|
Post by Entendance on Nov 8, 2017 6:32:03 GMT -5
"...Once built, the Gold Bar open-pit mine is expected to generate 65,000 ounces of gold annually over an 8-year mine life, with production beginning in 2019..." ***MUX McEwen to begin construction at Gold Bar project in Nevada
***About Gold Bar
MUX McEwen Mining Receives Key Permit for Gold Bar TORONTO, Nov. 08, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE:MUX) (TSX:MUX) (“McEwen”) is pleased to announce it has received the signed Record of Decision (ROD) on the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Gold Bar Project (Gold Bar), Eureka County, Nevada. Construction of Gold Bar will begin immediately. A photo accompanying this announcement is available HERE "This is great news for McEwen Mining and State of Nevada. Our mission to build Gold Bar has been ongoing since 2013, during that time we have overcome many challenges involved in bringing a new mining project to fruition. Gold Bar is the first new gold mine in Nevada to gain permit approval in several years. We advanced from Draft Environmental Impact Statement submittal to a Record of Decision in under 8-months, a very brisk pace for the last leg of the permitting process. We want to thank all those involved including our staff, the BLM, Eureka County Board of Commissioners, and other Cooperating Agencies,” said Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner.
Gold is important to me because... HERE
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 25, 2018 4:13:46 GMT -5
(Gold is important to me because... Click here)
McEwen Mining Announces Potential New Source of Revenue at the Black Fox Complex
TORONTO, May 24, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE:MUX) (TSX:MUX) (“McEwen Mining” or the “Company”) provides an updated mineral resource estimate for the Tamarack gold and base metal deposit at the 100% owned Black Fox Complex in Matheson, Ontario. The Black Fox Complex comprises the Black Fox Mine and the Tamarack, Gibson-Grey Fox, Froome and Stock zones. The base metal component of the Tamarack resource is being included for the first time. “This is the first time that base metals have been in incorporated into a resource estimate for the Tamarack project. With further drilling, we are excited to see how the project develops into what could be an additional revenue stream at Black Fox,” said Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner. The new resource estimate increased from 41,000 Inferred ounces gold at a grade of 6.23 g/t Au (previous resource effective Oct 31, 2018) to 127,000 Indicated ounces gold equivalent (AuEq) at a grade of 5.08 g/t AuEq with the inclusion of silver, lead and zinc mineralization. The updated resource estimate for Tamarack is the result of 46 new surface and underground exploration, delineation, and definition drill holes completed between October 2017 and April 2018 and already existing base metal assays not considered in previous estimates.
Table 1: Tamarack Mineral Resource Estimate, SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., May 18, 2018 here Table 1 outlines the mineral resource estimate for Tamarack reported at a cut-off grade of 3.00 g/t AuEq to reflect an underground mining scenario. Mining operations at the adjacent Black Fox Mine are currently 100% underground operations. The drilling completed over the last six months has increased confidence in the estimate such that previously reported Inferred resources have been upgraded to the Indicated category.
Tamarack geology and mineralization The polymetallic (Au-Ag-Pb-Zn) Tamarack deposit is centered on a North-South striking quartz breccia which cross-cuts the faulted contact between Tisdale Assemblage ultramafic- to mafic-volcanic flows and Porcupine Group sedimentary rocks. The zone is characterised by an Upper and Lower lens; the Upper Lens measures approximately 300m along strike and 450 m down dip from near surface and has an average true width of 4.5m. The Lower Lens measures approximately 200m along strike and 250 m down dip from a depth of 500 m, and is open at depth. The lower lens has a true width of up to 5.4m. These lenses are separated by minor, narrow and discontinuous diabase dikes. Lead, zinc, and silver mineralisation is preferentially located in the hanging wall of the quartz breccia, occurring as either i) stringers, disseminations, and semi-massive knots, clusters and bands of sphalerite and galena hosted within both the volcanic and sedimentary rock units; ii) as clasts in quartz breccias; and iii) as inclusions and fragments within adjacent diabase dikes. Gold mineralization is preferentially hosted within the quartz breccia, occurring as fine visible gold and in association with disseminated fine-grained pyrite. Exploration drilling will continue to test possible southerly strike extensions of the Upper Lens where a few narrow intercepts of gold +/- base metal mineralisation lie outside of the current mineralised envelope. The Lower Lens remains open along strike to the south and down dip. Some representative assay results of the higher-grade base metal and silver intersections that were part of the dataset used in the resource at Tamarack include: •12.45% Zn, 7.78% Pb, 149.36 gpt Ag over 2.72m (True Width) in hole 17BF-621; •12.10% Zn, 3.20% Pb, 40.60 gpt Ag over 1.32m (TW) in hole 520-EX582-48; •25.24% Zn, 4.53 % Pb, 69.58 gpt Ag over 1.91m (TW) in hole 18BF-627; •5.95% Zn, 4.56% Pb, 70.55 gpt Ag over 1.86m (TW) and •9.92% Zn, 4.83% Pb, 58.96 gpt Ag over 5.95m (TW) in hole 17BF-625; •22.80% Zn, 0.91% Pb, 16.90 gpt Ag, 1.01 gpt Au over 0.42m (TW) and •11.13% Zn, 7.28% Pb, 127.71 gpt Ag, 0.81 gpt Au over 4.21m (TW) in hole 520-EX582-47. These intervals have been previously released in 2018 exploration news updates, see footnotes below for details of composite interval criteria.
Further Work As part of the ongoing exploration program, additional surface and underground drilling will test, refine and define possible strike and dip extensions at Tamarack. Metallurgical test work on drill core samples from Tamarack is currently being conducted at an independent third-party laboratory, the results of which will help determine what processing route potential future production will employ. The test work is under the direction of Nathan M. Stubina, Ph.D., P.Eng., FCIM, of McEwen Mining who is a “Qualified Person” within the meaning of NI 43-101. It is currently expected that the gold-rich quartz breccia mineralisation will be processed at the existing mill facilities at the Black Fox Stock Mill. Further density testing of different lithologies, mineralised zones and host units will be used in future resource updates.
Exploration at the Black Fox Complex The exploration program across the Black Fox Complex, which includes the Black Fox Mine, Tamarack, Gibson-Grey Fox, Froome and Stock zones, continues with a total exploration budget of $15 million for 2018. Our primary goals are to extend mineralization around known deposits and to test targets close to our mine and mill. Recent highlights of the drilling campaign since our last Exploration news release of April 30th, 2018 include: •27.76 gpt Au / 6.12m (TW), including 106.91 gpt Au / 1.28m (TW) in hole 560-F098-05; •41.87 gpt Au / 0.38m (TW) in hole 560-F098-06. Both holes are located in the eastern Central Zone (CZ) of the Black Fox mine. Follow-up drilling is ongoing and a full exploration update is planned for the end of Q2.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 25, 2018 5:43:40 GMT -5
***Mexico Needs To Stop Gang Violence Impacting All Mining Companies - McEwen Mining
May 25, 2018 McEwen Mining Proposed Issue of Notes TORONTO, May 25, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE:MUX) (TSX:MUX) (“McEwen Mining” or the “Company”) today announced that it intends to issue up to US$50 million in Senior Secured Notes (“Notes”) to complete construction the Gold Bar Mine in Nevada. Negotiations are underway with an independent third-party lender, whereby they would purchase 50% of the Notes issued and Rob McEwen would purchase the remaining 50%. The Notes contemplated will have a term of 3 years and bear interest at a rate of 9.75% per annum. No fees, other than appropriate legal expenses, will be paid in connection with the Notes; and no warrants, shares, royalties, or streams will be granted. The proposed transaction remains subject to final agreement of terms and satisfactory completion of due diligence.
McEwen Mining intends to issue up to $50 million in Senior Secured Notes to complete construction the Gold Bar Mine in Nevada 06:21 AM ET 05/25/18 | Briefing.com
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jun 14, 2018 7:55:36 GMT -5
***McEwen Mining Annouces Results of the Annual Meeting
Gold Bar Construction Update "Dear Shareowners, Construction of the Gold Bar Mine is on track for completion in 2018, and commercial production is expected to begin in Q1 2019. Activity at Gold Bar continues to increase with deliveries of construction materials and equipment ahead of heavy mechanical and electrical installation starting later this month. Key progress since our last update: 1.Retaining wall installation ahead of primary crusher arrival. 2.Continued heap leach pad synthetic lining and clay liner placement. 3.Production of heap leach pad construction materials using temporary crushing plant. 4.Continued civil work ahead of process plant structural steel erection this month. 5.Process equipment delivered to site.
Below are photos of the Gold Bar construction progress."
(Gold is important to me because... Click here)
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 9, 2018 8:41:42 GMT -5
MUX McEwen Mining Files Fenix Preliminary Economic Assessment – Extends El Gallo Mine Life by 12 years TORONTO, July 09, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE:MUX) (TSX:MUX) (“McEwen Mining” or the “Company”) reports that it has filed the new Preliminary Economic Assessment prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) on its 100% owned El Gallo Complex (the “PEA“). Some of the details in the PEA document filed today differ from those disclosed in the news release dated May 25, 2018 entitled “McEwen Mining Announces New Preliminary Economic Assessment – Extending Life An Additional 10 Years in Mexico.” Please disregard the May 25, 2018 news release. The differences are listed here
The PEA is available for review on our website and SEDAR (www.sedar.com). This PEA study evaluates the potential extension of production from the El Gallo Complex in Sinaloa, Mexico. The proposed development plan evaluated in the PEA is called Project Fenix. The key outcomes of Project Fenix include an average annual production rate of 47,000 ounces gold equivalent (AuEq), a 12-year mine life, low initial capital cost of $41 million, mine pay-back of 4.1 years, and an after-tax IRR of 28% at current gold and silver prices.
Summary of the Project Fenix (Base Case) PEA at $1,250/oz gold and $16/oz silver prices(1)(2): ◾Estimated initial capital cost of $41 million for Phase 1 and $30 million for Phase 2 ◾Pay-back period of 4.1 years ◾28% after-tax IRR and $60 million NPV at 5% discount rate ◾$12.7 million of average annual cash flow from operations from year 2 onwards ◾47,000 ounces average annual AuEq production ◾Cash cost of $704 and $857 per ounce AuEq for Phases 1 and 2 respectively ◾12-year Life-of-Mine (LOM) ◾Updated resource estimate totaling 13 million tonnes at an average grade of 0.39 g/t gold and 77 g/t silver (Measured and Indicated) containing 591,000 oz AuEq, and 5.7 million tonnes at an average grade of 0.81 g/t gold and 27 g/t silver (Inferred) containing 214,000 oz AuEq
The PEA was prepared by GR Engineering Services Limited (GRES), an engineering, consulting and contracting company, under the direction of McEwen Mining in accordance with the requirements of Canadian National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” (“NI 43-101”). Contact details for GRES can be found after the footnotes below.
Financial Analysis The project base case generates an after-tax net present value (NPV5%) of $60 million, an IRR of 28%, and an annual average after-tax cash flow from operations of $12.7 million per year of operation after the completion of Phase 2.
Table 1: After-Tax Financial Results for 3 Scenarios here
Figure 1: Graph of After-Tax Cash Flows
mcewenmining.com/files/doc_news/archive/20180706_fenix_pea/20180706_fenix_pea_fig_1.pdf
Mining and Processing Details The Fenix Project involves a two-phase development process. Phase 1 includes the reprocessing of material on the gold heap leach pad at the existing El Gallo Gold Mine, and Phase 2 includes the processing of open pit gold and silver mineralization from several deposits including El Gallo Silver, Palmarito, El Encuentro and Carrisalejo.
The process plant would use conventional and proven mineral processing and precious metals recovery technologies. Phase 1 would have a throughput rate of 5,000 tonnes per day (tpd). During Phase 2 fresh mineralized material from the higher grade silver deposits (El Gallo Silver primarily) can only be processed at a maximum of 3,250 tpd.
The selected process recovery methods are based on separate treatment of heap leach material (Phase 1) and fresh mineralised material from other deposits (Phase 2). Phase 1 operation would target gold recovery from the heap leach pad material using a conventional ball grinding mill and a hybrid carbon-in-leach (CIL) circuit to recover gold onto activated carbon. Industry standard elution, electrowinning and smelting circuits would be used to produce a doré product.
In Phase 2 the process facility would be modified to enable treatment of mineralized material from El Gallo Silver followed by other deposits in the complex. Phase 2 operations would employ conventional flotation technology followed by intensive leaching and zinc precipitation using the Merrill Crowe process for silver and gold recovery. The Phase 1 CIL plant would continue to be used for leaching of the flotation tailings to maximize overall silver recoveries during Phase 2. Phase 2 would also use the existing three stage crushing plant to prepare material for delivery to the grinding circuit.
Tailings produced during the operation would be stored in a mined-out open pit at the El Gallo Gold Mine. As part of this process, tailings deposition would include a delivery system designed to maximize tailings consolidation and water recovery.
The proposed process plant and the El Gallo Silver deposit are separated by about 6.5 km; requiring construction of a dedicated haul road for the transport of mineralized material. A new substation and power line would connect both projects to the national electrical grid.
Over the mine life, production would total 17.2 million tonnes of mineralized material at an average head grade 1.20 g/t AuEq containing 667 koz AuEq, and recovering a total of 563 koz AuEq. The planned production schedule is shown on Table 2.
Table 2: Production Summary here
Capital and Operating Costs The Fenix Project’s low up-front capital requirements are primarily due to: •Utilizing existing infrastructure at the El Gallo Gold Mine; •Commissioning a tailings storage facility in an existing pit, and •Significantly reducing the required leach tank volumes for El Gallo Silver processing. Phase 1 initial capital expenditure is estimated at $41 million, Phase 2 additional expansion capital expenditure is $30 million, and sustaining capital and closure obligations of $10 million brings the total LOM capital required to $81 million. Mining and operating costs were estimated based on process design criteria, equipment lease rates, labor, reagent, grid power supply, diesel fuel, explosives, maintenance, and other miscellaneous costs. All costs are in Q1 2018 dollars. Table 3: Operating Cost / oz Summary Table 4: Capital Cost Summary Table 5: Operating Cost Per Tonne Summary here
Existing Permits The current operation at the El Gallo Gold Mine is a fully permitted open pit mine with a heap leach and ADR process facilities. El Gallo Silver and Palmarito are fully permitted for the construction of a CIL mill and drystack tailings facility. Some amendments to the permits are required for Project Fenix.
Future Permitting & Timing Phase 1 requires amendment of the current permits to include the construction of a mill and leach circuit at the location of the existing El Gallo Gold Mine for the reprocessing of the heap leach pad material. The permit amendment will also include the backfilling of the Samaniego pit with mill tailings as part of an integrated concurrent closure plan for the El Gallo Gold Mine. Phase 2 permitting will require authorization to augment the tailings volume to be stored in the Samaniego pit, and El Gallo Silver permits require amendments to change the processing location to El Gallo Gold. The Fenix Project has CONAGUA(11) approval for the extraction of groundwater and for the construction of wells. Advancing the project will require permit amendments and approval by the Federal Environmental Authority (SEMARNAT) for Phase 1 and subsequently for Phase 2. The Company seeks to obtain approval of the Phase 1 El Gallo permit modifications by Q4 2018 and Phase 2 approvals by Q3 2019. Further project advancement in 2019 is subject to permit approvals.
Resource Estimates Estimated resources for the Fenix Project are comprised only of material within the boundaries of conceptual pit shells, except for the El Gallo heap leach pad and Palmarito dumps, which are considered available for reprocessing.
Table 6: Mineral Resource Estimates(12) here
Metallurgical Testing Preliminary metallurgical test work conducted in 2018 indicated that the El Gallo Gold heap leach pad material would be amenable to direct cyanidation following conventional grinding. Test work identified moderate levels of soluble copper and zinc. From 2010 to 2016 extensive metallurgical test work has been conducted on samples from the El Gallo Silver deposit using a direct cyanidation flow sheet. From 2017 to 2018 metallurgical test work has been focused on using conventional flotation techniques to separate the slower leaching minerals to enable separate cyanide leaching of bulk flotation concentrate and flotation tailings streams with tailored leach conditions to reduce overall size of the leaching circuit. Results have proved favorable and a flowsheet incorporating bulk flotation and separate leaching of bulk flotation concentrates and tailings for treatment of El Gallo Silver has been adopted. Historical test work records have been utilized to gain a preliminary understanding of the remaining resources along with some scoping test work conducted in 2018 to determine how material from the other higher-grade gold and silver deposits included in the conceptual production schedule would respond to the selected flowsheet. Table 7: LOM Metal Recoveries for the Production Model here
Results from the scoping tests indicate that the Carrisalejo material will likely perform similarly to El Gallo Silver with respect to silver recovery. Scoping test results showed only modest silver recovery from flotation for the Palmarito sample. However, separate cyanide leaching of the bulk flotation concentrates and flotation tailings streams achieved positive results. The treatment process for Palmarito and Carrisalejo open pit material has therefore been assumed to be similar to El Gallo Silver pending confirmation through additional sampling and metallurgical test work.
For the PEA metallurgical samples selected for testing were assumed to be representative. Note that the Palmarito, Carrisalejo and El Encuentro deposits included in the production schedule have only been subjected to scoping level metallurgical test work using the selected process flowsheet. Further sampling and test work is required to better understand the response of each of the deposits to the selected flowsheet.
Exploration In recent years, exploration efforts at the El Gallo Complex have focused on both near-mine and property-wide targets. Near-mine drilling efforts have been successful in delineating and extending mineralization near the Samaniego and Sagrado Corazon pits. The new gold mineralization generally contains sulfides that could be processed in the Phase 2 process plant. At the property scale significant mineralization has been confirmed at the El Encuentro zone, which is located 10 km from the El Gallo Gold Mine.
A property-wide soil geochemical survey was completed earlier this year and results indicate the potential for extensions of known zones of sulfide mineralization. In addition, multiple targets were identified from the survey, and field evaluation and ranking of targets for drill testing is in progress.
Further Optimization, Cost Reductions and Project Potential
The Company believes there are opportunities to further improve the economics of the Fenix Project through ongoing testing and trade-off studies that will be continued throughout 2018.
Capital cost estimates for the project are to a level of accuracy that is consistent with a PEA technical report. During the next 14 months we will continue to review mineral processing, mine sequencing, material transportation and tailings disposal options; and the flow sheet will be optimized by undertaking trade-off studies, update cost models and additional metallurgical testwork.
FOOTNOTES (1) All amounts are in U.S. Dollars. “g/t” means grams per metric tonne, “oz” means ounce(s), “IRR” means Internal Rate of Return, “LOM” means life-of-mine. (2) All references to AuEq are based on a 75 Ag oz to 1 Au oz ratio. (3) The heap leach pad spent ore resource number assumes a cutoff grade that permits processing of the entire pad whereas blocks within the leach pad model will be mobilized while mining which will make them difficult to segregate; sub-cutoff leach pad material will inherently have potential acid generating sulfide liabilities if placed in our waste dumps and so it will be prudent to process the entire leach pad and place tailings in the Samaniego pit at an overall environmental and economic benefit. (4) Production numbers for El Gallo Silver are taken from designed pits from prior studies, which do not differ materially from published optimized pit resource numbers. (5) Production numbers for Palmarito are also taken from designed pits from prior studies, and do not differ materially from published optimized pit resource numbers. (6) Cash cost is calculated by dividing total life-of-mine production costs by total ounces produced. (7) All-in sustaining costs (AISC) is calculated by dividing the sum of all cash costs plus, sustaining capital and reclamation costs by total ounces produced. (8) There are no sustaining capital costs for Phase 1. (9) Mining of heap leach spent ore requires no drilling or blasting. (10) The heap leach pad is located immediately adjacent to the proposed plant location requiring no separate haulage costs in addition to mining. (11) CONAGUA is the Mexican federal water authority (Comision Nacional del Agua). (12) Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources estimated will be converted into Mineral Reserves. Numbers in the table have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate and may not sum due to rounding. (13) Resources stated as contained within a potentially economically minable open pit; pit optimization parameters are: USD$1,250/oz Au, & USD$18.00/oz Ag. Resource models have been developed based on gold and silver recoveries from historical testwork programs, which were based on a different process flow sheet to what has been adopted for the project. (14) Cutoff Grades vary by pit according to parameters.
Details for GR Engineering Services Limited: GR ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED Tel: +61 8 6272 6000 Fax: +61 8 6272 6001 Email: gres@gres.com.au Website: www.gres.com.au PO Box 258, Belmont WA 6984 71 Daly Street, Ascot WA 6104 More here
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 16, 2018 6:01:36 GMT -5
Wednesday July 18, 2018 Rob McEwen, chairman and CEO of McEwen Mining (NYSE: MUX, TSX: MUX): ***Miners Holding Steady In Face Of Lower Gold Prices
MUX McEwen Mining Reports Q2 2018 Production Results
TORONTO, July 16, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE:MUX) (TSX:MUX) reports consolidated production for Q2 2018 of 36,959 gold ounces and 772,432 silver ounces, or 47,258 gold equivalent ounces(1)(“GEOs”), using a 75:1 gold to silver ratio.
Consolidated Production Summary
Q2 ‘18 Q1 ‘18 Q4 ‘17 Q3 ‘17 Q2 ‘17 Gold ounces 36,959 35,069 48,609 19,051 22,191 Silver ounces 772,432 695,651 926,739 749,749 779,487 GEOs 47,258 44,344 60,965 29,047 32,584
Highlights of the second quarter from our four mines including our newest mine in Nevada, which is under construction, are as follows:
Gold Bar Mine, USA (100%) Construction activities at Gold Bar focused on the heap leach pad, and installation of the crushing and process facility. All major equipment and bulk materials are either on site or purchased. Engineering for the project is complete and approximately 90% of contracts are awarded. Construction is advancing on schedule for completion by the end of 2018, targeting production in Q1 2019. During the first three years of operation beginning with 2019, Gold Bar is projected to produce 55,000, 74,000 and 68,000 ounces of gold respectively.
Black Fox Mine, Canada (100%) Black Fox produced 14,055 GEOs, in line with our full year production guidance for 2018 of 48,000 GEOs. A $15 million exploration program is ongoing across the Black Fox Complex, drilling results and other developments will be released quarterly, with the next update planned in the coming weeks.
El Gallo Mine, Mexico (100%) El Gallo produced 10,808 GEOs, in line with our budget and full year production guidance for 2018 of 32,000 GEOs. By the end of Q2, mining and crushing activities ceased and contractor equipment has been demobilized from the mine site. Closure, reclamation and residual heap leach activities are ongoing and will continue for several years.
A new Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) study on the potential restart of production from the El Gallo Complex at some point in the future was published on July 9, 2018. The proposed development plan evaluated in the PEA is called Project Fenix. The key outcomes of Project Fenix include an average annual production rate of 47,000 ounces gold equivalent (AuEq), a 12-year mine life, low initial capital cost of $41 million for Phase 1 and $30 million for Phase 2, and pay-back period of 4.1 years. At current gold and silver prices the after-tax internal rate of return (IRR) is 28%, and the net present value (NPV) at a 5% discount rate is $60 million.
Capital cost estimates for Project Fenix are to a level of accuracy that is consistent with a PEA technical report. During the next 14 months we will continue to review mineral processing, mine sequencing, material transportation and tailings storage options; and the flow sheet will be optimized by undertaking trade-off studies, updating cost models and additional metallurgical testwork.
The PEA is available for review on our website and SEDAR (http://www.sedar.com).
San José Mine, Argentina (49%(2)) Our attributable production from San José was 12,139 gold ounces and 769,197 silver ounces, for a total of 22,395 GEOs. Production is on-track to achieve our full year guidance for 2018 of 91,000 GEOs. We received approximately $2.4 million in dividends from our interest in San José during Q2.
First Quarter Financial Results Operating costs for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 will be released with our 10-Q Quarterly Financial Statements in early August. As of July 9, 2018 we are debt-free with liquid assets of approximately $30 million.
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING McEwen’s goal is to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index by creating a profitable gold and silver producer. McEwen’s principal assets consist of: the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina (49% interest); the El Gallo Gold mine in Mexico; the Black Fox mine in Timmins, Canada; the Gold Bar mine in Nevada that is currently under construction; and the large Los Azules copper project in Argentina that is advancing towards permitting. McEwen has a total of 337 million shares outstanding. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, owns 24% of the shares.
Footnotes 1.'Gold Equivalent Ounces' are calculated based on a 75:1 gold to silver ratio. 2.The San José Mine is 49% owned by McEwen Mining Inc. and 51% owned and operated by Hochschild Mining plc.
All dollar amounts are US Dollars
RELIABILITY OF INFORMATION REGARDING SAN JOSÉ Minera Santa Cruz S.A., the owner of the San José Mine, is responsible for and has supplied to the Company all reported results from the San José Mine. McEwen Mining’s joint venture partner, a subsidiary of Hochschild Mining plc, and its affiliates other than MSC do not accept responsibility for the use of project data or the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
TECHNICAL INFORMATION The technical contents of this news release has been reviewed and approved by Nathan M. Stubina, Ph.D., P.Eng., FCIM, Managing Director and a Qualified Person as defined by Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 "Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects".
CAUTION CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This news release contains certain forward-looking statements and information, including "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements and information expressed, as at the date of this news release, McEwen Mining Inc.'s (the "Company") estimates, forecasts, projections, expectations or beliefs as to future events and results. Forward-looking statements and information are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, risks and contingencies, and there can be no assurance that such statements and information will prove to be accurate. Therefore, actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements and information. Risks and uncertainties that could cause results or future events to differ materially from current expectations expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements and information include, but are not limited to, factors associated with fluctuations in the market price of precious metals, mining industry risks, political, economic, social and security risks associated with foreign operations, the ability of the corporation to receive or receive in a timely manner permits or other approvals required in connection with operations, risks associated with the construction of mining operations and commencement of production and the projected costs thereof, risks related to litigation, the state of the capital markets, environmental risks and hazards, uncertainty as to calculation of mineral resources and reserves, and other risks. The Company’s dividend policy will be reviewed periodically by the Board of Directors and is subject to change based on certain factors such as the capital needs of the Company and its future operating results. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information included herein, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to reissue or update forward-looking statements or information as a result of new information or events after the date hereof except as may be required by law. See McEwen Mining's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the caption "Risk Factors", for additional information on risks, uncertainties and other factors relating to the forward-looking statements and information regarding the Company. All forward-looking statements and information made in this news release are qualified by this cautionary statement.
The NYSE and TSX have not reviewed and do not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of the contents of this news release, which has been prepared by management of McEwen Mining Inc.
CONTACT INFORMATION: Mihaela Iancu Investor Relations (647)-258-0395 ext 320 info@mcewenmining.com Website: www.mcewenmining.com
Instagram: instagram.com/mcewenmining 150 King Street West Suite 2800, P.O. Box 24 Toronto, ON, Canada M5H 1J9 (866) 441-0690
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 25, 2018 5:41:56 GMT -5
McEwen Mining reports additional encouraging exploration results from its ongoing $15 million exploration program at the Black Fox Complex near Timmins, Ontario 6:31 AM ET 7/25/18 | Briefing.com During Q2 a total of 129,000 ft (39,300 meters (m)) of surface exploration drilling was completed at Black Fox Complex, for a year-to-date total of 220,000 ft (66,900 m). Stock East has a strike length of approximately 500 m and extends vertically from surface to a depth of at least 450 m. Footwall drilling highlights include the following intersections: 19.42 g/t gold over 2.5 m, including 52.7 g/t gold over 0.83 m at the Footwall NW area; 7.97 g/t gold over 5.99 m at the Footwall North area; and 7.91 g/t gold over 3.12 m, including 13.9 g/t gold over 1.56 m at the Footwall SE area.
MUX McEwen Mining Black Fox Exploration News
TORONTO, July 25, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE:MUX) (TSX:MUX) reports additional encouraging exploration results from its ongoing $15 million exploration program at the Black Fox Complex near Timmins, Ontario, Canada.
McEwen’s 2018 exploration goals are to grow known deposits and make new discoveries to contribute to near-term gold production. During Q2 a total of 129,000 ft (39,300 meters (m)) of surface exploration drilling was completed at Black Fox Complex, for a year-to-date total of 220,000 ft (66,900 m).
“Our drilling continues to deliver very encouraging results, particularly from the three project areas highlighted in this release: Stock East, Froome and Gibson. Continued drilling success reinforces our view about the strong exploration potential of both the Black Fox and Stock properties,” stated Sylvain Guerard, Senior Vice-President Exploration. Three of our exploration targets are covered in this release: Stock East, Froome and Gibson. Underground delineation drilling intercepts from Black Fox are also included, along with a revised Black Fox Mine resource estimate, which eliminates the Inferred resource category and increases the Indicated ounces and grade.
Stock East The Stock Mine property covers a 4 mile (6.5 km) section of the Destor-Porcupine fault, and produced 137,000 gold ounces at a grade of 5.5 g/t between 1989 and 2005. Our winter drilling program was designed to follow-up on historical intersections and geophysical targets; it returned better than expected results at the Stock East target and prompted an expanded 66,000 ft (20,000 m) drilling program beginning in early June. Three drill rigs are currently active and will infill the Stock East target, test the depth extension of the Stock Mine below 500 m, and attempt to join mineralization at Stock East with the historical Stock Mine over a 2,000 m long trend (see Figure 1). Stock East has a strike length of approximately 500 m and extends vertically from surface to a depth of at least 450 m. Its proximity to our mill facility makes Stock’s potential for an open-pittable deposit a particularly attractive target. Significant drill intersections here
Froome The Froome deposit is located 2,800 ft (850 m) to the West of the Black Fox open pit. It was discovered in 2014 and has a current Indicated resource of 159,000 gold ounces at a grade of 5.26 g/t. Drilling at Froome during Q2 has identified a mineralized structure in the footwall, approximately 150 m North of the Main Froome Deposit (see Figure 2). The gold-bearing trend hosts clusters of positive drill intersections at Froome Northwest, North and Southeast that may lead to the definition of additional zones of mineralization proximal to the Froome Deposit. In addition, new drill intersections below the Froome Deposit suggest some incremental resource expansion potential. The potential to develop underground access to the Froome Deposit through mineralization in the footwall could provide a major enhancement to the project’s economics and will be evaluated once drilling to better define the zones is complete. Footwall drilling highlights include the following intersections: 19.42 g/t gold over 2.5 m, including 52.7 g/t gold over 0.83 m at the Footwall NW area; 7.97 g/t gold over 5.99 m at the Footwall North area; and 7.91 g/t gold over 3.12 m, including 13.9 g/t gold over 1.56 m at the Footwall SE area. Drilling down-dip of the Froome Deposit encountered 4.04 g/t gold over 7 m, suggesting the mineralization continues at depth. Drilling at Froome will continue in Q3 to follow up on these results. Significant Froome drill intersections here
Gibson The Gibson exploration target area is adjacent the Grey Fox Deposit, where Indicated resources of 465,000 gold ounces at a grade of 6.64 g/t, and Inferred resources of 100,000 gold ounces at 6.83 g/t are currently defined. The present dimensions of the Gibson Zone mineralization are approximately 100 m in length along strike and 400 m depth from near surface. Additional drilling is underway to better define the extent and orientation of the mineralization. Hole 18GF-1079 returned 3.11 g/t gold over 34 m (core length), including 10.81 g/t gold over 6 m, from a new style of breccia mineralization identified at the Gibson area. This new intersection suggests the potential for extension of the mineralization to a 500 m depth below surface. Drilling will continue in Q3 to further assess the potential depth extension. Significant Gibson drill intersections here
Black Fox Underground During Q2 a significant portion of the underground drilling was dedicated to confirming and expanding known mineralized trends that are located close to current workings and that could be brought into production quickly. Definition drilling to the east of 560 Central Zone (CZ) has extended the east sill nearly 30 m. Drill intercepts have recently been confirmed with high grade chip samples that were taken across development faces, including: 27.65 g/t gold over 3.4 m and 90.22 g/t gold over 3.3 m. Central Zone & Deep Central Zone drilling highlights here Underground mining and exploration efforts in Q3 will be dedicated to: 1) Conversion of ounces from the resource to the reserve category, and 2) Development of an exploration drift to provide additional drill platforms to test the depth extension of the mine that remains open.
Resource Update An updated mineral resource estimate for Black Fox Mine with an effective date of March 31, 2018 was completed by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. The resource update reflects improved modeling of underground voids, and additional definition and delineation drilling. SRK’s methodology applied to the current resource remained consistent with that used in 2017. The tables (i-iii) below summarize the current resource estimates for the Black Fox Complex. The next update of the Black Fox Complex resource estimates is planned at the end of the year, and will be published early in 2019 along with the revised and restated mineral reserve estimate. More here Figure 1 – Stock Exploration Drilling (Click to download .PDF): mcewenmining.com/files/doc_news/archive/20180724_bf/figure_1_mux_jul_24_stock.pdf
Figure 2 – Froome Exploration Drilling (Click to download .PDF): mcewenmining.com/files/doc_news/archive/20180724_bf/figure_2_mux_july_24_froome.pdf Figure 3 – Gibson Exploration Drilling (Click to download .PDF): mcewenmining.com/files/doc_news/archive/20180724_bf/figure_3_mux_july_24_gibson.pdf
Table 1 – All Drilling (Click to download .XLS): mcewenmining.com/files/doc_news/archive/20180724_bf/table_1_muxjuly_24_black_fox_au_composites.xlsx
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING McEwen’s goal is to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index by creating a profitable gold and silver producer. McEwen’s principal assets consist of: the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina (49% interest); the El Gallo Gold mine in Mexico; the Black Fox mine in Timmins, Canada; the Gold Bar mine in Nevada that is currently under construction; and the large Los Azules copper project in Argentina that is advancing towards permitting. McEwen has a total of 337 million shares outstanding. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, owns 24% of McEwen.
QUALIFIED PERSON Technical information pertaining to geology and exploration contained in this news release has been prepared under the supervision of Ken Tylee, P.Geo. Mr. Tylee is a "qualified person" within the meaning of NI 43-101. The mineral resource estimates were prepared by Dr. Aleksandr Mitrofanov, P Geo, who is a "qualified person" within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). Dr. Mitrofanov is an employee of SRK Consulting, (Canada) Ltd and is considered to be "independent" of McEwen for the purposes of NI 43-101.
TECHNICAL INFORMATION Black Fox Complex drilling was conducted by Forage Asinii Drilling, Boart-Longyear, Major Drilling, NPLH and Norex Drilling and supervised by McEwen’s Geology Department. All exploration drill core samples at the Black Fox Complex were submitted as 1/2 core. Analyses reported herein were performed by the independent laboratories: ALS Laboratories, which is ISO 9001/IEC17025 certified, Activation Labs, which is ISO 9001/IEC17025 certified, and SGS Canada Laboratories, which is ISO9001/IEC17025 certified. Samples from definition and select delineation drilling, and development sampling completed within the Black Fox mine are assayed at McEwen's onsite laboratory. McEwen’s quality control program includes systematic insertion of blanks, standard reference material and duplicates to ensure laboratory accuracy. To determine the lengths of significant mineralized intervals, the following composite criteria was established: a minimum reportable interval length of 3 m was determined by establishing a cut-off grade of 3g/t Au for underground (1 g/t Au for near surface). A consecutive maximum length of 3 m of internal waste, including sub cut-off grade material, is allowed and incorporated into the reported composites. Where an interval of less than 3 m is considered, if the grade x length calculation is greater than 9 (3 for surface), it may be reported. There is no top cutting or capping of assays.
For further details about the Black Fox Complex project including Tamarack, please see our recent NI 43-101 technical report titled "Technical Report for the Black Fox Complex, Canada" dated April 6th, 2018 with an effective date of October 31st, 2017 available on SEDAR www.sedar.com under our issuer profile.
Gold is important to me because... click here
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 31, 2018 5:28:51 GMT -5
Gold is important to me because... click here
MUX McEwen Mining posts loss on strong investment to grow key assets Mining Weekly: McEwen achieves 45% increase in gold equivalent output in Q2
Highlights:
- Q2 EPS of -$0.02
- Q2 production surged 45% Y/Y to more than 47K gold equiv. oz. while all-in sustaining costs fell by 2% to $816/oz
- Gold Bar mine in the U.S. is advancing on schedule for completion by year-end 2018, targeting commercial production in Q1 2019
MUX McEwen Mining Reports Q2 2018 Results TORONTO, July 31, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) today reported second quarter results for the period ended June 30, 2018 (“Q2”). During Q2, gold equivalent ounces (GEOs) produced increased by 45% and all-in sustaining costs per ounce decreased by 2% compared to Q2 2017. Net cash flow from the business excluding project development costs was $6.3 million(2) or $0.02 per share. A total investment of $26.3 million was made to further our long-term production growth plans at the Gold Bar, Black Fox, El Gallo Fenix and Los Azules projects. As a result, our consolidated net loss for Q2 was $5.4 million, or $0.02 per share.
During the first half of 2018 (“H1”) GEOs produced increased by 47% and all-in sustaining costs per ounce increased by 1% compared to H1 2017. In H1, net cash flow from the business excluding project development costs was $18.7 million or $0.05 share, and a total investment of $49.0 million was made to further our long-term production growth plans at the Gold Bar, Black Fox and Los Azules projects. As a result, our consolidated net loss for H1 was $10.6 million, or $0.03 per share.
Please join our quarter end conference call on Wednesday, Aug 1st, 2018 at 11am EST. Details are provided here
Gold Bar Mine, USA (100%) Construction activities at Gold Bar during Q2 focused on the heap leach pad, installation of the crushing and process facility, as well as site-wide electrical and water utilities. All major equipment and bulk materials are either on site or purchased and engineering for the project is complete. Construction is advancing on schedule for completion by the end of 2018, targeting commercial production in the first quarter of 2019. We capitalized to construction in progress $18.2 million and $27.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $33 million cumulative to date. During the first three years of operation beginning in 2019, Gold Bar is projected to produce approximately 55,000, 74,000 and 68,000 ounces of gold respectively.
El Gallo Mine, Mexico (100%) During Q2, the mine produced 10,808 GEOs, compared to 9,780 GEOs in 2017. Total cash costs and AISC were $783 and $816 per GEO, respectively. Production and cost guidance for 2018 are for 32,000 GEOs at a cash cost and AISC of $650 and $715 per GEO, respectively. By the end of Q2, mining and crushing activities ceased and contractor equipment has been demobilized from the mine site. Closure, reclamation and residual heap leach activities are ongoing and will continue for several years. A new Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) study on potential production from the El Gallo Complex at some point in the future was published on July 9, 2018. The proposed development plan evaluated in the PEA is called Project Fenix. The key outcomes of Project Fenix include an average annual production rate of 47,000 ounces gold equivalent (AuEq), a 12-year mine life, low initial capital cost of $41.0 million for Phase 1 and $30.0 million for Phase 2, and pay-back period of 4.1 years. At $1,250/oz gold and $16/oz silver the after-tax internal rate of return (IRR) is 28%, and the net present value (NPV) at a 5% discount rate is $60.0 million. During the next 14 months we will be applying for permits in addition to analyzing options for optimizing mineral processing, mine sequencing, material transportation and tailings storage as presented in the PEA. The Project Fenix PEA is available for review on our website and on SEDAR www.sedar.com
Black Fox Mine, Canada (100%) During Q2, the mine produced 14,055 GEOs. Total cash costs and AISC were $771 and $1,056 per GEO, respectively. Year to date costs are trending below budget and gold production is above our projections. We are maintaining production and cost guidance for 2018 are for 48,000 GEOs at a cash cost and AISC of $920 and $1,210 per GEO, respectively. A $15.0 million exploration program is currently underway at the Black Fox Complex. For information on our encouraging exploration results refer to recent news releases published on April 30, 2018 and July 25, 2018 available on the McEwen Mining website www.mcewenmining.com For 2018, we have budgeted a total of $18.4 million for sustaining and capital expenditure activities at the Black Fox mine, of which we spent $7.6 million during the first half of 2018.
San José Mine, Argentina (49%) Our attributable production from San José in Q2 2018 was 12,139 gold ounces and 769,197 silver ounces, for a total of 22,395 GEOs, which is essentially unchanged from the comparative period in 2017. Q2 production costs per GEO produced were also slightly lower than the comparative period in 2017. Year to date San José is performing in-line with our guidance for 2018 of 91,000 GEOs at a cash costs and AISC of $806 and $1,065 per GEO, respectively. During Q2 2018 and H1 2018, we received $2.4 million and $7.3 million in dividends from our interest in San José, compared to $2.4 million and $4.9 million in dividends received during the same periods in 2017. For 2018, we are forecasting dividends in excess of $12.0 million.
Los Azules Project, Argentina (100%) During the first half of 2018 we spent $5.9 million developing infrastructure alternatives and environmental base line monitoring work to advance our permitting efforts.
Conference Call and Webcast We invite you to join our conference call, where management will discuss our Q2 2018 financial results and project developments and follow with a question and answer session. Questions can be asked directly by participants over the telephone or can be emailed in advance to cd@mcewenmining.com. Please email questions prior to the start of the call. Wednesday, Aug 1st, 2018 11:00 am ET Toll Free US & Canada: 1 (844) 630-9911 Outside US & Canada: 1 (210) 229-8828 Conference ID Number: 8486966 Webcast Link: edge.media-server.com/m6/p/enj6zmcz
An archived replay of the webcast will be available for one week after it takes place. Access the replay using the link edge.media-server.com/m6/p/enj6zmcz or by calling (855)-859-2056 (North America) / (404)-537-3406 (International), Conference ID Number 8486966.
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING McEwen has the goal to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index by creating a profitable gold and silver producer focused in the Americas. McEwen’s principal assets consist of: the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina (49% interest); the Black Fox mine in Timmins, Canada; the El Gallo Fenix project in Mexico; the Gold Bar mine in Nevada, currently under construction; and the large Los Azules copper project in Argentina, advancing towards development. McEwen has a total of 337 million shares outstanding. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, owns 24% of the shares.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 1, 2018 6:13:43 GMT -5
Gold is important to me because... click here
MUX McEwen Mining Appoints Chris Stewart as President and COO August 1, 2018
TORONTO, Aug. 01, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) is pleased to announce the appointment of Chris Stewart, P.Eng., as the President and Chief Operating Officer (COO) effective September 1st, 2018. Chris replaces Xavier Ochoa who resigned as of July 13, 2018 to pursue an opportunity closer to his home and family in South America. “McEwen Mining is in a growth phase that relies heavily on engineering and execution of projects. In addition to growing organically, we seek opportunities to expand our production and resource base. Chris is an ideal executive to lead our organic growth initiatives, as well as evaluate and execute on acquisitions,” said Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner. “I am excited to be joining McEwen Mining. It has acquired several high-quality assets in world class mining camps with tremendous exploration potential. Our focus will be on organic growth and ensuring that we maximize value from the current operations. We will also be looking for external growth opportunities that can be accretive to the business and contribute to our goal of qualifying for the S&P 500 Index,” said Chris Stewart.
Chris is a senior executive with 25 years of diversified experience in the mining industry. The foundation of his extensive experience came from the 14 years he worked for Dynatec/DMC Mining, a Canadian mining contracting company. In 2007, Chris transitioned to working for mining companies, where he has held senior executive roles over the past 11 years. Most recently Chris was the President & CEO of Treasury Metals, a junior gold developer focused on its properties in Northwestern Ontario. Prior to that he was the Vice President of Operations for Kirkland Lake Gold, where he was responsible for all mining and milling activities, and played an instrumental roll in the significant turnaround of the company between 2014 and 2016. He was also Vice President of Operations for Lake Shore Gold, where he was responsible for the sinking of the Timmins West Mine shaft, obtaining early production from a new portal to access at Timmins West, and the refurbishment and commissioning of the Bell Creek Mill and Mine. Chris also worked for BHP Billiton where he was in charge of two new shafts at the Jansen Potash Project during the freeze wall design and construction phase. Chris is a registered Professional Engineer in Ontario and holds a Bachelor of Science, Mining Engineering, from Queen's University.
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING McEwen has the goal to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index by creating a profitable gold and silver producer focused in the Americas. McEwen’s principal assets consist of: the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina (49% interest); the Black Fox mine in Timmins, Canada; the El Gallo Fenix project in Mexico; the Gold Bar mine in Nevada, currently under construction; and the large Los Azules copper project in Argentina, advancing towards development. McEwen has a total of 337 million shares outstanding. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, owns 24% of the shares.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 2, 2018 3:20:22 GMT -5
MUX McEwen Mining Q2 2018 Earnings Conference Call Executives Rob McEwen – Chief Owner Andrew Elinesky – Chief Financial Officer Sylvain Guérard – Senior Vice President of Exploration
Analysts Jake Sekelsky – Roth Capital Partners John Tumazos – Very Independent Research Howard Flinker – Flinker & Co Matt Barry – H.C. Wainwright Bill Powers – Private Investor Bhakti Pavani
Rob McEwen Good morning fellow shareowners and curious investors. Joining me on this call today are Andrew Elinesky, our CFO; and Sylvain Guérard, our Senior Vice President of Exploration. Today, we’re going to talk about our second quarter and first half results for 2018 both financial and operational, in addition we will talk about our successful exploration program and our new incoming President and COO, Chris Stewart. This year we have held our – for this quarter and half year, we held our production costs in check, but significantly, increased our gold and silver production. In the quarter, all-in sustaining costs per ounce were down 2% and production was up 45% over the comparable period in 2017. In the first half of this year, our all-in sustaining costs were up slightly by 1%, but production was up 46% compared to last year. We are making a big investment in exploration, and to date the results have been very encouraging. Not only have we increased the size of our resource base, we have also established new compelling targets of both Gold Bar and the Black Fox complex. Last year at this time, we were waiting for a permit to start construction of our Gold Bar Project in Nevada. We have just made our first acquisition in the world class Timmins region of Canada, and we had just started our due diligence on what became our next strategic acquisition in the Timmins region, the Black Fox Complex, which we bought in early fourth quarter. Today, we have a diversified production base of three mines, increasing to four by year end. We have large landholdings and promising exploration potential in two of the best areas in the world for gold. We have a new development project in Mexico, the Fenix project, which is progressing to a feasibility study early next year and preliminary number show it to be a silver and gold mine that requires low CapEx and generates attractive returns over a 12-year mine life. Our San José joint venture of silver mine in Argentina continues to generate dividends. At this I would like to pass the call over to Andrew to speak about our financial and operational results for the quarter and half year.
Andrew Elinesky Thank you for taking the time out of the busy summer to join us here today. Further to Rob's opening remarks, the second quarter was a solid continuation of the steady production and cost at our operations. In addition to the stable performance, we have continued with the execution of a number of initiatives that the company had planned for this year and that includes building the Gold Bar mine, turning around the Black Fox mine, adding Fenix as the next operation in our development pipeline and that of course raising the capital to achieve these goals this year. From the perspective of operating performance, our production and cost per ounce metrics were slightly under planned levels as Rob mentioned. And from a financial perspective, the net loss we reported was also in line with expectations. As our income statement and treasury balance continue to reflect the sizable investments being made at the Gold Bar Project, our continued work at Los Azules as well as the exploration across our properties.
Regarding our overall operating result, the company had consolidated production of just over 47,000 gold equivalent ounces for the quarter, which brings our year-to-date production to over 91,000 ounces and as is tracking above our full-year guidance of 171,000 ounces. The increase in production is primarily the result of the addition of Black Fox in Timmins as well as slight increases at our El Gallo Mine in Mexico and San José mine in Argentina. And as Rob mentioned earlier, the lower than expected consolidated costs resulted in earnings from mining operations coming in at $15 million or $0.04 per share. This contribution from operations help to offset the significant investments being made at the Gold Bar project, evaluation work at Los Azules and the significant exploration program at Black Fox and our other properties in the Timmins area. These investments resulted in a decrease of our liquid assets by just $21 million when compared to the end of the first quarter.
The other major item to note is the increase in the loss reported from our investment in San José. Similar to the first quarter of the year, the joint venture reported an increase in non-operating expenses, which was driven by the continued devaluation of the Argentine peso and the resulting non-cash revaluation expense of the joint ventures net assets as well as an increase in tax expenses and accruals. Ultimately the combination of our project investment costs and the increased loss on our investment in San José meant the company reported a net loss of $5.4 million, or $0.02 per share. Moving on to the outlook for the rest of 2018, firstly with Mexico. We expect our cost to decline from the second quarter due to the completion of all mining, crushing and processing activities all of which ended in the second quarter. Despite El Gallo no longer being in operation after June 30, we will continue to produce gold on a declining basis as residual leaching activities will occur for the next two plus years or as long as it remains economic to do so. This will allow us to maintain an established presence in the area as we continue with our studies for the development of the Fenix Project or previously called El Gallo 2 for which we published the results of our initial study in early July. This study showed the potential for a robust operation that has an average annual production of just over 47,000 gold equivalent ounces for twelve years and has a 28% post-tax IRR. Moving over to Black Fox, production was ahead of plan due to an increase in tonnage with cost per ounce trending lower than our guidance, which was partly due to the increase in ounces, but also due to cost reduction efforts. These efforts included crushing at more opportunistic times to avoid peak electricity costs as well as other initiatives. We also continued with the evaluation of our project and exploration opportunities in the region and we feel that we are on our way to creating a sustainable cash generating operation. Thirdly, at San José production levels will stay consistent in the next quarter with the highest production occurring in the fourth quarter, which is in line with our historical production profile that has occurred there over the last decade. Accordingly, we’d expect cost of San José to stay in line with guidance on a per ounce basis as production increases over the year. In addition, we expect dividends to continue at a similar level for the foreseeable future as the cash generation abilities of the mine continue despite the increase in the non-operating expenses as a good portion of these are non-cash expenses. Finally, at Gold Bar, we’re still on schedule for commissioning of the mine in the fourth quarter of this year and it is our objective to declare commercial production in the first quarter of 2019. The project is currently on schedule and on budget with approximately 65% of activities completed and 50% of the costs incurred as of the end of July. Some of you may have received our e-mail blast yesterday with an update on Gold Bar and from slides 12 and 18 on our presentation online in this call, we have included the photos that were e-mailed to everybody as part of that blast. It shows the progress that we have made and the current status of the construction activities there. In addition, we have locked in prices for approximately 85% of the overall costs on long-lead items and other price sensitive construction materials. This removes a significant portion of the project's price risk and puts us in an excellent position to meet the $81 million capital budget for the project. Before I hand the call over to Sylvain, I would like to provide a quick update on our previously announced debt financing to let everyone know that this is proceeding as expected. The majority of the documentation has been finalized and we anticipate closing on this deal in short order, which as I mentioned earlier will allow us to finish the execution of our initiatives for the year. At this point, I'd like to thank you again for taking the time to join us today and I will now turn the presentation over to our VP of Exploration, Sylvain Guérard.
Sylvain Guérard Thank you, Andrew. We had another highly active and productive quarter focusing our exploration efforts at the Black Fox complex in Timmins and at the Gold Bar Project in Nevada. At the Black Fox complex, we continue our major exploration program, a total of 39,000 meter of surface exploration drilling was completed during Q2 for a year-to-date total of 67,000 meter. Our drilling continues to deliver very encouraging results and is reinforcing our view about the strong exploration potential of both the Black Fox and Stock properties. I will now discuss the results from our Stock property first and then the Black Fox surface and underground drilling results highlights. At Stock, drilling has been initially focused on the East Zone and the program has now extended along with 2 kilometer trend that cover the old Stock Mine to the west, the stock East Zone to the east as well as the sector between these two mineralized zone where limited drilling has been executed so far. The Stock East target has a strike line of about 500 meters and vertical extension from near surface to a depth of at least 450 meter. The zone remained open at depth and along strike. We are highly excited by the potential of the Stock properties. The presence of the old Stock Mine that remained untested below 500 meter, the positive drilling results of the Stock East target and very importantly, the proximity to our mill facility make the stock priority a compelling exploration project with both open pit and underground potential. Treasury rigs are currently active over the property and the first resort estimation of the stock East Zone is planned for later this year. Moving now to the Black Fox property, positive drilling results have been generated from multiple targets, with main highlights from the Froome deposit area, which is 700 meter west of the mine and from the Gibson target area in the Southeast property sector. At Froome, drill intersection suggests group potential beyond the current indicated resources of 159,000 ounces, at a grade of 5.26 gram per tonne gold. Drilling to the north of Froome is defining three new mineralized zones along a strike land of approximately 750 meter. The details of the drill results have been presented in our July 25th press release. We have two rigs operating at Froome in addition in the southeast property area, one drill rig is focusing on the Gibson target area to follow up on an impressive Q3 interaction of 3.11 gram per ton gold over 34 meter including 10.8 gram per ton over 6 meter. It is very significant intersection extend the depth of the normalization at the Gibson target by approximately 100 meter and suggest the potential for extension of the mineralization to about 500 meters depth below surface. Other high potential targets will be drilled during Q3 in the surrounding area, including the Gibson Southwestern target where 639 gram per ton gold over 0.7 meters was intersected earlier this year. At the Black Fox mine, a significant portion of the second quarter on the ground drilling was dedicated to confirming and expanding non-mineralized trend that are located close to current working and that could be brought into production quickly. Definition drilling to the east of the 560 central zone has extended the east zone by approximately 30 meter. In-filled drilling targeting the 780 meter to 820 meter level of the deep central zone has design to aid in future development and production planning as a return high-grade intercept showing an impressive natural [indiscernible]. Deep central zone drilling highlight from four intercept grade between 44 to 141 gram per ton gold over with ranging from 2.4 to 7.5 meter. Underground mining and exploration debt forwards in Q3 will be dedicated to conversion of ounces from resource to reserves category in the upper part of the mine and development of our next version drift to provide additional drilling platform for testing the mine-depth extension that remain open. I am now moving to Nevada, another focus of our exploration is our development stage Gold Bar Projects, and we are very pleased with our recent progress and new target defined. Gold Bar is located 25 miles southeast of Barrick’s mine and recently announced Barrick Fort mile discovery. This new significant hybrid discovery by Barrick reinforce the high upside potential over this portion, the Bella Morton Cortez trend that also cluster a large deposit at Barrick and along the Southeast extension McEwen mining, Tonkin and Gold Bar properties. In addition, favorable original setting type of old stocks presence of mineralization across number of tri-graphic horizon, type of alteration mineralization are all similar characteristics between Gold Bar and some of the large calling gold deposit. Exploration of Gold Bar was only reactivated in Q1 2017 following a five year break that occurred during the mine permitting period. Since then McEwen initiated a resource expansion and pit delineations with the objective of extending the mine life. Over the first half of 2018, geographical mapping, geophysics, geochemistry and spectral data has been compiled and new survey executed. As a result, we have defined new high quality drill target in the immediate area around the Gold Bar pit. Drilling is planned during the third quarter to test additional shallow oxide deposit as well as higher grades of hard mineralization. To summarize, our exploration program are advancing very well at mid year and the results received so far are highly encouraging and reinforce our view about the high exploration potential of our properties in the prolific Timmins mining region and along the Cortez gold trend in Nevada. Drilling will continue at Stock, Black Fox and Gold Bar during Q3 and we will keep you posted with new results.
Rob McEwen Thank you, Sylvain. I just like to follow up with some comments on the market and I'd also like say for those online that we do have a number of charts and diagrams attached to the link on the refresher screen. And I'm going to refer to those later there's also a short video. In fact I’d like to start by saying I view gold to be an asset where big surprises will be on the upside not on the other way around. You need to appreciate that the price of gold and the price of gold equities are cyclical and that both are trading at historic lows relative to the broader market. As successful investors you know that the largest games are made when you bought near the bottom. Many market indicators are signaling that now is the time to seriously consider building your portfolio of gold equities. Investor sentiment towards gold is scraping along the floor. Trading volumes are microscopic in the gold equities. There's a large short positions, the precious funds, managers are experiencing continuing redemptions and the only press the gold industry receives seems to be negative. It's a perfect environment for the contrarian investor. What do I recommend you consider? It will be the explorers, the junior and intermediate producers that should deliver the largest gains in this cycle why because they're making discoveries and they're growing their production while the seniors are shrinking their production. The seniors continue to work on bolstering their balance sheets by selling production and in essence selling their future production pipeline to raise funds, to reach higher their large debt loads. As you know, we have 337 million shares outstanding. I own 79 million shares, representing 24% of the company. And what you may not know is. One, the cost to my investment is a big number, its $133 million. Two, my personal financial commitment ranks as one of the largest personal investments of any CEO in the precious metal industry and among the top 1% to 2% of all the public company traded in the world. Three, I'm a big believer in the bright golden future of our company. Therefore, I am increasing my investment in the company by $25 million, providing half of the $50 million debt financing, that Andrew spoke of earlier. These funds will be used to complete financing and construction of our Gold Bar mine. I did not – when we chose depth, the reason was, we didn't wanted issue additional shares at the current share price because we believe the growth we're going through and what we're seeing in exploration will drive a higher share price in the future. I'm a big believer in exploration, and as Sylvain said, we have a lot of exploration going on at our properties. And just stopping for a moment, and just saying, Gold Bar is in a really good area of the world for gold. It's just 25 miles north to Gold Bar is Barrick's collection of properties Cortez Hills, Gold Rush, 4-mile Canyon or 4-mile discovery is over 50 million ounces, 25 miles away uptrend from us in the same rocks, in the same trend, and it appears that we have some of the stratigraphy. Is it a guarantee we'll have anything close to that? Absolutely not. But it is very prospective we – when we looked at Gold Bar, initially, it was viewed as shallow, open tips, mining oxide or and any time we hit sulfide, we stop looking at it. We did have a few hits and one of our targets besides expanding our oxide ore resources and extending the life of Gold Bar is looking deeper into these sulfide targets, getting into the lower plate and we've seen some shallow windows of lower plate, which would allow us to test this hypothesis that there is good geology sitting below. At Black Fox, we have a couple of slides I wanted to share with you and they're sitting online in the refresh button. Slide 14. Sorry I just needed an assist there. And what you're looking at there are a pass of – looking at the Black Fox mine and the distribution of grades using a color scheme in showing grams per ton, the distribution of it through the mines. So you're looking at a cross-section of the mine from the surface, there's a line, a straight line, showing surface and then indebted greenline that shows where the material was mined by open pit and below that, it looks like a patchwork of colors. So the first slide is showing gold, where it occurs in greater than 1 gram. The second slide is greater than 3 grams, there is also a darker red in there. The 3 grams is pink, 3 to 5, and red is 5 grams, anything greater, the next slide is greater than 10 grams, which is quite a respectable grade in the Timmins district. And you can see it's quite broad. And then the next slide shows us greater than 30 grams. And I want to emphasize that this deposit seems to be open at depth. Certainly, we're testing that and when you look at the mines, the majority of the mines within the Timmins, Matheson area, the area, the average depth is around 1,500 meters and we're down at 800 meters at the moment. And the last one you, you don’t see a lot of dots but you see little red dots and that's greater than 50 grams per ton. So exploration wise, I think, these facts give me a lot of encouragement. I would also say that in the gold market, there are number of people coming out and saying we are at or near our bottom. And I just want to reference you to Jim Cramer, there's a little 1-minute video where this person who hasn't been very bullish on gold for quite some time is turning that way and there are number of other people, including myself that feel that we are at the – either at the bottom or very near the bottom and it is an opportune time to be thinking about gold, gold shares and McEwen Mining. We have a large data, our balance sheet's relatively clean and diversified, production-based and we're growing.
Jake Sekelsky, Roth Capital Partners Starting at Black Fox, I mean it looks like cost has come down since the acquisition or Q2 level is something you guys think are achievable going forward on a cash cost basis we're below current 2018 guidance at 920 per ounce. So just a little color on that will be helpful.
Andrew Elinesky Q2 as I mentioned was a little bit lower just due to the increased ounces. I would expect cost to be at a similar level but perhaps a little bit higher. Maybe not in Q3 but Q4 where we do have a lower than planned activity level, just the seasonal order of things and the mine plan. Q4 will be our lowest amount of production for the year. So on a per ounce basis, we'd see cost increase slightly in Q4 compared to Q2. But generally speaking, you know this is where we anticipate costs, generally being, depends on some of the initiatives on the capital front. But Black Fox in our mind, that's a fairly steady state, which obviously, we're looking to improve upon any ways.
Jake Sekelsky Got it. And on the exploration side there, can you just quantify how much of the $15 million program has been spent to date, and may be just give us an idea of what the areas of focus are now that the portion has been completed?
Andrew Elinesky Yes. So your – for the first question on what was – what has been spent so far? As of the end of July, roughly speaking, out of the $16 million budget, we spent about $10 million in total. And sorry, I just missed your second question there, it was about meters?
Jake Sekelsky No, the second question was just related to the areas of focus. I mean now that a portion has been complete. Has any of the focus shifted to any particular areas than you guys had originally planned?
Sylvain Guérard Currently three rigs drilling at that Stock Properties, we like what we see at Stock since we started exploration there. As I mentioned, there is a 2-kilometer trend that owes the old mine and the depth extension that we started to test. And this extent to the east over what we call the East zone, where we have got very, very significant results from the surface to a depth of close to 500 meter, extending we're 500 meters right plan. So this entire trend at Stock is a focus of the exploration. And in addition, three rigs are turning at the Black Fox, we are back on Froome, we want to grow the resource at Froome, and we also find additional mineralization proximal in the footwall zone to the Froome deposit. And we see this as a extra potential ounces that could be mined, eventually at Froome. A third rig is in the southeast portion of the property around the Grey Fox Gibson area. We've got highly encouraging results of 3.1 gram per ton intersection at Gibson over 30 meters that's included high grade, and we also had surrounding targets in this sector, that we will be following up. So to summarize, three rigs at Stock over the 2 kilometer trend, 2 rigs at the Froome to increase the resource there and the rig in the Southeast property area.
Jake Sekelsky Thanks for that. That’s helpful. And just lastly at project Fenix, what are the next steps in the permitting process, you think can move forward there just from a high level over the next, call it, 2 or 3 quarters?
Andrew Elinesky Again, so we’re working on making our submission in the third quarter to amend the permits. We obviously have permits already in place, so we have to drill El Gallo 2 as well as for El Gallo 1 operation. So the permit application we anticipate making this quarter, so Q3, and then hopefully, walking through the government with that because it is an amendment and it is a change that is new to Mexico, and we will take them through that and hopefully have a result in the first quarter of next year.
Jake Sekelsky Perfect, that’s all for me.
Bhakti Pavani Just a quick question on the grades at Black fox. I know that the grades have slightly come down from below six, while modeling the production going forward, how should we consider about the grades at Black Fox?
Andrew Elinesky I would continue to model the Black Fox grades at similar levels maybe a touch higher, but I think what we're finding is higher tonnage and touch lower grades. However, the mining methodologies and plans there, obviously we have a new President and COO joining us in short order, so I'm sure that will be one of the first thing he reviews. But the plans that we have now for the rest of the year, I would continue to model probably just a little bit higher, but not as high as six, I think is what you talked about before. So the grades in tonnage that we had in Q2. Going forward, you see the tonnage go down a little bit, but the grade come up slightly, but not that much higher than the 5.6, 5.7 we had in the quarter. Bhakti Pavani Got it. Okay. With regards to the updated mineral resources that you put out at Black fox I'm kind of wondering with the exploration program or the drilling you are doing at Black Fox, do you see the mine life extending from the current results going forward before you guys bring the other project areas into the mine plan?
Andrew Elinesky Yes, the short answer to that is, yes. So our efforts right now aren't focusing on not just resource additions, but resource conversion into reserves and engineering department there as well as the corporate office have been focused on that, and when we do an updated Black Fox resource at the end of the year, we'll have an updated reserve estimate as well. And we would anticipate that we should see additions to that to accommodate to the consumption we've had from the production, since the last update.
Bhakti Pavani Got it, okay. And the last question is you have a drill results from Stock and you have drill results from Froome. Stock has been an historical mine, so when it comes to bringing that online, would did – if you have encouraging results going forward as well. Would it take precedence over developing Froome going forward?
Andrew Elinesky No, it would not. If we are successful at Stock, the potential there is a large open pits, deposits, if we're able to ever join those two potential deposits together and that would be quite a significant project on its own. And we're looking at moving Froome to bring development of that into 2019 and bring production out of Froome, starting at the end of 2019 or 2020. Stock, if you're able to make continue to with development of that deposit, we will slightly spend at least another year drilling the heck out of it. So I would think it will definitely be second on the list compared to Froome. Froome is much more closer to being intangible production in the short order.
John Tumazos, Very Independent Research In terms of sulfides at Gold Bar, congratulations Chris on the new job. How big would a sulfide deposit have to be to justify around metallurgical complex to 4 million, 6 million ounces? And do you think the strategy would be to corporate with one of the bigger neighbors with around metallurgical complex. I know I'm putting the cart before the horse, you have to find the gold first, but I'm just thinking ahead?
Andrew Elinesky We're still trying to find the horse, John. We have – that's an interesting question, which I love we’d have to deal with when we find more gold there. I think it's all going to depend on the type of results if – right now we have some sulfides that were drilled assay results that we had from earlier drilling, but we're ignored and they didn't stretch. Well, they stretched over 16 meters. We haven't got anything close to approaching the resource. We just have as few sulfide wholes at this point. I'd have to say if it wasn't a large resource that ultimately was found, but it could be mined. It would seem quite logical to approach the seniors that are nearby and see if they have excess capacity. If we're lucky enough to see a large deposit there, there was a major intrusive that our gravity survey shown sitting right underneath the property. So the potential for something like what's up the road exists then we would have to evaluate the economics. But definitely, it's – would you like to add to that Slyvain?
Sylvain Guérard As Rob mentioned earlier and s you know, Patrick's version have been focused on the upside portion of the deposit. And most, if not all of the mineralization is open and expand down deep and had depth into sulfide, that's the case that gold dig does the case with Kevin Creek. We now have a new geophysical survey, including CSAMT, survey that we have just complete recently, that exist that there is significant sulfide mineralization at the depth of both deposits or those pits, and we will certainly drill and evaluate the situation there. We have some historical drill intersection in sulfides and at significantly higher grade, which is encouraging because in sulfide we want to see higher grade. And interestingly, we did follow up on Kevin Creek down with extension where we have sulfide and oxide mineralization there surface and deeper down dip we intersected oxide mineralization again. So indication of a complex structure offsetting also a characteristic of the – some of the large deposit – carbon deposit you see in Nevada, a mixed up sulfide and oxide when you go at depth of those deposits. So oxide, remain our first priority. But certainly we'll be assessing the sulfide potential as well.
John Tumazos If I can ask you the second question. So that at Stock, you're looking at something totally different than 100,000 ounce underground historic production. Could you tell us a little bit about two open pits or targets you're trying to connect, if the grades are like one gram and if they're better than one gram, something about the size of the target or the dream?
Sylvain Guérard Yes, sure, we started our exploration at the Stock East target, which is 700 meters from our mill. It's a long the fall, the Destor-Porcupine east of the old stock mine. We had historical results there, but quite limited and formation. We were positively surprised with our first phase of drilling. We intersected grades ranging from one to three gram per ton starting at surface, extending at least up to 450 meter over a strike length of 500 meter. So that gives you a size. The grade is, as I said, from one to two over tens of meters, 10, 20, sometimes 30 meter intersections. And what we like, it also includes narrow high-grade mineralization. So we believe, the high-grade portion is a component of this mineralized system. On the geological front, we see what we want to see, what we like to see are for this type of deposit, major structure, mineralization all stood in mafic, ultra mafic and [indiscernible] typical Archaean gold deposit. If we extend to the West over the Stock Mine, Stock have been drilled to a depth of 500 meter, so there is still a significant upside potential to drill deeper and extend mineralization for underground potential at the old Stock mine. As you know, 500 meters is quite – is relatively shallow for this type of Archaean gold deposit. So we see a high upside potential there. And a part of this drilling is also intersecting large QFP dikes that are mineralized. We saw that in the historical drilling and we are currently having one rig turning on the down depth extension. And we are confident we should be able to intersect additional lower grade and wider zones. So there's a mix of a higher grade and lower grade and the potential is there at Stock for both open pit, but also we keep underground as a possibility.
John Tumazos So if you do the Stock open pit, is the existing mill big enough, or would you be so active and just take keep the best grades of the open pit?
Sylvain Guérard That's a good question. We still have to advance with our evaluation. Keep in mind that Stock East could be a mix of open pit mining and underground. So we could be starting for example, the Stock East mining with open pit and extended as an underground to catch high-grade. This is still early stage. As you know, started Stock exploration less than six months ago and progress have been excellent and results are above expectation, I would say.
Howard Flinker, Flinker & Co
I didn't hear something clearly. Did you say that at Black fox you're drilled down to 800 meters and other people find in the neighborhood are at 1,500 meters?
Andrew Elinesky That’s correct.
Howard Flinker All right, I just wanted to clarify that. Thanks. That's it.
Rob McEwen You’re welcome. I should mention to everyone on the call that on September 6, we are scheduling a major presentation on all of our exploration results on all of our properties and you're all invited to join the conference, but there will be physical presentation as well in our office. Just want to give you heads up to that upcoming event.
Matt Barry, H.C. Wainwright With the appointment of Chris Stewart today and with experiencing M&A, coupled with the fact that your goals remain to be included in the S&P 500. Should we expect to see more M&A? And if so, we wouldn't be surprised if you're not looking – I mean we would not be surprised if you're not looking at assets across the globe. So where you guys are currently looking, North America, South America? And our second question, the $15 million exploration program at Black Fox is pretty impressive. I think you guys may have touched on this a bit earlier, but can you just walk us through expenditures quarter-by-quarter over the remainder of the year? We're just trying to get some sort of sense of cash flow over the remainder of the year.
Rob McEwen Certainly. In terms of looking for opportunities to build production in our resource base, we’re looking through the Americas and through Europe at the moment. We are – I would describe ourselves as opportunistic and looking for acquisitions where we can build value under each one of our shares rather than just growing for the sake of growth. We needed to be growth for a higher share price. And yes, Chris has demonstrated background of turnaround, successful turnarounds, so with a very strong operational bias. In terms of exploration, I’ll just ask Sylvain to talk about his budget or Andrew.
Andrew Elinesky I'll answer the question, Rob. Thank you. Hi, Matt. We’re pleased to see the budget is geared towards the front half of the year, especially doing a sizable portion of that and flow through financing, we want to ensure that we get through the $10 million of flow-through funds in a timely fashion on qualified expenses. So we saw those 6 million cash expenditures in Q1, $5 million in Q2 and you will see both $3.5 million in Q3 and just over $1 million in Q4. What will remain to be seen is, what next steps we want to take or what Sylvain – what programs Sylvain wants to come up with and whether we do more flow through programs or how we choose to handle that depending on the success of the programs that are currently under execution. So Q4 may increase, but right now we're scheduled to spend just under $2 million in Q4.
Rob McEwen I can add to it. We continue to get the exploration results we're getting that will encourage us to keep an aggressive exploration program in front.
Matt Barry Perfect, thanks a lot guys.
Bill Powers, Private Investor Yes. It sounds like you're off to an excellent start as far as exploration goes, but just a two quick questions. Personally, I know move forward on M&A, a lot of it is going to depend on accretive acquisitions and a part of this is, is the stock price as far as it seems as though McEwen shares are the most shorted precious metal stock in the world right now and one of the most shorted stocks in North America from what my research indicates. And was about 38 days to cover a 19% of the [indiscernible]. I mean have you guys spoken to the OSC about this, about whether there's been actual failure to borrow correctly or saying that or any plans to I guess reduce the short position outside of just continued operational results because it seems as though nobody cares right now, from what I could see.
Rob McEwen Thank you for your question Bill. No, we have not spoken to the Ontario Securities Commission or the SEC about that. I've looked at the short and in a positive light and that if we continue to delivering good exploration results and improving operational results, we're going to make those shorts run to cover. And that will be a great fuel for the fire to drive the price. But I take your suggestion and we’ll follow-up on that.
Bill Powers Okay. Well, thank you. And then the second one is just as far as Tonkin goes, I mean given it's proximity between Gold Bar and Cortez projects. Has there been any thoughts given to reviewing or reestablishing exploration there, given what you're seeing elsewhere in Nevada?
Rob McEwen We are exploring. We are not exploring, but well we’re exploring recovery methods because in between Gold Bar and Cortez is our Tonkin property, which is better than 1.6 million, 1.7 million ounces of gold. It's locked – it's largely locked up in a silica compound and we've been looking for ways to be able to break that bond and recover the gold, but it's a large resource sitting there. There's a large – we always thought there was a large stratigraphic unit called the lone Mountain that it was barren and you had to go through about 3,000 feet to get down to the lower plate. But given what Barrick has found down around 2,200 feet, we're looking and seeing if there any spots on the property where there might be shallower windows to the lower plate. And definitely, what Barrick has shown is that there is still a lot more gold to be found in that area, just a short distance north of our properties. So we have a large land package there, a very, very favorable land package and I'll just ask Sylvain to elaborate on that.
Sylvain Guérard Yes, if I – good morning, Bill. If I can add to this and I think we have a slide that is available that’s shown our land position at Tonkin and Gold Bar in relation to the Barrick cluster of deposit to the Northwest and this is a big cluster of deposit. As Rob mentioned, there's like a 50 million ounces of gold cluster around pipeline Cortez build, Gold Rush and a new 4-mile discoveries. So we are strategically located along the trend on the Southeast extension. As you know, the large deposit in Nevada sits around those trends, and we do have mineralization at both properties, Tonkin, has a large low-grade deposit in what we call the upper plate, which is not the best poster, so we will keep looking and developing the model there to keep chasing what could be extension of the mineralization within the most favorable lower plate rocks at Tonkin. At Gold Bar, we have the system, well developed in the oxide and the depth extension remains untested. We've been adding quality new layers of information that allow us for the very first time developing a good understanding of this property. As mentioned, we were not active there for five years. We have now all the key layers of information. In addition, we are reinforcing the team. We are assigning a new exploration manager, a former, highly experienced Barrick geologist that work at gold strike. So all these together, make our Nevada exploration highly exciting. And again, it's all about being at the right place and I strongly believe that those properties are extremely well located along the trend in a country where elephant deposits procure close by.
Bill Powers Okay, well thank you very much for your time this morning.
Howard Flinker, Flinker & Company I add to your comment about the short sales. Every one of those shares has to be bought back and it is really deferred purchases. So like you I contrarily view it as a positive phenomenon.
Rob McEwen Yes, thank you. Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. May you continue to have profitable investments in the gold sector and look forward to giving you further exploration news as year goes on. Thank you. Gold is money.
Gold is important to me because... click here E. on twitter
Dear Shareowners, Construction of the Gold Bar Mine is on track for completion in 2018, and commercial production is expected to begin in Q1 2019. Activity at Gold Bar has reached full capacity with over 200 contractors on site daily. Open pit mine development is well underway and key process facilities are all under construction. Key progress since our last update: •Commenced gold recovery plant structural steel and process equipment installation; •Continued heap leach pad construction (+50% complete); •First generator on site, two more will be dispatched in September; •Crushing plant installation complete, conveyor installation continues; •Continued mine waste stripping and ore stockpiling; Below are photos of the Gold Bar construction progress.
This chart summarizes the relationship between U.S. government debt and the purchasing power of the dollar since the early 1970s when the United States abandoned gold and launched the era of fiat money and an ever-expanding national debt. In that period of time, the national debt has gone from $302.6 billion to $2.1 trillion and the dollar has lost nearly 87% of its purchasing power. -USAGOLD
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 24, 2018 12:07:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Sept 5, 2018 16:15:13 GMT -5
McEWEN MINING INVESTOR DAY TOMORROW! Discover the Potential with McEwen Mining
Rob McEwen, Chief Owner, together with McEwen Mining’s Senior Management and Technical Teams will be gathered in Toronto for a live webcast to show you how we are breaking barriers at our exploration, development and operational projects. We will update you on all operation and exploration activities and tell you why we believe you should be excited about McEwen Mining and the future of our projects. Rediscover the Black Fox Complex in Timmins. We will demonstrate where we have uncovered new zones of mineralization and where we have encountered high grade gold…up to 20 ounces per ton. Look at where we are building our gold resources and where we see the potential to extend the mine life within the Complex. The Gold Bar Mine in Nevada is targeting commercial production for 2019. View our progress and discover the additional areas where we believe we can extend the mine here as well. In Mexico, we plan to extend the mine life at the El Gallo Complex by 12 years without onerous financing. Los Azules, a large copper project and our biggest possible value creator, is being transformed from a remote, limited access project to having year-round access and moving quickly towards permitting. These are exciting times for McEwen Mining. Come share the future with us! WHEN: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 6TH, 2018 TIME: 12 PM - 2 PM WEBCAST DETAILS: www.smpav.ca/sign-in.php?ID=39321
ATTENTION ALL CONTRARIAN INVESTORS: BIG PROFITS ARE POSSIBLE – TIME TO ALTER YOUR PORTFOLIO MIX
TORONTO, August 30, 2018 - McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) invites all precious metals analysts, market letter writers, shareholders and contrarian investors to circle in their calendar, Thursday, September 6th from 12pm to 2pm EDT. We have made a lot of progress this year, which we want to share with you. We are inviting you to come and learn how: •Exciting new drill intercepts at Black Fox have encountered high grades of up to 20 ounces per ton of gold; •We have been building our gold resources at Black Fox and Gold Bar; •Our newest mine, Gold Bar is progressing quickly to production; •We plan to extend the mine life in Mexico by 12 years without onerous financing needs; •Los Azules, a large copper project and our biggest possible value creator, is being transformed from a remote, limited access exploration project to having year-round access and moving quickly towards permitting.
Our Chairman and Chief Owner, Rob McEwen, has just increased the cost base of his investment in the Company by $25 million to $160 million. Come find out why. It will likely be a big surprise to most investors to learn that many gold stocks have delivered far superior returns to the broad market indices. Since the start of 2016 to present, while the Dow Jones Industrials and S&P 500 have increased by 52% and 45%, respectively, the share price of McEwen Mining has increased by 76% and yet it is trading at 21% of its 2011 high of $9.15. If you haven’t considered an investment in precious metals for quite a while, you should now. Why? Because there hasn’t been a better time in many years. The downside risk is much lower than the broad market and the potential for large capital gains is considerable. Consider these two facts: commodity prices are cyclical; and today the value of commodities relative to equities is at the lowest point in 48 years. Join us on Sept. 6thto learn why precious metals are the next place to invest and why you should consider having McEwen Mining in your portfolio. The event will be held at Vantage Venues, (previously St. Andrew’s Conference Centre) at 150 King St. West, Toronto, 27th floor, Caledonia Room, from 12:00 pm to 2:00 in the afternoon.
To reserve a seat, please RSVP to cd@mcewenmining.com or info@mcewenmining.com or call our office at telephone 647-258-0395 or toll free 866-441-0690.
If you can’t attend in person, or if the room is filled before you reserve a seat, please join us via webcast at www.smpav.ca/sign-in.php?ID=39321 These are very exciting times for MUX and we want you to be a part of it! ABOUT MCEWEN MINING McEwen’s goal is to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index by creating a profitable gold and silver producer. McEwen’s principal assets consist of: the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina (49% interest); the El Gallo Gold mine in Mexico; the Black Fox mine in Timmins, Canada; the Gold Bar mine in Nevada that is currently under construction; and the large Los Azules copper project in Argentina that is advancing towards permitting. McEwen has a total of 337 million shares outstanding. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, owns 24% of McEwen.
Gold is important to me because... click here
More Emerging Market Chaos – How Long Before It Spreads To The Developed World?
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Sept 8, 2018 3:17:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Oct 12, 2018 1:33:16 GMT -5
McEwen Mining Reports Q3 2018 Production Results TORONTO, Oct. 11, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) reports consolidated production for Q3 2018 of 33,806 gold ounces and 745,172 silver ounces, or 43,742 gold equivalent ounces(1)(“GEOs”), using a 75:1 gold to silver ratio. Consolidated production for the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2018 was 135,344 GEOs, which is 48% higher than the comparable period in 2017. Consolidated Production Summary
Gold Bar Mine, Nevada, USA (100%) Construction is advancing on schedule for completion by the end of 2018, targeting production in Q1 2019. Activities at Gold Bar in Q3 focused on completion of the heap leach pad and crushing circuit, and advancing the process facility. All major equipment and bulk materials are either on site or purchased. Engineering for the project is complete and 97% of contracts are awarded. During the first three years of operation beginning with 2019, Gold Bar is projected to produce 55,000, 74,000 and 68,000 ounces of gold respectively. During Q3 we announced an updated and increased resource estimate reflecting changes since the last Gold Bar Feasibility Study was published in March 2018. Measured and Indicated resources increased by 92,000 gold ounces to 721,000 gold ounces at 0.92 g/t, and Inferred resources increased by 82,000 gold ounces to 197,000 gold ounces at 0.90 g/t. Combined with the nearby Gold Bar South deposit the total resources on the Gold Bar Property are now 822,000 gold ounces in the Measured and Indicated category, and 202,000 gold ounces in the Inferred category. An updated mineral reserve estimate will be completed in Q1 2019. We have committed $5 million to exploration in 2018 to further increase gold resources and test new exploration concepts at the Gold Bar Property, located along the prolific Battle Mountain - Cortez Gold Trend, Nevada.
Black Fox Mine, Timmins, Canada (100%) Black Fox produced 11,618 GEOs in Q3, and 37,751 GEOs year to date, in line with our full year production guidance for 2018 of 48,000 GEOs. During Q3 we announced new resource estimates for both the Froome and Stock East deposits, as well as encouraging exploration results from the ongoing $15 million exploration program at the Black Fox Complex near Timmins, Ontario. The updated Indicated Mineral Resource for Froome increased 14% to 181,000 gold ounces at a grade of 5.09 g/t, and the initial Inferred Mineral Resource for Stock East contains 114,000 gold ounces at a grade of 2.54 g/t. Significant high-grade drill results from the Black Fox Complex included: •Froome Footwall Target: 53.93 g/t gold over 8.29 m including 322.86 g/t gold over 1.34 m •Pike River Target: 35.04 g/t gold over 3.30 m •Stock East Deposit: 25.16 g/t gold over 2.09 m •Grey Fox Deposit– 147 Zone cross structure: 13.41 g/t gold over 2.82 m including 27.70 g/t gold over 0.94 m •Black Fox Mine depth extension: 35.08 g/t gold over 1.69 m For additional information on exploration refer to two news releases published on Sept. 6, 2018 on our website www.mcewenmining.com
San José Mine, Argentina (49%)(2) Production is in line with our full year guidance for 2018 of 91,000 GEOs. Q3 attributable production from San José was 11,768 gold ounces and 743,100 silver ounces, for a total of 21,676 GEOs. Year to date our attributable production is 34,729 gold ounces and 2,204,349 silver ounces, for a total of 64,120 GEOs.
El Gallo Project, Mexico (100%) Production has exceeded our full year production guidance for 2018 of 32,000 GEOs. Residual heap leaching at El Gallo resulted in 10,448 GEOs in Q3, and 33,473 GEOs year to date when combined with prior period mining activity. Q3 was strong as a result of ore stacked on the heap leach pad at the end of Q2, however, residual leaching is expected to taper significantly in Q4 to be more in line with our longer term recovery expectations. By the end of Q2, mining and crushing activities at El Gallo ceased. Closure, reclamation and residual heap leach activities are ongoing and will continue for several years. A new Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) study on the potential restart of production from the El Gallo was published on July 9, 2018. The proposed development plan evaluated in the PEA is called Project Fenix. The key outcomes of Project Fenix include an average annual production rate of 47,000 ounces gold equivalent, a 12-year mine life, low initial capital cost of $41 million for Phase 1 and $30 million for Phase 2, and pay-back period of 4.1 years. At current gold and silver prices the after-tax internal rate of return (IRR) is 28%, and the net present value (NPV) at a 5% discount rate is $60 million. Capital cost estimates for Project Fenix are to a level of accuracy that is consistent with a PEA technical report. During the next 11 months we will continue to review mineral processing, mine sequencing, material transportation and tailings storage options; and the flow sheet will be optimized by undertaking trade-off studies, updating cost models and additional metallurgical testwork. The Project Fenix PEA is available for review on our website and SEDAR www.sedar.com
Third Quarter Financial Results Operating costs for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018 will be released with our 10-Q Quarterly Financial Statements at the end of October. As of Oct 5, 2018 we had $51 million in liquid assets and $53 million in debt.
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING McEwen has the goal to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index by creating a profitable gold and silver producer focused in the Americas. McEwen’s principal assets consist of: the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina (49% interest); the Black Fox mine in Timmins, Canada; the El Gallo Fenix project in Mexico; the Gold Bar mine in Nevada, currently under construction; and the large Los Azules copper project in Argentina, advancing towards development. McEwen has a total of 337 million shares outstanding. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, owns 24% of McEwen.
Footnotes (1) 'Gold Equivalent Ounces' are calculated based on a 75:1 gold to silver ratio. (2) The San José Mine is 49% owned by McEwen Mining Inc. and 51% owned and operated by Hochschild Mining plc. All dollar amounts are US Dollars.
RELIABILITY OF INFORMATION REGARDING SAN JOSÉ Minera Santa Cruz S.A., the owner of the San José Mine, is responsible for and has supplied to the Company all reported results from the San José Mine. McEwen Mining’s joint venture partner, a subsidiary of Hochschild Mining plc, and its affiliates other than MSC do not accept responsibility for the use of project data or the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Gold is important to me because...here
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Oct 30, 2018 17:24:47 GMT -5
October 30, 2018 McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) Reports Q3 2018 Results
TORONTO, Oct. 30, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) today reported third quarter results for the period ended Sept. 30, 2018 (“Q3”). During Q3, gold equivalent ounces (GEOs) produced increased by 51% and all-in sustaining costs per GEO sold decreased by 3% compared to Q3 2017. Net cash flow from the business excluding project development costs was $2.2 million or $0.01 per share. Total expenditure of $35.5 million was incurred to further our long-term production growth plans at the Gold Bar, Black Fox, Fenix and Los Azules projects. Our consolidated net loss for Q3 was $13.3 million or $0.04 per share.
During the first nine months of 2018, GEOs produced increased by 48% and all-in sustaining costs per GEO sold was unchanged compared to the same period in 2017. Net cash flow from the business excluding project development costs was $20.8 million or $0.06 per share. Total expenditure of $84.5 million was incurred to further our long-term production growth plans at the Gold Bar, Black Fox, Fenix and Los Azules projects. Our consolidated net loss for the first nine months of 2018 was $23.9 million or $0.07 per share.
We invite you to join our conference call, where management will discuss our Q3 2018 financial results and project developments and follow with a question and answer session. Questions can be asked directly by participants over the telephone or can be emailed in advance to info@mcewenmining.com
Please email questions prior to the start of the call.
Wednesday, Oct. 31st, 2018 11:00 am ET Toll Free USA & Canada: 1 (844) 630-9911 Outside USA & Canada: 1 (210) 229-8828 Conference ID Number: 1787027 Webcast Link: edge.media-server.com/m6/p/8bcjbhsg
An archived replay of the webcast will be available for one week after it takes place. Access the replay using the link edge.media-server.com/m6/p/8bcjbhsg or by calling (855)-859-2056 (North America) / (404)-537-3406 (International), Conference ID Number 1787027.
The table below provides comparative production and cost results for the third quarter and year-to-date (YTD) ended Sept. 30, 2018 and 2017. For the SEC Form 10-Q Financial Statements and MD&A refer to: www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000314203
Notes: Silver and gold production is presented as GEOs, which approximate prevailing spot prices at the beginning of the year. The silver-to-gold ratio used for 2017 and 2018 is 75:1. Represents the portion attributable to us from our 49% ownership interest in the San José Mine. Earnings from mining operations, total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs (AISC), and cash, investments and precious metals, as applicable, are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under U.S. GAAP. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Measures” for additional information, including definitions of these terms. The Black Fox mine was acquired on Oct. 6, 2017.
The table below provides comparative financial highlights for the third quarter and nine months ended Sept. 30, 2018 and 2017.
Gold Bar, Nevada, USA (100%) Construction is advancing on schedule for completion by the end of 2018, targeting production in Q1 2019. Activities at Gold Bar in Q3 focused on completion of the heap leach pad and the crushing and conveying system, and advancing the gold processing facility. All major equipment and bulk materials are either on site or purchased. Engineering for the project is complete and 97% of contracts are awarded. During the first three years of operation beginning with 2019, Gold Bar is projected to produce 55,000, 74,000 and 68,000 ounces of gold, respectively. During Q3 we announced an updated and increased resource estimate reflecting changes since the last Gold Bar Feasibility Study was published in March 2018. Measured and Indicated resources increased by 92,000 gold ounces to 721,000 gold ounces at 0.92 grams per tonne (g/t), and Inferred resources increased by 82,000 gold ounces to 197,000 gold ounces at 0.90 g/t. Combined with the nearby Gold Bar South deposit, the total resources on the Gold Bar Property are now 822,000 gold ounces in the Measured and Indicated category, and 202,000 gold ounces in the Inferred category. An updated mineral reserve estimate will be completed in Q1 2019. We capitalized to construction in progress $28.5 million and $55.5 million for the three and nine months ended Sept. 30, 2018, respectively, and $61.5 million cumulative to date. Open pit mining development in the third quarter continued to focus on the Gold Pick West and Cabin Creek deposits. To date, 52,000 tonnes of ore at a grade of 0.5 g/t have been stockpiled, and a total of one million tonnes of pre-strip waste material has been removed. We spent $1.0 million and $4.2 million on exploration in 2018 for the three and nine months ended Sept. 30, 2018, respectively, to further increase gold resources and test new exploration concepts at the Gold Bar Property, located along the prolific Battle Mountain - Cortez Gold Trend, Nevada. During 2019 we plan to drill for potential deep and large Carlin-type gold deposits below the existing oxide resources.
Black Fox, Canada (100%) Black Fox production is in line with our full year production and cost guidance for 2018. Production in Q3 was 11,618 GEOs at cash costs and AISC of $932 and $1,285 per GEO, respectively. Year-to-date production was 37,751 GEOs at cash costs and AISC of $839 and $1,159 per GEO, respectively. The total exploration budget for 2018 at the Black Fox Complex in Timmins is $19.0 million, of which we have spent $17.4 million during the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2018. For information on our encouraging exploration results refer to recent news releases published in 2018 on Apr. 30, Jul. 25, and Sept. 6, available on the McEwen Mining website www.mcewenmining.com For a comprehensive video introduction to the potential of our properties and operations, watch our Sept. 6, 2018 investor day presentation here:
San José, Argentina (49%) San José production is in line with our full year production and cost guidance for 2018. Our attributable production from San José in Q3 was 11,768 gold ounces and 743,100 silver ounces, for a total of 21,676 GEOs at cash costs and AISC of $856 and $1,028 per GEO, respectively. Year-to-date our attributable production is 34,729 gold ounces and 2,204,349 silver ounces, for a total of 64,120 GEOs at cash costs and AISC of $864 and $1,078 per GEO, respectively. During the three and nine months ended Sept. 30, 2018 we received $2.1 million and $9.4 million in dividends from our interest in San José, compared to $2.3 million and $7.2 million in dividends received during the same periods in 2017. For 2018, we are forecasting dividends of $12.0 million.
El Gallo, Mexico (100%) El Gallo production has exceeded our full year guidance for 2018 of 32,000 GEOs and costs for the quarter are in line with our guidance. Residual heap leaching in Q3 resulted in 10,448 GEOs at cash costs and AISC of $671 and $696 per GEO, respectively. When combined with mining activity in the first half, year-to-date production was 33,473 GEOs at cash costs and AISC of $709 and $752 per GEO, respectively. Q3 was strong as a result of ore stacked on the heap leach pad at the end of Q2. Residual leaching is expected to taper significantly in Q4 to be more in line with our longer-term recovery expectations.
Fenix Project, Mexico (100%) A new Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) study on potential production from the El Gallo Complex assets was published on Jul. 9, 2018. This proposed development plan evaluated in the PEA is called the Fenix Project. Key outcomes of Fenix Project include an average annual production rate of 47,000 ounces gold equivalent, a 12-year mine life, low initial capital cost of $41 million for Phase 1 and $30 million for Phase 2, and pay-back period of 4.1 years. At gold and silver prices of $1,250 and $16 per ounce the after-tax internal rate of return (IRR) is 28%, and the net present value (NPV) at a 5% discount rate is $60 million. The Fenix Project PEA is available for review on our website and SEDAR (www.sedar.com). During the three and nine months ended Sept. 30, 2018, we spent $1.5 million and $2.6 million respectively, on activities required to advance the Fenix Project. A final feasibility study for the Fenix Project will be released during the first half of 2019.
Los Azules Project, Argentina (100%) For the 2017-2018 exploration season at Los Azules, we forecasted $8.9 million in expenditures, of which we spent $5.5 million during the year. The activities performed were mainly technical site investigations and environmental baseline monitoring work, to advance permitting efforts. Currently, we are investigating the possibility of a new access road that could provide year-round access, as opposed to the current 5-month seasonal window.
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING McEwen has the goal to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index by creating a profitable gold and silver producer focused in the Americas. McEwen’s principal assets consist of: the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina (49% interest); the Black Fox mine in Timmins, Canada; the Fenix Project in Mexico; the Gold Bar mine in Nevada, currently under construction; and the large Los Azules copper project in Argentina, advancing towards development. McEwen has a total of 337 million shares outstanding. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, owns 24% of the shares.
Gold is important to me because...here
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Nov 1, 2018 4:02:30 GMT -5
Nov 01, 2018 Video Rob McEwen: Gold Majors Are Doing More Harm Than Good
Executives Rob McEwen – Executive Chairman & Chief Owner Chris Stewart – President and Chief Operating Officer Sylvain Guerard – Senior Vice President of Exploration Andrew Elinesky – Chief Financial Officer
Analysts Jake Sekelsky – Roth Capital Partners Heiko Ihle – H.C. Wainwright Mike Kozak – Cantor Fitzgerald Bhakti Pavani – Alliance Global Robert Silvera – R.E. Silvera Associates Bill Powers – Private Investor
Rob McEwen Thank you, Operator. Good morning, fellow shareowners, ladies and gentlemen. I'm very pleased to welcome you to our third quarter conference call. Happy Halloween. During the third quarter, we moved forward on a number of fronts. Exploration has been successful, increasing our resource base at Gold Bar and will lead to an extension of mine life. Gold Bar is also advancing as planned, on schedule, on budget, with production to begin in Q1 of next year. At Black Box, exploration has not only increased the resource base of several existing deposits, it has found a number of new targets that are quite encouraging. At Los Azules, the most important development is the possibility of a new access route into the deposit, and this could provide 12-month or year-round access rather than the current five month access. It looks promising, and should it work, I think, this will substantially increase the value of Los Azules to us. As a result of these factors and work being done at Black Fox and in Mexico, my confidence in our company's assets, management, exploration potential and my belief that we are in the early stages of the next bull market for gold equities, compelled me to increase my investment in the company by $25 million. This brings my total investment in MUX to $161 million. I'd like to start with this agenda. We'll start with our new President and Chief Operating Officer, Chris Stewart, addressing our operating performance and forecast for next year. Chris will be followed by our Senior Vice President of Exploration, Sylvain Guerard, who'll update you with the recent results from our exploration. And Sylvain, will be followed by our CFO, Andrew Elinesky, who will cover off our financial performance for the third quarter. Chris, over to you.
Chris Stewart Thank you, Rob. Good morning, everyone. Q3 2018 was a strong operating quarter with consolidated production of 43,700 gold equivalent ounces using a 75 to 1 gold to silver ratio. Consolidated production for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was 135,000 gold equivalent ounces, which is 48% higher than the comparable period of 2017. El Gallo mine in Mexico, residual leaching activities continued after the final ore was mined and stacked on the heap leach from El Gallo Gold. Work progressed on the Fenix project, including the start of our feasibility study in July and ongoing environmental permitting assets. While the most recent Fenix project, PEA economics were completed at $1,250 gold and $16 silver, based on current metal prices, the project still demonstrates strong economics with an NPV of $41 million and a post-tax IRR of 22%. Based on residual heap leach activity, the operating team achieved a production of 10,400 gold equivalent ounces in Q3, which brought the year-to-date production to 33,400 gold equivalent ounces. Following substation of mining and crushing activities at El Gallo, by the end of Q2, cost in Q3 were down to a total cash cost of $671, and all-in sustaining cost of $696 for gold equivalent ounces. Q3 was strong as a result of ore stacked on the heap leach pad at the end of Q2. Residual heap leaching is expected to taper significantly in Q4 to be more in line with our longer term recovery expectations. Closure and reclamation and residual heap leaching are ongoing and will continue for several years. Our Q3 work is focused on advancing the Fenix project towards the final feasibility study to be published during the first half of 2019. During the three and nine months ending September 30, 2018, we spent $1.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively, on feasibility study work, which includes reviewing mineral processing, mine sequencing, material transportation, tailing storage options and flow sheet optimization. We also progressed permitting for Project Fenix and plan to make our formal submittal for Phase 1 in November with approval expected in Q2 2019. Phase 1 is for the reprocessing of El Gallo Gold, heap leach material through a typical carbon-in-leach mill circuit. Phase 2 permitting, which we look to obtain in 2020 would require further expansion to process sulfide ores from mainly El Gallo silver. Project Fenix is expected to add another 12 years of mine life to our Mexican operations. On Canada, at Black Fox during Q3 underground exploration efforts focused on potential resource growth near existing infrastructure. We also commenced an exploration drift on the 810 meter level, which will allow us to drill to deep potential for the main Black Fox deposit. We have initiated cost, logistics and environmental baseline studies at Lexam’s Fuller product and we now have completed the resource estimate for Froome deposit near the Black Box mine and a new resource for the Stock East Deposit near our mill. Together with results announced in Q3 from the ongoing exploration program of the complex we continue to develop expanded ore zones that can increase our mining output and gold production. We've produced 11,600 gold equivalent ounces for a total of 37,750 gold equivalent ounces produced year-to-date. Cash costs were $932 and all in sustaining costs $1,285 per gold equivalent ounces during the quarter bringing year-to-date cash costs to $839 and all-in-sustaining cost to $1,159. Black Fox production is in line with our full year productions and cost guidance for 2018. For 2018, we forecast a total of $14.5 million for sustaining and capital expenditure activities at Black Fox mine of which we spent $10.6 million during the nine month period ending September 30. We're excited about the potential of our Black Fox property and we will be closely evaluating our options with respect to bringing on additional production from one of our satellite deposits at from the Grey Fox and Tamarack in the next 12 to 18 months. And the San Jose mine in Argentina production is in line with our full year production and cost guidance for 2018. According to our 49% interest in the mine, our attributable production in Q3 was $21,600 gold equivalent ounces at a cash cost of $856 and an all-in-sustaining cost of $1,028 per gold equivalent ounce. Our year-to-date attributable production is $64,000 gold equivalent ounces. The cash cost of $864 and all-in-sustaining cost of $1,078. At Gold Bar construction is advancing on budget and on schedule for completion by the end of 2013, targeting production in Q1 2019. Activities at Gold Bar in Q3 focused on completion of the heap leach pad, the crushing and conveying system, and advancing the gold processing facility. We expect to complete commissioning of the crushing and stacking circuit by mid -November and then we will start loading the lease pads with ore. Our ADR plant is expected to be completed in mid-December after, which the cyanide leaching process would commence. Mining activities are progressing well. We pre-stripped one million tons of waste material at Gold Pick, and Cabin Creek. We're also mining ore from Cabin Creek pit and currently have approximately 100,000 tons of ore sitting on the ground in front of our crushing plant waiting to be placed on heap leach pad. We also have another 97,000 tons of ore Cabin Creek, waiting to be hauled at the crushing facility. So we're in great shape with regard to having ore ready to go on to leach pads. All major equipment and bulk materials are either onsite or purchased, engineering for the project is complete. And 97% of the contracts are awarded. Exploration on the Gold Bar property restarted in November 2017 after receiving the construction permit from the mine from the $5 million exploration budget for Nevada, we spent $1 million in Q3 adding to the $4.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. At Los Azules, we forecasted $8.9 million in expenditures for the 2017, 2018 exploration season. We spent $5.5 million during the year. The activity is focused on technical site investigations, environmental baseline monitoring work in order to advance our permitting efforts. As you can see Q3 was another quarter during which we delivered significant production and focus on the future production growth of our company. I will now turn it over to Sylvain Guerard our Senior Vice President of Exploration to expand on the exploration programs for our properties.
Sylvain Guerard Thank you, Chris. To better visualize the tradition our projects I would like to refer you to look at the presentation slides available online. On the exploration front and starting with key highlights at Gold Bar in Nevada we increased significantly our resources and the reserve updated and progress to extend our current mine life. In Timmins we increased and we also added new resources and generated multiple drill intersection that will positively impact our development projects and that may lead us to new discoveries. Q3 was another highly productive and successful quarter, a total of $30,000 meter was drilled during Q3 for a year-to-date total of 110,000 meter. We are measuring our recent exploration success as follow. First, we have significantly increased our mineral resource base and defined new resources at Gold Bar and at Black Fox. For total of 241,000 ounces of gold equivalent in Measured and Indicated and $196,000 gold ounces in Inferred categories at an average grade at an average all included cost of about $39 per ounces. Second we generated multiple positive including high-grade drill intersection. And third we developed new high quality drill target and kept reinforcing our exploration team. Starting with Nevada one of our key objective is to extend the Gold Bar mine life. During Q3 we were pleased to announce an increase of the Measured and Indicated resources by 92,000 ounces and Inferred resource by 82,000 ounces, representing a 13% and 68% resource increase respectively. The total resources of the Gold Bar property including Gold Bar South are now 822,000 gold ounces in the Measured and Indicated category, and 202,000 gold ounces in the Inferred category. An updated mineral reserve estimate will be completed in Q1 2019, that will extend the life of mine at Gold Bar. A complete set of data including new the geophysical surveys have been at sound levels contributing to the definition of multiple high quality near mine targets. Drilling to test some of these targets started in mid-August and will continue in Q4. This new data is also providing key information in the development of conceptual targets for potentially deep and large in Carlin gold type deposits and drilling would start in 2019. Moving on to the Timmens regions at Black Fox property drilling on the extension of the Froome deposit located only 800 meter west of the Black Fox mine led to an increase of 14% of the indicated resources to 181,000 thousand ounces gold at a grade of 5.1 gram per ton. At The Stock property located about 30 kilometers northwest of Black Fox drilling on Stock East target led to an Inferred, an initial Inferred mineral resource totaling 114,000 ounces gold at an average grade of 2.5 gram per ton. Including 40,000 ounces at 1.6 as open pit and 73,000 ounces at 3.9 as underground resources. This newly defined resource is located less than a kilometre from our mill and it's part of a two kilometer priority exploration trend that own the former Stock mine. In 2018, Black Fox and Stock exploration programs were also very successful in generating multiple new significant drill results that may positively impact our development projects and lead to the discovery of news on the mineralization. At the Froone footwell target a new mineralized structure has been defined to the northeast of the Froone deposit with intersections of up to 54 gram per ton of gold over 8-meter, including 322-gram per ton over 1.3 meters. This new zone mineralization is considered important and is located between the Black Fox mine and the Froome deposit, where future rent developed and is anticipated to access Froome. At Grey Fox, a new mineralized structure with intersection of 13 gram per ton over 2.8 meters has been defined to the northeast of the Grey Fox zone of 147. This new target area has settled overburden and will be considered as a potential site for researcher access decline to reach the main Grey Fox deposit. Finally, drilling at the Pike River target located alone the Gibson-Kelore Fault zone that owes Froome and Gibson deposit, return on intersections of 35 gram per ton over 3.3 meter highlighting the upside potential of this under explored structure. Follow up drilling will continuing into 2019 with the objective to define the external and concentrated mineralization of the Froome Footwall, Grey Fox Northeast and Pike River target. At the Black Fox mine, the deepest drill intersection yet returned 55-gram per ton gold over 1.2-meter at the 10, 50 meter level on the depth extension of the mine. During Q3, we developed an exploration drill at the 810-meter level, from which we have initiated drilling to test the depth extension of the Black Fox deposit, and future drill results are expected over the coming quarter. At the stock property, in addition to the focus on the Stock East zone where we have generated the first resource, drilling on the down-plunge extension of the former stock mine returned multiple positive intersection, including up 30-gram per ton over 0.8-meter as part of the 3.8-meter interval grading 7-gram per ton. Indicating that the mine mineralized system remained open at that. Follow up drilling is planned for 2019 to deep extension potential. On the west extension of the Stock East Deposit, from wide lower grade enter a wall of 0.8-gram per ton was intersected over 35-meter cord lamp and follow up drilling was performed with pending assays over the sector with the objective to extend the Southeast Central resource to the west. During Q4, our Black Fox surface drilling was focused on the Froome Footwall target. Underground drilling will focus on testing the depth extension and the far west target area earlier area. Our stock updated and reserves estimate for the Stock East deposit will be delivered later in the quarter. At Gold Bar drilling continue it’s testing in priority targets including Gold Bar South to extend the mine life. Finally, we are working on our program and budge planning for 2019 to build on the excellent exploration success generated this year at our Timmins and Nevada priority projects.
Andrew Elinesky Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today during a busy reporting period. Further Rob and Chris’ opening remarks, the third quarter for us was one of the steady production and operating cost on a consolidated basis. In addition to the stable performance, we have continued with the execution of our capital investments, the company had planned for this year, building the Gold Bar mine in Nevada, recapitalizing Black Fox mine, progressing with the Fenix project in Mexico, and of course, raising the required capital needed for achieving these goals within 2018. Our operating performance in the quarter was in line with our expectations, both from a production and cost per ounce perspective. However, the company reported a net loss of $12.8 million or $0.04 per share. And this was greater than expected and it was due to the overall lower sales prices as well as increased foreign exchange in tax cost at the San Jose mine in Argentina. Our treasury balance continues to reflect the sizable investments being made across the board. And as such, you see the increase partially offset by the investments being made. Regarding our overall operating results, related to Chris’ comments earlier, the company had consolidated production of just over 43,000 gold equivalent ounces for the quarter and that brings our year-to-date production to over 135,000 gold equivalent ounces and still has this tracking above our full year guidance of 171,000 ounces. The increase in production versus the prior year's primarily the result of the addition of Black Fox and Timmins, as well as a significant increase in production at our El Gallo mine in Mexico. Our earnings for mining operations were $6.9 million or $0.02 per share in the quarter, which was 28% lower than the third quarter of 2017. This was the net result of the stronger performance in Mexico as a result of the increased production levels, while both the San Jose and Black Fox mines reported slight losses due to weaker sales revenues and increased costs. This net contribution from operations, helped to offset the significant investments being made at Gold Bar, Los Azules and the exploration program, primarily at Black Fox. In addition, the company finalized the previously announced $50 million term loan facility during the quarter, which should satisfy the capital needs required for our investments this year. This net result of the capital raise and investments spend and our liquid assets increased by just under $20 million when compared to the end of the second quarter. And to summarize the financial results for the quarter, the lower profitability of the Black Fox and San Jose mines in combination for the continued exploration program for the quarter and the company reported our net loss of $12.8 million or $0.04 per share. Moving on to the outlook for the final quarter of 2018. Firstly, with Mexico, we expect our cost to continue to decline compared to the first three quarters of the year. This is due to the completion of all mining, crushing and processing activities, which ended in the second quarter. And despite El Gallo no longer being in operation after June 30, we will continue to produce gold on a declining basis as residual leaching activities will occur for the next two-plus years. This allows us to maintain and establish presence in the area, as we continue with our studies for the development of the Fenix product, which despite the drop in metal prices, still has an IRR above our investment threshold of 20%. Moving over to Black Fox. Production is in line with our plan, despite the lower grade in the third quarter, which we partially offset with an increase in tonnage. And we aim to keep our per ounce costs at or lower than our guidance. We also continue with the evaluation of our project opportunities in the area and plan to continue with a meaningful exploration program due to significant success that Sylvain and his team have had so far this year. Thirdly, at San Jose, production levels should increase next quarter. This is in line with historical production profile that has occurred here over the last decade. And we should expect cost at San Jose to stay in line with guidance on a per ounce basis due to this production increase in the quarter. However, we do likely anticipate the increased foreign exchange losses that we saw in the third quarter to continue and there will be the additional export taxes which came into effect in September. Finally, at Gold Bar, we are still on schedule for commissioning of the mine in the fourth quarter of this year, and it is our objective to declare commercial production in the first quarter of 2019. The project is currently on schedule and on budget. And I think it is worth highlighting one point that Chris mentioned earlier. With approximately 97% of the overall project cost locked in, we've removed a significant portion of the projects price risk at this point. And this risk should continue to decline as we complete the remaining work in the coming months and puts us in an excellent position to meet the $81 million construction budget for the project.
Rob McEwen Thank you very much, Andrew. I'd like to start by talking about what I call the invisible gold bull market. And it’s started in January of 2016. But it appears to be invisible to almost everyone. Just look at the performance of the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones Industrial Index since 2016 – January of 2016. The results are quite respectable. The S&P is up better than 32%, the Dow is up even more at better than 43%. So you don't have to look any further, those are good gains. On October 4, The Wall Street Journal wrote that “the pessimism for gold is near total”. And I believe that view is shared by most investors. In fact, if you were to look at the only gold stock in the S&P 500, which is Newmont, and took it to market cap and compared it to the market cap of all the stocks in the S&P 500. Newmont's market cap would represent seven 100th of 1%, almost nothing. So the performance of gold stock since January 2016, will appear to many is unbelievable. Our share price during this period, January 2016 to present, delivered a gain of greater than 3x the S&P and 2x the Dow and better than 100% gain in 22 months. I believe we are in the early stage of a new bull market in gold equities. And the performance of our shares is not unique. There are a number of gold stocks that have also done that. In the last three months, there has been exploration companies and what you're looking at is a situation, where there is very – most of the selling has happened, there's very little volume out there. And when someone sees a story, they like and they start buying it, it's moving some stocks up very quickly. So in the last three months, if you want to look at the chart there, six companies we looked at and they increased in value between 50% and 500% in just the last three months. These are gold exploration stories, small companies. But they are another sign to me that we're in a bull market because if they have to release the results six months earlier, it would have gone nowhere. It would have been like pushing the string. Their share price would have just sat there. But we're now in a market and is paying – starting to pay attention to drove results. We're entering the market where profits can be made again by buying gold stocks. I think we're well positioned to participate in this new bull market. We have growing production, exciting exploration results, one of the highest debate in the gold industry, large insider ownership, a good balance sheet, big optionality to copper. And I might say, we have a large, short position in our company and it’s probably take 25 days of the average daily trading to cover it. And you might look at that as a negative. But in a rising gold market, the shorts could find themselves in an uncomfortable position or they have to cover at a higher price than they sold, fueling a rapid increase. So I look at our share price and I look at in the past, there is some – right now, we have something, we’d be called an inverted head and shoulders pattern. It looks very positive. And that's also reinforced by my positive view on the gold market. I'd just like to give you a little bit of history on gold equities. And in the last 77 years, there have been eight bear markets for gold shares. The last bear market that we were in ended at the end of 2015. And I can say, it was one of the longest bear markets we've injured in the last 77 years and it was the deepest. During that same period, there have been a number of bull markets, we are currently in the seven, and the six – of the six preceding bull markets, four of them had gains from bottom to top of over 600% or better. So if you use that for as a reference point, out of the six, you could project that – it’s on a very limited scale, we can say there's a 67% probability that you could get a three or fourfold increase from where we are before this cycle ends. And to me that's where it is looking at. The broad market is at record high. And so there's room on the downside. And the gold market was pushed to the floor. And you could say, well, it could go lower, but I can tell you, there's not much left to go lower on. So I think risk reward is quite good here.
Jake Sekelsky, Roth Capital Partners Costs at Black Fox for the quarter were mostly in line with 2018 guidance, but they did seem to tick up a bit from the previous quarter. Can you speak to the drivers behind the quarter-over-quarter increase there?
Rob McEwen Sure, Jake. Chris, would you like to address that?
Chris Stewart Yes, sure. How you doing, Jake? Just could you clarify your question a little bit because our overall ounces mined was down slightly from Q2 and significantly from Q1 – in Q3 so I want to get a better understanding of your question, sorry.
Jake Sekelsky Yes, so I'm just trying to get a handle on costs going forward. On a cash cost basis, we did move up quarter-over-quarter, that's just a function of less ounces mined?
Chris Stewart In Q3, the recoverable grade was down from what we anticipated. So as a result, we ended up with lower gold ounces produced. But the other thing we started to do in Q3 have spent some more money on capital development. So we reactivated the ramp at the bottom of the mine to access some new levels coming into 2019 to set ourselves up for success there. So I just joined the company and that have been slowed down and I was very focused, when I came on at mid-August was to start pushing that heading against we can set ourselves up. So I think you'll see coming into Q4, cost will be similar to what they were in Q3, I would say with respect to cash cost.
Jake Sekelsky Okay, that makes sense. And then just switching over to El Gallo, you've already beat 2018 guidance there. Can you just give us some color on where the residual leach activities are at right now, where we should expect them to be going into Q4 in 2019?
Rob McEwen Yes. Again, at El Gallo, as you mentioned, we've sort of over performed on the recoveries. So we did our recovery model for that and anticipate the overall recovery of gold to drop and be more in line with what we are predicting originally, we’re sort of in the 1,000, 1,200 ounces per month type area. So we expect coming to year end, we will beat our guidance there and then next year again, we are looking at more in the 1,000 to 1,200 ounces per month range. Jake Sekelsky Perfect.
Rob McEwen Thank you, Jake. Just like to read a question from Neil Barron, he’s a private investor from Virginia. And he starts off, Rob, congratulations. Thank you for another excellent quarter, stay the course, keep the research exploration funded, keep building mines, producing gold and silver and looking for our next major acquisition. His question is about the short position. He was looking for insights into the short position. And when this might be over? Our short position is equivalent to about 25 days of average trading volume, which is high relative to a number of companies in the industry. In looking into it, you can go out and borrow stock and there are various rates that are applied for borrowing stock. And the last I saw was the borrowing rates for our shares was 1.15%. So it's a low-cost to borrow it. And we are in 57 ETF indices and mutual funds. And these holders often rent out or lease out their positions to people who want to short. So one way to stop that is probably to get your stock registered in your name, if we had all of our shareholders registering their stock in the name, there would be less of shares available for shorting and would probably increase – and as a result, that would increase the cost of borrowing because some borrow rates are up around 5% or 6%. So might mitigate some of the benefit. And Neil had a second question regarding the silver price being below 16 and the impact on Fenix, and Andrew and Chris spoke about that. At the current price of silver and gold, which is below the numbers we used in our study on El Gallo, we still – at current price, it's generating about 22% after-tax IRR. So we're still pushing that forward. Heiko Ihle, H.C. Wainwright
Hey, spent some time in your website earlier and played it around with that Black Fox virtual tour that you have on there, which is pretty cool. I think I mentioned that to you before. Can you just sort of why – it led to a pretty obvious question, given there is a virtual tour rather than images. Can you just sort of walk us through which parts have not arrived at the site Antamina, earlier on this call, someone mentioned that the ADR plant was getting completed in mid-December. I assume that the pricing is definitely down but I mean what about deliveries, are they locked as everything on-site. Are there any potential bottlenecks that we may not know about yet?
Rob McEwen Heiko, that would be our Gold Bar property rather than Black Fox.
Heiko Ihle I’m sorry, of course.
Rob McEwen It's all right. And with respect to your construction, I'll turn it over to Chris, let him cover up that.
Chris Stewart With respect to Gold Bar, we're in very good shape. Everything, all the critical items are on-site. So there's no – as far as the risk goes to complete and are we waiting for any materials to show up or anything like that. That's all looked after and we're in very good shape and we're very confident that we're going to be on track to again sort of loading the leach pads in mid-November and have the ADR completed, the last items that were concerned where the MCCs for all the electrical and that was on-site, about a week late, but we’ve essentially caught up on schedule on that. So we're in good shape with the liquid natural gas plants, for electrical power have all been commissioned, that's up and running up. We got power across the site. So we're in very good shape with respect to construction, very confident we can deliver on time and on budget.
Heiko IhleGreat. You mentioned $4.2 million exploration at sites for 2018 year-to-date, any – I know its early but any idea we should expect to see for 2019? Rob McEwen
In terms of our budget?
Heiko Ihle Correct.
Rob McEwen We're looking around $5 million on Gold Bar.
Sylvain Guerard Just to add on this. It’s Sylvain speaking. Regarding our plan for next year, we have developed a lot of quality target just around the mine site there, that we are currently drilling and will extend to 2019. And we also have very interesting target to develop deeper for large potential call in mineralization that we are planning to add them also next year.
Heiko Ihle Very helpful. Thank you guys.
Rob McEwen Good, Heiko. Thank you very much. Our next question that was came in via email was from Steve Ellis, an investor, says I hope all is good with you. After 10 – after additional 10 months of stock price, I was wondering if the company has any idea when it will turn profitable, even assuming the price of gold and silver stay where they are. So we are investing heavily in growth in exploration and building roads, hopefully losses are less, and building the value. In terms of turning profitable with gold and silver stay where they are today, it's unlikely we will turn a profit next year. But our objective is to be profitable and we will see the – we're hopeful that our investments that we're making and the expenses were incurring will generate assets that produce a healthy profit margin in the future.
Mike Kozak, Cantor Fitzgeral A few questions from me. First, just go back to Black Fox. In Q3, the grades of the mill averaged 4.8 grams per ton. I think you mentioned that's a little bit lower than expected. That just kind of slightly negative grade reconciliation or more dilution, can you just elaborate on that a little bit?
Rob McEwen Yes, in Q3, we did incur more dilution than we had anticipated with some of our stopes. So we’ve actually – we’re spending time right now, redesigning the stopes and especially the hanging wall with respect to ground sport requirements. So we're taking steps to mitigate that. But certainly, if you look at the overall – we overproduced on tons but underperformed on grade and it's certainly it's a dilution.
Mike Kozak Got you. And then just following up on that, I mean that grade, I mean, it's down for four quarters in a row for when you guys bought. I’m just wondering, when – what that's grade going to stabilize that or what kind of average grades you guys looking at for next year at Black Fox?
Chris Stewart We’re still working on that process right now. So I can't give you a firm answer on that. But I think, you can anticipate, seeing better grades next year than what you've seen this year and that’s our focus is on controlling dilution, reducing dilution within the stopes and looking at how we handle the ore as well through the entire process to get it over to the mill.
Mike Kozak Got you. Okay. And then again at Black Fox, just when I calculate your unit cost per ton in Q3, I get $129 per ton, so that's mined, milled, G&A, everything on the operating front. That's down, I think, over 30% from last quarter and over, I think, 15% from Q1. So that's very good. I'm wondering is that sustainable, is this a function of some of those cost reduction initiatives that you talked about at your Investor Day, what number should we look at on a per ton basis going forward at Black Fox?
Chris Stewart Again, we are just working through the plans for next year and what our budget will look like. And I think certainly some of the cost-saving initiatives, especially the global adjustments, that the team has been doing there. It certainly going to pay dividends next year, and that will be reflected in the cost per ton. The reason the cost per ton declined a fair bit in Q3 again was a result of handling all the tons that we have. But we do have excess capacity and we're again looking to match what we have with respect to manpower and equipment usage to match the production and that should in fact move your cost per ton down from where it's been in the past. But I would say if you’re in the sort of the $120, $130 range, it's probably a good sort of thumbs-up for now, for next year.
Mike Kozak Okay, that’s great. Last quarter, I think, costs were up at $180 a ton. So that's good to see it coming down. And then just my last question and I'll hop off. I think you mentioned, although, you went through pretty quick, that you have 100,000 tons of ore that was mined and crushed, that's sitting there in front of the leach pad, waiting to get stacked. If that number is right, what – if you can say what is the grade – what's the grade of that 100,000 tons and how to reconcile relative to your reserve model?
Chris Stewart Yes so we actually have 100,000 tons of ore, it's not crushed, it's sitting in front of the crushers. So we haven't fired up that part of crushing and stacking circuits. So sitting there basically run a mine ore. As far as reconciling with our model, we actually have a positive reconciliation on tons. We expect them to get 67,000 tons. We've got 100,000 tons of ore. And with respect to the grade, we planned on a 0.014 ounce per ton for that ore and those ventures, and we see – sorry – 0.001 buy, so actually slightly better than what was planned.
Mike Kozak Okay, that’s great. Yes best of luck for next year guys.
Rob McEwen Thanks very much Mike. The next question is from Allen Steven, a long-term shareholder. He said we're doing a great job, especially with respect to management and compensation, aligning interests with shareholders breath fresh air. He was wondering about Los Azules any possible joint venture news there. And what about permitting PEAs in the next six months? And the likelihood of a deal being struck, provided copper prices remain around $3. We are going to be submitting in the first half of next year a permit application to develop the project. Right now we're doing reconnaissance on the access route into Los Azules, which, as I said earlier, would give us – if it works, it would give us 12-month access below the snow line and would provide a very good route for bringing power into the site and would alter, in my mind, the value of this property significantly. Given the capital cost, we are looking for a joint venture partner. We’ve had some discussions. The ones we've haven’t had lot of conditional statements attached to them and weren’t attractive. Perhaps with copper around $3, this is an attractive price. And with the road, we'll be able to put, I would just think, something else. Someone ask about running their 4x4 up the road. It’s ready. But sorry about that, Allan. We'll hear news losses over the next six months on the road and permit application.
Bhakti Pavani, Alliance Global Just a quick question Black Fox, assuming there is still potential below the mines, just kind of wondering at this point, with the exploration work that you have done, especially at the Black Fox's main side, do you see any potential of extending the mine life of the Black Fox deposit itself over next two to three years? Or do you think you will have to bring in from the next 12 months?
Chris Stewart Yes good morning. With respect to Black Fox, personally, I'm quite bullish on the operational. I think there's significant potential to see growth. If you look at all the deposits through that area in northern Ontario, we typically go down 2,000 meters below surface. We're only scratching the surface down, sort of 800 meters down with the latest pull that Sylvain drill down to 1,050 meters. Again we’ve got a decent good grade into gold intercept there. So I think there's significant potential depth and also along strike as well. We're planning some new areas with the exploration drilling that are quite interesting and close to our existing working so that could move into the mine plan fairly quickly as we continue to drill that moving into 2019. Overall, when you look at the – the overall idea in my mind with respect to what we have in Timmins there, we got Black Fox mill, that's capable of 2,400 tons per day. And if you run 5 gram material through that, 5.5 gram material, you should be able to generate 140,000 ounces roughly per year. So our goal is to expand life at Black Fox, have it continue to operate, and then in conjugation with that, bring in some of the satellite deposit, so we can actually start to pump up the overall production at the mill rate, so start to try – essentially try and fill our mill overtime. Those going to take some time to do that, but that’s sort of what our vision is for what we want to do there in the Timmins camp.
Sylvain Guerard Maybe I can add a bit on this. Sylvain speaking. What we see there at Black Fox or in Timmins, the Black Fox complex it's a complete pipeline, where we have the mine and we are working to extend the life of mine with the underground exploration drilling there, and we have some success that we are advancing with. And going down with development projects and the pipeline point of view, we have, as you know, the Froome, that is sitting there all ounces in the ground at 12.5 meters spacing and also Grey Fox in the Southeast area. However, exploration is adding mineralization close to those deposits in the Froome footwall, hopefully that will contribute to make Froome even more attractive and economic. And at Grey Fox, we have the Northeast zone that is recently defined and could provide access to the Grey Fox main deposit. And we have a bunch of new early-stage exploration intersection that could lead us to new discovery. And I am just talking here on Black Fox property. Now next to our mill, as you know, we have Stock. Stock is the new play [indiscernible] for 20 years, no drilling on the Stock East, where we have generated our first resource. And this sits on a very attractive joint called sitting on the big structure, that's at Destor-Porcupine, right geography, right alteration and correlative of gold over 2 kilometers strike line that we will extending next year and drilling over a 3 kilometer strike line at Stock. So together it’s a pretty good story, and of course, we are working hard to extend life of mine at Black Fox.
Bhakti Pavani Perfect. Thank you. Just a follow-up. So if I have to model production for the Black Fox going forward, would it be fair to say that the production would remain consistent at the 2018 levels going into 2019? But – and should I model an increase in production from 2020, assuming that Froome will come online, is it fair to say that?
Rob McEwen I would say 2019 you're safe. Froome, we're doing studies, the economics. We think we're going to be right now preparing a portal to go in. But I'd like to be a little more confident that we've driven over there and are ready for production before saying in 2020, we'll have Froome added to our production. But we'll know in the first half of this year – next year about Froome.
Bhakti Pavani Got it. Okay, perfect. Switching to El Gallo, I know third quarter was a quite a surprise when it comes to production numbers. So – and the production is expected to taper off in fourth quarter, but just kind of wondering between now and when Fenix comes online, do you think the residual leaching activities would help you sustain during the time until Fenix comes online. And at this point what is the expected time line for Project Fenix?
Chris Stewart Yes. Also the residual leaching will certainly help us maintain our operations and continue to do work on on-site. We have incurred manpower, layoffs as such given that the mining work has stopped, and as again, we're just residual leaching out, but we're moving full steam ahead on the feasibility study. And again, it's planed to be completed mid-next year. And then depending upon the outcome of that, a decision would be made to move that into construction. So we started a bunch of work to do around that to sort of make that decision. But certainly based on – if you run through the PGA numbers right now, its current material prices, it doesn't look like it's still quite attractive. But as you know when you get to the feasibility level, you're digging a bit further into the costs and becoming a lot more accurate around that. So, we'll have to see what the results are but if it is positive, which we expect it will be, we'd move into production and you probably got a year's worth of work to get that up and running. And during that time we’ll still be residual leaching, we expect the leaching, the residual leaching to last another sort of another three to four years. And phase one is actually reprocessing all that material on the leach pad running that through a CIL mill to reprocess that. So, we pick up whatever gold we haven't in residually leaching by doing that.
Bhakti Pavani And lastly just to get a hand on the exploration expense across all your properties, what's kind of the expected exploration spend that we should be modeling in fourth quarter?
Chris Stewart In the fourth quarter of this year Bhakti. We're spending about 1.2 million in Nevada, and we're spending just under a million dollars at Black Fox. So the fourth quarter is a bit lighter than the first three quarters of this year. Black Fox was the significant program from the flow through funds, which we completed before the end of September. So it's we're down to one surface rig right now at Black Fox and Gold Bar we're getting some work done but we'll see an increase in activity next year for Gold Bar and the Black Fox Project and the Timmins region will still see a sizable investment, but it won't be the same as what we invested this year.
Bhakti Pavani And lastly Los Azules?
Chris Stewart Los Azules for this year. So, the season is just kicking off, we're waiting to get – we’re waiting for the snow melt to co-operate to get site access, so we can continue on gathering data for our permit application. So we have about 2.5 million budgeted for this quarter but that's going to be dependent on the access and how quickly we get there to spend the funds but we're looking at about votes for that the 2018, 2019 season, we're looking at between $7 million to $9 million depending on the work we can get done on the road access.
Rob McEwen I just wanted to build on Alan Steven's comment about management compensation and the Paulson Fund Management Company a year ago delivered a blistering attack on the mining industry and focusing in on performance and compensation. We just built on that. But the 15 largest Gold producers in the industry, the CEO compensation between 2010 and 2017 are over those seven years. The total of the 15 amounted to $695 million, which is outrageous, given the performance they had. Of the 15, 13 of them delivered performance that range from – their shares down 21% to 94%. In that same period, we were down 2% and I received over that seven years $3 in pay. I do think the industry has to realign its compensation to reflect the performance and deliver more to the share owners. Before share owners are only too happy to share it when it's going up and improving that. I think compensation is one of those big hot topics in the industry and that goes along with share ownership. Most of the people who got those large compensation packages had very little ownership in their company.
Robert Silvera, R.E. Silvera Associates Hi, Rob thanks for taking the call. We've been shareholders for before your name was changed, long time and our perspective has always been long-term. Gold is your principal with silver et cetera. It's getting harder and harder to find a significant sources so to speak locations for gold especially and silver. What is your strategy for long-term. Because we’re – we tend to be very long-term holders want to stay with the company stay solid. Love your management, love your approach et cetera. Your history, and that's why I have stayed with you so many years. But it's getting harder and harder to find gold, harder and harder to find these deposits. Do you have any vision for going into – because we know mining, things like the platinum groups, and/or lithium for instance, which has a future in batteries et cetera to branch out into those areas, so that we have a very long-term future for the company.
Rob McEwen Robert I moved or jumped from the investment industry into the mining industry many years ago, and it was a belief that I saw a number of prospectors that showed me property packages and they showed me that – they kept discovering new deposits. My own history with Goldcorp, we’ve took a mine that had been starved with capital for 15 years, was high, it had a short life, or thought to have a short life of three years, had it difficult labor and at the bottom a mile below the surface we found what became one of the richest gold mines in the world. It defied a lot of the geological thinking at that time. There are deposits still being found and I think maybe they're not on surfaces easily found as they were before. Some are found right in the shadow of the head frame of an existing mine. And there are other new settings so. I do believe you're going to see more Barrick Gold would be a case although that was 25, 30 years ago. They bought right between Homestake and Newmont in the Carlin Trend for $60 million bought something that ultimately produced 40 million ounces of gold. They're still finding deposits just north of our Gold Bar. Deposits up at Cortez Hills, recently Barrick announced a big discovery, a four mile discovery and it was right near Cortez Hills. So – and they're picking them up in Africa, the Fosterville in Australia was a very difficult mine and they've encountered some high grade at depth. We haven't gone – we have gone deep in South Africa much deeper than anywhere else in the world with their gold mines about down a kilometer and a half two kilometers that you're down in Timmins, you're in Red Lake, Curtin Lake. Our mines, I think our properties could yield additional discoveries just at depths and we have some good real estate. If you were to take a look at our copper project and if you were to take the liberty of taking our Inferred resources both categories of resources, which you're not supposed to do but that would be about 30 billion pounds of copper, if you put that in to a gold equivalent it's more than 70 million gold equivalent ounces based on our PEA $1.14 a pound production cost that be equivalent to about $500 an ounce production costs and its modeled to have a 36 year life.
Robert Silvera So, you do see a long-term horizon as far as being able to successfully mine gold and silver. And not what I read so many times that – these are being so hard to find. By the way I've owned Goldcorp also since the days you were there at Goldcorp. So I mean I've been with you for a long, long time and when you left Gold Corp and formed McEwen, I have stayed with you and very pleased with what you've done. But I wonder are you willing to look and branch out to for instance the platinum groups because we need platinum and we need palladium catalysts all that stuff.
Rob McEwen Yes well part of my thrust has been gold and gold is money and it's a monetary asset not an industrial asset as much but when I was running Gold Corp we did have some industrial mineral operations that provided steady long-term cash flow and I'm not adverse to that type of investment
Robert Silvera Good and I am just trying to get a perspective because as I said we're very long-term holders and I believe in the management pretty strong.
Rob McEwen Thank you very much, appreciate that Robert.
Robert Silvera Thank you. And hopefully the price of gold will get real one of these days. We'll talk to you later.
Rob McEwen Robert, if you have a moment Sylvain would just – he is our Head of Exploration, just wanted to make a comment.
Robert Silvera Sure, sure go ahead.
Sylvain Guerard Yeah thank you Robert. It's actually a very good question you're asking there. I'd like to add a bit of our view on the exploration potential, how can we increase our chances or probability to be successful with our exploration program. One of the key point is that we try to focus our exploration effort in the right regions on the right projects. But in the right region. And we are currently investing and focusing exploration in the highland regions. I'm talking here of the regions that old hundreds of million ounces of gold. They are not small regions, they are in small deposits and those deposits, those $100 million ounces of gold sit along very well defined structure and you have to be those are the breaks that the [indiscernible] Black Fox is located. In Nevada the trends that the small all the large Carland gold system including the Barrick Newmont deposit. So, this is where we are and this is where we believe we have a lot better chance to be successful. And this is where discovery keep happening until now. Even if those came sometime 100 years of mining and exploration there are still new discoveries happening. So maturity much is still relatively low because success keep happening there. So we have a strategic position, if we look at the local scale and Rob mentioned that and as you probably know, Gold Bar is located right along the Cortez trend, right along the southeast of the Barrick large cluster of deposit. And we have the right geology, the same geology, the same type of mineralization, the same type of deposit. And the other important things about Timmins, Black Fox and Gold Bar, we are just starting a year ago exploration on those properties. So we are quite Primero in Q4 of 2017 and for Gold Bar the project was inactive for five years and we are just restarted again in Q4 of last year. So it’s a year of exploration and what we have generated as new resources, new exploration, drill intersections and development of new targets is extremely positive and give us all the confidence that we are at the right places to keep delivering good results there. And finally those good regions are Ontario and Nevada are some of the best mining jurisdiction in the world when it comes to investment and stability and very low political risk and security risk. So all this to say that we tried to focus our effort where there’s a lot of gold or there’s a large deposit on the right property along the right structure at all scales and based on what we see with good encouragement, we keep advancing with strategic and exploration investment.
Robert Silvera Good. What do you – from a geological standpoint since you brought that up, and I do love the fact that you’re in relatively stable places, how do you view Argentina and where we are as far as future goes, they keep throwing taxes around in their monetary situation, et cetera. How do you view that area?
Rob McEwen It’s a good question. It doesn’t have a long history of mining. But it does have a long history of populous governments, both to the relation. And so we’re watching it. They said that the tax they have reimposed on exports will be there until 2020. And I think right now they’re desperate for an exchange and the exports seem to be the only additional source they could access. But if they want to attract any foreign – large foreign investments, they’re going to have to deal with that. So I would expect by the time we start thinking about developing Los Azules will be okay. It does have an adverse impact on our San José revenue.
Robert Silvera Do you find when working with the people down there, a cooperative spirit in Argentina?
Rob McEwen Generally, yes.
Robert Silvera Good. Okay. Well, thanks very much, Rob. I really appreciate it and congratulations and thank you for the way, you run the company. I’m very, very pleased within. Thank you.
Rob McEwen Thank you very much. Rob and appreciate the comment.
Bill Powers, a Private Investor Hello, Rob. Couple of quick questions. One, I guess, what is your projected cash flow? I know -- I believe it’s all once for Gold Bar in the first year, it was projected at around $35 million and I was wondering if that is still holding through as far as where you’re seeing next year unfolding?
Chris Stewart Hi Bill, the cash flows as we’ve revised the mine plans, particularly recently we were seeing kind of cash flows tapering off in 2021 and 2022, the guys have been going back to look at those cash flows for Gold Bar. And effect we’ve been trying to smooth out, we get some stable performance there. So next year, some of that has come out of next year. We are looking at over $20 million in terms of cash flow for the mine site next year, assuming 1250 gold. And then effectively seeing so comparable similar levels for the following four years after that. It’s not as high as new in the feasibility study, but the feasibility study was significantly had a bit of gap in 2022 in particular, which we’ve been looking to address with revised mine plans as well as minimizing the upfront OpEx that we planned to incurred us to get going on the mine too.
Bill Powers Okay. And then I just have one more question regarding slightly you guys have out on your website regarding its – the sulfide mineralization that’s from the Cabin Creek area. You guys have a couple of nice picture or a nice picture of some core samples from Cabin Creek area. I guess, this goes back to your a little next to your drilling, what you plan to due into the deeper sulfide next year. Could you just tell me little bit about where this came from and kind of – I guess, is this historic drilling that you were able to core sample you’re able to achieve, receive from previous drilling or – and I guess, how is this connected to what you’re planning to do going forward?
Sylvain Guerard Yes, Sylvain here. That’s a good question. And as you know, what we have at the Gold Bar, it’s a heap leach upside open pit, but we know that there is a component of this system that will be hosted in the sulfide. And historically some exploration hurdles like the one that you see there on the photo, this is typical calling type system into sulfide and its high grade. So for us, it’s a very good indication that this mineralization exists at Gold Bar. And this one is to later all to Cabin Creek and historical drill core that you’re seeing there. But we work with former Barrick geologists and actually our exploration manager in Nevada is a former Barrick geologists, that work at gold strike. And when those people look at this core, they all ask this is exactly what we see at Cortez. This is what we other large calling gold system. So what we have there at Gold Bar is the -- it’s a longer trend and the project or the priority scale has all the right ingredients for hosting a larger and hopefully higher grade sulfide deposit. And all the path exploration stopped at the limit of the pit depth or when they start to hit sulfides but we know that mineralization is open into sulfides along the right statographic horizon. And then, we are also developing the deeper target, which stem beneath a unit called the mountain and this lower statography that could host this type of larger sulfide deposits like the other large one in large Nevada remain basically untested on our Gold Gar property. And next year we are planning to seismic geophysical surveys and are defining targets to start drilling for such deep deposits. So we have the near mine, extension of non-mineralization and that is a bit more shallow exploration. And part of that we want to initiate the deeper score and we believe we as said we have all the right visions to grow this Gold Bar deposit.
Rob McEwen Thank you very much one and all for joining us today. Best wishes for a successful investing.
Gold is important to me because...click here
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 6, 2019 5:02:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jan 12, 2019 9:09:07 GMT -5
"It was a showdown among titans. Once again, this year’s vote for Kitco Mining CEO of the year was a close-fought race, but for the third year in a row, Rob McEwen of McEwen Mining (NYSE: MUX TSE: MUX) took the crown. In what was a frustrating year for mining investors – many of the criticisms that often surface are that while stock performance may be down, it has not stopped executive boards and CEOs from walking out with a huge paycheck. And year after year, investors take their hats off to McEwen who stands by his $3 annual salary. In a November interview with Kitco News, McEwen said his advice to other CEOs was “reduce your pay.” “In the last seven years, the CEOs of the 15 largest companies in the industry paid themselves just under $700 million,” McEwen said. “Pay yourself less and get your stock performing better and buy shares in your company,” he heeded. And when it came time to ask our Kitco viewers the reasons for their nominations, this message was loud and clear:
“McEwen, keeps the company afloat with little to no debt and has skin in the game,” said one voter. “He has a natural talent for finding good mines and putting them into production for less money than competitors.” “He takes little salary and acts in the best interest of the shareholders of which he is one.” “He puts his money where his mouth is, and continues to expand the company through tough times while keeping investors frequently and fully informed of the progress and challenges. “[McEwen] believes in his company. Puts his money where his mouth is. [He] Does not take compensation. Every other mining CEO is getting rich at the expense of the shareholders...” Rob McEwen, Mark Bristow and Keith Neumeyer Lead Pack for CEO of 2018
Gold is important to me because...click here
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 12, 2019 5:18:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 20, 2019 12:47:37 GMT -5
McEwen Mining Reports 2018 Full Year and Q4 Results February 21, 2019 TORONTO, Feb. 21, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) today reported fourth quarter and full year results for the period ended December 31, 2018. For the year, McEwen Mining achieved record production of 175,640 gold equivalent ounces(1) (“GEOs”), at cash costs of $817(2) per GEO and all-in sustaining costs (“AISC”) of $1,002 per GEO. Our 2019 production guidance is 210,000 GEOs, a 20% increase over 2018 production, at average cash costs and AISC per GEO of $877 and $1,034, respectively. During 2018, we invested heavily in areas that we believe will enhance our future growth and profitability. We invested $35 million in exploration, $66 million in construction at the Gold Bar Mine in Nevada, and $10 million to advance our Fenix and Los Azules projects. As a result we are reporting a consolidated net loss for 2018 of $45 million, or $0.13 per share.
At December 31, 2018 we had cash and liquid assets of $38 million, including cash and restricted cash of $31 million. In August 2018 we raised $50 million in debt to fund construction of the Gold Bar Mine. We decided to debt finance a portion of the required capital rather than issuing equity because we strongly believed that higher gold and silver prices were close at hand, and that our share price should improve as a result.
The table here provides production and cost results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2018, comparative results from last year, and production and cost guidance for 2019.
The table here provides financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2018, and comparative results from last year.
Gold Bar Mine, Nevada, USA (100%) Construction of the Gold Bar Mine started in November 2017 and by year-end 2018 we had invested $72 million, approximately 89% of the total construction budget of $81 million, the balance of which will be spent in Q1 2019. In 2018, our exploration expenditures of $5 million resulted in an increase in our gold reserves of 8%, which extended the Mine’s estimated life to 7.4 years from 6.3 years. It is expected that a portion of the resources at Gold Bar South will be converted to reserves once the permits for development are in place, which would further extend the Mine’s life. See Tables 1.1 to 1.3 for updated mineral resource and reserve estimates. Our 2019 exploration budget on the Gold Bar property is $5 million. Exploration drilling will target both near surface and deep Carlin-type mineralization. Gold Bar 2019 production guidance is 55,000 gold ounces at cash costs and AISC per GEO of $930 and $975, respectively. The first gold ingot weighing 390 ounces was poured at the Mine on February 16, 2019. Heavy snowfall at Gold Bar and being understaffed have recently impacted our operating activities, particularly delaying the ramp-up of the crushing plant, as a consequence we expect to achieve commercial production during Q2 2019.
Gold Bar Feasibility Study (2018) Our 2019 cash costs guidance of $930 per GEO at Gold Bar is approximately 6% higher than that projected for the first year of operations in our feasibility study. This is primarily due to an increase in the amount of waste stripping. A revised mining schedule has been designed to better position the mine for its second year of production in 2020, which is estimated to have 20% lower cash costs and 35% higher gold production.
Black Fox Mine, Canada (100%) Production in 2018 was 48,928 GEOs, in-line with our production guidance of 48,000 GEOs. For 2018, total cash costs and AISC per GEO were $845 and $1,137, respectively. Black Fox 2019 production guidance is 50,000 gold ounces at cash costs and AISC per GEO of $905 and $1,080, respectively. The Black Fox mine is undergoing significant changes in management, workforce and mining practices, with the objective of improving the overall economic performance of the mine in 2019-2020. So far in 2019 the mine has faced some challenges reaching targeted productivity levels, although we believe these issues are temporary and should not impact our planned output in 2019. In 2018, we spent $21 million on exploration at the Black Fox Complex. Our 2019 exploration budget is $17 million. The mineral resource and reserve estimates for the Black Fox Mine have been updated (Tables 2.1 and 2.2) to reflect mine depletion, additions from exploration, and the deletion of certain resource blocks that are deemed inaccessible due to prior mining activity. Resources and reserves decreased by 19% and 21%, respectively. The mineral resource for the Stock East exploration project was updated and increased by 32% (Table 2.3). Resource estimates for other deposits at the Black Fox Complex including Froome, Grey Fox and Tamarack are unchanged.
San José Mine, Argentina (49%) Our attributable production from San José in 2018 was 47,331 gold ounces and 3,020,696 silver ounces, for a total of 87,607 GEOs. Compared to 2017, gold and silver production were down 4%, primarily due to lower average mined grades of gold and silver. For 2018, total cash costs and ASIC per GEO were $851 and $1,061, respectively. During 2018, we received $10 million in dividends from our interest in San José. For 2019, we expect to receive $7-10 million in dividends, with the final amount being determined by the profitability, treasury position, and decisions on capital and exploration investments. In 2018, $6 million was invested in exploration at San José, and the 2019 exploration budget is $5 million (100% basis). San José 2019 production guidance is 49,000 gold ounces and 3,225,000 silver ounces, for a total of 92,000 GEOs attributable to us, at cash costs and AISC per GEO of $830 and $1,060, respectively. The mineral resource and reserve estimates for the San José Mine have been updated (Tables 3.1 and 3.2) to reflect mine depletion and additions from exploration. Resources increased by 11% and reserves decreased by 10%.
El Gallo Project, Mexico (100%) Production in 2018 was 39,105 GEOs. For 2018, total cash costs and AISC per GEO were $733 and $771, respectively. Mining activity ceased at El Gallo by the end of Q2 2018. El Gallo 2019 production guidance is 13,000 gold ounces at cash costs and AISC per GEO of $875 and $915, respectively. These ounces are derived from residual heap leaching activities that are ongoing and will continue for several years.
Fenix Project In 2018, we invested $4 million to advance the development of the Fenix Project. Activities included metallurgical studies, permit applications, and the preparation of a feasibility study. The Fenix Project’s PEA is available for review on our website and SEDAR ww.sedar.com Potential Sale Our focus is on delivering near-term production growth from our projects in the United States and Canada, and on advancing Los Azules. As part of our capital allocation strategy we will be exploring the potential sale of our Mexican assets. We anticipate that half of the net proceeds from the potential sale would be used to advance the development of projects with the greatest potential to significantly improve our share value, and the balance would be used to retire a portion of our debt.
Los Azules Project, Argentina (100%) We spent $6 million at Los Azules during 2018. The activities performed were mainly technical site investigations and environmental base line monitoring work, to advance permitting efforts. We are currently investigating a new access route to the project that, if developed into a road, could provide year-round access to Los Azules, greatly accelerating the potential development of the project and reducing operating costs. Our 2019 exploration budget for Los Azules is $3 million.
Distribution During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company paid two semi-annual distributions on February 14 and September 4, totaling $0.01 per share of common stock, for total distributions of $3.4 million. The next semi-annual distribution of a ½ cent per share will be paid on March 15, 2019, to shareholders of record on March 8, 2019.
Resource and Reserve Updates Mineral resources and reserves have been updated for the Gold Bar Mine and Gold Bar South (Nevada), Black Fox Mine and Stock Project (Ontario), and San José Mine (Argentina). Resources for other deposits in our portfolio are unchanged from the previous estimates. For a summary of all the McEwen Mining’s resources and reserves refer to the tables on our website.
***FORM 10-K For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
McEWEN MINING Operations Sites
MCEWEN MINING Q4 AND YEAR-END 2018 RESULTS CONFERENCE CALL
TORONTO, Feb. 19, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) invites you to join our conference call following the release of our Q4 and full year 2018 financial results on Thursday, February 21st, 2019 at 11:00 am EST. Questions can be asked directly by participants over the telephone or can be emailed in advance to info@mcewenmining.com Thursday, February 21st at 11am EST Toll Free US & Canada: 1 (844) 630-9911 Outside US & Canada: 1 (210) 229-8828 Conference ID Number: 3366294 Webcast Link: edge.media-server.com/m6/p/yb78r4sn
An archived replay of the webcast will be available for one week after it takes place. Access the replay using the link edge.media-server.com/m6/p/yb78r4sn or calling (855) 859-2056 (North America) / (404) 537-3406 (International), Conference ID Number 3366294.
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING McEwen has the goal to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index by creating a profitable gold and silver producer focused in the Americas. McEwen's principal assets consist of: the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina (49% interest); the Black Fox mine in Timmins, Canada; the Fenix Project in Mexico; the Gold Bar mine in Nevada; and the large Los Azules copper project in Argentina, advancing towards development. McEwen has approximately 345 million shares outstanding. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, owns 23% of the shares.
Gold is important to me because...click here
"Since the world left the gold standard, all governments have spent money they didn’t have and made commitments they can’t complete in order to get the mob to vote for them. Meanwhile the middle class is being destroyed as the 99% see their taxes increase just as their salaries decline. It will end poorly." -Bob Moriarty
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Feb 22, 2019 4:03:51 GMT -5
MUX: McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) CEO Robert McEwen on Q4 2018 Results
Robert McEwen - Executive Chairman and Chief Owner Chris Stewart - President and Chief Operating Officer Sylvain Guerard - Senior Vice President, Exploration Andrew Elinesky - Chief Financial Officer
Jake Sekelsky - Roth Capital Partners Heiko Ihle - H.C. Wainright & Co Michael Kozak - Cantor Fitzgerald Canada Corporation Bhakti Pavani - Alliance Global Partners Bill Powers - Private Investor
Robert McEwen Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome fellow shareowners. 2018 was a milestone year for McEwen Mining. And with me today to tell you about last year and provide guidance for this year are: Chris Stewart, President and Chief Operating Officer; Sylvain Guerard, Senior Vice President - Exploration; and Andrew Elinesky, Chief Financial Officer. The 2018 milestones were numerous. Record production growth, we produced a record 175,640 ounces of gold equivalent, which was a 15% improvement over 2017. In addition, we generated $51 million in earnings from operations. There was an emphasis on exploration. We had our largest exploration budget ever, a total of $35 million that resulted in mine life extension in Nevada at our Gold Bar Mine, and in Timmins it generated much enthusiasm with numerous new targets and increased resources on our Black Fox properties. We built a new mine. Just before the start of 2018, we received government permits to construct and operate our new Gold Bar Mine and work began immediately. By the end of 2018, we had spent $72 million or 89% of budget. Speaking of budget, we are pleased to say we are on budget. We reported our first gold ingot just last week. However, we are behind on achieving commercial production. Chris will talk to that as he follows me. We did financings, and we were active in the second half of the year. In August, we decided to complete the funding of Gold Bar with debt rather than equity. We raised $50 million. This is the first time we have ever had debt. Then later in the year, we sold $15 million of equity at 27% premium to market to fund our second year of aggressive exploration on the Black Fox properties in Timmins. And then subsequent to that, we registered a facility, an at-the-market financing facility of an amount of $90 million. And that was to access low-cost financing should we need it. We have no immediate plans to sell this amount of equity. We're working on the turnaround. We purchased the Black Fox Complex for $35 million in late 2017. The previous owners had invested $560 million. So we bought it for $0.06 on the dollar. With that purchase, we got a permitted 2,400 tonne per day mill, an operating goldmine and an excellent land package in a very prolific area, the Destor-Porcupine Fault near Timmins, a gold system that has historically produced over 85 million ounces of gold. Now, when you buy something for $0.06 on the dollar, you have to anticipate it's going to come with some challenges. And they did, and we're making changes at the operation, everything is being reviewed and questioned. There is a new management team in place. And we are confident that 2019 will be a transformational year for this operation. There has also been a lack of - there was a lack of expenditure on exploration in the past and since purchasing Black Fox in October of 2017, we have invested more than $21 million in exploration and we have committed a further $17 million for exploration this year. We believe there is a lot more gold here and Sylvain will discuss this later in the call. We've been extending the life of our operations. Particularly, in Mexico a feasibility study is underway for our Project Fenix. It's expected to be completed by midyear. This project is expected to add 12 years of mine-life to the operations in Mexico. And it has very robust economics as determined by the PEA that was developed in the middle of last year. We have made a decision however to investigate the sale of these assets as we would like to focus our efforts on Nevada, Ontario and our Los Azules property in Argentina to maximize the potential of these properties in the short term. A sale of Mexico would allow us to reduce our debt and invest the additional cash in the development of additional resources at the areas I mentioned. Lastly, we've been looking with our exploration for areas where we could increase our revenues by avoiding developing properties with historic metal streams and royalties.
Chris Stewart 2018 production represents a 15% increase in our 2017 results. Consolidated production from our operations for 2018 totaled 175,600 gold equivalent ounces, which I'll refer to as GEOs going forward, consisting of 48,900 GEOs from Black Fox in Canada, 39,100 GEOs from El Gallo in Mexico and 87,600 GEOs from our 49% interest in the San José mine in Argentina. Our new Gold Bar Mine in Nevada in the USA is located on the prolific Battle Mountain Cortez Trend. Construction of the open heap-leach pad operation commenced in November 2017 and has culminated with our first gold pour on February 16. The mine and processing operations are in the final commissioning stage. And the project is coming in on budget. Cumulative to date, we have capitalized $72 million to construction in progress, tracking our on our original capital cost estimate of $81 million. Commissioning efforts have been hampered by a significant snowfall during the past couple of months. And with such a competitive labor market in Nevada, we have struggled to reach our full complement of manpower. We are taking steps to address the manpower issue by hiring temporary workers from our local labor provider as well as getting their assistance to find and hire the remaining personnel we require. As a result of these challenges, we are now anticipating commercial production to be declared during Q2. Construction activities at Gold Bar during 2018 focused on completing the heap leach pad, the crushing and conveying system, and substantial completion of the gold processing plant and refinery circuit. Site buildings and infrastructure are complete and occupied. Mining, crushing, loading of the heap leach pad, the processing plant are all active. Remaining construction items include the onsite laboratory installation and miscellaneous electrical and instrumentation work in both the goal process plant and refinery building. To date, 240,000 tonnes of mineralized material at gold grade of point 0.6 grams per ton have been placed on the leach pad. Leaching was initiated in mid-January, and whilst still early in the process, preliminary results are indicating that our gold recovery model is consistent with our expectations. Our main asset in Canada is the Black Fox Complex, which includes a fully operational Black Fox gold mine as well as the Grey Fox, Tamarack and Froome advanced stage exploration projects. We also have the Stock property, which is where our mill facility is located along with our new Stock East Deposit, which Sylvain will discuss further in his exploration overview. At the Black Fox mine, our 2018 production of 48,900 GEOs exceeded our production guidance of 48,000. The average grade of the mineralized material mined during the year was 5.98 grams per tonne. Our $845 cash cost and $1,137 all-in sustaining cost realized in 2018 are down from the cost incurred in Q4 of 2017 and in line with our guidance from 2018. For 2019, we plan to produce 50,000 GEOs from Black Fox at $905 cash cost and a $1,080 all-in sustaining cost. The increase in our cash cost is related to the remnant mining that we will be doing this year in the upper part of the mine which requires rework to access the stopes that were left behind. The decrease in all-in sustaining cost as a result of reduced capital development required to access the gold ounces to be produced in 2019. The Black Fox mine is undergoing significant changes in how we manage and operate the business with the objective of improving the overall economic performance of the mine as we move into the second half of 2019 and into 2020. So far in 2019 the mine has faced some challenges, reaching targeted productivity levels, these issues appear temporary and should not impact their planned output in 2019. In 2019, we will also continue to closely evaluate our options for bringing on additional production from one of our satellite deposits at Grey Fox, Froome or Tamarack. The most interesting deposit for us at the Black Fox Complex is in fact Grey Fox. When you look at Grey Fox, combined with the recent exploration success in the immediate area around it, which Sylvain will discuss shortly, Grey Fox is very attractive to us, because it would allow us to maximize revenue from our gold production, because this property is not subject to any streaming agreements. In Mexico, at El Gallo Gold, by the end of May 2018 mining and crushing activities at the mine had ceased. And the final mined ore was stocked on the heap leach and residual leaching activities have been continuing ever since. Residual leaching tapered towards the end of 2018 getting more in line with our longer term recovery expectations. Production for the full year of 2018 was 39,100 GEOs, which exceeded our 2018 production guidance of 32,000 by 22%. The average grade of the ore stocked on the leach pad during 2018 was 1.5 grams per ton. Due to decreased activities, following the cessation of mining and crushing operations at El Gallo, 2018 realized costs were down from 2017 to $733 cash cost and an all-in sustaining cost of $771. Residual heap leaching activities are ongoing and will continue for several years. For 2019, we anticipate producing 13,000 GEOs from El Gallo at a cash-cost of $875 and all-in sustaining cost of $915. We are seeing an increase in our cost per ounce for a couple of reasons. First, our costs for cyanide has increased by 40% in 2019, and with increased consumption at the same time to improve our goal leaching from the heap. In addition, in order to continue residual heap leaching activities you still need to keep a full complement of people to operate the leaching and processing facilities. So some of the increase in cost is directly related to having a lower denominator in the cost per ounce calculation. Activities in Mexico at El Gallo complex include ongoing work on the Fenix Project, which was announced through our Preliminary Economic Assessment Study published in July of 2018. Using a base case of $1,250 per ounce of gold and $16 per ounce of silver, Fenix demonstrated strong economics with a net present value of $60 million and an after tax internal rate of return of 28%. So during 2018, we spent $4 million on activities required to advance the Fenix Project, which include reviewing of mineral processing, mine sequencing, material transportations, tailing storage options and flow sheet optimization. We are evaluating the potential construction of a new mine and mill at El Gallo, and expect that during the first half of 2019, we will complete a final feasibility study. And we will receive regulatory approval for permit amendment to allow for in-pit tailing storage, a key feature for the implementation of the Fenix Project. In-pit tailings disposal is a preferred method for tailings disposal in Australia and has been used successfully there for many years now. In-pit tailings eliminates the risk of dam failure, as we no longer need to construct the dam above surface. There's also a significant capital cost savings to the operations. The environmental reclamation work is an added benefit, as you're filling in an old open pit, which allows you to bring the area back to its natural state, one very close to what it would have been before mining activities ever took place. The Fenix project is expected to add another 12 years of mine life to our Mexican operations. In Argentina, at the San José Mine, our attributable production in 2018 according to our 49% interest was 47,300 ounces of gold and 3 million ounces of silver for a total of 87,600 gold equivalent ounces. This is 4% below our guidance. The decrease in GEOs produced was a result of a decreased average grade of the ore processed by 8% for gold and 9% for silver, partly offset by a 4% increase in the tonnes of ore processed in 2018 when compared to 2017. Our cost of San José in 2018 were $851 cash cost and $1,061 all-in sustaining cost, in line with our guidance. For 2019, we plan to produce at San José 49,000 ounces of gold and 3.2 million ounces of silver, totaling 92,000 gold equivalent ounces at a cash cost of $830 and an all-in sustaining cost of $1,060. Also in Argentina, at our mammoth Los Azules property, we spent $6 million during 2018 to advance this project. The activities performed are mainly technical site investigations and environmental baseline monitoring work, to advance permitting efforts. Currently, we are investigating the possibility of establishing the Northern Route, a new all-year access road. We're working on the permit approval and continuing the engineering, planning and budgeting for that, hence pioneering this road access as soon as possible. This access once completed will allow us to do work around [Technical Difficulty] lower operating costs and to accelerate the timelines of the Los Azules. In conclusion, 2018 was a year in which we delivered significant production and focus on the future growth of our company. And we anticipate 2019 will continue this trend. We are pleased to announce that our 2019 production guidance is 210,000 gold equivalent ounces, a 20% increase over our 2018 production. Cash cost of $877 and an all-in sustaining cost of $1,034.
Sylvain Guerard During 2018, we focused our exploration efforts on Gold Bar, in Nevada, and on the Black Fox and Stock properties in the Timmins region. We invested a total of US$26.6 million at these properties, completed over 140,000 meter of exploration drilling, and added a total of 473,000 new gold equivalent resource ounces. We also generated multiple new targets that will aggressively follow up in 2019. We are very pleased with the progress made and results generated in 2018. We remain committed to continuing exploration on our Gold Bar, Stock and Black Fox properties, and are planning to invest over US$20 million in 2019, to build on last year's exploration success. We increase our resources, extended the mine life at Gold Bar, and generated new exploration target for our properties, which are located along prolific trends in some of the best gold districts in the word. We are also planning to continue our exploration efforts at the San José site in Argentina, where our partner Hochschild has a long-term track record of adding new high grade gold and silver resources, and reserves to the operation. Starting with Gold Bar, following the reactivation of exploration in late 2017, we have invested $5.2 million in exploration in 2018. And our initial approach was to drill the extensions of mineralization near the open pit. This led to an increase of 92,000 ounces of measured or indicated, and 82,000 ounces of inferred resources, adding a total of 174,000 ounces of gold in 2018, which contributed to the extension to our mine life up to 7.4 years, just as we are starting projects here. We are also going to add to our mine life on the Gold Bar South deposit, which currently owes an indicated resource of 100,000 ounce of gold. Additional drilling would be performed at Gold Bar South in 2019 to upgrade the resource to reserve. During 2018, we completed some drilling outside the Cabin Creek deposit and also at the ML target, with encouraging drilling result [is to find] [ph] follow up in 2019. We kept developing the geological and structural understanding of the Gold Bar property through drilling activity, completion of new survey, reprocessing and interpretation of all data and also from working session with McEwen geologists and external consultant specialized in calling gold deposit. Multiple prospective new drill targets have been defined. First, as extension of existing recession near the mine and also at deeper and potentially high grade target, like the large Barrick Gold deposit of similar type in geological setting, located 40 kilometer northwest of Gold Bar along the Cortez trend. We believe that we have all the right ingredient characteristic to some extent Carlin type gold mineral [indiscernible] and we are planning to invest around $5 million in exploration in 2019 and look forward testing our priority target. Moving now to Timmins, the south property turn out to be a greater presence in 2018. We invested $3.4 million and completed a 28,000 meter drill program that took the project from inactive exploration stage in early 2018 definition of initial resource at southeast in Q3 and future drilling led to an updated and fair and indicated resource of 150,000 ounces in late 2018. The deposit remain open in all directions with possibility for open pit and underground potential. The Southeast zone is located less than a kilometer from our mill, near road access and all infrastructure. In addition to southeast, we drill the depth extension of these so we call Stock mine that produce close to 140,000 ounces at 5.5 gram per tonne from 1989 to 2005. Our deeper hole at the top returned multiple positive intersection such as 506 gram over 3.3 meter and 7 gram per tonne over 3.8 meter, including up to 30 gram per tonne over 0.8 meter. These results suggest that the mineral system remain open below the historical mining depth of about 400 meter, which is relatively shallow for our team gold standard deposit. In 2019, we will continue drilling and extending the southeast resource, the Stock Mine depth extension and we'll also keep drilling the highly prospective mine trend over a three kilometers strike end to define new horseshoes. At the Black Fox property now. Drilling continued on the ground at the mine at surface with $18 million invested and over 97,000 meter exploration drilling completed. That led to a new indicated resource of 127,000 ounce of gold equivalent at the Tamarack deposit, an increase of resource at the Froome deposit to 181,000 ounce of gold and positive drill intersections generated at six new exploration target. From the 2018 drill intersection previously reported from new drill occurrences, the Gibson exploration target is considered as one of the most encouraging. In Q3, an intersection of 3.1 gram per tonne of gold over 34 meter, including 10.8 over six meter was returned from a new style of greater mineralization developed. The Gibson target is located in the southeast of the Black Fox property adjacent to the Grey Fox deposit where an indicated resource of 465,000 ounces at a grade of 6.6 gram per tonne is currently defined. At the Froome deposit now, we increased the indicated resource by 22,000 ounces and drilled the northwest extension of the deposit and the crater to be displayed by a fault. The right style of mineralization and the sedimentary awestruck were intersected, but the gold rate is so far around 1 gram to 2 gram per tonne, which is lower than the 5 gram per tonne Froome deposit. We also intersected multiple positive drill intersection over almost a kilometers strike line at the Froome Footwall fracture, located northeast of the Froome deposit. Future drilling has been planned in 2019 on the extensions of both the Froome deposit and Footwall fracture. A budget of $15 million U.S. is planned for 2019 to follow up on our high explorative target at the Black Fox and Stock property. Finally, at the Black Fox mine, our underground drilling program kept intersecting high grid mineralization at our existing resource and underground development. The geological model have drastically evolved throughout 2018 and early 2019 and the new site team is confident that our sustained drilling efforts could lead to an increase of resource and addition of new reserve in 2019. During 2018, 18,500 meter of underground exploration drilling was completed, the majority of which was devoted to two main programs. In the beginning of 2018, drilling focused to drill in here and grow the Tamarack gold and base metal deposit. After Q1, the drilling took place on the depth extension and over the upper portion of the Black Fox Mine. About 20,000 meter of underground exploration drilling is planned for 2019 with the objective to add new ounces for short-term mining including in the upper part of the mine. Main targets area include the 300 west target where high grade and visible gold up to 246 grams per tonne gold over 1.65 meter, which include 402 gram per tonne over meter intersected at shallow depth in late 2018, early 2019. Multiple exploration target in the western flank of the mine and the depth potential of the mine, main system below existing development.
Andrew Elinesky Thank you for joining us today, during a busy period of year in reporting. The fourth quarter completed a year of steady production and mine operating cost for us. In addition to meeting our consolidated guidance for production and cost per ounce, we are also on track to meet the construction budget of our newest mine in Nevada, Gold Bar. The full year as well as the quarter for 2018 was also a period where periods of additional significant capital investments and exploration in Timmins and in Nevada as well as the development of our Phoenix Project in Mexico. For the quarter, our operating performance was in line with our expectations. The significant net loss of $45 million or $0.13 per share was also in line with our expectations due to the development in exploration investments, combined with the unfortunate loss of profitability of the San Jose mine joint venture in Argentina. All of this was reflected in our balance sheet and treasury. As we saw, our cash balance decreased by $10 million in the quarter and $7 million overall for the year. The cash investments were offset by operating earnings as well as regarding our overall results and further to Chris's comments earlier. The company had consolidated production of just over 40,000 gold equivalent ounces for the quarter, which brought our year-to-date production to approximately 176,000 gold equivalent ounces. We exceeded our consolidated guidance for both production and cost per ounce. Our earnings for mining operations were $51 million or $0.15 per share, 4% higher than 2017. This was the net results of increased gross profit at El Gallo and Black Fox, offset by a 50% decrease in operating margin at San Jose. The increase in Mexico was due to an increase in the number of ounces sold and lower per ounce costs as a result of the switch to residual leaching in June. For Black Fox, we saw the effect of having a full year of mining earnings, as opposed to only a single quarter in 2017. As mentioned earlier, San Jose Southern earnings from operations fall from $24 million to $13 million for the year. This was due to overall lower sales volumes and reduced silver prices throughout the year. There was also the imposition of an export tax in September. And in addition, there was a one-time loss due to the bankruptcy of Republic Metals refinery with whom San Jose had a receivable balance of $4.5 million, which has been written off in full. The $51 million of earnings from operations were used to finance the significant investments being made at Gold Bar, the continued work in Los Azules and the significant exploration program at Black Fox and our other properties in the Timmins area. To summarize the full year financial results, the significant investments were partly offset by slightly increased operating profits, which resulted in the company reporting a net loss of $0.13 per share. Moving on to the outlook for 2019. Firstly with Mexico, we expect our cost to increase compared 2018 due to the decrease in ounces coming from residual leaching as well as having higher cost for consumables such as cyanide and other reagents. On the Black Fox, production should be in line with last year. Although, we have made significant efforts to reduce the cost base of sites and we are expecting a 5% reduction in our budgeted cost per ounce. We also continue with the evaluation of our project opportunities in the area and plan to continue with another large exploration program in the region due to the significant successes in 2018 as mentioned by Sylvain just now. To fund this exploration program, the company finalized a $15 million flow through equity offering in December. At San Jose, production level should increase slightly when compared to 2018, which is allowing the guidance for our per ounce cost to remain the same as 2018 despite a significant increase in exports costs and in addition to the inflationary outlook for Argentina. And finally at Gold Bar. The construction is on budget with approximately greater than 95% of construction activities completed and costs incurred as of the middle of February. We are in an excellent position to meet $81 million construction budget.
Robert McEwen As many of you know, our overarching goal is to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index. I had hoped we would have been closer to that goal by now, but we aren't for a number of reasons. However, the current market environment appears to be an excellent time to build. The prospect of significant property dispositions by nature as a result of recent megamergers. And industry in need of consolidation and the continued scarcity of capital for the sector make this a very good time to be looking and acquiring. To qualify for the S&P, we have to grow. How big and how, let me tell you. To be considered for the S&P, the biggest hurdle for us to clear is a minimum market capitalization of $6.2 billion So what would McEwen Mining have to look like to qualify. I believe if we could grow our annual production to 600,000 ounces. If we could produce our gold and silver at a cost in the bottom half of the industry cost curve. Have an average mine life of 9 years plus. Combined with a credible development pipeline to build annual production up to a million ounces, then we would have an excellent shot of being considered for inclusion in the S&P 500. However, this growth needs to be executed with close attention to building value per share and not just building for size, plus the downfall of the industry in the last cycle. This growth needs to be achieved without paying excessive premiums and experiencing large share dilution. As the chief owner of McEwen Mining, I have $160 million after tax dollars invested in our company. I own 23% of the shares and I take a dollar a year in salary. I can assure you that my prime objective is to build the size of our company, only if we build the value of every share of the company. During 2019 and this year we have continued to make management changes at head office and at the mine site. We are constantly looking for individuals who have strong skills, who are ready to challenge established practices and who are hungry and ambitious. On paper some people appear more attractive and effective than they turned out to be and change is required. Just going back to my previous job when I headed up Goldcorp, I went through multiple heads of operation before finding the right one. I feel Chris possesses not only the right skills, the right attitude coupled with the strong drive and ambition to be the right person for the role of president and chief operating officer. I just like to sort of go off to the side and share with you some of the things that might happen in the mining operations that is very hard to expect or anticipate. And this deals with Timmons and there are three people I think are going to be eligible for winning the Darwin Award. At the Black Fox Mine, we bring the ore to surface and we have hired a contractor to crush the ore on the mine site and then truck it to our mill. Several weeks ago, it was quite cold in Timmins maybe minus 40 degrees and the conveyors used in the crusher weren't holding the ore very well because they were so cold and these three individuals decided to get a very large blowtorch and focus it on the conveyor way. Well that was all well and good, until all three of them decided to go to lunch at the same time, and leave this blowtorch on the conveyor. Unfortunately, it caught fire and ignited a large part of the crusher and melted part of its frame and we've been without a crusher for about two and a half weeks. This stupidity, I cannot begin to describe and that's why I say these are things that are unanticipated. Fortunately, it wasn't our staff, it was the contractors, but I do believe they're Darwin Award candidate. So I'll skip from that and those are some challenges you meet in operation. In Timmins, we're expecting our explorations push and reveal new areas of future production on the Black Fox property that are free of expensive revenue destroying metal streams and royalties. In Argentina, we're working to establish a new access route to our massive Los Azules copper project. This access would - provide would be year round and would dramatically improve the development cost, operating costs and the ultimate value of this property to all of us. In Mexico, the Fenix project feasibility study is expected to be out by midyear. At current silver and gold prices, the Fenix PEA showed last year that this project has a very robust 28% after tax IRR and a better than 60 million NPB using a 5% discount rate with a mine life of 12 years. We recently decided to focus our attention on properties that had larger potential value - to the larger potential value drivers such as at our Black Fox, Gold Bar and Los Azules projects. And we are looking at selling our Mexican property to both reduce some of the $50 million debt we have, and to apply those funds to building the potential of these other properties. 2018 was a year where we strengthened and expanded our foundations, foundations that will allow us to drive hard towards our goal. We look forward to delivering our production and cost guidance along with valuable exploration results to you in 2019. I would now like the operator to bring the Q&A session to a start. Jake Sekelsky, Roth Capital Partners
Can you maybe just provide some additional color on the potential sale of the Mexican assets? I guess, just how far along are you in the process? And would it open the door to an additional acquisition or is it really just to reduce debt and focus on your existing assets for now?
Robert McEwen It's all of the above. The Board recently resolved to look at a sale of the asset. We were looking at - when we looked at the - or the PEA, it had an estimated value of over $60 million at $1,250 gold and $16 silver, $75 million value at $1,300 gold and $17 silver. So we looked at it and just thought, let's concentrate in the areas where we think we have the biggest potential for growth, and use some of those funds not only to retire a portion of the debt, but also to look at acquisitions.
Jake Sekelsky Okay. That makes sense. And switching over to Gold Bar, it looks like you're expecting some of the South resources to coming in the mine plan at some point, which will obviously help to extend the mine life. Are you looking at any other property in the area as additional sources of mill feed or are you really just going to be focused on exploration at the existing property?
Robert McEwen Two years ago, we bought what we call Gold Bar South, and we bought a little over 100,000 ounces. It's located - there's a road that connects it to where our mill is. It's about 5 miles in length. And our expectation that we would bring that into our mine plan as soon as we get permits. And it would add at a minimum 1 year. We have made acquisitions this past year, adding to our property package around Gold Bar. And we are on the lookout for opportunities within Nevada that would allow us to spread our management team over more properties there, just being more efficient.
Jake Sekelsky Okay, very good. That's all for me. I'll hop back in the queue. Thanks again.
Heiko Ihle, H.C. Wainright You mentioned you reported first gold ingot. Congratulations, I just want to say that. At Gold Bar, you mentioned delays were attributable to heavy snowfall, being understaffed. I mean have you had issues getting good labor or was this a labor force that was supposed to help with the ramp-up of the crushing plant? Or what exactly is the issue there? And on that same token, if it's hard to find good labor, are you currently forced to pay a little bit more than you previously planned to have a workforce that actually does what they're supposed to do?
Robert McEwen I'd say yes to both questions. It's a tight labor market. And in how we're dealing with it by hiring supplemental workforce, we'll be paying more for that labor. For our Gold Bar, we've come in under budget, so that's good. It's just where because of weather and labor shortages we're behind on loading the pad. And that's why we're looking at commercial production in the second quarter.
Heiko Ihle Right. Speaking of good workers and bad workers, I mean, I assume the three guys with the blowtorch that you were talking about earlier all this call are gone, correct?
Robert McEwen They weren't our employees. They were contractors' employees and most of them are gone. We don't want them in the site and we're looking for ways to get rid of that crusher too.
Heiko Ihle Perfect. And you have no way to get the contractor to pay for the economic damages that his employees' caused, do you?
Robert McEwen The thought is he's going to crush a lot faster and a lot more and we'll make up. But he had a 6 or a 7 day interruption clause in his contract. We are going to extract something from him. We'll probably put that blowtorch on the sign orders.
Andrew Elinesky But to answer your question on cost cycle - sorry, this is Andrew - there are no additional costs to us. It's just the delay. But as you know about Black Fox, having the extra capacity in the mill and running a week on and week off, we're not anticipating an impact to the annual production for the year, because we can - once we can get the material crushed, we'll get it to the plant and we'll run that plant consistently for a few weeks as opposed to shutting down off and on. So that's why we're not expecting any impact to our production for the year, as well as our costs.
Robert McEwen I should add that first quarter could be weaker than we hoped for. But we are seeing a higher grade coming out of the mine, which will compensate for it…
Heiko Ihle I'm sorry, did you just say the first quarter is going to be weaker than you hoped for?
Robert McEwen Yes.
Heiko Ihle Okay, perfect, very good. Thank you, guys.
Mike Kozak, Cantor Fitzgerald Just two kind of housekeeping items for me, the first one, so of the 55,000 ounces of 2019 forecasted production at Gold Bar, does that include pre-commercial ounces? And if so, how much approximately would be pre-commercial?
Andrew Elinesky Hi, Mike. It's Andrew again. And, yes, it does include pre-commercial ounces. As a U.S. GAAP issuer, we are not terribly concerned about pre-commercial credits, so at 55,000 ounces, the total ounce number for the year. And depending on which month we declare commercial production, you're looking at the range of 2,500 to 4,500 ounces to be poured in advance of commercial production announcement.
Michael Kozak Got it. Thanks. And then second and last question, of the 2019 exploration budget, in total if I add up across all your mines I get about $25 million. Is all of that going to be expensed or you're able to capitalize any of that?
Andrew Elinesky We will capitalize a portion of, particularly, underground and in-pit drilling, so underground at Black Fox and in-pit drilling at Gold Bar. However, the majority of it is going to be hitting the income statement.
Michael Kozak Got it, okay. That's it for me. Thanks for answering all the questions.
Bhakti Pavani, Alliance Global Partners Just wanted to talk about Black Fox, I wanted to confirm. Earlier in the press release, you did mention that you plan to bring production from some of the satellites, especially Grey Fox. Is that sort of the plan for this year or are you talking about the next couple of years?
Robert McEwen It'd be the next couple of years.
Bhakti Pavani Okay. One more question with regards to Gold Bar, in the press release you did mention that the stripping ratio has been higher. I'm just kind of curious, what's kind of the stripping ratio for 2019?
Chris Stewart Yeah, the stripping ratio for 2019 is going to 5 to 1.
Bhakti Pavani And what are kind of the mining cost assumption and how they pan up or reconcile from the feasibility standpoint?
Chris Stewart Sorry, could you repeat the question?
Bhakti Pavani With regards to the mining cost and production cost, I know in 2019 you have guided slightly higher cash cost and all-in sustaining cost. So just kind of wondering, how - what is the range for the mining and processing cost and how do they reconcile with the feasibility study assumptions.
Chris Stewart Yeah, we've been - part of the process we've been doing as we've sort of started off with Gold Bar is reviewing the mine plan and it evolves as we work through and start stripping, which is part of the reason we have a higher stripping ratio early on than we had originally anticipated in the feasibility study so we are going to see higher cost this year, but we're also looking at you know 75,000 ounces to 80,000 of production in 2020, which will substantially reduce the cost as compared to the feasibility study. So we're moving - attempting to try and move ounces forward in our production profile to realize the value of - cash value of money essentially.
Bhakti Pavani Okay, that's helpful. Moving on to project Fenix, you did mention about investigating a potential sale. As of now, do you have a kind of a tentative timeline that you are looking, considering you are in the process of completing a feasibility study?
Robert McEwen It'll be during the year.
Bhakti Pavani And also with regards to permitting, just kind of curious, I mean, would you be waiting to obtain those permits or is it going to be, once you complete the feasibility study - and just on the property?
Robert McEwen We would expect that the sale would take some time to complete. The permitting we're expecting in the first half of this year, the amendment to the permit to allow us to go forward. And if we were selling it - if it's sold before that we'd make it conditional. There'd be a condition that you participate - get it permitted to sell and you'd be priced on that basis.
Operator Thank you. And we have questions from the web as well. A question from the web states, what is your company's biggest challenge and what is your plan to address it?
Robert McEwen Biggest challenge, is growing without diluting more in shareholders. That's on a corporate side. I'd say the biggest challenge is turning around the operation at Black Fox, extending its life, probably the two biggest ones right now.
Operator Next question from the web is, since you own such a large percentage of the company what long term plans are in place to continue your vision?
Robert McEwen Well, I plan to live to 120, so I've got a few years in front of me. I think the mining industry can deliver great treasures and having experienced it with Goldcorp and another companies, I'd like to see us grow and maybe get McEwen Mining to the size of Goldcorp was when I left in.
Operator The next web question says, what is the 2019/2020 plan for monetizing the Los Azules asset?
Robert McEwen Our plan right now is to see if we can put this northern access root in. I think it would greatly enhance the value of the property by providing year round access. Currently, we can get in comfortably for five months of the year, but with great difficulty seven months of the year so to come in, 12 months of the year, it would reduce our development costs, it would reduce our operating cost, it would reduce our CapEx and that would enhance the project in the eyes of potential partners or buyers of that asset. So I'd say, what are we doing about it when our plans are to see if we get this route going and work on putting the permit in to the government for development.
Operator The next web question states the following, I've owned MUX through the ups and downs of over the last seven years, I listened to the last call where you said that even with Gold Bar coming online in Q1 this year, it was unlikely that MUX return on profit in 2019. Can you elaborate on the current plan to bring the company into two profitable quarters in a row and based on that plan when can we expect to see the first quarterly profit?
Andrew Elinesky Thank you for the question, it's Andrew, CFO. So as the question mentioned, we don't anticipate having significant profits in 2019. We do expect our profit both at Gold Bar and Black Fox to be higher than it was in 2018, but we're going to see reduced probability in Mexico. When you combine those operational profit movements with our investments continued going on in exploration, particularly in Timmins and also Nevada as well as Los Azules development, you're likely unlikely to see profitability in 2019. And then in terms of predicting when we will turnaround two consecutive quarters of profitability. I can't exactly give the timing to that but I can tell you what would be required which would be strong profitability and a turnaround of Black Fox, steady-state production and profitability coming from Gold Bar, and then having San Jose contribute profitably like it did back in 2016 in addition to the dividends that it sends us on an annual basis.
Robert McEwen Just thinking about profitability, we believe we're investing in the future with our exploration expenditures with the work we're doing at - development at our various sites, I can say when we we're building Goldcorp, The Red Lake Mine, I first gave it $10 million and then another $10 million and another $10 million and production went from 50000 ounces to 500,000 ounces. We are buying assets, some of the assets such as Black Fox - we bought very inexpensively, but you know when you buy something inexpensive you have to expect you have to put money back into it to make it work and that's precisely what we're doing here. We think we have an asset-rich collection of property that in the next couple of years will really begin to shine.
Operator Our next web question states the following. How will a full or partial sale of the Los Azules deposit accelerate the company's plans to grow and to get into the S&P 500?
Robert McEwen Well, if we were to sell Los Azules, then we've gotten attractive price. It would provide us with capital to look at some M&A and development of our other properties. As I said, I gave you a model of how big we have to be or I believe we have to be to qualify. Currently, we're doing 200,000 ounces. To get the 600,000 ounces, we have to add another 400,000 ounces, which is a triple where we are right now today. The other side, there are exploration stories that can drive the growth of companies and their market cap. Goldcorp was one of those, but there are many others that grew on the back of very successful exploration program. We think we're located in the right district where there's a history of large gold mines and big discoveries. And I'm a big believer in exploration.
Bill Powers, private investor Yes, good morning. Couple quick questions, I guess as far as and Nevada goes where you located your, I guess, deeper target, it's north of your Gold Bar, I guess, has there been previous historic drilling in the area or kind of what has kind of - are going to make this such an attractive topic or our target I should say.
Robert McEwen Bill, I'll ask Sylvain to talk about the attractiveness. I can tell you though there hasn't been any deep drilling in the immediate area of the Gold Bar Mine.
Sylvain Guerard And you know, Gold Bar it's - as you probably know very well located you know we are along the Cortez trend, just southeast of the large cluster of deposit that was owned by Barrick there. With more work that has been completed this year, we feel even more confident about the potential that we see there at Gold Bar. We believe that we control the district. We have all the right geology. We have the right stratigraphy, you know right type of rocks. We have the right alterations that make the big deposits and we have a gold system. Now and past exploration have been mostly focused on or around the pit, now we have been developing targets still near mine but across the property as extension of non-mineralization and so this is our prime targets to keep expanding mineralization hopefully adding more to the oxide mineralization to be heap leached. We have the Gold Bar South, but we also have multiple drill targets that we'll be testing this year. Talking of the deeper potential, there is very, very limited drilling, actually one hole have been reaching the lower part of the stratigraphy that is highly favorable to an old potentially large and high grade sulfide deposit. We are going to initiate some drilling this year. We have defined targets and the idea is not to go with a very extensive program, but it's to start testing this potential with probably a couple of holes and those are deep and expensive holes, but we want to develop the understanding of what could be there. You know as I said on extension of non-mineralization at more shallow depth, but also starting to investigate deeper on our targets either.
Bill Powers Okay, well thank you for that answer. I guess, shifting gears to Los Azules. It seems though the valuation gap from where the market seems to perceive the value of Los Azules right now compared to where other, I guess copper assets go off in sale transactions or even our value towards much closer to NAV than what it appears to NA of Los Azules is, I guess, the impact of putting in the road, how - I guess firstly, would that be something that you would expect to go or no-go decision this year. And then I guess, after that would you do an update to your PEA once that is in place and is that something that would really facilitate, apply for permits. Kind of, I guess that should be the - what I will be interested in finding a little bit more about?
Robert McEwen Sure. Bill, the road if it's possible, right now, we've flown it by helicopter, it's been flown by drone they've have done topographical studies on it. Some of our group is going in and just going to go on the ground and look at it more closely at the engineering and the cost of putting a four-wheel drive track through there. Then that's going to happen this year, that study, and if it's positive then I would expect us to push ahead on the road. We wouldn't be restricted by snows because most of the route is below the snow line. And that would definitely lead to taking another look at our PEA and seeing what impact it has on our CapEx and OpEx. One of the things, you talk about the discrepancy in value between, say pure copper plays and this copper project sitting in our portfolio of properties. It's - perhaps its location, Argentina has puts doubts in some people's minds. But it's something where we're looking at right now and I think the Argentina factor probably reduces the attractiveness of the property to some people. And others are pure copper plays and we're gold silver with copper rather than a pure copper play.
Bill Powers Yeah. Okay, well, the reason I'm pulling that up is simply because Alumbrera was such a - seem to be a cash generator for Goldcorp. And I don't know whether this has potential or it's something that would be - it seems as though it would be more impactful given the size of McEwen versus the size of what Alumbrera was to Goldcorp. It's…
Robert McEwen Goldcorp had a partial interest in Alumbrera. If we were able to bring this on stream ourselves, this would be an extraordinary contribution to...
Bill Powers I mean, I would assume that you would be JV-ing it. I mean, obviously, given the CapEx, right now. But anyway, well, that's - thank you for all the color on that. I appreciate it.
Robert McEwen You're very welcome.
Operator Thank you. And we have a question from Terry Debree, he's a shareholder. Your line is now open.
Unidentified Analyst Robert, I've been a shareholder for quite some time like the previous gentleman from the web. And I hold with great confidence, not only in you and the management team you put together, but also in where the future price of precious metals are going. My question relates to the sale of El Gallo. You've mentioned debt and growth. You've also mentioned in this conference call exploration is - you're a firm believer in explorations. When you go to work each morning, Rob, what excites you the most? Is it one thing that you go to work and see - like, obviously, we hope for another red light. What is the one thing you're focused on right now the most?
Robert McEwen I look for Sylvain to come over and tell me that he's got a very high grade intercept at either Black Fox or Gold Bar. It's just - I think we have a good property package that has a lot of potential. And maybe my question is how do we speed up what we're doing, how do we get the results earlier from our exploration, how do we get information from mining faster, how can we operate 24/7 rather than 12/7. And what can we bring in the way of innovation to lower our cost, improve our margins to this industry and to our operations. So I think a multiple, but I'd say big bright visible gold intersections have probably given me the biggest smile.
Unidentified Analyst Yeah, me too. Thank you very much.
Robert McEwen You're welcome.
Operator Thank you. And we have two web questions. The first web question goes as follows. You have stated that MUX has beta of 3.0 and as a result the stock trends to follow the gold price both on the way up and on the way down. Can you explain why the gold price has trend upwards over the past several weeks and yet MUX has not followed the same bullish pattern?
Robert McEwen It's a good question. I'm not sure why we're down and it's up. We do the - beta is calculated by Bloomberg, not by ourselves. And if you look over a longer time period, you'll see that when gold is going up, we run higher than gold in a percentage basis, historically. And when it goes down, we drop more than it drops. At the moment, I would say the market was looking and waiting to hear about Gold Bar, is it coming on stream, is it on budget or is it like everybody else in the industry, going over budget and failing to deliver the promise. And they're looking to see is Black Fox really going to turn around. And that's going to take some time. I think we'll be able to demonstrate that Black Fox is turning around that the property that it's located on has a lot of exploration potential. And there are other areas there that can be developed and brought into a mine. And we have to address the temporary problems of startup at Gold Bar. And then we'll get back in line with that beta.
Operator Thank you. Our next web question says the following. How much of a threat is President Obrador to the gold and silver mining companies in Mexico?
Robert McEwen Could you repeat that, please?
Operator The question reads as follows. How much of a threat is President Obrador to the gold and silver mining companies in Mexico?
Robert McEwen Another good question, I don't have an answer to that. He hasn't put more taxes on the industry, but he appears to want to put taxes on anything foreign in the country, anything extractive. So we're patiently waiting and hoping he doesn't, because the mining industry has already been hit by heavier taxes with the past President. And…
Operator Our last web question - our last web question goes as follows. It is apparent that the Black Fox Mine was acquired at a deep discount. What were the reasons for this and is there any regret in this purchase? As a shareholder it's been very frustrating to watch the stock price going down while gold prices have been rising.
Robert McEwen Well, I'd like to say, since the beginning of 2016, when I thought the bull market started, our shares are up 77%. We've outperformed the Dow and the S&P. I'd like to say we were up more and we were at some point during that period. Black Fox, no regrets. I think we got a very good deal. I think in the intermediate term, it's going to prove to be a very astute purchase. That has lots of growth elements to it. The mine has, I'd say the previous owners didn't get a good geological model, created good geological model of the mine. And as a result, could not have put on an efficient mine plan. They were in a lot of working areas. They went deeper and deeper following high grade, to a point that it started becoming uneconomic. We're hoping to be mining closer to surface in some of the areas that were not extensively mined. But time will tell. But the Black Fox mine is a very interesting piece of real estate in a very prolific gold district, one of the best known gold districts in the world. So... Thank you, operator. I hope all your investments go very well and remember gold is money. Thank you for joining the call.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Apr 3, 2019 15:48:31 GMT -5
April 2, 2019 11:00 AM ET The Conference Call
Company Participants Rob McEwen - Chief Owner Chris Stewart - President and CEO Andrew Elinesky - CFO
Conference Call Participants Bhakti Pavani - Alliance Global Partners John Tumazos - John Tumazos Very Independent Research George Darling - Sandstorm Resources Ken Rostron - Carpathia Portfolio Consulting John Rast - Huntleigh Securities Ken Reese - Sagepoint Financial
Rob McEwen Thank you, operator. Good morning fellow share owners. I'd like to start this conference call with an apology. I want to apologize for our horrible share price performance. Clearly, our actions and statements have disappointed confused and prompted many shareholders to sell their shares. Today, we want to share with you; one, the reasons why it has been challenging for us in the last three to six months. The corrective steps we've taken and what the balance of 2019 looks like. With me today on the call are Chris Stewart, our President and Chief Operating Officer; and Andrew Elinesky, our CFO. Before asking Chris to talk about operations, I'd like to say that we have four sources of production and revenue this year, up from three last year. We have reduced our production guidance by less than 3% to 205,000 gold equivalent ounces from 210,000. And the recent financing has repaired the damage to our balance sheet caused by several events, some of which were beyond our control, but it has given us put us in a position to complete the year as we have planned at 205,000 ounces gold equivalents. At this point, I'd like to ask Chris to talk about the operational issues and the solutions to them and what it looks like for the balance of the year.
Chris Stewart Thank you, Rob. Good morning everyone. First quarter of 2019 has been challenging for our North American operations that represent approximately 3% of our annual goal production. At our Black Fox mining, total issues had a negative impact on our Q1 performance. In January, we ran into an issue with one of ore which took our only ore source at a time online for about 2.5 weeks. After getting our workplace back up and running in late January, we had an incident early February with our local contractor who carries out ore crushing on surface. They had a fire in the surface crushing plant. The conveyor belt caught fire and quickly consumed the cone crusher tower, setting for the two other conveyor belts, melting all the electrical wiring and the heat damaged the structural integrity of steel tower. So, it took a month for the repairs to be completed on the crushing plant, was back up and running in the first week of March. While the temporary crushing plant [indiscernible] to see that’s as an immediate fix, winter conditions in February were particularly brutal in the Timmins area this year where temperature is in the minus 35 to the minus 45 Celsius range. So, the temporary plant did not perform well at all. So, we had very limited mill processing in February. We had seen significant improvements within operations in second half of March as we add two to three mines fronts available to us. Our main focus in the first half of 2019 is about well back test to multiple mines front in the underground operations. This will allow us to be more consistent in our number of tons of ores in second half of the year. Private owners did not invest enough capital into development at the mine. They only spent enough money to access the next mine area, which resulted limited workplaces being available at any time. So it's hampered the overall performance of this operation. We are now developing as planned on multiple mine fronts and pushing to open up areas in the upper, middle and lower parts of the mine simultaneously. We've also replaced the majority of our senior leadership team at Black Fox, as we worked during in the operation around. The problems had hampered our performance in Q1 have been resolved and we were back to regular operations. Other new Global mine in Nevada, we also struggled with our operational performance in Q1. Several factors impact the operations here. 2018, 2019 winter has been wettest weather ever recorded in the United States. In local area, we have experienced a wetter and colder winter than normal. To give you an example, we've received over 7 inches of precipitation in Q1 compared to the normal average of 3 inches and total precipitation in our area is 11.8 inches annually on average. The unusual weather caused delays in both our mining operating on the mountain due to wet conditions, snowfall with a commissioning of our handling system as the crushing, screening, conglomeration and stacking system which how we take the road of mine ore and committed for replace on the heap leach pad. To address these issues, we made modifications to our ore handling system to promote better move on the ores of the entire system. We're also in the process of installing whether protection around the layers of major equipment infrastructure. Men hour are also contributed albeit to a lesser extent to our slower than anticipated progress in late 2018 and into early 2009 that we are manned moving forward now. Our ADR process plant is working well with and falling our [indiscernible] February 16th, we continued to pour gold ore on a regular basis. The commissioning process has been challenging during the reverse quarter, but we are on targets and move into commercial production in the second quarter as planned. We're pleased to share that our El Gallo mine and scope performing as planned and the feasibility study remain on track to be completed midyear. Our El Gallo mine adventure producing well and on budget for Q1. So in summary, first quarter of 2019 has definitely been challenging, but we're confident we have resolved the unusual operation excuse at Black Fox in Q1. And at Gold Bar, we have identified the issues, we've developed solutions and we're in the process of reinventing them now. We look forward to us underperforming in Q2 and the remainder of 2019. Thank you.
Andrew Elinesky Good morning, everyone. This is Andrew Elinesky, Chief Financial Officer. I'll take you through the financial impact of events that Rob and Chris just described. First, go back through that time line events that Rob mentioned, impact of our cash flow and followed by review how we see 2019 and 2020 from a cash perspective. Upon our plain cash generation for operations in 2018 was progressing well until about the fourth quarter. At which point, the reintroduction of exports taxes in Argentina as well as losing gold and silver inventory in the republic refinery bankruptcy amended our planned portion of the cash proceeds from the San Jose mine were reduced by approximately $6 million roughly covering the period of December 2018 to 2019. Then starting in early January this year with the commissioning issues being faced with Gold Bar described by Chris, meant our original production plan was about 7,500 ounces for the first quarter and we reduced this to 4,500 ounces in our guidance given in February. And in turn, this just came in at just over 2,000 ounces forward as at the end of March. Similarly, the Black Fox revenue plans were impacted by the production issues. And originally, we had 15,000 ounces envisaged for the first quarter of 2019. This was then introduced to 10,000 ounces when we issued our guidance in February, and our actual production just coming in sort of just over 8,000 ounces for the quarter. So, these combined events continuing our ongoing cash and working capital balances where both significantly impacted and the capital injection was obviously required. The timing of this was predicated by the working capital covenant of our term loan, meaning we needed the capital injection by the end of March in order not to breach this covenant and trigger the associated penalties. This capital injection that we just completed should carry us through the rest of this year to focus on the Gold Bar startup, as well as the turnaround of Black Fox as well as our projects and exploration activities at both sites as well as progressing with our evaluations of Los Azules. For everyone's references, our projections used at 1,250 gold price and a $15 silver price. The outlook for MSC is steady as usual, now that a slight increased plan for compared to 2018 as well as continued peso deevaluation of the next few years. We should allow us to see dividends and the cash flows from the joint venture, continuing the range of about $10 million per year plus or minus 20%. At Gold Bar with the construction coming in on budget and the mine on track for commercial production, we will see this business unit switch from being a cash consumer to a cash generator, particularly in 2020, which should see significantly higher production in cash generation. In addition, mine life extension opportunities remain in our goal to extend to 10 years or greater still achievable. And finally, at Black Fox as Chris said, we've recovered from our delays and gold production rates have normalized. The production rates have increased significantly in the last three weeks with just over 4,500 ounces of the overall 8,000 ounces producing the quarter reported in March alone. With this fair capacity, our processing plant in the mining rate being increased. We're still on track for meeting our 50,000 ounce guidance for the year despite this delay. And similar to Gold Bar, we're still working on the significant project and exploration opportunities that attracted to us for this investment in the first place. Overall with the conclusion of construction at Gold Bar and turnaround work at Black Fox, we should see our operations transition from cash assumption 2018 to cash generation starting this year and ramping up and increasing into 2020. And with that, I'll hand it back to Rob.
Rob McEwen Thank you, Andrew. I'd like to now just talk a little bit about the background to our why we did the financing, we did recently. And I'll go back to August of last year when we were looking at how would we finance the construction of Gold Bar, complete the construction of Gold Bar, and we required $50 million. And if we looked at our stock price at the time and said, it seems low. And we looked at our projections for revenue over the next year. We said next couple of years and we thought, well, why don't we take out some debt? We should have a comfortable margin to service the debt and retire it and rather than issuing shares of what we thought was a low price per share. So, we raised $50 million. There were some covenants attached to that debt that we thought we could clear those hurdles easily. Then, as Andrew said in the fall of last year, Argentina impose taxes, export taxes on our San Jose mine and it went across the entire industry on mineral exports. And then, there was a bankruptcy refinery used by our partner, which further reduced the revenue we received from the mine. And we thought, well, alright, we're with there, but we will need -- we could need some financing mid this year. So we put in place an ATM or what an app market financing. It was described to us and we were led to believe it was a low costs, lower cost one of the financing in your traditional equity issues. And it'll be less disruptive to the market because it was being sold in smaller quantities rather than doing an issue all it once. And we thought, well, if we could sell it at a certain price, if we continue going on and we'd raise the money that we need without disturbing the market, we made a mistake, which we corrected recently by canceling the ATM. But our financial position was aggregated in the New Year by loss of production, as Chris said, basically for the first two months of the year from Black Fox and Gold Bar being delayed, by a quarter coming into commercial production. So, we haven't raised much money through the ATM, but we put a $90 million top on what was possible to raise through the ATM and I think that just gave the impression that we are going to be in the market forever and we only sold about $2 million worth of stocks in the ATM. And now, we were with the loss of revenue from the two of our operations, we were facing a covenant for each -- a possible covenant for each of our loan. And it came with some penalties, which we really didn't want to see have to deal with. We needed to have a $10 million of working capital. And if we were below that, at the end of the quarter, the interest rate on the loan would increase from 9.75% to 15%. And we would be technically in a default, and we didn't want either those events to happen. And so, we then started saying, well, we got to get some capital quickly and we looked at a number of alternatives. And the one we selected was a, single shareholder, stepped up and said they'd put up the bulk of the money, but they would like to see -- they put up 88% of the money. And they said, we'd like to see alignment with management, and a number of directors and officers of the Company put up money including myself and we closed for financing on March 31, and thereby prevented any breach of covenants. Is this the preferred way to raise money? No, we thought we had it under control with the ATM. We didn't plan on Black Fox having the production problems or the contractor having a fire in his crusher that would shut us down for basically two months between the technical problems underground and the fire. Now did we plan on the delay at Gold Bar. Could we have had insurance for the contractor, fire, we haven't found any insurance that we could have utilized. We didn't lose any gold. It just got deferred into the next quarter. I'm very pleased by what happens in March at Black Fox. We certainly perform very well there. And I think it's a good sign of what's going ahead. The grades were improving, Gold Bar; Chris says, if the phone call is a little the sound wasn't that great. Good Chris up by the phone connection from Gold Bar wasn't that good. So I apologize for that. But we're addressing that and we're looking at commercial production in Q2. As I said earlier on, we're been doing a much more dire first quarter. It won't be a strong one. But it's going to be much better than we had thought at the end of February that it would be. There are concerns about financings and why not everyone's involved? And I'd like to suggest to all our shareholders that as it makes interest and we need money somewhere in the future that they indicate net interest to us in the near future, to say, yes, I'd like to participate. We did the right issues some years ago. It's a very cumbersome process. And then it's expensive, it's lengthy and needs a lot of exposure. And I don't know why the securities commissions around the world, particularly United States and Canada, don't change the rules on rights issues. So they could be executed much the same way as a private placement. Fairly quickly shareholders are knowledgeable of the Company, they should be able to make that decision and not be prevented by securities regulators. We did do financing last year, late in the year of flow-through financing, it was done in 24% premium above market. We found the flow through a good instrument to use one because of the money's being spent on the Black Fox properties. It's being used for exploration. We have $180 million in tax loss carry forward. So we're not giving up any sales there. And as I said it's done at a premium we also do one in 2017 again 24%, 25% premium over market. The, if we were, we did announce we reporting are open to sale, conversations about selling on Mexican in property. We wanted some flexibility on our balance sheet. So the question about whether or not we would use the proceeds of the sale to buy back stock. That is a possibility, but we're continuing to grow and advancing our plans to qualify for the S&P. So in the near-term where growth company, adding to production we think our exploration this year will yield some interesting results. We're already seeing good results from Black Fox and Gold Bar, we have an exciting program there this year, to not only test for additional surface oxide ores. But in the late summer will be testing for a possible deep sulfide carbon-styled mineralization on the property, which is a reasonable belief that it could be looking for us to surface close, I mean, within the top 3000 feet. This point, I really wanted to use this session to field questions from our shareholders and interested investors. And I'd like to ask the operators open up the questions period.
Question-and-Answer Session Operator Our first question comes from Bhakti Pavani with Alliance Global Partners.
Bhakti Pavani Just kind of wondering you, in your prepared remarks, you did mention about increasing the development at Black Fox mine. Could you maybe you know elaborate or provide some additional colors on what would it -- how would it reflect when it comes to production from the mine for this year and going forward?
Rob McEwen Certainly, I'll ask Chris to answer that Bhakti for you.
Chris Stewart Yes, with respect to the capital developments are doing, as I mentioned, we're developing balance on three different areas of the mine. So the upper, middle and lower portions historically, what, what they've done is basically developed to the next level set themselves up so we have more stopes in. When you're done above, you need go down in mine. But they didn't sort of push ahead a number of different trends that does as it limits your ability through the mine cycle between drill last mark and then peak billing where you're limited to the number of areas. So you can actually work and draw ore. So that gives us lots of variation in the production levels kind of the mine sort of strategy is to open up multiple areas. And again and sort total different areas of the mines, so we're not opening to [indiscernible] in any area, but it allows us the flexibility. So, if we do into an issue that we had in January where we had a blast and slurring go had on it and it took us 2.5 weeks to cover that to get stood up and running. If you do run into that problem, you still have two or three other areas and draw for. So allow you to get better coordinated the overall cycles within the mining sequence. So you get that consistency in that business. So our strategy is focusing on development 13 and 11 meters per day of development for currently to meeting that and essentially open up the areas ever saw set up by year or second half 2019 as much stronger from a gold production perspective in 2000. First half of the year, certainly Q2 will see significantly proven in gold production as well. So we're taking the time out, setting ourselves up for success going forward. And I will maintain that, in details of is Wendy and Ron. Bhakti Pavani And then from the cost perspective given developed, what kind of increase in cost are you expecting for this year and maybe next?
Andrew Elinesky Bhakti, built that into our budget for the year so numbers that we've issued, our guidance for cash cost and all and sustaining costs are reflective of the work that we're supporting right now. And plan to yourself set up for success going forward.
Bhakti Pavani Okay. Perfect.
Andrew Elinesky So we’ll increase crossover over where already sort of shared with everybody.
Bhakti Pavani With regard to the disruption in the queue and production at Black Fox, the issue with the contractor, has there been any additional costs incurred due to that or is that already covered by the insurance?
Chris Stewart No, as Rob mentioned, we didn't have insurance for that. So that's done essentially by the revenue stream for us. So, we didn't lose any gold. So, we've continue to be underground albeit January and February, we're not undergo perspective, as far as production goes, but we continue to produce stock that ore and when the pressure got pick up and running in, which is as I started to see that and again, winter played bit of havoc on us because [indiscernible] sat there, sort of froze up while we're fixing that the cone crusher tower. That was part of the reason we saw such a great sort of recovery in March and we are able to process the order that sort of stockpiled plus our crews really doing a great job on the production site in the latter part of March as well. And we had some [indiscernible] deal. So, we’re pretty solid coming into April now.
Operator Thank you. And our next question comes from John Tumazos with John Tumazos Very Independent Research.
John Tumazos So Chris, how are things in Nevada?
Chris Stewart Hi, John, yes, not too bad, the weather could be a little better. We're still getting a bit of rain and some snow here this week, but spring is coming.
John Tumazos I have four specific Gold Bar questions. And forgive me if I don't word in the most smooth manner. Sometimes when the production doesn’t come out, there are different things that can happen. Could you explain your confidence that the original or grade calculations are correct? Second, you confidence that the leach pad kinetics are as projected, in other words, maybe it takes 90 days instead of 60 days or something to dissolve the gold? Third, could you describe your confidence that the recovery rates are the same in the commercial size pads as opposed to bulk test columns or bottle rules? And finally, could you describe the integrated feasibility study versus the initial results as to whether any of the long term metrics could be different? Excuse me for the mouthful, great, recovery feasibility study.
Chris Stewart I'm trying to remember all those questions. I would say that’s a good summary. With respect to the grade that we're seeing coming out of pick and cabin here to start this and with respect to the, there were times based on our mine plans, we are seeing a very good reconciliation. We've actually got a little bit of ore bench early in pit. And the grade is sort of bang on for what we anticipated. So, we're pretty confident in our sort of resource model and what we put together as far as our mine plan goes. Similarly in cabin, we've seen so much more ore mineral of that beyond was in the resource model. And again, the grade is reconciling very, very close to what we have in our model. So I'm very happy with what we're seeing right now up on the mountain as far as the grade goes and the tons, so no issues there. The weather has caused us some problem and sort of the big impact of that is we had, I think 24 snow days now, we have no production coming out of the [indiscernible] on the hill. So, it's the biggest in there, but grade we're looking good. With respect to the ore on the heap leach pad. Currently, we got about 400,000 tons of ore under leach and we're pleased with what we're seeing as far as leaching kinetics go. It's lining up nicely with our recovery period that we view in the feasibility study, to basically layout or budgets and our plans going forward. So preliminary results here, we had the cells have been under leach since sort of mid-January and as a result sort of incoming offline we just two more sales off in this past week. And again, though the results we're seeing as soon as you put your underneath in the spike. In Golden solution, everything's lining up nicely with the recovery percent we have for the operating. So again, things looking good there, the ADR process plant, it's running very well. And the issue that we're having, the largest issue with respect to the operation moving ourselves in the commercial puts is around the ore handling systems, getting the ore on the leach pad and right now, the bulk of our orders coming from cabin over the first sort of quarter and a half. So Q2 and into Q3 were 90% of our orders coming out of cabin, which has a high clay content, compared to pick, which is very little glint in it. So that's sort of starts to come online in July and August, which will allow us to blend the material more or so. So this is we're having now is related to clay and getting teary able to move through the shoots.
John Tumazos Are you agglomerating to address the clay?
Chris Stewart Correct, we do have an agglomeration plant here, which is critical part of the process, so just getting the order to move. So again, we've implemented a number of solutions. We're actually not a down day-to-day, adding in additional equipment under the screening plan because we've had some backup there and we're anticipating starting to hit our stride here in the next couple of weeks. So then move into commercial production than the latter part of Q2. So, overall, I guess my confidence around what we have here is very high and then very happy again with the ore up on the hill, very happy with the leaching connects we're seeing in recovery coming out of the plan. And my concern right now is addressing the issues around ore handling system.
John Tumazos So, Chris Saturday, it was 75 degrees and beautiful here and I spent a few hours of the morning reading the Guyana Goldfields' 43-101 that's on 10 o'clock Friday night. A couple years ago, Newmont invited me to Surinam, and I took an extra day and beyond it was very expensive, because I bought some of the stock. People concerned that there's a $60 million write down coming because Gold Bar a shit show. What you're saying is there's no such indication and that there's just some delays due to weather and that you have full confidence in the project.
Chris Stewart I think that's a good summary John. The challenge we have right now is. The one thing and I told obvious as many times as what we built here as far as an infrastructure perspective and the quality of the work that's been done. I haven't seen better anywhere, ADR process plan is the quality of work in there and the piping and instrumentation, everything it's running very, very well. And I'm very impressed with what they've seen there. In the issuing now that we're having is all around the crushing surveying to lean system, which again, I don't think showstopper, we just have a few more modifications zooms out to the original equipment supplier here on site this week, as well as working with us to address those issues. And, part of the challenges we're trying to bring this into production in Q1 which was original target was in the middle of winter. And we have, or with the high place on them and we've had excess of precipitation which as you can understand and relate to clean and water do not make so well right. So it's, which is challenging.
John Tumazos You're saying the 5000 ounce per month, designed capacity as planned.
Chris Stewart Right now, obviously, I'd say that will probably come in sort of June, July sort of Q3 as when we hit our stride. So we'll come into commercial production, I said late in Q2 here. So that will be, bridging the gap of 50 by 100 times a day to through the crushing tracking system under the pads. And our target is 1,700 tons per day. And it'll run for almost 11,000 tons a day is full capacity if you don't saw. We do have some ability to kept on our loss portion as well as we move through the year. We do have a 200,000 tons sitting on the wrong pad we're now, waiting to get put on to the pad on heap leach pad.
John Tumazos So Rob, I think that part of the market concern is just the natural anxiety until Gold Bar is designed given that some other people dropped the ball and, you never know if the Gold comes out to the gold comes off. As opposed to people being concerned about the financing for say it, when you execute those things should take care of themselves, good luck and thank you.
Rob McEwen Thank you, John. I just add that ore handling system, you mentioned the $60 million write down. The ore handling system costs $6 million. And there's some additions to that. But as Chris pointed out, you see real bottleneck at the moment and this being resolved, but thank you for your comments.
Operator Our next question comes from George Darling with Sandstorm Resources.
George Darling Just wondering about at Black Fox. Just wondering about Froome. Can you talk to a little bit about what your plans are for the Froome ore body?
Chris Stewart Yes, no problem. So currently, the prior management teams have put together a bit of a plan around accessing Froome the bottom of the hill, the old Black Fox mine open pit. Right now we have our engineering team basically building a scoping study around that. And we should have sort of some results coming from that and the plant put together on whether it makes economic sense or not. We did see a bump up in the overall resource there to 181,000 ounces. So that's certainly going to help the economics. And, the gold price moving up will certainly up. We wanted to go back and do own homework on that and put together an internal scoping study to justify moving that project forward. So we should have a decision or a scoping study that we can use to make a decision towards the latter part of Q3. So from there, if it makes sense, we'll be looking to, push just the across to the access that is probably the 16 to 18 month timeframe to get that up and running into production from the time we make the decisions.
George Darling Great, thanks, Chris. And I think hit star one a couple of times, so ignore the rest of them.
Chris Stewart Thank you, George.
Operator Thank you. And our next question comes from Larry Gitomer.
Unidentified Analyst This question is for Rob. How are you today Rob?
Rob McEwen I am well, Larry. Yourself?
Unidentified Analyst Pretty good, sir. Calling from New Jersey. A question for you, sir. I'm a private investor. How many years are you thinking to qualify for the S&P 500, if you had to guess?
Rob McEwen It’s a very good question. It depends on the market, Larry. I think, right now, there's some opportunities developing as a result of the large mergers that have happened in the industry and property sales. But really good, optimistic way of the three to four years could take a little longer.
Unidentified Analyst Okay, so that’s the only question I wanted, and I'm sticking with you. I’ve studied your history and I have all the confidence in the world in you and your team.
Rob McEwen Appreciate your comments, Larry. Thank you.
Operator Thank you. And our next question comes from Ken Rostron with Carparia.
Ken Rostron It's Carpathia Portfolio Consulting. Thank you, gentlemen. I'm going to take a little different bend here and I’m pleased just have open hearts and open minds as we take that of 20,000, 40,000 foot view. Who can answer the question, what’s the largest grade per ton that we're running anywhere in the Company?
Rob McEwen Largest grade.
Ken Rostron Yes, that's the ore that we're running anywhere.
Rob McEwen Well, if you look at our Argentinian property in San Jose, it has a reserve grade of 580 grams silver and 8 grams gold which would make it. Yes, and that would be one of the highest grade mines in the Americas, on a silver equivalent or gold equivalent basis.
Ken Rostron Okay, thank you for that, I am just trying to get re-acquaintance. From a perspective of where the industry is resource and where we're at in the financial markets, I take the perspective is that we're already swing an upstream, because it was very interesting, the other day, I was at a conference where I was listening to a conference and I guess it was Liz Ann Sonders was speaking and somebody asked her about gold and she had this look on her face and I respect her. I think she's a good strategist and she didn't even really have an opinion, so first of all, -- I mean, no, seriously. So what we're up against trying to build McEwen mining is we do have a system now in the financial allocation markets with 70%, 80% of it is combination of passive, systematic, robotic, whatever you want to call it, Black Fox, Fidelity, nobody -- we don't even have mine share for the industry. So if you -- and that's why I bring up the Liz Ann Sonders. So if you go back 40,000 feet, you look at what Marks is doing. Again, that we were trying to reach and trying to grow and trying to keep Black Fox and Gold Bar going. But in reaching we have any environment where we don't even have any mine share, we have a series of nothing but really bad no news, as John said, or I don’t that language, we have got to get to a point where every piece of news coming out of this company is positive. Not a series of we had a fire and I know you can't control that. We have whether, but we need some drill holes to goals. Something doesn't have to be great. We have to get people's mind around the fact that we can take Rob's experience in history like to sell out from New Jersey said. But we got it we got to start asking like we're moving the ball towards the Gold line. I mean, every piece of news is a takedown to thought to deal financing. You want to win mindshare, you start producing drill holes with some goals. And I heard Gold Bar, summer how to breakdown, when we're going to do some drill holes that can expect some people. I don't know that's my comment. And I guess you got to fix first I get that. But let's fix it and start drilling some holes. Thanks.
Rob McEwen Thank you, Ken. I couldn't agree more. Last year, we had a Black Fox, we had $19 million program for exploration this year at $17 million. We bought Black Fox for a song, $0.06 on the dollar. And when you buy something that inexpensively you have to appreciate that there's going to be equipment to be upgraded. There's probably development work to be done before it's going to operate the way want. And we think we can bring down the operating costs of Black Fox and we've taken, Chris is taken quite a few steps in that direction to reduce the workforce better match the equipment, get more development place is working, development headings underground. And there are drill holes in the mine and not more particularly on the property that have delivered some double-digit and in many cases, many cases and some cases, triple-digit numbers, grams per ton. So encouraging drove results, so we're following up on those. And I couldn't agree more with pushing out positive news rather than, look, we have this problem here there. We hope that's all behind us, and certainly going to work to make sure it is. And as you said, the mindshare, it's the whole goal space, if you look at the S&P 500, it is one goal sock in it. And that's new one and its market cap is about 7, relative to the market capitalization of all the companies in the S&P 500. New month is equivalent to about seven 100 of 1%. So the market is paying little is interesting for gold, but stays its coming. And we're positioning ourselves to be there for it. Thank you.
Operator And our next question comes from Chris White with TELUS Ventures.
Unidentified Analyst Hi, Rob. This is Chris White from TELUS Ventures. I got an overarching question and then a little specific, if you could clarify. The overarching is, do you think we're at a base or is there potentially more bad news over the next two quarters that can get us here for the stock that we haven't had said on this call yet.
Rob McEwen I think you had the bad news in the first quarter and the following quarter this year will be improving picture.
Unidentified Analyst Yes so then to that end, more specific is could you clarify, again a little bit from the front end of the call what you're estimating for your next funding round and that amount? And could you be specific and describe what right now you're thinking or most likely sources and the structure of those funding will be?
Rob McEwen Certainly, Chris, we don't anticipate we'll need any funding going forward this year. Unless there is some exciting exploration developments we'd like to follow up on. The other would be the access road into Los Azules, which I think would be a real game changer in the value of that asset that large copper deposit. But we're using in our budgeting we're using it, as Andrew said at 1250 gold price. And gold prices stay where they are. And the production goes on stream as we anticipated, well, there's no need for capital this year. Outside of if there were some attractive M&A, or as a step further development in exploration, or more expensive accesses in Los Azules.
Unidentified Analyst And so then what you were talking about their folks reaching out to you. What was, could you color that a little more? I misunderstood then what that fund raising would be?
Rob McEwen It was really trying to get a list of share owners that we just looked at different ways of financing. One might be a private placement with shareholders and just saying, asking them if we had a better sense of we've been approached by people and said what could we participate. And we're willing to buy shares is if you need to the next time you need financing. And what I want to do is get a list of people that would be prepared to do that. And we could approach them and have more shareholders participating or financing. That was the only point we didn't. We don't have any immediate needs for financing. It was just more to have a list of people who are interested when you contact them and say, look, are you still interested sometime in the future if we had to do a financing, would you like to participate?
Unidentified Analyst And you have a minimum amount of what a regular shareholder would have to put up for participate in that?
Rob McEwen Not at the momentum, that we still have to work with security regulators. They somehow feel that only what they call sophisticated investors combined in private placements. And I often tell that shareholders are sophisticated, they are familiar with the Company. And they don't need that the same type of disclosures that the securities commissions want. They should be able to participate. Everyone should be able to participate if there's a financing. And it's really just, we got squeezed this time, we probably were taking care with the ATM, it didn't seem to work. And then we have the problems that the two operations that made our financing needs more acute and an immediate. So we resorted to the method we did use. In the ideal world, everybody should be able to say, yes, I want to be in there and we accommodate people who say yes.
Operator Thank you. And our next question comes from John Rast with Huntleigh Securities.
John Rast Good morning, Rob. I was just wondering when we will begin to hear some of the drilling results at Black Fox and at Gold Bar and also the road permitting in Argentina.
Rob McEwen The drilling we put some of our drilling on hold of the surface drilling in the first quarter because of the financial situation that developed. There are drills being mobilized next week on surface at Gold Bar -- Black Fox and Gold Bar will be in the next month. Drill results I would expect within the next two months we'll start seeing coming out. And the road on Los Azules we had a group we'd already flown it by helicopter and drone and done topographical mapping. We had a crew in on the ground for a couple of weeks doing a reconnaissance and they're coming up with engineering diagrams, there's an area, possibly 20 to 30 kilometers that's quite difficult. I mean they're just coming up with a cost estimate for pushing that through there. Once we have that through then we have 12 months access to the property and it is totally different story and being much more attractive asset for to a larger group of a larger audience of possible investors. So that's a month away, at least in terms of getting those estimates off completed.
Operator Thank you. And our next question comes from Stuart Bailey, a private investor.
Stuart Bailey I've got four or five questions here, so you can cut me off anytime you want. But I've got a list of going with each mine. Except the first question I was a shareholder with VG Elexum [ph] and you made attempted gold discovery in Colorado and you end up with an oil discovery. And you were talking about suing the government to get access to it it’s the 75% VG Elexum [ph] and 25% Exxon. What's the status of that property? Should that be sold?
Rob McEwen Supposed, the property we have mineral rights or NOL and gas price on a large track of land in Colorado in the San Luis Valley. It's about 100,000 acres. We've tried to do work on there. We've been given permission by the fishing game. And then there are parties opposed to doing any drilling in the area. And they were the ones -- we weren’t suing anybody they were. These parties were suing the government to overturn the permit the government granted us. I think one day when the oil price recovers, and these are the interesting properties, they're probably horizontal drilling candidates. We don't have any resources on and we just have a little show oil showing. And it goes back quite awhile we were drilling for gold on the property. And we hit of 40 to drill holes, hit Cretaceous age rock with, and 27 of them had oil in it and two of them flow to surface. It's always been an interesting project, but I think, it needs a higher price and a clear shot at getting a permit to do additional drilling.
Unidentified Analyst You couldn't sell it right now.
Rob McEwen We haven't seen anybody come forward. I have to admit, we haven't made a concerted effort to try to sell it. But I believe, the price of oil has to get a little better before you get an attractive valuation on that.
Unidentified Analyst Okay, next question. On Las Azules you're putting in this new road and I'm assuming that it costs $100 million, $50 million, a lot of money. Are you doing any prospecting around that, my theory is that, we'll build $100 million dollar road and somebody else come up and find 10 million ounce gold deposits and just use our road to make a profit ratio. Can you run around and try to find something?
Rob McEwen We haven't done any, we're not doing any drilling this year, there's.
Unidentified Analyst I don't mean really, I mean, just prospecting on land that you don't own that might have minerals?
Rob McEwen I think it's a very good suggestion. We've been working on pushing a permit forward and improving the access. In terms of dollar amount, you're probably right in terms of what it would cost to build a road. It was a service of mine up there. But our approaches to them to go in and see if we can build a four wheel drive track into the property that would allow us easy 12 months access. Right now, so got a 5 months access into the property and then snow makes it much more difficult and high mountain passes. This would be a lower altitude access route. But it's a large, we're in between the indicated and inferred, there's about £30 billion of copper, and 5.5 million ounces of gold and I think 90 million ounce of silver. There's probably something else.
Unidentified Analyst Cutting a project in half, say it make it at $1.4 billion project and just make it into smaller operation and then maybe in 5 years after it's working doubled up.
Rob McEwen Part of it is the access both being able to drive into bringing in power. We haven't seen a way of cutting it in half yet.
Unidentified Analyst Then cut me off if I'm taking too much time, but I got a few questions on Black Fox. It seems to me there's a lot of the problems in McEwen. But the go away, if you could double the production of their 200,000 ounces a year, it seemed to be pretty easy as that a lot of gold. It was any one of them maybe 41 million on Mexico. It seems like that 41 million, you might be able to double up your production and you've got the mill and everything. And I don't know much about mining except what I was in every conference call with McEwen mining since 2011. That's where I've learned everything about mining, but it seems like a lot of it probably go away we just double our production.
Rob McEwen So you're speaking Chris's language. He's completely the same mind as yours about trying to get enough working places where we have the flexibility underground to, and the capabilities to increase production because we certainly have the excess capacity in our in our mill or process plant to be able to handle a much higher throughput.
Unidentified Analyst I was very surprised when you announced the 639 or 622 ounce drill hole there on the southern part of the property. Nobody seemed to really care, I noticed I thought it was a big deal. I estimated that that wondering might whole between 25,000 ounces of gold and 1.2 million ounces of gold, Have you done any drilling around that hole?
Rob McEwen Well, I just want to correct one item in front of 632 ounces per ton, it's -- grams.
Unidentified Analyst Yes, it's still a lot.
Rob McEwen It's still a lot of gold and that particular drill hole was in the new area about 200 meters away from where we knew we had mineralization. We are putting more attention into seeing for what type of mine plan we can put in that area at the south end of the Black Fox mine property. Because there's there has been past production in that area of the small. And earlier operator drill hole ramp down, I think it was down about 90 meters. And they took 27,000 ounces of gold and they had a grade of just over 27 grams per ton. So it's a very interesting part of the property. And if we could, maybe Black Fox mine itself will not generate more ore annual production, but when you look at the property as a whole there are a number of other areas where we could source additional production from and possibly get up to the numbers are beyond the numbers you were talking of an annual production. And that's been a large part of the purpose of our aggressive exploration program on the properties we haven't --
Unidentified Analyst You said in the past when you look for gold you look in the shadow of where gold is. And I'm looking right now at your, the map of the Gold Bar property. And from Gold Rush to Gold Bar you say is 20, 27, 25miles something like that. But your Tonkin property is 7.5 miles from Gold Rush. That's a same distance between pipeline and Gold Rush. Why don't you drill up there where you're closer to Gold Rush? You've got a better chance of finding the deep gold there don't you?
Rob McEwen That was the original premise behind buying U.S. gold which has morphed into matured mining that most of the drilling on the property was shallow and Cortez hills and Gold Rush has and four mile discovery hadn't occurred but, it was deeper mineralization. And a lot of the mineralization are then source of mineralization just up the road from us at Barrett's operations Cortez hills and the others you mentioned, is sound in what's called the lower play. And so a geological level or a unit of rock and it wasn't -- we've -- there’s been some deep drilling at Tonkin and when they -- it is a unit of rock in between seem to be quite thick and they weren't hitting the lower plate. We have to take another look at Tonkin most of the focus has been on Gold Bar so far because Tonkin had a recovery problem with the near surface mineralization. But there's about 1 million -- 1.6, 1.8 million ounces of gold at Tonkin with and a good portion of that had a recovery issue. But at Gold Bar, last year, we hired some geologists that were previously with Newmonts and Berrick, and they said why aren't you looking deeper with some of the geophysical work and other exploration work we did last year indicated that the lower plate unit that hosts Cortez Hills. It's a Carlin style mineralization comes closer to surface and we originally thought and that's going to be the target at Black -- Gold Bar this year later in the summer, just put some deep drill holes down and I suppose that we should be taking another looked at Tonkin as well see how where those if the lower plate comes up because there's certainly some big, big deposits just north of us on the same trends.
Unidentified Analyst Okay, Rob, I got one last comment. And that is that the -- this cold whether you've experienced, I believe is result of no sunspots on the sun and from what I learned this cycle is going to continue until 2046. So my advice to you is you better prepare for a lot more cold weather at Nevada and up in Canada. I don't think this is a one off, I think you better be ready for more cold weather, but that's certainly my personal opinion living here in Southern California. I don't know much about cold weather anyway.
Rob McEwen I think it's a very good advice.
Unidentified Analyst All right, thank you very much, Rob and I really enjoyed the all these years, I'm 75 this year and the time since I've owned your three stocks that became one, I really had a lot of fun and enjoyed it and I think it's -- I think that you picked about the hardest business to be successful at.
Unidentified Company Representative Well, thank you very much Stuart, for your comments, your questions and your continued shareholding.
Operator Thank you. And our next question comes from Bob Ward, a private investor.
Unidentified Analyst Rob, first of all, thanks for hosting this call and trying to explain some of the things that have happened. Two relatively straightforward questions, the first is. What is the total cost of the financing that you just completed last week, and if you would, if you can do that on both financial and reputational terms. And second question is, do you think you have the team in place to reach the goals that you’ve set?
Rob McEwen Total costs the commission on the financing was 6%. The -- so that was about a $1.5 million will be. Part of the financing 22 million was closed. And the other 3 million is subject to shareholder approval at the upcoming annual meeting. And that's the sale of stock to insiders myself plus about 11 other members of the board and management team. In terms of reputation, I can't quantify that. But you can probably look at how to set the stock reacted to the news of the financing. That would be part of the cost of reputation. In terms of team, yes, I believe, a very talented team that has the experience to bring this on. To deliver what we said, we've just projected. There will be some further changes to site management at Black Fox and Gold Bar. But other than that we're set to run. Did I cover it up Bob?
Unidentified Analyst I'm sorry. I'm a little slow here. I have my phone on mute. It was very helpful. Thank you. You've answered all the questions that I appreciate the phone call.
Rob McEwen Thank you very much.
Operator And our next question comes from Anthony Bairs, a private investor.
Unidentified Analyst I just have a couple more comments and then maybe get some perspective on you. So as a steward of the capital and the cost of capital right now, you talked earlier about issuing debt versus shares. And I've noticed the share is very sensitizing and vulnerable to any problems that come up. Do you think the Company is moving too fast or too slow? Any investor or anybody on the call cannot see what you guys see direct way to mine site and the management team working collaboratively together? You see a bigger life at the end of the tunnel and can you comment on what you can do so that the share price is not as a vulnerable to these things that happen? Thank you.
Rob McEwen Are we moving too fast or too slow? So the industry is characterized by moving slowly and we're trying to fight that there have been some operating issues that have slowed us down. Gold Bar upon reflection, it might have been wiser to have said will be commissioning and during this year rather than building through the winter and having the complications that come with weather. Is there light at the end of the tunnel definitely what I saw happening in the month of March of Gold Bar was there are Black Fox is very encouraging. We up until the end of February I was looking and saying Q1 was going to do the ugliest quarter I've ever overseen, particularly at Black Fox and in the month of March is really performed well. It did, it doubled our production. So and the grades improved, so I do see letting the end of the tunnel. As Chris talked about Gold Bar in Nevada is a question of, the only thing is not working as well as it should be is the crushers, stacker or handling system that we now believe we have solutions that will be soon in just. And that will be beyond just. So
Chris Stewart Just on our I guess if there's any way you can have some cash in the bank so that if there's any issues with any of the mine it doesn't automatically becomes a financial issue to the corporation.
Rob McEwen Yes well we started out when we did the debt. We thought we had lots of comfort, good margin of safety. And it was just the events that came along, as I mentioned earlier on about Argentina imposing taxes and then our partner in Argentina utilizing a refiner that ends up going bankrupt the cut that revenue. And then the delay in Gold Bar and Black Fox in revenue generation caught us off guard. We tried to put it in an instrument that would address that, because it wasn't that affected her that was the ATM. And then we had to run quickly.
Unidentified Analyst So okay, and do you think that joint venture and any of the projects will be something that company would look at? Because at some point, I know you and I talked about the cost of capital. Do any of these projects make sense from a joint venture perspective, looking out into the future? Thank you.
Rob McEwen Absolutely, our Los Azules copper project is a prime candidate for a joint venture. We have had discussions with a couple of companies one last year was quite extended lasted five, six months. Going back and forth and our thought was if we could get a joint venture, where we have some cash upfront for in consideration for the moneys we've put in, that they move forward to putting a property in the production and then we retain an interest in that property going forward. The capital cost from our projects is multiples above our current market cap. So a joint venture there with these quite a sensible approach. And it's an asset with a 36 year life, in the preliminary economic assessment, that we did in '17. It envisions of mine that would be producing 415 million pounds of copper a year. And that's a very big mine and at $3 copper was projected to pay back in under four years, now run for 36 years. So that's prime candidate and I think with the growing demand for copper for electric vehicles and renewable energy usage and the forecast deficit in copper I think that asset is going to become a more valuable asset in our portfolio. And the road that I spoke about earlier on the access roots if we can get that through then you have a lot of leverage to copper with that property. Elsewhere, we put up our we said our Mexican property is available for sale. And if we did sell that the proceeds would go into furthering Gold Bar and Black Fox.
Operator Thank you. And our next question comes from Wade Gibson.
Unidentified Analyst I have a few quick questions. You touched on most of it that done. I wondered, if you could comment briefly on the given the recent suspension on the dividend, your visibility and intention with regard to revisiting that or coming back to it.
Rob McEwen Certainly, we looked at the dividend and we have some needs for cash to satisfy our operations going forward this year. So we suspend it and we thought it was prudent to suspend it in light of our capital requirements. All I can say, is that when we get into position where we're making profit, so I've always believe dividends or form of rent, that we need to pay our share owners while we are waiting for capital gains to occur. And I can only give you my past experience when I was building Goldcorp, we started, we once became profitable we put in a dividend we paid once a year, the next year it was semiannual, the following year it was quarterly, and thereafter, we paid a dividend monthly. I can't give you a projection, when we’ll start it. But that's the philosophy behind paying a dividend.
Unidentified Analyst And I wondered, can you reiterate, I want to be sure I heard it correctly. As of today for 2019 total production, gold equivalent ounces, did you say 205,000 is today's number?
Rob McEwen That's correct. It was 210,000 at the beginning of the year. And…
Unidentified Analyst Okay, thank you
Rob McEwen The breakdown of that is 50,000 ounces from Black Fox, 50,000 ounces of Gold Bar, 92,000 ounces from -- 10,000 [ph] from Mexico.
Unidentified Analyst My final question. With a previous caller, you commented a little bit on drilling activity exploration activity. In your annual call, we talked about the budget for that. And you mentioned in two months, drill holes at Black Fox and Gold Bar at least. I was curious. what if anything you can say today about your visibility for a timeframe of when any results might be released, how they’re let out to the public and what shareholders might expect this year for when anything might hit the wires with regard to exploration results.
Rob McEwen It will be ongoing through the year, suspect what the first release will be. When we're putting out our production costs for 2018, we should be about a month away from now, month and half.
Unidentified Analyst And from then on it can it visibility…
Rob McEwen It would be I think fairly steady regular lease, probably once every month or six weeks. As I said, we’ll be spending $27 million on explorations here 17 is that will be in at around the Black Fox properties, five of that at Gold Bar and another five, Argentina.
Operator Thank you. And our next question, in Argentina. How do the changes related to the taxes impact your operations and development projects? And do you foresee any additional changes as it relates to government or policies that could impact you?
Rob McEwen Argentina, this year, we're expecting $8 million to $10 million coming from Argentina, assuming there's no additional taxes or changes and operations. There is an election coming up later in the year. So there could be a change in government. But at the moment, the current government is pro-development. They impose the export taxes supposed to come off, but I'm not sure their governments ever take taxes off, but it's projected to come off in 2020. So at the moment, Argentina, we're not expecting our partner to have another refinery go under and we're not anticipating additional factors at this point.
Operator And our next question, in the case of auspicious changes in capital, such as through the sale of the Mexican assets, would management consider using some funds or a buyback in order to offset the recent dilution incurred by shareholders?
Rob McEwen The dilution was very large, but we have to look at it, depending on what we receive on the sale of an asset. But certainly a consideration, we put it in and we had a buyback in 2015 when their share price was weak. And if we had adequate capital and we didn't have other areas where we saw a greater return, that's something we'll consider.
Operator Thank you. And our next question, how will the 2019 and 2020 production guidance change given the recent events at Black Fox and Gold Bar?
Rob McEwen Well, in 2019, we reduced our guidance like 2% from 210,000 gold equivalent ounces to 205,000 ounces. And we would expect in 2020 a higher rate of production coming out of Gold Bar. It would expect to, we're hopeful. We'd be able to move that number from 2005 to a level higher than that.
Operator And our next question regarding, the Los Azules project. Are you pursuing the possibility to bring in the china partner given the longstanding good bilateral and trading relations China has with Chile?
Rob McEwen We haven't looked at just any one particular part of the world. But China maybe a possible source of partners for Los Azules. We're not discouraging any anyone from looking at doing a joint venture with us? We're encouraging that.
Operator And our next question, when do you anticipate to be cash flow positive and returning cash to existing shareholders?
Rob McEwen Well, returning cash to existing shareholders would be in the form of a dividend. And I answered that question earlier when we are in the position to do that. We do have some ambitious growth plans and so will be consuming capital. We should be positive cash flow next year. And at some point, we have to get the production up. I think that’s the policy.
Operator Thank you. Our next question as a long time shareholder and supporter of the McEwen Mining, I feel that it is unfair, the management was given the opportunity to buy shares and is financing at a discount when I am buying in the open market and my cost base is much higher. Can use when shareholders and long-time supporters of the stock do not get the opportunity to participate in a discounted deal?
Rob McEwen Certainly, when the financing is more often than not done at a discount to market, we have always hoped we could do we do the rights issue back a number of years ago. It was heavily discounted, all shareholders could participate. Unfortunately, securities laws require a rights issue to go through very extensive documentation and three to four months time to execute. And it's associated with a lot of uncertainty. The last rights issue we did I backstop in its entirety. As I answered earlier on, we're, if there's shareholders who would like to participate, indicate their interest to us, we'll keep a list of interested parties. And when should we need additional financing somewhere in the future, we'll contact and see what we can do for them to participate. This most recent financing was done with one party who was a shareholder. And they wanted to see alignment with management line. So management put up 12% management's and directors put up 12% of the money.
Operator Thank you. And our next question. In a March 13th, press release, you terminated an equity distribution agreement, or what is also been called an ATM. How much capital was raised here? And what was the total dilution?
Rob McEwen There was $2 million, just over 2 million -- I'm sorry, $2.7 million raised or gross $2.8 million raised. The limit on the ATM was $90 million. We felt that it was an overhang or black cloud over our stock price and that's why we discontinued it. We were not prepared to sell stock and lower prices. And that's why it was a very limited race.
Operator Thank you in our next question comes from Gary Matza [ph], a private investor. Your line is now open.
Gary Matza Thank you very much for taking this call. I am listening to these calls for many years. I appreciate Mr. McEwen's investment in the Company. I listened to all of this information on drilling et cetera. It's pretty much doesn't mean anything to me because I don't understand a lot of it. So, basically, my question is. Do you have an estimate as to when the Company will be profitable? One thing I know from investing for many, many years, share price is directly proportional for profits. And secondly, and many people may not like this question, but is there any possibility that the Company would suffer anything that would cause it to declare bankruptcy at any point in the near future?
Rob McEwen Thank you, Gary. I'll address the last issue first. No, there is nothing that would put us into bankruptcy. And in terms of profitability, we've been investing for growth. We acquired -- we’re building Gold Bar right now, so that was consuming capital. We think that will be generating profits at should breakeven. I think I said just over a three year payback at current gold prices. It has a seven year life at the moment. There's some other assets we’ve acquired nearby. It would give probably extend its life to about 8.5 years. We think there's some attractive exploration. The asset value and extend the life, if we’re successful there. Black Fox we bought at a steep discount through the biggest owners of stock they were in for 560 million and we bought it 35 it was a distressed situation. It needs money before it'll turn around but we believe there's potential to turn around and make it an asset that drives a valuable contribution to our revenue stream and profits. So when do we get profits, we're building and it'll take a couple of years before we're generating the healthy profits that we believe are possible. But we will be able to -- with our cash flows funds, our growth, our current development projects.
Operator Thank you. Our next question, given the need to issue to register direct offering to raise cash and immediate loan covenants, and given also the stuff accent, Black Fox and Gold Bar. Can you give us some guidance on how MUX will face operating expenses for the remainder of the year without having to dilute shareholders again?
Rob McEwen As I mentioned in earlier questions, we’ve -- based on the current gold price it involves where it is and our current Accenture plans and the turnaround at Black Fox and Gold Bar. We will not require additional financing assuming we don't take on additional projects. Next question?
Operator The next question is a three part question. One, can you give us some guidance on the cash flow shortage? Is the organization adequately funded to continue operating in an environment was stagnant gold prices? And how many months of operating cash are on hand?
Rob McEwen All those questions have been answered in earlier questions. But, we had a sufficient fund to carry outour operations for the year. Next question?
Operator Our next question, why did this financing offer units instead of just shares? Why were there three year warrants without an acceleration clause? I do recognize that the warrants are at a premium to the financing price and will bring funds into the Company when exercised. However, being able to have access to these funds sooner rather than later, is in the interest of the Company and its shareholders?
Rob McEwen Agreed, the terms for -- the terms that the buyer needed to participate in the issue. If the warrants are exercised, the stock traded close at $1.73, the night before the issue was announced, and assuming warrants or exercised the effective sale price is $1.70 of the effective of pricing issue. But the terms were dictated by the buyer. Next question?
Operator Thank you. Our next question comes from Ken Reese with Sagepoint Financial.
Ken Reese Considering financing, the 6% commission seems rather high and I'd like to know who received that?
Rob McEwen The investment dealers received it. And the lead was Roth Capital, A.G.P was in there. And then there was [indiscernible] a small portion of that.
Ken Reese Was there any way to negotiate that down a little bit? Or did it negotiate in the first place?
Rob McEwen It was negotiated and that was the terms for the financing.
Operator Thank you. And our next question. Rob, in an interview with Kitco, you stated that the gold pool market started in 2016. You also say that MUX has a large data to gold ratio, and the stock moves with gold. Can you elaborate as to why the share price of MUX has been on such a dollar trend and has hit a two-year low of $1.43 a share?
Rob McEwen That's a very good question. First, gold market appears to have been in the gold market from the beginning in '16. Although gold share, the price of gold was only up less than 25% during that period. Senior gold starts measured by the GDX were up, almost three times that, at around 655 a week ago. We were a little higher than that upon the announcement of this financing. It was received poorly by the market. And that's why we dropped $2.43, I think concerns about Gold Bar, it was expressed earlier on by John Tumazos, concerns is that Gold Bar might be a real problem and possibly a write-off, which is not the case. And in the market is nervous. Next question?
Operator Thank you. I am not showing any further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back Rob McEwen for any further remarks.
Rob McEwen Thanks very much, operator. I'd like to thank everyone for joining the call today. We'll have our production numbers up within a short while and that would be followed by news at our annual meeting on, in the middle of May. Thank you very much and successful investing.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Apr 9, 2019 5:13:39 GMT -5
Q: Hi Bill, Looking at the huge short interest in both Pretium with a 9 days to cover ratio and McEwen with a nearly 18 days to cover ratio and see one huge hedge fund momo trade ready for an unwind. As both companies had mine start up issues the shorts just piled on. Since neither company is a fraud and the companies are operationally and financially stable it just seems a short squeeze might be better than making a discovery for the share price. To put this into perspective TSLA has less than a 3 days to cover. Just need gold to break out for this to matter. Am I missing something here? Thanks Fleck: MUX did a deal, so some of the shorts may be related to that. They need a stronger gold price to make any shorts feel nervous, I'd say.
************************** •McEwen Mining is exploring the potential sale of its Mexican assets. •MUX says half of net proceeds from a potential sale would be used to advance development projects, with the rest used to pay down debt. •The company reports Q1 gold production fell 23% Y/Y to 26,789 oz. and silver output rose 10% to 703,217 oz., with gold equiv. production declining 18% to 36,166 oz. •Chairman Rob McEwen says gold production "improved significantly" at the Black Fox mine in March, and "the issues that pushed the start-up of commercial production at Gold Bar from Q1 into Q2 have largely been resolved."
McEwen Mining Reports Q1 2019 Production Results April 9, 2019 TORONTO, April 09, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) reports consolidated production for Q1 2019 of 26,789 gold ounces and 703,217 silver ounces, or 36,166 gold equivalent ounces(1)(“GEOs”).
Consolidated Production Summary here
“ I am very pleased to say that after a tough start to the year at our Black Fox and Gold Bar mines, we have delivered a strong close to the first quarter. In March, gold production improved significantly at Black Fox, allowing us to achieve 93% of our budgeted production for the quarter. The issues that pushed the start-up of commercial production at Gold Bar from Q1 into Q2 have largely been resolved. The San Jos é and El Gallo mines are performing well and are on-track to deliver over 50% of our planned 2019 production of 205,000 gold equivalent ounces . I’m excited about starting our exploration drilling programs in Timmins and Nevada, which will generate results for the rest of the year,” said Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner.
Gold Bar Mine, USA (100%) The ramp-up of production at Gold Bar is progressing and we are addressing the challenges with the crushing plant. Several issues related to material handling have been resolved and throughput at the crushing and stacking plant is increasing. Other aspects of the mine are performing as designed. The first gold ingot was poured at Gold Bar on February 16. Since then the mine has poured gold regularly with Q1 production totalling 2,052 gold ounces. Guidance has been reduced by 10% as a result of the slower than expected start-up. We expect Gold Bar to achieve commercial production during Q2 2019, and produce 50,000 gold ounces during the full year. Our 2019 exploration budget for the Gold Bar property is $5 million. Exploration drilling will target both near surface and deep Carlin-type mineralization. Drilling is expected to start in early May and continue throughout the rest of the year.
Black Fox Mine, Canada (100%) Black Fox produced 8,765 gold ounces in Q1. In spite of the primary contractor-operated crushing plant being shut down for 6 weeks in February and March due to a fire, our team recorded strong production of 5,335 gold ounces in March, and achieved 93% of our budgeted production for the quarter. The crusher has been repaired and is now operating normally and we maintain our guidance of 50,000 gold ounces for 2019. Our 2019 exploration budget for the Black Fox Complex is $17 million and includes surface and underground drilling. Surface drilling with three drill rigs started up again at the beginning of April, and we expect to announce initial results in late May.
San José Mine, Argentina (49%(2)) Our attributable production from San José was 10,559 gold ounces and 701,341 silver ounces, for a total of 19,910 GEOs in Q1. Production at San José is typically lower in the first quarter due to regularly scheduled maintenance. The mine is on-track to achieve our full year guidance for 2019 of 92,000 GEOs. We received approximately $2 million in dividends from our interest in San José during Q1.
El Gallo Project, Mexico (100%) El Gallo produced 5,413 gold ounces in Q1. El Gallo continues to recover gold from residual leaching of the heap leach. During the quarter the process plant underwent a small expansion to improve efficiency and enable faster gold recovery.
Fenix Project Work on the Fenix Project feasibility study and permitting is progressing. We expect the feasibility study to be complete in Q2 2019.
Potential Sale As part of our capital allocation strategy we are exploring the potential sale of our Mexican assets. We anticipate that half of the net proceeds from the potential sale would be used to advance our development projects, and the balance would be used to retire a portion of our debt.
First Quarter Financial Results Operating costs for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 will be released with our 10-Q Quarterly Financial Statements in early May.
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING McEwen has the goal to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index by creating a profitable gold and silver producer focused in the Americas. McEwen's principal assets consist of: the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina (49% interest); the Black Fox mine in Timmins, Canada; the Fenix Project in Mexico; the Gold Bar mine in Nevada; and the large Los Azules copper project in Argentina, advancing towards development. McEwen has approximately 360 million shares outstanding. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, owns 22% of the shares.
Footnotes 1.'Gold Equivalent Ounces' are calculated based on a 75:1 gold to silver ratio. 2.The San José Mine is 49% owned by McEwen Mining Inc. and 51% owned and operated by Hochschild Mining plc. All dollar amounts are US Dollars.
Reliability of Information Regarding San José Minera Santa Cruz S.A., the owner of the San José Mine, is responsible for and has supplied to the Company all reported results from the San José Mine. McEwen Mining’s joint venture partner, a subsidiary of Hochschild Mining plc, and its affiliates other than MSC do not accept responsibility for the use of project data or the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Technical Information The technical contents of this news release has been reviewed and approved by Chris Stewart, P.Eng., President & COO of McEwen Mining and a Qualified Person as defined by Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 "Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects."
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Apr 16, 2019 0:51:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 2, 2019 12:35:03 GMT -5
Q1 2019 Earnings Conference Call May 1, 2019 Company Participants Rob McEwen - Executive Chairman & Chief Owner Chris Stewart - President & Chief Operating Officer Andrew Elinesky - Chief Financial Officer Sylvain Guerard - Senior Vice President, Exploration
Conference Call Participants Heiko Ihle - H.C. Wainwright Jake Sekelsky - Roth Capital Markets Bhakti Pavani - Alliance Global Partners John Tumazos - John Tumazos Independent Research Rolf Wagner -Wagner Investment Ronnie Simpson
Rob McEwen Good morning ladies and gentlemen. With me today are Chris Stewart, our President and Chief Operating Officer; Andrew Elinesky, our Chief Financial Officer. I welcome you and I'm going to jump right over to Andrew to talk about our financials.
Andrew Elinesky Thank you, Rob. Good morning everyone. Thank you for joining us today. In the first quarter, McEwen Mining continued with significant investments in exploration, development of Black Fox, completing the construction at Gold Bar, as well as continuing work on the Los Azules and the Fenix projects. The combination of lower than expected production and sales, in addition to these project investments resulted in the company reporting a net loss of $10.1 million or $0.03 per share. Our cash consumption by the operations for the quarter increased by $17 million compared to the same quarter of last year. However, we issued equity in the quarter of just over $22 million, which more than offset the spend and our liquid assets increased by $2.5 million in the quarter. We ended at the end of March 31st with $26 million in cash and a total of $40 million in liquid assets, which should take us safely to the end of the year and beyond. Regarding our overall operating results, the company had consolidated production of just over 36,000 gold equivalent ounces. With these levels being lower than planned, our cost per ounce were also higher than we forecasted. Our earnings for mining operations decreased by just over $11 million or $0.03 per share compared to the same period in 2018. This is primarily the result of; one, a significant drop-off in operating profit at our El Gallo Mine, as the mine has transitioned from mining to residual leaching. And two, the Black Fox Mine had a decrease in profitability due to the production delays for the first two months of the year. Please note that we did not report any non-GAAP measures, such as earnings from mining operations or cost per ounce for Gold Bar this quarter. We will start to report them once we have declared commercial production. Moving on to the outlook for the rest of 2019, Black Fox production should be in line with the 50,000 ounces produced in 2018 and we still plan on seeing a 5% reduction in the all-in sustaining costs per ounce when compared to last year. At San José, production level should increase slightly when compared to 2018 which is allowing the guidance for our per ounce cost to remain the same as that year, despite the significant increase in export costs, in addition to the inflationary outlook for Argentina.
Chris Stewart Good morning everyone. I would now like to discuss our operations. At Gold Bar, construction of our newest gold mine is approaching completion and commissioning activities are underway. During the first quarter, unfavorable weather and a lack of manpower slowed our progress. We plan to achieve commercial production in Q2. As previously announced, we have successfully implemented solutions to the operational challenges which slowed our progress in the first quarter. We are now fully staffed and we've recruited a new General Manager to lead our operations into full production. I'm pleased to announce that Jack Henris will join our Nevada operations next week. Jack has worked as General Manager at Newmont's Cripple Creek and Carlin Mines and has extensive experience in the Nevada area from a combined 21 years with Newmont and Barrick. The first gold ingot was poured at Gold Bar on February 16th, 2019 and we continue to pour gold regularly, as we ramp-up production towards commercial production. We're pleased with the recovery rates we are seeing from the ores stacked on the heap leach pad, they are in line with our feasibility study curves. As a result of moving commercial production at Gold Bar into the second quarter, we have revised our production guidance for Nevada from 55,000 to 50,000 gold equivalent ounces which impacts our Gold Bar production guidance for the year by only 2.4%. Exploration work will commence in May on the Gold Bar property. In Canada, at the Black Fox Mine, our team recorded strong production of 5,300 gold ounces over the last three weeks of the quarter producing 8,900 gold equivalent ounces in Q1, which represents 93% of our budgeted production for the quarter. This Q1 production was achieved despite the operational challenges that essentially stopped our gold production from mid-January, February, and into the first week of March, so approximately eight weeks in total. The fire damaged crushing plant has been completely repaired and is operating normally. Production is back on track and we fulfilled our budgeted ounces for the month of April. We maintain our guidance of 50,000 gold equivalent ounces at Black Fox for 2019. Black Fox had a cash cost of $805 with an all-in sustaining cost of $1,454 per gold equivalent ounce during the quarter. The all-in sustaining costs increased due to fixed costs being spread over decreased number of ounces sold and an increase in sustaining exploration and development cost during the quarter. As we're increasing production, reducing sustaining exploration and development costs in the second half of 2019, the all-in sustaining costs at Black Fox will decrease in the following quarters and balance out our guidance number of $1,080. During Q1 2019, exploration work continued underground at the Black Fox Mine. The first phase of the exploration drift on the 810-meter level of the mine is now complete and will provide a drilling platform that gives us a better angle to target the Black Fox deposit at depth, below the existing mine development. We have four drill rigs turning underground and we plan to maintain that level during the year, with drilling focused on confirming and expanding known mineralized trends located close to existing mine workings in three different areas of the mine. We're working on developing multiple mining fronts in the underground operations, as this will provide more consistent ore production in the second half of the year. As of April, we now have an additional seven drill rigs turning on surface at various locations on the Black Fox property and on the Stock property next to our mill facility. At the San José Mine in Argentina, production is on track to achieve the guidance for 2019. According to our 49% interest in the mine, our attributable production in Q1 was 10,500 gold ounces and 700,000 silver ounces for a total of 19,900 gold equivalent ounces at cash costs of $749 and an all-in sustaining costs of $1,115. For the El Gallo Complex in Mexico, we're pleased to say that production from our operation has delivered as planned for the first quarter and that the feasibility study for Fenix project remains on track to be completed midyear. Residual leaching activities from El Gallo Gold continued after the final ore was mined and stacked on the heap leach pad back in mid-2018. Our operating team achieved a quarterly production of 5,400 gold equivalent ounces, comparable with our production from the previous quarter and in line with our 2019 guidance of 13,000 gold equivalent ounces for Mexico. Total cash costs were $967 and all-in sustaining costs $989. Closure, reclamation, and residual heap leaching are ongoing and will continue for several years. During Q1, work continued to progress on the feasibility study and we expect the feasibility study to be completed by the end of the second quarter. We also progressed the permitting work for Phase 1 of Project Fenix which is for the reprocessing of El Gallo Gold heap leach material. Our formal application is submitted, with approval expected in Q3. At Los Azules, during 2018, we defined the northern access route, a new low altitude all-year access for our copper project in the Argentinian Andes. During Q1, we completed an on-the-ground expedition to gather data which will now allow us to complete a more detailed plan and cost estimate for establishing this year-round access route. During Q1 2019, we continued environmental baseline monitoring together with our other work for the environmental impact assessment submission. We're targeting the submission of the IIA within the next 12 months and expect the environmental impact declaration to be received during 2020. The main objective of this work and investment at Los Azules is to further de-risk and improve the value of the project, while we look for strategic partners to further advance this world-class copper deposit. In conclusion, Q1 was a challenging quarter for both our Gold Bar and Black Fox operations. We have come through with a solid focus on recovery in the production output at Black Fox and achieving commercial production at Gold Bar in Q2. We look forward to presenting you with positive updates from our projects and operations in the coming months and over the rest of 2019. I will now turn it back over to Rob.
Rob McEwen Thank you very much, Chris. Good morning, again. I'd like to start by saying I'm really happy that Q1 is behind us. It was a challenging quarter, with a number of events that knocked the confidence in our operations. As you heard from Chris and Andrew, Black Fox is back on track. Looking at production in January and February, it amounted to 19,000 ounces over those two months from Black Fox on a consolidated basis for the company. And in the month of March we did 17,000 ounces; in the month of April 16,500 ounces. So we're getting back to where we thought we'd be. We're looking at a year-end production number of 205,000 ounces for the corporation, being 16% higher than the year before and that was building on a year of 16% growth. So, production is going up, at Black Fox we see costs going down. We have a healthy treasury that will take us well into next year and beyond and a really exciting exploration program this year and we're going to start seeing a large flow of news coming out of it starting later this month. We've been investing in the future and I'm sorry to shaking your confidence with the first two months, but we hope to regain it in the balance of the year. And at this point, I'd like to open it up for questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Heiko Ihle, H.C. Wainwright Hey, Rob. In the Feb 21 press release you guys were talking about the potential sale of the Mexican assets. I just wanted to see if there's any progress, anything that you can report. How has buyer interest been, given, I mean, there is not that many good projects on the market to the best of my understanding? And do you want to just provide some color on where this stands or is this still planned? And, I don't think you're going to be willing to do this, but maybe even some of the prices that have been thrown your way.
Rob McEwen We have had a number of companies that have looked at or signed confidentially agreements. Some have come in and looked at it, we have received no offers as of this date.
Heiko Ihle Okay. That’s a very direct answer and I appreciate it. And these CAs are still active? Or have they moved on to something else?
Rob McEwen I don't know, until we hear otherwise from them.
Heiko Ihle Fair enough. And then on Gold Bar and this is just a clarification on my end. The 2,030 ounces of pre-production that you got during Q1, I assume there's going to be some more pre-production ounces during Q2 as well. Are these figures reflected in the 50,000-ounce guidance for 2019?
Rob McEwen Yes.
Heiko Ihle Okay, okay. Perfect. And then, I assume the answer to it is yes as well. Are they also included in the cash cost guidance for the year? Because, I mean, if you extrapolate that, presumably, 2020 cash cost should be somewhat lower than 2019.
Rob McEwen Yes and yes.
Heiko Ihle Okay. Very good. Thank you so much.
Rob McEwen Thank you, Heiko.
Jake Sekelsky, Roth Capital Markets You've obviously outlined a fairly robust exploration program. Can you maybe just walk us through some of the initial targets, particularly at Black Fox? Or maybe put more simply, what's the primary goal of the first leg of the 2019 program?
Rob McEwen I'll ask Sylvain Guerard, who's our Senior VP of Exploration, to speak to his projects.
Sylvain Guerard Yes. Good morning. Yes, we started in April our surface exploration in Timmins and quickly we ramped up and we have now seven rigs turning at both Black Fox and the Stock properties there. As you know, last year we had a very good year. We added reserves, resources, basically at all of our projects and we generated a lot of new drill intersections. Those are our potential discoveries, but at very early stage. So one of the priorities right now is to follow up on those new results and there's multiple targets that we are currently testing. One of the focus at Black Fox is over the Southeast property area the Grey Fox sector. We have three deposits there. There is a total of 465,000 ounces at 6.6 grams per tonne Indicated resources. And surrounding this sector there's multiple targets within 1 kilometer radius around this place. Last year we had a very interesting intersection. I'll give you an example. At Gibson, within the intrusive we intersected 34-meters over 3 grams per tonne including 11 grams over six meters. So this is a new style of mineralization, potential bulk style that we are following up right now. There is a structure just to the east of one of the zones, Zone 147 there, where we have 264,000 ounces at 7.5 gpt that we are also drilling. It's a shallow high-grade vein structure. So this is also something that could add to the economics of the Grey Fox deposit. And we also have the exploration going out at Stock. Stock, as you know, we drilled first program last year. In nine months we came with the first resource, very first initial resource of Stock East 150,000 ounces. And we drilled over 2-kilometer strike length along the Destor-Porcupine that of the former Stock Mine. The Stock Mine was mined down to 330 meters, which is extremely shallow for Archaean gold deposit. So we are following up on the mine itself, as well as now over 3-kilometer strike length that holds the mine there that's including of Stock East new discovery and resource. So the objective is to grow the resource and find new shoots along this very prospective trend that's remained underexplored. And at Black Fox we're also drilling underground, as Chris talked about that expanding the mineralization to the West more particularly. And finally I just want to not forget the Nevada. We have a great project at Gold Bar. We made a lot of work last year and we were successful to increase reserves. We added a year of mine life there. We also added resources to surround our pit. And we developed a very solid exploration model. We added new surveys we added new geologists including former geologist working with Barrick to the north. And together they came with a strong model and they found multiple new targets around Gold Bar. We see Gold Bar as a high-quality Carlin gold system on the Cortez trend and probably the most underexplored gold system along this trend. So we have multiple targets. Some are shallow oxide that we are targeting and we are going to go a bit deeper outside of our pits and oxide area also to try to define potential for large deposits like you see to the north there, with Barrick. And this program at Gold Bar is starting later this month and will continue over the rest of the year. And we’ll also include as part of this program two deep holes to go and test lower part of the stratigraphy, the Roberts Mountain stratigraphy, where we believe we can discover large high-grade sulfide deposits like the big deposits you see in Nevada.
Jake Sekelsky Got it. Okay. Thanks for that. That's very helpful. And just switching over to Los Azules, it sounds like progress is being made on the access route. I'm just trying to get a handle on when we'll see some definitive news there and obviously the potential impacts on project economics and permitting?
Rob McEwen Jake, on the road we're doing engineering work right now trying to get estimates on cost and that we should have by the time of our annual meeting, which will be on the 23rd of this month and we'll be sharing it with our shareholders. Jake Sekelsky Okay, that’s much sooner than I had thought. All right, that’s all for me.
Bhakti Pavani, Alliance Global Partners Just a quick one on Black Fox. Despite the challenges, I did notice that the grade was significantly higher than what you guys have reported in the previous quarter. So, just kind of from the modeling perspective, is that the sort of range of grade we should be modeling going forward?
Chris Stewart Good morning. I'd say we reported around, I think it was around 6.6 to a plan of 5.5 roughly during the quarter. So we did see a bit of improvement there. We have implemented a number of things at the mine, essentially to try and manage our ore handling a lot better, so we reduced the loss. So when you look at the overall reserves, reserve grade is around 7.7, 7.8. So I would say going forward, our challenge will be to keep it in that sort of 6 to 6.5 range but I don't think it's out of the question, given some of the changes that we made within the operations on a go-forward basis.
Bhakti Pavani And I guess the production guidance that you have provided for Black Fox is considering this level of grade or does it assume the 6.5 grade?
Chris Stewart The work that we've done, we're in the process of actually sort of reviewing all the information on site and building a bit more of a database around the grades we're getting out of some of the stopes. So we're trying to again manage our whole process better, but currently the 50,000 ounces assumes the grades that historically we have seen coming out of these stopes. So there's some potential to see a bit of a bump in the grade during the year, but we need to get a bit more experience under our belt before we can sort of confirm that. Bhakti Pavani Got it. Thank you. Moving to Gold Bar, I know you mentioned that the issues with the crushing plant have all been resolved. Just kind of wondering, what are the key factors that you need to I guess checkmark before you announce commercial production at Gold Bar?
Chris Stewart The sort of requirement we've imposed on ourselves to achieve commercial production is obtaining 75% over 30 days and we're in the process of working on that now. So our target is 7,200 tonnes per day. So we're looking for a 5,400 tonne per day average stacked onto the heath leach pad in a 30-day period.
Bhakti Pavani And how is the process coming along and how is it bearing in comparison with your expectation at this point, with regards to the crushing plant and the other process?
Chris Stewart We've resolved a number of issues related to processing the clay through the crusher and through the screening plant and we've got those issues behind us. We're now working on typical commissioning issues with some communication issues between grasshoppers and little things that stop you for 1/2 hour here and a 1/2 hour there. So we're getting the most out of the system now. But we're pleased with our progress especially over the last week. We've really seen the tonnage coming up on the system since we've resolved the issues around the screening plant crusher. So I'm pleased with what we're seeing there now and we're confident we can obtain commercial production here in Q2.
Bhakti Pavani Okay. Perfect. That’s it from my side. Thank you.
Rob McEwen Bhakti, just one comment on production at Black Fox, in the first two months of the year, in January/February, we didn't really have any production coming out of Black Fox and so reflecting in our corporate numbers, we only had 19,000 ounces. But right now between March and April we produced 76% more in the third and fourth month than we produced in the first two months. So at Black Fox, January and February, just to break it down, just to the operations was a little over 3,400 ounces. In March we did 5,500 and in April we did almost 4,500. So there's significant change and improvement in production as those problems were resolved.
Chris Stewart Our current budget, just so you’re aware as well, is based on a head grade of 5.75 grams per tonne.
Robert McEwen Okay.
Bhakti Pavani Okay. Thank you.
John Tumazos, John Tumazos Independent Research In a way, Chris and Andrew, you're teasing us a little bit telling us that total company did 17,000 ounces March single month, 16,500 April single month or 200,000 annualized. Could you break it down by mine? I now you were just on the last question starting to. I'm guessing that, San José does about 4,000 a month and the residual leach in Mexico about 1,500 a month. So there is about 10,000 broken down per month between Black Fox and Gold Bar starting up, where some of the Black Fox surge is catching up on that stockpiled ore in January, February that wasn't crushed and some of the Black Fox surge is a little better grade. And in March, there wasn't anything from Gold Bar, but in April there was. So if you could break down April by mine, I guess we should be happy things are great, I just like to know better why they're great and how they're great.
Andrew Elinesky That's a good point, John. It's Andrew. As you said, San José obviously the significant contributor, being guidance of over 90,000 ounces gold equivalent for the year, so in April we had San José at 8,600 ounces gold equivalent, Gold Bar at 1,790, El Gallo at 1,800 and Black Fox, as Rob just mentioned, just under 4,500 ounces.
John Tumazos Could you give us that for March?
Andrew Elinesky Sure. So Black Fox was 5,500, Mexico was 1,200, Gold Bar was 1,400 and San José was 9,000.
John Tumazos Thank you very much.
Bill Powers Yes. Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions.
Robert McEwen Good morning, Bill.
Bill Powers Good morning. As far as my understanding is, you've had a reduction of about 70 personnel in Black Fox and to me that estimates to about 50,000 per annum run rate of about $100 per annum as far as cost reduction. Is this accurate or is this am I missing something? And is this trend would indicate that you have further to go as far as cost reductions at Black Fox?
Chris Stewart Hi, Bill, Chris Stewart here. The number for a reduction in the workforce is closer to, we were at 260, we are down to 209, so we have 50 people have been removed from the business, which translates into $6 million thereabouts coming out of the cost. So that's something that will be on an annualized basis. So that's now reflected in our updated budget. And we continue to analyze everything at site leaving no stone unturned . Essentially they’re trying to continue to reduce our cost. We're bringing some contracted task in-house this year as well. So we're going to see cost savings around that and that's in line with our objective to again try and control our gold in the ore much better by reducing the amount of handling and where we're crushing the ore currently. We crush the ore on surface of the mine and then ship it over to the mill and our plan by midyear, well actually by the end of this mid-May, we'll actually be hauling run of mine ore from the mine – sorry – by midyear, we'll be moving ore over to the mill and crushing it over there. So we're going to refurbish our own crushing plant that we have at the Stock Mill rather than crushing at the mine site, and we think that'll help improve our gold grades that we're seeing, so reducing the loss at the end of the day. But we are ultimately looking for cost reduction opportunities at Black Fox, as we continue to push ahead there.
Bill Powers Okay. Thank you for that. And my second question would be as far as the tailings in Nevada. Where do those stand, are those incorporated into the mine plan as of now or are those going to be looked at in the future as far as incorporating them at this point?
Andrew Elinesky Nevada, I don’t quite understand your question. Nevada is a heap leach?
Bill Powers Oh I'm sorry. My understanding was there were historic tailings there that were either under review for potential upgrade or potential future material or maybe I'm – have my mind mixed up?
Robert McEwen Bill, it's Rob. We don't have tailings in Nevada, but we do have material that was considered non-economic, that was mined by the previous operator in the 1980s and there's a number of dumps on the property, places where they've been placed and some of them are running. They were mining two-gram material back in the 1980s and our feasibility is based on one gram. So there is ore that we're going to be recovering from these various areas of what was considered uneconomic 30 years ago.
Bill Powers Okay. And these were already incorporated into your plan?
Robert McEwen Yes, yes.
We have a question from the web. It appears that the 2019 guidance for cash costs and all in sustaining costs at Gold Bar are $930 and $975 respectively. This is higher than the 2018 feasibility study. Can you explain the difference in costs?
Robert McEwen Yes. Andrew, would you carry this?
Andrew Elinesky Yes. Thank you for the question, John. I'm afraid you're not necessarily comparing apples-to-apples. The $770 and $843 costs from the feasibility study were for the life of mine. And the costs obviously for this year relate only to 2019. And what you have is a ramp-up in a partial year of production, which means our per ounce costs for the first partial year of being 2019 are going to be higher, as well as we're seeing an increase in our ramp-up costs and part of the delays that we've encountered. And it's our first year obviously of production so we've come up with $930, $975 and obviously, as we get to commercial production, we expect those to come down and as we switch our focus from commissioning to becoming more efficient and focusing on how we can save money there.
Our next question is from the web says, has the company developed an all-in sustaining cost per ounce for the 2018 company-wide silver production?
Andrew Elinesky Thank you for the question. No, we normally don’t disclose a silver all-in sustaining cost. Silver accounts for less than a quarter of our production. However, on a 75 to 1 silver to gold ratio, 2018 cost on a silver equivalent basis would have been $13.50. If you use the average for the year, which is closer to 85 to 1, our silver equivalent all-in sustaining cost would be $12.44 per silver equivalent ounce. Rolf Wagner, Wagner Investment Bob, I have kind of a tested question. I think, reviewing some data, I think the company and/or you took an interest in Great Bear, an exploration company in Canada. Since you are active in that area, can you enlighten us why? Is it a company possession or is it your personal holding?
Rob McEwen Rolf, it's both. The firm made an investment I made in the company. It's located in Northwestern Ontario. It's in an area called Red Lake where Goldcorp’s Foundation asset is located. And they had some very interesting grades when we bought it. The grades were interesting, the market cap was low and it looked like there's a chance to have a new gold rush in the Red Lake District. And we use our investments to build our treasury.
Rolf Wagner Yeah, thank you. I mean, the reason I ask because you are very familiar with that area, right, because of your original activity, and it feels good. Thank you for answering the question.
Our next question comes from the web. Given the need for capital to develop the current portfolio of projects, would it makes sense to sell off some of the investments in Inventus, Golden Predator, Great Bear Resources and others?
Rob McEwen That's the intent, that over time we would liquidate those positions and use the funds to develop the properties where it's needed.
Our next web question, what are your thoughts in considering a merger or joint venture dealing with other mining companies? While your exploration is targeting the development of new deposits, isn't it more profitable to focus on exploration at the existing mine site? How do you see the evolution of McEwen Mining’s production at various sites by the end of the year and for 2020?
Rob McEwen Okay. You have four questions. First, thoughts of merger or joint venture. Our door’s always open for discussions. And, at the right price, any joint venture or merger is worth considering. We have plans to grow the company, qualify for the S&P over time, and right now is an interesting time to be looking for, certainly property acquisitions. In terms of measures to reduce production cost, Chris highlighted some areas of Black Fox that we're doing it earlier in the question period. And the debt, it has a three-year term and I'm never a big fan of debt. So I'd like to get that off the books as quickly as we can. The third question was asked about we're targeting new deposits. The ones that Sylvain spoke about in one of the questions, we have quite a few targets on our own properties and we're certainly putting $27 million into exploration this year, $17 million in Timmins, $5 million in Nevada, $5 million in Argentina. I like those areas. We are on all our mine sites and we think we have excellent potential on there. How do we see production at the various sites by the end of the year? Well, our total forecasted production is 205,000 ounces that's a 16% increase from the year before, building on a 16% the year before it. We will see increased production just coming -- Gold Bar should be producing more next year according to its mine plan than what it accounts for. And we're looking at putting plans in place that could bring in other satellite deposits that exist on our mine properties right now.
Ronnie Simpson Yes, this question is for Rob. Rob I've followed McEwen Mining for several years, and I've had confidence in you, but looking at the share price, I'm concerned about the share price. We're down to $1.38 now, and we're getting close to $1. And I keep hearing conversations about how we're going to be -- your goal is to join the S&P 500. I'm concerned to moving the share price up first before we start having those kind of conversations, because the share price has deteriorated a lot in the last two years and I'd like you to address that.
Rob McEwen Happy to, Ronnie. Thank you for the question. I'm not happy with the share price either. Like yourself, I have a few shares in the company, about 78 million shares. At this point trying to do some M&A with our share price here, doesn't make a lot of sense if we don't have an extremely good price on that acquisition. Our goal is to grow, but to grow without losing value in the company. We had a particularly hard first quarter. And, as I said at the beginning of the call, I'm glad it's behind us. Production is picking up at Black Fox and Gold Bar is coming on stream this quarter. We should see our numbers by the end of the year, as I said earlier, 205,000 ounces. And we think there is good room to build on our exploration success. I'm sorry, you and every other shareholders had to endure the price decline, but I think the direction is up from here, not down. Hope that answers your question.
Our next web question, what measures are you taking to reduce the debt from McEwen Mining?
Robert McEwen Our debt has a three-year term. It matures in August of 2021. So, we'll look to retire it there. If we happen to sell one of our assets, we'd apply a portion of those funds to the retirement of the debt or eliminate it totally.
Our next question comes from the web. Has there been any progress in the potential sale or joint venture of the Los Azules copper project in Argentina?
Robert McEwen We've already answered that question earlier, so.
Our next question is a three-part question. First part, can you provide some background on the plan to build the northern route -- road and infrastructure in the Los Azules? The cost to build the project. How long it will take to complete once all governmental approvals are in? And who will maintain it?
Robert McEwen Excellent questions. Don't have many answers to those. Right now, we have done aerial surveillance, created topographical charts, we've gone in on foot. And currently, engineering drawings and cost estimates are being put together. And by our annual meeting, we should have more details on what the cost would be to build the road. The other matters about all government permits and the cost to maintain it, it's still too premature to comment on those.
Our next question is from the web. Who own what once it is complete? Does McEwen Mining have a majority say in its future evolution?
Robert McEwen Of what, operator?
Operator We'll go to the next question. Are there any restrictions on its use? Do you foresee developments along the route and other public and private use of the infrastructure?
Robert McEwen The road would be a private road going to the mine. At this point, there'd be no other uses for that road.
Rob McEwen Thank you very much operator. It only gets better. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 7, 2019 2:40:05 GMT -5
McEwen Mining Announces Management Changes TORONTO, May 06, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) is pleased to announce two new management appointments. Meri Verli, PhD, CA, CPA, will be joining as the new Chief Financial Officer, replacing Andrew Elinesky who is departing the Company effective today; and Jack Henris will be joining as General Manager for Nevada effective today. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, commented: “I’m pleased to welcome these two experienced and accomplished individuals to the team at McEwen Mining. We are moving forward with a strong management team, who is focused on operational excellence.”
Meri Verli Meri has extensive experience as a senior financial executive, having held several management roles in the gold mining sector, including most recently as the CFO of PPX Mining Corp since October 2017, Senior VP Finance and Treasury at Kirkland Lake Gold until July 2017 and VP Finance at Lake Shore Gold for 9 years. At Kirkland Lake Gold, Meri was part of the team that executed the transformational merger between Kirkland and Newmarket Gold creating a new +500,000 ounce per year gold producer in 2017. During her tenure at Kirkland Lake, Meri was instrumental in integrating the finance and treasury teams, policies and practices for the various acquired entities. Meri was VP Finance at Lake Shore Gold until September 2016, where she provided senior financial planning and analysis support. She played a key role in cost reduction initiatives and in building the finance department and policies as Lake Shore Gold transitioned from a junior exploration company to a commercial gold producer with more than 600 employees and contractors. Meri is a Chartered Professional Accountant, holds a PhD in Economic Sciences, a Bachelor of Geology and Engineering and a Bachelor of Economics from the University of Tirana, Albania.
Jack Henris Jack is a senior executive with deep hands-on experience in the mining industry. He has a successful track record of driving cost reduction, increased production and safety improvement. Jack brings over 30 years of experience, most recently as the Vice President of Mining and Geotechnical for Goldcorp. He has extensive experience in Nevada having worked at Newmont for 12 years and Barrick for 9 years. Prior to joining Goldcorp from 2013 to 2017, Jack held the position of General Manager at two large Newmont operations in Nevada, the Carlin Operation and Cripple Creek. Jack holds a BSc in Geological Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology.
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING McEwen has the goal to qualify for inclusion in the S&P 500 Index by creating a profitable gold and silver producer focused in the Americas. McEwen's principal assets consist of: the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina (49% interest); the Black Fox mine in Timmins, Canada; the Fenix Project in Mexico; the Gold Bar mine in Nevada; and the large Los Azules copper project in Argentina, advancing towards development. McEwen has approximately 360 million shares outstanding. Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner, owns 22% of the shares.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 21, 2019 1:28:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 23, 2019 6:52:51 GMT -5
•McEwen Mining MUX says it has reached commercial production at its Gold Bar Mine in Nevada, and reports new positive exploration drill results from the Grey Fox Area within the Black Fox property in Ontario. •MUX says Gold Bar production has been steadily increasing since the first gold pour in February and forecasts output of 50K oz. at an all-in sustaining cost of $975/oz. for 2019. •MUX also says Ontario drill results included positive results from two targets in the Grey Fox area, which cumulatively hosts estimated indicated resources of 465K oz. of gold.
McEwen Mining Exploration Produces Rich Gold Results at Black Fox
Key intercepts include: 34.77 g/t Auover 2.65 m (1.12 opt* Au over 8.69 ft.) 396.46 g/t Auover 1.81 m (12.75 opt Au over 5.94 ft.) 245.55 g/t Auover 1.27 m (7.89 opt Au over 4.17 ft.) 30.64 g/t Au over 2.99 m (0.99 opt Au over 9.81 ft.) 51.50 g/t Auover 0.95 m (1.66 opt Au over 3.12 ft.)
TORONTO, May 23, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) is delighted to report rich gold assay results from its Black Fox Mine near Timmins, Ontario, Canada.
Sylvain Guerard, Senior Vice President Exploration, commented: “For a mine with a history of producing 5 g/t gold, these drill assay results are very encouraging. These results highlight the significant potential of our exploration to extend the mine life at Black Fox and improve its profitability. Our geologists are building an improved geologic model of the Black Fox deposit that should allow us to grow our resources through near-mine exploration and enable more effective mine planning. We have a large and exciting year of exploration ahead of us.” More here
Gold is important to me because...here
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jun 22, 2019 0:21:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Nov 22, 2019 9:12:02 GMT -5
|
|