Yet it is China that is guilty of… what? Unable to point to any concrete infraction, Western governments and media can only accuse China of “increased assertiveness”, ie, not knowing its assigned subjugate place in the Western hegemonic order.
International justice has become a sick joke. Were the International Criminal Court (ICC) functioning effectively, Israeli leaders would be on trial even as we speak, and there would have been no need for South Africa to approach the ICJ. As it stands, though, the ICC only indicted Africans until 2022, when it announced an investigation into the Russian invasion of Ukraine less than a week after its start. The ICC issued indictments, including for Russia’s President Vladimir Putin, in less than a year. Conversely, it took over six years for the ICC to open an investigation into the situation in Palestine, and even now, years later, meaningful action has yet to be taken. While Israel continued its orgy of violence against the people of Gaza, Karim Khan, the British Chief Prosecutor of the ICC, visited Israel and stressed the need for Hamas’s crimes to be prosecuted, while going soft on Israeli crimes. Little wonder many civil society organisations are calling for him to be fired.
Of course, Western hypocrisy is nothing new. From the get-go, international legal norms were intended to apply only to so-called “civilised” – read white – peoples. Savages did not count, and the powerful Western states could – and did – do to them what they pleased. Natives certainly did not “own” land or natural resources, and colonial powers were free to steal and exploit those as they wished. Zionism was also founded on such racist attitudes – attitudes that remain at the core of Israeli policies to this day.
These double standards are apparent with regard to the right to national self-determination – the fundamental right of all peoples to choose their own political system and control their own natural resources. After World War I, US President Woodrow Wilson insisted that self-determination be the guiding principle of the new world order – but, of course, only for Europeans. Palestinians and other Arab peoples found out the hard way that colonialism was alive and well: They were subject to League of Nations Mandates, which justified colonial rule for “peoples not yet able to stand by themselves”. The Charter of the United Nations also included provisions for Trusteeship, essentially along similar lines as the Mandates of the League...'
By supporting Israel’s atrocities in Gaza, the West has shredded what remains of its credibility and brought the ‘rules-based’ world order it purports to lead to the point of no return
The devil is no fool. He can get people feeling about heaven the way they ought to feel about hell. And he does so, not by light but by obscurity, not by realities but by shadows; not by clarity and substance, but by dreams and the creatures of psychosis. And men are so poor in intellect that a few cold chills down their spine will be enough to keep them from ever finding out the truth about anything. - Thomas Merton, No Man Is an Island
Each day we are becoming a creature of splendid glory, or one of unthinkable horror. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 22, 2024 8:19:47 GMT -5
Elon Musk, unfortunately, I am sorry to say that you are under the influence of the Zionists. You cannot support the Jews by going to Auschwitz with the genocidal Zionist Ben Shapiro, because Zionists like Ben Shapiro distort Jewish history and present Zionism as Judaism to you. The reason they do this is to legitimize the occupation and genocide and to make everyone accept their thoughts in this way.
Dear Elon Musk, please try to learn Judaism from real Torah Jews, not from Zionists.
Zionism is not Judaism.
Supporting Israel is not supporting Jews. Supporting Israel and Zionism is harming Jews. -Torah Judaism |
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 24, 2024 5:00:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 28, 2024 2:48:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 29, 2024 6:34:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 1, 2024 11:29:50 GMT -5
West Asian exports to Israel have skyrocketed since 2020. These are the Arab and Muslim governments that put goods on Israeli shelves, despite their public stances supporting Gaza.
If you lose everything, remember to preserve your reputation.
Once your reputation is lost, afterwards you will be nobody.
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 2, 2024 10:53:27 GMT -5
An Israeli startup company is among several other firms setting up land routes through Arab states into Israel
'...cargo ships arrive and unload in the UAE. The trucks then carry the goods from Abu Dhabi, crossing into Saudi Arabia through the Emirati Route 62 and Saudi Route 65 highways until they reach Jordan. Once in Jordan, they enter Israel via the Jordan River Crossing, and move on to Haifa...'
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 7, 2024 7:00:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 9, 2024 8:38:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 10, 2024 18:30:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 15, 2024 12:53:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 19, 2024 5:36:04 GMT -5
'Professor Michel Chossudovsky, director of Global Research, has examined the new French law that defines dissent from official medical narratives as a “sectarian aberration” and criminalizes dissent from medical narratives, such as “the mRNA vaccine is safe and effective.”
The law also creates a new crime called “provocation to abstention from medical care.” A French citizen is guilty of a crime if the person refuses a vaccine or medical treatment handed down by authorities. Had the law been in place during the mass vaccination campaign with the deadly mRNA “vaccine,” all who refused would have received three years imprisonment and paid a 45,000 euro fine. This ensures that next time everyone will receive the “vaccine,” because if you refuse you will be imprisoned and the prison rules will require you to be “vaccinated.”
The new law also protects the pharmaceutical corporations from any accountability for the deaths and health damage their lies caused by criminalizing French citizens–including doctors and medical scientists–who speak against the Covid-19 “vaccines.” This demonstrates the power of Big Pharma over democracy, which with this death blow given to free speech and medical fact no longer exists in France.
Here is Professor Chossudovsky’s account: www.globalresearch.ca/frances-draft-law-citizens-who-speak-out-against-the-covid-19-vaccine-3-years-prison-and-e45000-fine/5849818
This is a very serious development. It is an official act by an alleged “Western democracy” that criminalizes truth. For example, French medical scientists who find that the mRNA “vaccines” result in death and health injury will be imprisoned if they report their findings. The new French law takes the determination of medical fact out of the hands of medical scientists. The “fact” henceforth is whatever Big Pharma’s paid shills among politicians and medical “authorities” say it is.
Something similar has occurred in Germany. The distinguished German attorney Reiner Fuellmich was about to file a lawsuit supported by thousands of medical doctors and attorneys against the mRNA manufacturers when he was kidnapped by the German state and imprisoned in Germany where he is currently standing trial on trumped up charges brought by what appears to be paid “witnesses.”
This is not the way democracies operate. As I have written on many occasions, Western countries have ceased to be democracies. The people have no voice. The countries are governed by the agendas of the elites and powerful corporations with the money to purchase the laws that serve their agendas and interests. The people who run for office are the people approved by these elites. Trump was the exception, and look at what has happened to him. The ruling elite have made their point: “Cross us and we will destroy you.”
Western governments serve at the expense of the people the material interests of the powerful and ideologies such as the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset.” Dutch and Irish governments are dispossessing under the rubric of “global warming” farmers of their flocks of sheep and herds of cattle, thereby driving up food prices by curtailing the supplies of meat, milk, butter, and cheese, while simultaneously allowing entry to hordes of immigrant-invaders whose support the people are forced to undertake. Today a “Western democracy” is an institution that forces citizens to support interests that are not their own.
We are now witnessing, with the new French law, with the German government’s kidnapping of Reiner Fuellmich, with the American persecution of medical scientists who truthfully reported the mRNA danger, the Stalinist indictments of President Trump, and with media that no longer serve as watchdogs over the government but as propaganda ministries for government lies, the legalization and institutionalization of the tyranny that has displaced democracy in the Western world.
A large percentage of Western peoples are so indoctrinated and brainwashed that they do not see what is happening. Moreover, Western countries having been turned into towers of babel means there is no social unity, which makes it impossible to oppose the tyranny as some of the diverse elements see tyranny useful in suppressing political and ideological opponents. In the US the Democrats’ policy of wide-open borders for “people of color” but not for whites is dispossessing Americans of their own country. Despite public opposition to the policy, it has moved into high gear with, according to official numbers, entry each year of immigrant-invaders in numbers equivalent to 12 cities the size of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. There is no doubt whatsoever that the goal is to replace the white American population who are powerless to do anything about it.
Meanwhile the Western governments foment wars with Russia, China, and Iran and expect the demoralized citizens they are dispossessing to supply the army.
Does the Kremlin comprehend that its de-nazification agenda cannot be limited to Ukraine but must be applied to the entirety of the Western world?'
|
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 21, 2024 6:29:34 GMT -5
Putin has been deceived, betrayed, demonized, and given the West’s cold shoulder for two decades, and he still wants to negotiate with those who have thrashed him?
|
|
Blood Money: The Top Ten Politicians 
