|
Post by Entendance on Jul 12, 2017 16:52:14 GMT -5
Your Money In The Bank Will Be Gone For anyone who has money in the bank today, it is virtually guaranteed that in the next 5-7 years either the bank will be gone or the money will be worthless, or probably both. Governments and Central Banks are now supreme experts in the total destruction of your money. They are constantly adding new methods so let’s just look at a few of them: *Zero or Negative interest rates – Over time, together with bank charges, your money will slowly be confiscated. *Bail-ins – No one will bail you out. Instead the insolvent banks will take your money to save the bank. *Ban cash – Within a few years, cash will be virtually banned in many countries. So you will not see your money again and the bank and the government will tell you what you can do with it. *Forced savings in government bonds – Bankrupt governments will force you to invest in bonds for 30 years or longer. The bonds will be worthless at maturity. *Money Printing – Finally if the money isn’t already gone, governments will totally destroy it by printing so much that it will become worthless.
The world is now starting the final phase of the failed experiment in creating wealth and prosperity for a select few and massive debt and misery for the masses. It all started with the creation of the Fed in 1913. This led to a global credit creation and money printing extravaganza of a magnitude that the world has never seen before. We have now reached the point when it makes no difference who becomes US president or what the Fed or the IMF will do. No, now we are at the point that von Mises so succinctly defined: “There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.” The latter is guaranteed – Only Gold will protect you. -Egon von Greyerz
Sell everything whose value only exists as a result of confidence in central bank(ster)s.
In Praise of ***Ferdinand Pecora (By the time Ferdinand Pecora, slight, soft-spoken son of Italian immigrants, got through with the bankers, Senator Burton Wheeler of Montana was likening them to Al Capone and the public referred to them as “banksters,” rhyming with gangsters.)
Your complete list of secure, non-bank facilities used to store valuables! Act accordingly. ***The safest places in the world to store your gold your silver and your cash***
While the world’s central bankers have given us absolutely no reason to trust them, our governments have given us every reason to NOT trust them. Governments, especially the bankrupt insolvent ones, have a long history of theft, deceit, and plunder. As we have discussed so many times before, confiscation and/or criminalization of gold is not exactly a zero-risk prospect. Not to mention other related risks as litigations and social unrest. Safety deposit boxes where you have ultimate custody of your metal and cash are the best solution.
2016: It all started quite some time ago... Cash Banned, Freedom Gone: War on Cash Some politicians want to ban cash, arguing that cash is helping criminals. The first steps in that direction are the withdrawal of big denomination notes and the limits imposed on cash payments. Proponents of a ban on cash claim that this will help fight criminal transactions — involved in money laundering, terrorism, and tax evasion. These promises of salvation are used to get the general public to agree to a society without cash. But there is no convincing proof for the claim that the world without cash will be a better one. Even if undesirable behavior is indeed financed by cash, you still need to answer the question: will the undesirable behavior disappear without cash? Or will those who commit the undesirable acts take to new ways and means to reach their goal?
Take the example of the 500 euro note. If we do away with it, won't those who wish to use cash pay with five 100 euro notes instead? Or ten 50 euro notes? And what about the costs imposed on the large majority of respectable people, if you put a ban on their cash? Using the same logic, should we ban alcohol, because some can't handle it properly? It’s Really about Central Banks The plan to restrict the use of cash, or to abolish it step by step, has nothing to do with the fight against crime. The real reason is that states (and their central banks) want to introduce negative interest rates. Although central banks have long pursued inflationary policies that devalue the debt owed by governments, negative interest rates offer a new and powerful tool to do this. But, to make negative interest rates work well, you have to get rid of physical cash. Otherwise, if you apply negative rates on bank deposits, customers in the short or long run will try to avoid the costs that negative rates impose on their bank deposits. So, depositors will, in many cases, hoard cash. To block this last escape route, proponents of the ban on cash want to do away with it. The Natural Rate of Interest Incidentally, some reputable economists are supporting the plan, claiming that the “natural rate” has become a negative rate. Because of that, central banks were forced to push interest rates below zero, being the only way to foster growth and employment. The assertion that the balanced interest rate has become negative doesn't stand up to a critical examination though. It is inherently impossible that the balanced interest rate is negative. Market rates, which entail the balanced rate, can fall below zero, but not the balanced rate itself. The policy of negative rates is no cure for the economy but causes massive economic problems. Competition and Property Rights Banning cash is infringing on the freedom of citizens on a massive scale. In withdrawing cash, the citizen is bereft of choice for his payments. After all, the state has the monopoly on the production of money. There is no competition on cash. Thus, nobody but the state can satisfy the demand for money by citizens. If the state bans cash, all transactions must be executed electronically. For the state to see who buys what when and who travels when where is then only a small step away. The citizen thus becomes completely transparent and his financial privacy is being lost. Even the prospect that a citizen can be spied upon at any time is an infringement on his right of freedom. Cash helps to protect the citizen from an unfettered intrusiveness by the state. If the state increases taxes too much, citizens at least have the option to avoid the tribulation by paying in cash. The knowledge that citizens can do so, makes states hold back a little. States will give up any restraint once cash has been banned. The justified concern isn't at all rendered obsolete by the cases of Sweden and Denmark, where the cashless society is said to function to its perfection. The citizens of those countries can still use foreign cash if they want. The plan to ban cash — step by step — is a sign of the fundamental ailment of our time: the state is destroying more and more of the freedom of citizens and businesses, once it has turned into a territorial monopolist and highest judge of all conflicts. The fight to keep cash may bring something good though: it will shed light on the need to take the power away from the state as we know it, by applying the same principles of law on its actions as on those of each and every citizen. That way, the state’s monopoly on producing cash would come to an end and the citizen wouldn't need to worry that he may be deprived of his cash against his will. -Thorsten Polleit
Bail-ins (and other confiscations) are*** likely coming. It is only smart to have a LARGE amount of your financial assets outside of the banking system.
***Inspire Your Day At The E. Beach***
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 12, 2017 17:25:58 GMT -5
"Cari bancari, ma non vi fate schifo?"
"Back in 2008, I began warning of increasing capital controls that we would see in the future, as a component in the decline of Western economies (Western in the broad sense, including Japan, Australia, etc.) Along the way, it occurred to me that, at some point, governments might collectively attempt to eliminate paper currency in favour of an electronic currency - transferred from party to party solely through licensed banks. Sound farfetched? Well, maybe, but what if the U.S. and EU agreed on an overall plan, then suggested it to other governments? On the face of it, this smacks of conspiracy theory, yet certainly, all governments would benefit from this control and would be likely to get on board. In fact, it might prove to be the only way out of their present economic problems. So, how would it play out?..." ***The International War on Cash
Πάντα χωρεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει καὶ δὶς ἐς τὸν αὐτὸν ποταμὸν οὐκ ἂν ἐμβαίης. -Ἡράκλειτος ὁ Ἐφέσιος Everything changes and nothing remains still; you can’t step twice into the same stream. -Heraclitus of Ephesus ***Change Happens!
In A World Of Artificial Liquidity – Cash Is King and you'd better have some stashed out of the system Not only have the major banks been the main recipient of manufactured liquidity, they have also received consolidated access to our deposits, which they can use like hostages to negotiate future bailout situations. Elite bankers moan about the extra regulations they have had to endure in the wake of the financial crisis, while scooping up cash dispersed under the guise of stimulating the general economy. Central banks seek fresh ways to keep the party going as countries like Greece shut down banks to contain capital flight, and places like Puerto Rico and multiple states and municipalities face economic ruin. But they are clueless as to what to do. In this cauldron of instability and lack of leadership, cash is the one remaining financial possession that Main Street can translate into goods, services and security. That’s why private banks want more control over it. Banks Want Your Cash For Their Latent Emergencies One of the most inane reasons cited for restricting cash withdrawals for normal people is that they all might turn out to be drug dealers or terrorists. Meanwhile, drug-dealing-money-laundering terrorists tend to get away with it anyway, by sheer ability to use a plethora of banks and off shore havens to diffuse cash around the globe. Every so often, years after the fact, some bank perpetrators receive money-laundering fines. For average depositors though, these are excuses for a bureaucracy built upon limiting access to cash whether from an ATM or an account. There’s a difference between physical cash (the kind you can touch and use immediately) and the electronic kind, associated with your bank balance or credit card cash advance limit. If you hold it, you have it – even if keeping it in a bank means it’s probably slammed with various fees. Banks, on the other hand, can leverage your deposits or cash, even while complying with various capital reserve requirements. That’s not new. But the expanding debates about how much of your cash you get to withdraw at any given moment, is. The notion of a bail-in, or recourse to people’s deposits, is related to the idea of restricting the movement, or existence, of physical cash. Bail-ins, like any cash limitations, imply that if a bank needs emergency liquidity, your deposits are the place to find it, which has negative repercussion on your own solvency. This is exactly what the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, coupled with the creation of the FDIC sought to avoid – banks confiscating your money at the worst possible times. The ‘war on cash’ is thus really a war on the difference between the money you can hold on to and the money the banks can take away from you. The existence of this cash debate underscores the need for a personal policy of cash extraction from the big banks. Do you have one? They're Coming For Your Cash Liquidity-starved banks will take your savings via bail-ins. •The banking system runs on liquidity •Banks will do anything to keep it flowing -- including raiding their depositors •The risks of a global liquidity crunch are dangerously high today •Why extracting physical cash from the system is highly advised Liquidity is the buzz-word that central banks used to justify their policies of keeping short term rates at zero (give or take) percent and buying bonds from banks in return for giving them more of it. Central banks say their primary responsibility is to balance full employment with low inflation, but that’s just code for being able to keep the largest banks solvent in times of emergency by all means possible. This current emergency has lasted nearly seven years and counting.
Here are my laws of liquidity behavior: The first law of liquidity – when it is most needed, it will be least available. The second law of liquidity – the easier it is to get, the less value it holds for the recipient. The third law of liquidity – the harder it is to find, the greater its systemic cost. Banks gain on multiple fronts from “accommodative” monetary policy with respect to their liquidity needs. First, they can borrow money at next to nothing. Second, they can hoard that extra cash under the guise of complying with capital reserve requirements and get brownie points for passing stress tests because they are holding the cash or high quality assets bought with the cash, that central banks provided them to begin with. Third, they can sell bonds they don’t want or need at full value to central banks, and afterwards mark similar bonds at higher levels than the market would otherwise value them.
This is all shell-game finance. It is why people should be diligent about...***Nomi Prins
***The Death of Cash Germany Unveils "Cash Controls" Push:Ban Transactions Over €5,000, €500 Euro Note
27 MAGGIO 2016 “Il direttore mi disse: non far marcire la liquidazione sul conto” ***Cari bancari, ma non vi fate schifo?
Jan 31, 2016 at 11:56am ...le banche italiane sono tutte serie; non ce ne è una che ride...
<...1. Every financial transaction can be taxed. 2. Every financial transaction can be charged a fee. 3. Bank runs are eliminated. In fractional reserve systems such as ours, banks are only required to hold a fraction of their assets in cash. Thus a bank might only have 1 percent of its assets in cash. If customers fear the bank might be insolvent, they crowd the bank and demand their deposits in physical cash. The bank quickly runs out of physical cash and closes its doors, further fueling a panic. The federal government began insuring deposits after the Great Depression triggered the collapse of hundreds of banks, and that guarantee limited bank runs, as depositors no longer needed to fear a bank closing would mean their money on deposit was lost. But since people could conceivably sense a disturbance in the Financial Force and decide to turn digital cash into physical cash as a precaution, eliminating physical cash also eliminates the possibility of bank runs, as there will be no form of cash that isn’t controlled by banks...> ***Norway's Biggest Bank Demands Cash Ban
domenica 7 febbraio 2016 A. Bagnai:"...Abbiamo di fronte a noi un'alternativa non semplice: o un gesto disperato ma risolutivo, o alcuni decenni di disperazione. Chi ci comanda non ha chiari i termini del problema, ve lo garantisco (e del resto lo vedete da voi), e quindi quale sarà l'esito ve lo lascio immaginare..."
"...You don’t need to be a conspiracy theorist to recognize that if a central bank drives interest rates into negative territory, it’ll struggle to manage with physical cash. When a bank balance starts being eaten away by a sub-zero interest rate, cash starts to look inviting..." ***Europe’s €500 Notes Are the Latest Front in the War on Cash ***Here Is The Real Reason Why Authorities Want To Ban High Denomination Bank Notes
***Capitulation to irrelevance: Italia
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 12, 2017 18:10:53 GMT -5
We are entering a very dark phase in this battle to retain our liberty. A proposal now being whispered behind the curtain in Europe is to impose a tax on withdrawing your own money from an ATM. The banks support this measure as a whole because they see this as preventing bank runs. Nobody will look at the direction we are headed. I am deeply concerned that these type of proposals will send the West in a real revolution not much different from that of Russia in 1917. The divide between left and right is getting much deeper and the left is hell bent on stripping those who produce of their liberty and assets. This type of confrontation is in line with our War Cycle, which we will update in 2017. This is the most dangerous period we are heading into for governments will respond only in their own self-interest to survive. The socialists hate those who produce. That is just the bottom line. Nobody should have wealth more than they and this is the same human emotion that has cost tens of millions of lives in civil conflicts through out the centuries. Proof this is a persistyent problem is the fact taht even the Ten Commandments state clearly that socialism is wrong: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house … or anything that belongs to your neighbor” (Exodus 20:17). Nevertheless, this is repuidiated by socialists who say it’s not fair that anyone has something more than they do. This material jealousy has been the source of so much death throughout the centuries because it has been exploited by the ruling class to justify their theivery. We will review all our models and update this after the U.S. inauguration since the socialists are trying to figure out how to steal the election from Trump. There is no way to overturn Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania without fraud and they need all three overturned to claim victory. This will not end nicely. The divide will only get bigger. The future is anything but stable and safe. The war on cash is in full swing. The whispers behind the curtain are starting to get louder. The headlines in Australia demonstrate how the press is already conspiring against the people. The new slogan rising is***Cash is for Criminals.
What killed the frogs? Many of us would say the boiling water. But the truth is what killed the frogs were their own inability to decide when they had to jump out.
***ECB COUNCIL VOTES TO SCRAP EU500 NOTE
***It's Time To Kill The $100 Bill
Simon Black: The ban on cash is coming. Soon.
Mish: French and Italian Bank Deposits vs. Guarantees: How Safe is Your Money?
David Stockman: Why The Keynesian Market Wreckers Are Now Coming For Even Your Ben Franklins
That’s what happened in Cyprus. The banks were going to the wall.***So, they confiscated deposits to help make themselves whole again
***64 Chapters On Stupidity
5 pages***The banksters
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 12, 2017 18:39:23 GMT -5
"...The political and financial establishments want you to willingly get on board with the idea of abolishing, or at least reducing, cash. And they’re pumping out all sorts of propaganda to do it, trying to get people to equate crime and corruption with high denominations of cash. Simply put, the data doesn’t support their assertion..." ***An interesting perspective on the War on Cash
***Gold Price Skyrockets in India after Currency Ban – Part IV
The War On Cash Is Increasing As countries move to negative interest rates the thrust of the policies are to force people to spend. No mattress money allowed thank you. Nations like Japan, Sweden, Denmark and Switzerland have already implemented these policies. Central Banks are basically charging member banks to hold cash. The superficial belief is to force loan making and spending which will stimulate inflation and growth. The minus rates being applied by the ECB, Denmark, Switzerland, Sweden, and Japan havefailed to juice growth, or stocks, or inflation. A clear ulterior motive is by eliminating cash, countries will increase tax revenues by negatively effecting the private economy and illegal activities at the same time. A recent move by the ECB is to eliminate the €500 note. This was followed this week by influential economist Larry Summers desires to eliminate the $100 bill. And, so it goes. But clearly the government wishes to squeeze cash transactions. The Central Banks hate physical cash. So much so they there will likely try to ban it in the near future. You see, almost all of the “wealth” in the financial system is digital in nature. ◾The total currency (actual cash in the form of bills and coins) in the US financial system is a little over $1.36 trillion. ◾When you include digital money sitting in short-term accounts and long-term accounts then you’re talking about roughly $10 trillion in “money” in the financial system. ◾In contrast, the money in the US stock market (equity shares in publicly traded companies) is over $20 trillion in size. ◾The US bond market (money that has been lent to corporations, municipal Governments, State Governments, and the Federal Government) is almost twice this at $38 trillion. ◾Total Credit Market Instruments (mortgages, collateralized debt obligations, junk bonds, commercial paper and other digitally-based “money” that is based on debt) is even larger $58.7 trillion. ◾Unregulated over the counter derivatives traded between the big banks and corporations is north of $220 trillion. When looking over these data points, the first thing that jumps out at the viewer is that the vast bulk of “money” in the system is in the form of digital loans or credit (non-physical debt). Put another way, actual physical money or cash (as in bills or coins you can hold in your hand) comprises less than 1% of the “money” in the financial system. As far as the Central Banks are concerned, this is a good thing because if investors/depositors were ever to try and convert even a small portion of this “wealth” into actual physical bills, the system would implode (there simply is not enough actual cash).
Remember, the current financial system is based on debt. The benchmark for “risk free” money in this system is not actual cash but US Treasuries. In this scenario, when the 2008 Crisis hit, one of the biggest problems for the Central Banks was to stop investors from fleeing digital wealth for the comfort of physical cash. Indeed, the actual “thing” that almost caused the financial system to collapse was when depositors attempted to pull $500 billion out of money market funds. A money market fund takes investors’ cash and plunks it into short-term highly liquid debt and credit securities. These funds are meant to offer investors a return on their cash, while being extremely liquid (meaning investors can pull their money at any time). This works great in theory… but when $500 billion in money was being pulled (roughly 24% of the entire market) in the span of four weeks, the truth of the financial system was quickly laid bare: that digital money is not in fact safe. To use a metaphor, when the money market fund and commercial paper markets collapsed, the oil that kept the financial system working dried up. Almost immediately, the gears of the system began to grind to a halt. When all of this happened, the global Central Banks realized that their worst nightmare could in fact become a reality: that if a significant percentage of investors/ depositors ever tried to convert their “wealth” into cash (particularly physical cash) the whole system would implode. As a result of this, virtually every monetary action taken by the Fed since this time has been devoted to forcing investors away from cash and into risk assets. The most obvious move was to cut interest rates to 0.25%, rendering the return on cash to almost nothing. However, in their own ways, the various QE programs and Operation Twist have all had similar aims: to force investors away from cash, particularly physical cash. After all, if cash returns next to nothing, anyone who doesn’t want to lose their purchasing power is forced to seek higher yields in bonds or stocks. The Fed’s economic models predicted that by doing this, the US economy would come roaring back. The only problem is that it hasn’t. In fact, by most metrics, the US economy has flat-lined for several years now, despite the Fed having held ZIRP for 5-6 years and engaged in three rounds of QE. As a result of this… mainstream economists at CitiGroup, the German Council of Economic Experts, and bond managers at M&G have suggested doing away with cash entirely.
If you think this sounds like some kind of conspiracy theory, consider that France has a cash ban on any transaction over €1,000 Euros from using physical cash. Spain has a cash ban on transactions over €2,500. Uruguay has cash bans on transactions over $5,000. And on and on. A cash ban will be coming to the US in the near future. Already, the big banks (the ones with the closest ties to the Federal Reserve) have begun turning away deposits OR charging them. State Street Corp. , the Boston bank that manages assets for institutional investors, for the first time has begun charging some customers for large dollar deposits, people familiar with the matter said. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., the nation’s largest bank by assets, has cut unwanted deposits by more than $150 billion this year, in part by charging fees… And here’s another big “tell”… “At some point you wonder whether there will be a shortage of financial institutions willing to take on these balances,” said Kelli Moll, head of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP’s hedge-fund practice in New York, saying that where to hold cash has become an increasing topic of conversation as hedge funds are shown the door by longtime banking counterparties. So where is the physical cash meant to go? Jerome Schneider, head of Pacific Investment Management Co.’s short-term and funding desk, which advises corporate and institutional clients, said that as a result of the bank actions, he and his customers have discussed as cash alternatives boosting investments in U.S. Treasury bonds, ultrashort-duration bond funds and money-market funds. When it comes to cash, Mr. Schneider said, “Clients have been put on warning.” Source: Wall Street Journal. This is just the beginning. Indeed… -Graham Summers
Should the war on cash prove unsuccessful in its early stages, banks could be closed for long periods. Investors should be aware of such possibilities and consider whether to hold cash and precious metals prudently outside the banking system. Better to be even months too early than a second too late should we be left facing a bank’s closed doors. -John Browne
War on Cash Chapter: End Of Story "...The truth is that if society panics and there is a full blown rush out of existing electronic bank deposits and into physical currency to avoid negative rate taxation, only those who panic first will be safe. Why? Because of the "magic" of fractional reserve banking - there is simply not enough physical currency in circulation to satisfy all savers' claims..."
The Global Run On Physical Cash Has Begun: Why It Pays To Panic First 'need more asshats' comment on the above ZH article: I yanked all my cash from Wells Fargo last week. Closed the account. Fuck 'em. I'm doing my part. How about you? ***********
"...Cash has a lot of virtues. One of them is that it allows people to engage in voluntary transactions without the knowledge or permission of anyone else. Governments call this suspicious, but the rest of us call it something else: Freedom." Glenn Reynolds: Cash is the currency of freedom
***Cognitive Dissonance & Confirmation Bias
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 12, 2017 18:51:55 GMT -5
Cash Banned, Freedom Gone: War on Cash
May 20, 2016 "...the war on cash is all about increasing control by eliminating privacy and the freedom to abandon the debt-serf rat-race..." ***The War on Cash Is a War on Your Freedom to Opt Out
2016 Richard A. Werner:***Negative“ Interest Rates and the War on Cash H/T Public Banking Forum Of Ireland & Public Banking Alliance
Remember: no cash means no effective lower bound and with no lower bound, the economy can be completely centrally planned - for all intents and purposes. Consumers not spending? No problem. Just tax their excess account balance. Economy overheating? Again, no problem. Raise the interest paid on account holdings to encourage people to stop spending.
"You’re never going to save everyone. There are some people that are never going to get it. It’s sad, but true. There will always be investors that can’t help themselves or get out of their own way. I used to think everyone could be saved if they would only learn. But changing behavior is simply too difficult for many. In order for one group of investors to prosper, another group has to fail. It’s an unfortunate truth of the financial markets." -Ben Carlson
***Greece Orders Banks To Record Personal Data On Anyone Who Was Hoarding Cash
Rescuing the Economy or the Banks? "...The situation is worse than it was in 2007. Our macroeconomic ammunition to fight downturns is essentially all used up. . . . European banks have already admitted to $1 trillion of non-performing loans: they are heavily exposed to emerging markets and are almost certainly rolling over further bad debts that have never been disclosed. The European banking system may have to be recapitalized on a scale yet unimagined, and new “bail-in” rules mean that any deposit holder above the guarantee of €100,000 will have to help pay for it. It seems the War on Cash is being waged, not to stimulate the economy, but to save the lucrative private banking scheme at all costs. Quelling the riots likely to result from the mass confiscation of deposits could also underly the heightened push for a global “security state” and for those “anti-corruption” measures designed to determine where the money is and who owns it..." ***The War on Savings: The Panama Papers, Bail-Ins, and the Push to Go Cashless
The European Central Bank will discontinue production of the 500-euro ($575) banknote in a move that risks tensions with euro-area citizens worried the institution is encroaching on their freedoms...***ECB Decrees Slow Death of 500-Euro Note in Fight Against Crime (...Ewald Nowotny, the governor of Austria’s central bank, also opposed removing the bill because it may fuel the general debate over the abolition of cash...) *ECB ENDS PRODUCTION AND ISSUANCE OF €500 BANKNOTE •*ECB SAYS ISSUANCE OF EU500 NOTE TO STOP AROUND THE END OF 2018 •*ECB SAYS OTHER EURO BANKNOTES WILL STAY IN PLACE •*ECB: EU500 CAN BE EXCHANGED AT CEN BANKS FOR UNLIMITED TIME And just like that the second highest denominated European bank note in circulation (after the CHF1000 Bill) is dead...and so now, everyone rushes into the CHF 1000 note. Europe has banned the use of €500 bills. The reason? They claim these bills are used in money laundering and for drugs. And if you believe that is the concern, you probably believe the earth is flat. The fact of the matter is that Europe is now the center for misguided Central Planning for monetary policy. ECB President Mario Draghi has cut interest rates not once, not twice, not even thrice, but FOUR times into NIRP. The end result has been two items: 1) A barely noticeable blip in EU inflation and GDP growth (the former has already rolled over while the latter began to move up even before NIRP) 2) Savers and investors to begin to hoard cash rather than go out and spend it or even better (according to Draghi’s thinking) take out loans and spend them too. NIRP is highly DE-flationary. It is a current tax on capital as well as a future tax on interest income payments. NIRP, in a vulgar fashion, is telling you that you are “screwed” no matter what you do. Even a basic understanding of human nature suggests that the natural reaction to this is to panic and begin hoard cashing. If you KNOW that the bank is going to charge you for having a deposit, why not take the money out of the bank and put it in a safe where it won’t be charged? This, not drug money and certainly not money laundering, is why the EU decided to ban €500 bills: to stop people from taking their money out of the banks. After all, if you’re moving €20,000 or more into cash, you don’t want small denominated bills. It’s much too large a pile to comfortably move around.
This is just one weapon in the growing War on Cash. If you think this sounds like some kind of conspiracy theory, consider that France has banned any transaction over €1,000 Euros from using physical cash. Spain has already banned transactions over €2,500. Uruguay has banned transactions over $5,000. And on and on. The next step, if this fails, will be to implement a carry tax on actual physical cash. The idea here is that since it costs relatively little to store physical cash (the cost of buying a safe), Governments should be permitted to “tax” physical cash to force cash holders to spend it (put it back into the banking system) or invest it. The way this would work is that the cash would have some kind of magnetic strip that would record the date that it was withdrawn. Whenever the bill was finally deposited in a bank again, the receiving bank would use this data to deduct a certain percentage of the bill’s value as a “tax” for holding it. For instance, if the rate was 5% per month and you took out a €100 bill for two months and then deposited it, the receiving bank would only register the bill as being worth €90.25 (€100* 0.95=€95 or the first month, and then €95 *0.95= €90.25 for the second month). This includes the Fed… which has already begun discussing NIRP and Helicopter Money in policy meetings. Indeed, we've uncovered a secret document written by a strategic advisor to multiple Central Banks, which lays out ALL of the above plans. The paper, written before the 2008 Crisis, suggests that IF a Crisis were to hit and ZIRP didn’t result in a recovery, Central Banks should: 1) Buy assets (QE) 2) Begin money transfers (the so called “Helicopter money” policy) 3) Implement a carry tax or ban physical cash. We're currently preparing for a this situation today. It sounds like absolute insanity, but I can assure you that Central Banks take these sorts of proposals very seriously. ******************** ...The only way to protect yourself from this is to remove as much of your wealth from financial custodians as possible. Not only is the new regulation a clear warning bell of another financial collapse coming, the Fed and the Government are making it even easier to trap your wealth. The financial system is one giant roach motel – you can check-in but eventually your money will never check-out...
The Shift to a Cashless Society is Snowballing Love it or hate it, cash is playing an increasingly less important role in society. In some ways this is great news for consumers. The rise of mobile and electronic payments means faster, convenient, and more efficient purchases in most instances. New technologies are being built and improved to facilitate these transactions, and improving security is also a priority for many payment providers. However, there is also a darker side in the shift to a cashless society. Governments and central banks have a different rationale behind the elimination of cash transactions, and as a result, the so-called “war on cash” is on.
On the Path to a Cashless Society The Federal Reserve estimates that there will be $616.9 billion in cashless transactions in 2016. That’s up from around $60 billion in 2010. Despite the magnitude of this overall shift, what is happening from country to country varies quite considerably. Consider the contradicting evidence between Sweden and Germany. In Sweden, about 59% of all consumer transactions are cashless, and hard currency makes up just 2% of the economy. Yet, across the Baltic Sea, Germans are far bigger proponents of modern cash. This should not be too surprising, considering that the German words for “debt” and “guilt” are the exact same. Within Germany, only 33% of consumer transactions are cashless, and there are only 0.06 credit cards in existence per person.
The Dark Side of Cashless The shift to a cashless society is even gaining momentum in Germany, but it is not because of the willing adoption from the general public. According to Handelsblatt, a leading German business newspaper, a proposal to eliminate the €500 note while capping all cash transactions at €5,000 was made in February by the junior partner of the coalition government. Governments have been increasingly pushing for a cashless society. Ostensibly, by having a paper trail for all transactions, such a move would decrease crime, money laundering, and tax evasion. France’s finance minister recently stated that he would “fight against the use of cash and anonymity in the French economy” in order to prevent terrorism and other threats. Meanwhile, former Secretary of the Treasury and economist Larry Summers has called for scrapping the U.S. $100 bill – the most widely used currency note in the world.
“Smoother” Aggregate Demand? It’s not simply an argument of the above government rationale versus that of privacy and anonymity. Perhaps the least talked-about implication of a cashless society is the way that it could potentially empower central banking to have more ammunition in “smoothing” out the way people save and spend money. By eliminating the prospect of cash savings, monetary policy options like negative interest rates would be much more effective if implemented. All money would presumably be stored under the same banking system umbrella, and even the most prudent savers could be taxed with negative rates to encourage consumer spending. While there are certainly benefits to using digital payments, our view is that going digital should be an individual consumer choice that can be based on personal benefits and drawbacks. People should have the voluntary choice of going plastic or using apps for payment, but they shouldn’t be pushed into either option unwillingly. Forced banishment of cash is a completely different thing, and we should be increasingly wary and suspicious of the real rationale behind such a scheme.
E. on Twitter
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 12, 2017 19:20:26 GMT -5
2017: The Global War on Cash If low interest rates were the solution for robust economic growth why has the near zero rates in major economies failed so far in this endeavor? Furthermore why would interest rates at minus 5 percent revive economic growth? Why not minus 10 percent or perhaps minus 20 percent? Note that the abolition of cash implies the removal of money and hence the destruction of the division of labor and the market economy. It is likely that rather than promoting economic growth, abolishing cash to permit the central banks to lower interest rates into deeper negative territory will lead to the destruction of the market economy and promote massive economic impoverishment. Will Eliminating Cash Save the Economy? NO! Meanwhile, ***The EU is preparing for a cashless society...
Fred & EntendanceInvestors Beach...because this place is for Uncolonized Minds
"...Every time the Deep State hatches a new looting scheme, they dress it up in false righteousness, phony morality and motherhood. In the case of cash elimination, they say it is needed to fight terrorism, drug laundering, tax evasion and crime. This is a huge, concocted, pre-packaged lie; the same kind that Hitler and Goebbels used. Hitler said and proved that if you make the lie big, and repeat it again and again, the people will come to believe it. This is the exact kind of lie the Deep State is telling to push its corrupt, greed-diseased, epically evil cash elimination scam...
"...The cashless society – which more accurately should be called the bank-payments society – is often presented as an inevitability, an outcome of ‘natural progress’. This claim is either naïve or disingenuous. Any future cashless bank-payments society will be the outcome of a deliberate war on cash waged by an alliance of three elite groups with deep interests in seeing it emerge. The first is the banking industry, which controls the core digital fiat money system that our public system of cash currently competes with. It irritates banks that people do indeed act upon their right to convert their bank deposits into state money. It forces them to keep the ATM network running. The cashless society, in their eyes, is a utopia where money cannot leave – or even exist – outside the banking system, but can only be transferred from bank to bank. The second is the private payments industry – the likes of Mastercard – that profits from running the infrastructure that services that bank system, streamlining the process via which we transfer digital money between bank accounts. They have self-serving reasons to push for the removal of the cash option. Cash transactions are peer-to-peer, requiring no intermediary, and are thus transactions that Visa cannot skim a cut off. The third – perhaps ironically – is the state, and quasi-state entities such as central banks. They are united with the financial industry in forcing everyone to buy into this privatised bank-payments society for reasons of monitoring and control. The bank-money system forms a panopticon that enables – in theory – all transactions to be recorded, watched and analysed, good or bad. Furthermore, cash’s ‘offline’ nature means it cannot be remotely altered or frozen. This hampers central banks in implementing ‘innovative’ monetary policies, such as setting negative interest rates that slowly edit away bank deposits in order to coerce people into spending. Governments don’t really mention that monetary policy agenda. It isn’t catchy enough. Rather, the key weapons used by the alliance are more classic shock-and-awe scare tactics. Cash is used by criminals! People buy drugs with cash! It’s the black economy! It supports tax evasion! The ability to present control as protection relies on constant calls to imagine an external enemy, the terrorist or Mafiosi. These cries of moral panic are set in contrast to the glossy smiling adverts about digital payment. The emerging cashless society looms like a futuristic sunrise, cleansing us of these dangerous filthy notes with rays of hygienic, convenient, digital salvation..." ***In praise of cash
If you like this beach, then you can help your friends locate it by letting them know about Fred & EntendanceInvestors Beach. Let's all make this place a thriving sheltered Club for excellence, education and information.
Sollte dir dieser Strand gefallen, dann kannst du deinen Freunden behilflich sein, indem du sie über Fred & EntendanceInvestors Beach informierst. Lasst uns gemeinsam diesen Ort zu einen blühenden Club für Vortrefflichkeit, Bildung und Information machen!
***Italiani***
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 16, 2017 7:09:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 23, 2017 0:43:23 GMT -5
"QE to Infinity, followed by Gold balancing the balance sheets of the sovereign balance sheet disasters. Just as there is no tool other than QE to feign financial solvency, there is no tool to balance the balance sheet of the offending entities other than Gold. It is just that simple." -Jim Sinclair
"Electronic money, a cashless society, is perhaps the ultimate and most direct means of the New World Order (NWO), also called One World Order (OWO), to control us all via its financial system. A system that the NWO would like to maintain as the world's financial system, albeit, it has already been reduced to the western world's financial system. Why reduced to the Occident? - Because the Orient, China, Russia and the other countries belonging to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and to the Eurasia Economic Union (EEU) have already largely delinked themselves from the western dollar-based system of fraud. They are saved from slavehood.
This reminds of one of the oldest and world's worst criminal agent against humanity - still alive and kicking - Henry Kissinger: "Who controls food, controls the people; who controls energy controls entire continents; and who controls money controls the world." He is, of course, right on all fronts, and has given us this clue already more than 40 years ago. But nobody has really seriously taken it to heart and acted upon these edicts. Many,***including me, have written about freeing the world from the NWO money control.
Deglobalizing would be a first step towards freeing us all from the bloody claws of the Washington implemented, and Dark State directed NWO. Critics often talk of an overhaul and reform of the system. This monetary system cannot be reformed. It is privately owned and rotten to the core. None of the private owners, the Rothschild, Rockefeller clans et al, would allow interfering with their wealth, usurped of the back of the world’s workers and populace at large. Former attempts (e.g. under JFK) to bring the FED (Federal Reserve) under national reign, have resulted in failure. Compare the dollar-based monetary system to the European Union – which cannot be reformed either. Any ‘reform’ is just fiddling at the margins – as is inherent in the term ‘reform’. And that’s not good enough. As we know by now, the EU was not the construct of Europeans, per se, but an idea behind the ‘deep state’, already at the onset of Phase II of the Great Hundred Year War (WWII – September 1939 to September 1945). Phase I (WWI – 1914 – 1918), as well as Phase II were induced to weaken Europe, to make her ready for full domination.
Imagine a ‘Picador’ of a Spanish bullfight, whose job it is to weaken the bull to the point where the torero and matador have a relatively easy task subduing and killing the bull. Well, Europe is the bull. They don’t want to kill Europe altogether, good old Lady Europe, because they need her as a stepping stone for subjugating the rest of the world, for vital trade that helps justifying and generating the unlimited dollar machine – and, as a cushion to the East, where massive military troops and weapons can be stationed in the name of NATO, to eventually launch, what they would like to think, is the final blow on the East, starting with Russia.
For all this the European (non)-Union was created, her Brussels hub, dominated by the non-elected European Commission (EC) which also dictates most of the rules imposed on her 28-member states – and which are all not-so-coincidentally run by neoliberal, some close to neofascist governments. Of course, by adhering to the Brussels dictate, they have become devoid of national sovereignty. That is a must. A sovereign country would not submit to the horrors of police state and militarization that are in the coming. The euro with the Wall Street (Goldman Sachs – GS) run European Central Bank (ECB) is just a logical add-on to the fake EU. By now, many serious scholars have concluded that neither the EU nor the euro are sustainable, but are doomed to collapse sooner or later. The EU and the € are a complex construct, largely manipulated and carried forward by the Dark State’s main secret services, CIA, NSA, Mossad, MI6 with close collaboration of Europe’s national secret services. Hence, the creation of a complete political and monetary vassal, the European Union and her currency, equally fraudulent as its master currency, the US-dollar.
It is not by chance that today’s western US-dollar based monetary system, with its center, the Federal Reserve (FED), has been created just at the onset of Phase I of the Hundred Year war, i.e. WWI. In 1910, Rhode Island Senator, Nelson Aldrich, with his heart close to the world of bankers, organized a ”hunting trip” for five top Wall Street (WS) bankers to travel in disguise by train to Jekyll Island, off the coast of Georgia, where they concocted in a few days the concept of the modern FED – which was to become the ‘mother’ of the new dollar-based world monetary system, now reduced to the western monetary system. The Federal Reserve Act was signed into law in December 1913 by President Woodrow Wilson. On his death bed, in 1924 Wilson apparently declared, “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”
The FED, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS – also called the central bank of all central banks, manipulating gold prices and currency exchanges), as well as the related dollar-machine are totally privately owned. On top of the owner pyramid are the Rothschild and Rockefeller clans, et al. Henceforth, all international monetary transactions had to transit through a WS bank, be it in New York or London. This is the only reason why the US government, i.e. Washington and its dark handlers, are able to hand out economic and financial ‘sanctions’ as they please, to control those, who do not want to bend to their dictate. ‘Sanctions’ in terms of blocking trade with a Washington-destined country and punishing everyone who does not observe the sanctions, plus, confiscating a country’s foreign assets – are totally illegal before any international court. But there is no international court that is not bought by this sham monetary system. By the same token, this same deceitful banking-monetary scheme induced the last artificial economic ‘crisis’ 2007 / 2008 – and counting, allowing WS to launch a worldwide globalization of banking which de facto, puts worldwide private banking under the oppressive wings of the FED and WS. This, all the more as the World Trade Organization (WTO) a few years earlier made banking deregulation mandatory for any new WTO wannabe member.
How to get out of this slavery before we are totally locked into a system from where to escape may be nearly impossible? The solution sounds simple enough in theory, but of course is much more complex, as it confronts politics, which is controlled by the ‘dark deep state’ of the NWO, or the One World Order which more appropriately describes what we are faced with. Nations and societies that want to get out of the killer-claws of those who control the NWO, have to start thinking out of the matrix – ‘deglobalizing and de-dollarizing’. The first step is thinking in a new paradigm. Greece would have had an excellent opportunity to show the world how to become free of those abusive financial vultures, and regain her sovereignty. Hélas, Geece didn’t. She may have not been ‘allowed’ to do so. A huge dark killer sledgehammer was and still is hanging over the country..." ***“Electronic Money” under “The One World Order” (OWO): Are We Becoming Western Money Slaves? Solutions? *** “Resistance Economy”, “De-dollarization”, “De-globalization”
My Dear Friends, This article is not only correct but an enlightened perspective. In my opinion, this is not only what is going to happen but reveals so many truths that the article is worthy of study, and should be required reading. Understand this article is necessary in order to comprehend what is happening. This is happening now, not in some far away future. Forget the one world conspiracy theory. The Pyramid Structure of society is too small at the top, with room for only one person. All group theories are hogwash or simply a tool for accomplishing the final goal of that "one" at the top. The $100 and $50 USD have very short term life remaining. Their life could be months, but not years. Recently India cancelled all large bills. India has a huge population who are known to be unruly. Yet, it is interesting that India has thus far survived this dramatic change in monetary/currency policy. The coming reset will be a combination of market activity and edict. Few if any know what it will look like, and even fewer will know how to make a fortune because of it. I understand how to do this, and so do you who have remained with us the last 14 years. Some know and others will find out. We are on the precipice of a wealth transfer. Some of you are already prepared and just haven't realized it yet. I will outline in detail the "how" as the time approaches. My 14 year veterans will not be surprised to know they are already there. Sincerely, Jim Sinclair
In collaboration with Tom from Florida
Fred & EntendanceInvestors Beach:***Peter Koenig
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 4, 2017 2:54:38 GMT -5
***The war on cash is moving at breakneck speed
"...The first reason for abolishing cash is to have total Big Brother control of the people’s spending and tax compliance. Remember that most countries had no income tax 100 years ago. In the US, for example, income tax was first introduced in 1913 (same year as Fed was created). The tax rate was 1% for income above $3,000 for individuals and $4,000 for couples. Above $500,000 income ($11m today) the tax was 7%. The high threshold meant that virtually nobody paid any tax. These tax levels are slightly different to today when the total tax burden in most countries, including all direct and indirect taxes, social security etc amount to over 50%. This is part of the financial slavery and control of the people today. The individual’s incentive to work hard and spend his money on what he chooses is taken away and instead the state takes a major part of the cake and wastes most of it on bureaucracy health or social security. Income tax should be abolished and replaced by a Value Added Tax or sales tax.
The second reason to abolish cash is to totally control people’s spending. With a banking system that is leveraged up to 50 times, there is no chance that bank depositors will ever get their money back. The government knows this and this is why having only electronic money gives the state total control of people’s assets and cash. The state can now control exactly how much money is withdrawn and stop people from spending their own money. Governments believe that this is an efficient method of controlling the people, but instead of achieving control of the money, governments are at some point likely to lose control of the people which will result not just in bank runs but in government runs and anarchy. Another very dark new development is that the European Union is considering measures to stop people withdrawing cash to stop bank runs. The plan is currently being discussed and would block payouts for 5 to 20 days. Once this law is in place, it is very easy to extend to much longer periods or permanent.
The trend is clear. Governments worldwide know that the banking system is totally bankrupt. The problem is that most governments are also bankrupt. The only solution they have is to print money but as I have discussed above, money printing will solve absolutely nothing. Nobody holding cash or assets in the bank must believe that the government guarantees of $100,000 or €100,000 is worth anything. Firstly, the governments haven’t got any money and secondly, they will renege on their commitments. ...There is still time to take money out of the bank and to***own gold in safe jurisdictions..."
Egon von Greyerz:***Time Is Running Out
If you like this beach, then you can help your friends locate it by letting them know about Fred & EntendanceInvestors Beach. Let's all make this place a thriving sheltered Club for excellence, education and information!
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 16, 2017 4:44:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Sept 20, 2017 5:42:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Oct 9, 2017 7:21:26 GMT -5
"...Governments want to get rid of cash for two reasons. First, it gives them more control over citizens: They justify it in the name of fighting terrorists and organized crime, but what they really care about is making sure that nobody escapes their scrutiny, for purposes of taxes, regulation and political finagling. Second, if you’re stuck putting your money in a bank, they can force you to spend it (and thus “stimulate” the economy) by subjecting you to negative interest rates, in which money that just sits in the bank shrinks away, providing an incentive to spend..." -Glenn Reynolds: Cash is the currency of freedom
***Cash is already pretty much dead in China as the country lives the future with mobile pay
Digital payments expected to hit 726 billion by 2020 — but cash isn't going anywhere yet
***BUY GOLD & SILVER BULLIONS
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Oct 20, 2017 4:25:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Mar 20, 2018 9:49:37 GMT -5
"...Precious metals is the only asset class which will maintain its purchasing power in the coming financial crisis. But more likely is that gold and silver will do a lot better than just maintaining value. Commodities are now finishing a major bear cycle and will outperform all asset classes in coming years. Gold and Silver will be the winners amongst all the commodities and will reach levels which are hard to imagine today. What is guaranteed is that paper money will become worthless in the coming crisis and that most bubble asset classes will decline 75-95% in real terms. Gold is nature’s money and as such will be the only money that will survive the coming crisis just as it has for over 5,000 years..."
***DERIVATIVES – A RECIPE FOR DISASTER & SYSTEMIC COLLAPSE***
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 1, 2018 5:30:46 GMT -5
***Abolishing Cash H/T our member theunderdog
Fred & EntendanceInvestors Beach...because this place is for Uncolonized Minds. Gold is not an investment, it is real money. Gold reflects governments ongoing deceitful action in destroying the value of paper money. Informed investors no longer trust the paper gold markets. Currently the paper market in gold is at least 100 times greater than the physical market. Many investors are under the illusion that they own gold when all they have is a piece of paper with no physical gold backing. Gold dealers such as Comex, the interbank market, futures markets, many gold Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), derivatives market etc would have no possibility of delivering physical gold against their paper commitments. Furthermore, it is unlikely that Central Banks own the 30,000 tons of gold they say they do. An important part of their stated holdings is likely to have been sold or leased to bullion banks. The US Government gold has not been audited since the 1950s and many other governments refuse to reveal in what country their gold is held. This is most likely because they don't actually own the physical gold that is on their balance sheet. We will soon be at a point when investors in paper gold realise that they need to take physical delivery in order to have the certainty of owning gold and eliminating counterparty risk. When that time arrives, there will not be enough gold around at current prices. Gold is then likely to appreciate very substantially due to massive shortages of physical gold. Money is a store of value (or wealth), a medium of exchange as well as a unit of account. In order for money to be effective in the above it has to have the following properties: · divisible – should be divisible in smaller units · portable – able to carry it around therefore a high value should be able to be contained in a small space and weight · homogenous – one unit should be the same as any another unit · durable – should not be able to be easily destroyed or eroded · valuable – should have intrinsic value, normally because it is desirable. Should not be able to be created or discovered without reasonable effort (normally a commodity itself). Gold has all the above properties.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 16, 2018 2:26:20 GMT -5
"...The abolition of cash is necessary for several reasons: 1.To eliminate “black market” economies: the black markets, simply put, are free enterprise minus control and monitoring to regulate and tax those enterprises. 2.To tax “normative” businesses with no possibility of even a dime being unaccounted for 3.To steal with impunity [The Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules] 4.To make your money disappear inexplicably: as in the case of an electronics “glitch” or a “computer error.” With nothing but electronic “quatloos” to your credit, you possess nothing tangible…therefore, it’s easier to take away. 5.To monitor your every transaction: every purchase, every expenditure…providing further ammunition to the companies to incessantly bombard you with marketing and sales attacks based on your demographics. 6.To monitor you, as a person: every like and dislike, your social, religious, political, and private proclivities opened before them. 7.To track your movements, as well as purchases: No more cash means POS (Point of Sale) with the computer (once called a “cash register”), camera above your face, bar coded product, inventory and marketing stats all neatly figured in, and biometric data stored up in one package…. a record of your travels via your purchases, now done electronically. 8.Shut you down in an instant: Some primate reports “suspicious” activity about you, and an investigation begins?..." ***The War on Cash: Crucial Step Toward Totalitarianism
All you need to know about Banksters Cartel International is here
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jun 3, 2018 3:49:41 GMT -5
War on Cash Suffers Setback "...It was a stark reminder of just how fragile and vulnerable a 100% cashless society would be — at least until a cashless system can be created that is 100% safe from the threats posed by natural disasters, accidents, cybercriminals, and basic human incompetence. And it’s why cash retains its crucial role in the payment universe, whatever Visa, driven by its desire for more profits and a larger market share, might want people to believe..." ***Visa Goes Down in the UK, Chaos Ensues, Cash is Suddenly King
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jun 7, 2018 4:00:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jun 13, 2018 0:59:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jun 30, 2018 3:34:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 17, 2018 5:20:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 19, 2018 4:21:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Sept 3, 2018 5:17:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Oct 27, 2018 1:58:20 GMT -5
Shadow Banning Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg: We're All Digital Ghosts Now
"Cash is less of a threat to central bank policies when interest rates rise above zero" Swedish Central Bank Makes U-Turn on Cash as NIRP is Ending
"The Fed is FAR more concerned about BONDS, than stocks. When stocks collapse, investors lose money. When bonds collapse, entire countries go broke. With that in mind, once the US bond market began to collapse, pushing yields above their long-term trendline, it became apparent that the Fed would “sacrifice stocks to save bonds.”
Letting stocks collapse will force capital into bonds, thereby forcing yields lower. That process is now officially underway. And if you think the Fed is close to “stepping in” you’re mistaken. Cleveland Fed President Helen Mester just told CNBC two days ago that “the stock market drop is FAR from hurting the US economy.” This ties in with Fed Chair Jerome Powell's assertion during a recent Q&A session that the Fed would not step in to prop up the stock market unless it was a sustained collapse that was bad enough to impact the REAL economy, specifically consumer spending. In simple terms… the Fed’s not coming to the rescue this time. And stocks are going to have to drop a LOT further before it does." -Graham Summers
BANKS WON’T SURVIVE WITHOUT BAIL-INS
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Mar 9, 2019 9:08:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Apr 5, 2019 3:25:14 GMT -5
"...For globalists to gain full control of the financial system, the ability of citizens to hold their money anonymously must end. The strawman arguments in favour of this happening have already been planted within the media – from illicit financing of terrorism to money laundering. Concerted efforts are being made to encourage people to look upon those who prefer to deal in cash with suspicion. When you narrow it down, being able to trace and track every single payment, which is currently not possible if you opt to pay with cash, is the goal here. Therefore, eliminating the choice of using banknotes and coins is essential. Equally disturbing is the use of interest rates under a CBDC system. Right now, if you hold physical money, it is not vulnerable to a fluctuation in rates. Money held in a bank account, however, is susceptible. Even so, it can easily be transferred to one that offers a better rate, or can ultimately be withdrawn altogether in favour of holding the money in your hand. With CBDC’s, you would be locked in. Positive rates would continue to pay you interest. But what about if rates turned negative throughout the banking system? In this scenario you would be charged for holding your money with the bank, with no way of counteracting such measures.
In short, the loss of anonymity and exposure to negative rates would mean servitude to the banking system. Short of transferring assets into precious metals, it would leave citizens with no means of escape."
BIS General Manager Outlines Vision for Central Bank Digital Currencies
Going Cashless The governor of the world’s oldest central bank discusses his country’s shift toward digital money
That bank? Read here
The Truth Behind Globalists’ War On Cash
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Apr 16, 2019 6:22:32 GMT -5
If you want to very quickly understand why banks stopped lending to one another in 2008, credit markets froze, bank stock prices collapsed, and the Federal Reserve secretly pumped $16 trillion into banks, just take a few moments to study this chart from the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission of the derivatives casino that Goldman Sachs and the major banks on Wall Street had become in June of 2008. Wall Street banks knew they had created a collapsing house of cards but they didn’t know just how much exposure each bank had or which bank would fail first, so they simply stopped lending to each other, causing a run on the banks. Now, take a deep breath, because we have to tell you that if there was a derivatives graph of every other major Wall Street bank in June of 2008, you would see the same handful of bank counterparties to tens of trillions of dollars more in opaque over-the-counter derivatives. A small handful of Wall Street banks and their global counterparts were on the hook for hundreds of trillions of dollars in derivatives without anywhere near the capital to make good on these casino bets. Now take another deep breath because the tragic truth is that little has materially changed in this situation today — even after the crisis has been studied and examined for a decade; after the massive Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation has been enacted; and after new Federal bodies like the Office of Financial Research and the Financial Stability Oversight Council have been created to prevent another financial crisis.
The Next Financial Crisis’ Catalyst: Mountain Of Corporate Debt
We Have Seen This Happen Before The Last 3 Recessions – And Now It Is The Worst It Has Ever Been
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Apr 17, 2019 23:57:49 GMT -5
Only those in cryogenic freeze or in solitary confinement for the past couple of decades would not know that privacy is already dead, a quaint relic from a time long since past. In today’s world, the price of participating in society is the sacrifice of privacy and self. It is not so much that technology is the culprit, it’s that a networked world, whether through stories told around a campfire that are passed on in an oral tradition, or instantly via Facebook/Twitter, appears to be a necessary human craving. Wanting to belong to something or some group, to be able to identify with an ideology or fad is apparently irresistible. The Price of Participating in Society is the Sacrifice of Privacy and Self
The Entendance Beach & Maslow
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Apr 21, 2019 10:32:19 GMT -5
The war on cash: “Treating dandruff by decapitation.”
The ruling oligarchs are running out of time. This teetering edifice of debt is going to collapse, and they know it. Those with cash and precious metals are enemies of the state at this point. They will be making an all-out effort to ban cash and force all transactions to be electronic. This will further enrich the banking cabal, as they get a hefty slice of every transaction. It will also allow the ruling class to inflict negative interest rates on savings to force you to spend. I don’t think there will be enough guillotines to dispense justice when the shit hits the fan. THIS IS THEIR PLAN TO FUCK YOU
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 18, 2019 3:02:01 GMT -5
The elitist establishment push for a cashless economy
Forecast at Hoover Monetary Policy Insider Conference: Cashless Economy is Coming to the U.S.
"...How is the Fed's free money for financiers not commoditized, institutionalized fraud? Those who can borrow outlandishly large sums at a discount are in effect being given the tools to defraud the financial system..." The Normalization and Institutionalization of Fraud
Anyone with a brain can see it...these are the hero wealth generators everyone kneels to.....too bad we don't meet in the fields instead of digitized black pools.
"If nearly a decade of clear documentation of the fraud of so-called "growth" over the last 30+ years doesn't wake people up, if they refuse to demand that facially-felonious crap that both robs and kills them outright be stopped, backing up that demand with whatever is necessary to make it happen and instead either subscribe to the garbage of "impeachment" over allegedly obstructing something that never happened in the first place and was a clear political puff piece that failed to win the day, or possibly even worse fellating a President who is in fact calling for more monetary fraud from The Fed exactly why should I, or anyone else for that matter, give a wet crap what happens to anyone else -- or this nation as a whole?" Karl Denninger here
|
|