|
Post by Entendance on May 6, 2022 7:42:08 GMT -5
McEwen Mining Announces Senior Management Changes McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) (“McEwen Mining” or the “Company”) announces that Anna Ladd-Kruger, Chief Financial Officer, has decided to retire to focus on her health and family; she will depart after the first quarter reporting is complete and an orderly transition is in place. CFO responsibilities will be assumed on an interim basis by Perry Y. Ing until a new executive transitions into the position. Mr. Ing, CA, CPA, CFA, is an experienced executive who previously served as CFO of the Company and its predecessor from 2008 to 2015 and subsequently served as CFO of Kirkland Lake Gold and, most recently, of Mountain Province Diamonds. Additionally, Peter Mah, Chief Operating Officer, is stepping down for personal reasons on June 3rd. Responsibility for oversight of operations will be assumed on an interim basis by William (Bill) Shaver, currently a director of the Company. Mr. Shaver, P. Eng., is a seasoned mining executive with over 50 years of management and executive experience in all facets of mine design, construction, and operations. In 1980, he was a co-founder of Dynatec Corporation, which became one of the leading contracting and mine operating groups in North America. Most recently, he served as Chief Operating Officer of INV Metals before its sale to Dundee Precious Metals. The CEO and Board of Directors are currently preparing transition plans and a search for candidates for both roles is underway. We thank Anna and Peter for their contributions and wish them well in the future. The focus of the Company going forward is on stabilizing its operations after a challenging period, divesting certain assets, and advancing our most significant value driver, the giant Los Azules copper project, towards key milestones (PEA, IPO, PFS)
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 11, 2022 3:33:24 GMT -5
McEwen Mining: Q1 2022 Results
McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) reported its first quarter (Q1) results for the period ended March 31st, 2022.
Production was 20,850 gold ounces and 336,500 silver ounces, or 25,100 gold equivalent ounces(1) (GEOs)(see Table 1), compared to 30,600 GEOs during Q1 2021. Average cash costs(2) per GEO sold from our 100%-owned mines in Q1 was $1,696, below our guidance of $1,940 to 2,100 per GEO. Average all-in sustaining costs ("AISC")(2) per GEO sold from our 100%-owned mines was $2,146, below our guidance of $2,340 to 2,560 per GEO.
Management continues to work diligently to address operational challenges and reduce costs, while continuing to invest in exploration and the advancement of McEwen Copper’s Los Azules project.
Our consolidated net loss in Q1 was $19.3 million, or $0.04 per share, which relates primarily to $14.4 million invested in exploration and advanced projects and a gross loss of $6.0 million from our operations.
Our 100%-owned mines generated a cash gross loss of $2.3 million(2) in Q1 and a gross loss of $6.0 million. Cash gross profit (loss) is calculated by adding back depletion and depreciation to gross profit (loss).
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at March 31, 2022 was $70.4 million, of which $35.6 million is attributable to McEwen Copper.
We completed a flow-through equity financing on March 2nd for gross proceeds of $15.1 million, and a debt financing by way of an unsecured subordinate promissory note for $15 million (please see news releases dated March 2nd and April 5th).
Dr. Merri Sanchez has been appointed to the Board of Directors. Dr. Sanchez has over 40 years of spaceflight engineering and operations experience, and previously served as the Chief Scientist of the U.S. Air Force Space Command.
A webcast will be held on Friday, May 13th at 12:00 pm EDT. Please see the details further below.
Operations Update Fox Complex, Canada (100% interest) Fox produced 7,700 GEOs in Q1 at total cash costs and AISC of $1,193 and $1,729 per GEO sold, respectively. This compares to 5,200 GEOs at total cash costs and AISC of $1,262 and $1,560 per GEO sold, respectively, in Q1 2021. The higher production level and lower cash costs quarter over quarter were primarily due to mining at the new Froome mine versus the Black Fox mine in Q1 2021. During Q1, the solid performance in the mine was offset by a labour shortage due to COVID-19, coupled with equipment failures at the Stock mill. Approximately 11,700 oz of gold was mined during the quarter from the Froome deposit, which would have resulted in production of 10,500 oz of gold if the mill had been able to process all the material as planned. Our team is in the process of implementing long-term solutions such as replacing aging equipment and de-bottlenecking to improve reliability going forward. We announced the results of our Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the Fox Complex. The PEA presents estimates for a positive business case for the Fox Complex expansion project, with potential average gold production of 80,800 gold ounces per year over nine (9) years, after the depletion of the current resources at Froome. The economic analysis estimates an after-tax IRR of 21% at a gold price of $1,650 per oz, and average cash costs and AISC per ounce of gold of $769 and $1,246, respectively. Additional exploration work on the Fox Complex properties will be conducted throughout 2022 to support the ongoing studies necessary to advance the expansion project. In Q1, we incurred $1.7 million for exploration. Our exploration spend at Fox for 2022 & 2023 is forecasted to be $10.0 million and $15.0 million, respectively. During the remainder of 2022, exploration will focus on: Stock property, where we expect to improve the business case for development of an underground ramp access to the Stock West and Stock East deposits; and Grey Fox property, where the Whiskey Jack exploration target area returned high-grade intercepts in 2021, including 7.29 g/t gold over 15.35 m (hole 21GF-1350) and 4.75 g/t gold over 25.20m (hole 21GF-1333) (please see news release dated April 25th, 2022).
Gold Bar Mine, USA (100% interest) Gold Bar produced 6,300 GEOs in Q1 at total cash costs and AISC of $2,284 and $2,633 per GEO sold, respectively. This compares to 7,400 GEOs at total cash costs and AISC of $1,865 and $1,934 per GEO sold, respectively, in Q1 2021. Mining from the Pick open pit was 44% below target in Q1 due to mining contractor employee turnover, lower blasting productivity, and the segregation of potentially preg-robbing carbon in mineralized material which could not be heap leached; further metallurgical testing is underway. Heap leach and process plant operations partially offset the deficit of ore mined by achieving 13% higher gold recovery and 8% higher gold grade than the corresponding targets for the quarter. We are evaluating if carbon will remain an issue during the current and future phases of mining at Pick. Near-mine exploration drilling is underway around the Pick pit with encouraging oxide drill results, including: 1.93 g/t gold over 38.6 m (126.5 ft) in hole GBSW002, and 0.93 g/t gold over 19.5 m (64 ft) in hole GBSW006. This mineralization remains open along a trend to the southwest (please see news release dated April 25th, 2022). We received regulatory approval to amend the plan of operations to include the Gold Bar South (GBS) deposit on April 1st, 2022. We are planning to start construction of the access road and heap leach pad expansion to accommodate the expected gold production starting in Q4 2022. In Q1, we spent $1.5 million on exploration activities. One drill rig is currently operating at targets designed to extend the Pick deposit. Drilling is also planned at the Atlas pit, where drilling in 2021 returned 3.10 g/t gold over 27.4 m (90 ft) (please see news release dated April 25th, 2022).
San José Mine, Argentina (49% interest) San José attributable production for Q1 was 6,450 gold ounces and 335,500 silver ounces, for a total of 10,700 GEOs. Total cash costs(2) and all-in sustaining costs (AISC)(2) for the quarter were $1,589 and $2,103 per GEO sold, respectively. This compares to 16,700 GEOs at total cash costs and AISC of $1,088 and $1,328 per GEO sold, respectively, in Q1 2021. San José production was impacted by COVID-19-related employee absences, which resulted in fewer tonnes of ore processed during the quarter. Despite the slow start to the year, the San José mine is expected to meet production guidance of 69,500 to 77,500 GEOs (49%). In Q1, 2,050 m (6,720 ft) of exploration drilling was completed around the mine area and the Saavedra vein. Drilling highlights include 6.0 g/t gold and 236 g/t silver over 1.5 m (hole SJD-2451) and 8.3 g/t gold and 561 g/t silver over 1.2 m (hole SJD-2453) in the Celina vein; and 2.8 g/t gold and 546 g/t silver over 1.1 m (also hole SJD-2453) in the Celina Piso vein. An additional 2,000 m of resource delineation drilling is planned in Q2.
McEwen Copper (81% interest) The Los Azules project, located in San Juan, Argentina, is one of the world's largest undeveloped open-pit copper porphyry deposits. During Q1 2022, approximately 5,340 m (17,500 ft) of drilling was completed in ten holes, and by the 10th of May 2022 approximately 10,780 m (35,360 ft) had been drilled. Drilling rates were impacted by equipment availability, productivity and reliability of drills assigned to the project. Drill contractor mobilization of crews, equipment, and parts supply were adversely affected by COVID-19 and industry-wide shortages of labor. Steps to remedy these challenges are resulting in improved performance during April and May. Seven drills are currently active, and good turnaround time for results is currently being maintained by the assay lab. The drill program will continue in Q2, weather permitting, followed by a winter break during the months of June to August. Drilling is expected to re-start in October. Additional drilling is confirming the mineralization size and grade compared to historic intercepts used to estimate the 2017 PEA mineral resource estimate. To date, the results from core logging and sample analysis are very encouraging. In many holes, drilling was allowed to continue beyond the planned length where visible copper mineralization was observed. Often, primary mineralization in the hole was still apparent when drilling was stopped. Hole AZ22142 intersected 419.1 m of 0.79% copper, including an interval comprising 104.0 m of 1.00% copper in the supergene enriched zone and 46 m of 1.59% copper in the hypogene copper zone. Importantly, our updated geological model will reflect the sub-vertical structures and rock types that are thought to be key features controlling the distribution of mineralization. This points directly to the potential for significant mineralization to be discovered with additional drilling to depth (please see news release dated May 4th, 2022). The critical issue of road access to the site has been resolved. We have developed a second road at a lower altitude that will allow for year-round access to the site. Our access will be extended, making it safer, less expensive and faster to advance and complete our fieldwork. Whittle Consulting's Enterprise Optimization work, which will be outlined in our forthcoming updated PEA expected in Q1 2023. Their analysis has provided important focus and direction for the detailed work underway, including guidance for drilling programs, metallurgical test work and trade-off studies for mining, processing and infrastructure. McEwen Copper spent $9.8 million in Q1 to advance the Los Azules project.
Director Appointment Dr. Merri Sanchez was appointed to the Board of Directors effective February 25, 2022. She is a Technical Fellow with The Aerospace Corporation where she provides technical and strategic advice on matters concerning civil, commercial, and government spaceflight programs. She has more than 40 years of spaceflight engineering and operations experience. She previously served as the Chief Scientist of the U.S. Air Force Space Command, as a senior executive for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and as Senior Director of a commercial space company. She received a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M University, a Master of Science in Physical Sciences (Planetary Geology) from the University of Houston — Clear Lake, a Master of Mechanical Engineering from the University of Houston, and a Doctor of Philosophy in Industrial Engineering (Human Factors) from the University of Houston. Our Board believes that Ms. Sanchez’s expertise in cutting edge science and technology as well as her experience in operations, engineering, safety, risk management and decision making for both human and robotic spaceflight makes her an asset to our Board.
NYSE Listing On January 5th, the Company was notified by the NYSE that the average price of its common stock for the previous 30 trading days was below $1.00 per share. Under NYSE regulations we had six months to bring the share price and 30-day average closing share price back above $1.00. The Board of Directors have not approved a reverse share split and will therefore seek other means of remaining on the NYSE. Should the Company become delisted it will continue to trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX"). Additionally, the Company is exploring transitioning to an alternate exchange or quotation system in the United States.
Table 1 here provides production and cost results for Q1 2022 with comparative results for Q1 2021 and our guidance range for 2022.
Conference Call and Webcast Management will discuss our Q1 financial results and project developments and follow with a question-and-answer session. Questions can be asked directly by participants over the phone during the webcast. Friday, May 13 th , 2022 at 12:00 pm EDT
To call into the conference call over the phone, please register here: www.directeventreg.com/registration/event/1556038
Audience URL:
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 14, 2022 3:19:01 GMT -5
McEwen Mining (NYSE:MUX) Q1 2022 Earnings Conference Call May 13, 2022 Company Participants Rob McEwen - Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Anna Ladd-Kruger - Chief Financial Officer Rory Greyvensteyn - Director of Operations, Canada Adrian Blanco - Director of Operations USA & Mexico Stephen McGibbon - Executive Vice President of Exploration Michael Meding - Vice President, Copper and General Manager Bill Shaver - Director
Rob McEwen Thank you, operator. Hello, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to our first quarter 2022 conference call. Last year we saw signs of our turnaround in progress. The trends look good as we closed on 2021 with higher gold production and lower production cost per ounce relative to 2020. This year, our results have been mixed. The Fox Complex started strong and then was slowed down by manpower shortages induced by COVID and that was followed by an equipment failure in the mill. But despite these issues, Fox produced more gold at lower cost than it did in the first quarter of 2020. An important development in Q1 was our Preliminary Economic Assessment that outlines the future growth prospects of the Fox Complex. It details a bright future for Fox with a nine-year mine life, significantly longer than what we have right now and attractive mining costs. We are confident that our exploration will result in a shortening of the payback period and an improvement in the economics. Our Director of Canadian operations Rory Greyvensteyn will be expanding on the activities later on this call. Mining at Gold Bar, the costs were very high, and we expected that, because we are in a transitory stage of our mining cycle where there is an extensive period of stripping to remove over burden in order to reach the ore zone. Adrian Blanco, our Director of Operations for America and Mexico will elaborate on both these operation. At the San Jose mine, which is operated by our joint venture partner Hochschild Mining, COVID induced manpower absences resulted in a temporary mine shutdown that adversely impacted gold and silver production and the costs associated with that production.
Looking ahead, our partner believes that they'll be able to make up what was lost in the first quarter over the balance of the year and deliver on guidance. At our Los Azules project, we have made much progress that I believe is significantly increasing the value for McEwen Mining of this large asset. Michael Meding, our Vice President, McEwen Copper will provide you with an update. We encountered a cash squeeze during Q1 as a result of our revenue shortfall. Then, however, I feel confident enough that the future value -- in the future value of the company to personally step up and provide the company with $15 million. We own a portfolio of assets, the majority of which are located in well-known prolific gold producing districts in areas considered exploration rich real estate and that is why we continue to invest in exploration with the belief that we will be able to extend the life and size of our mine. We also own a huge copper project that is looking increasingly more valuable as a result of our investment, as a result of the surging demand for copper, as a result of the higher copper price and the changing geopolitical environment in the largest copper producing area in the world. At this point, I would like to ask Anna Ladd-Kruger, our Chief Financial Officer to provide an overview on McEwen Mining's financial results for the first quarter of this year.
Anna Ladd-Kruger Thank you, Rob, and good day everyone. The COVID-19 pandemic continued to impact our operations in Q1 in areas of supply chain, labor shortages and inflationary pressures. We continue to monitor the impact of these factors on our financial condition, liquidity, operations, suppliers and our workforce. Our consolidated net loss in Q1 was $19.3 million or $0.04 loss per share. It relates primarily to $14.4 million invested in exploration and advancing our Los Azules project. Our operations had a total gross loss of $6 million. Contributing to this was $4.1 million loss from our Mexico operations as we wind down residual completion. We expect to make strategic decisions on our Mexican business units in the second half of this year.
We benefited from higher average realized gold price of $1,895 per gold equivalent ounce in Q1 versus $1,763 per gold equivalent ounce in the same quarter of last year. Consolidated production in Q1 was 25,100 gold equivalent ounces, this included 14,400 gold equivalent ounces from our 100% owned operations, which was 4% higher than the same period last year. Average cost per gold equivalent ounces sold in Q1 from our 100% owned lines were $1,696 per cash costand $2,146 for all in sustaining cost. These are expected to be higher this quarter. However, they did come in lower than we guided to the market in March. Liquid assets at the end of the first quarter, which includes cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash was $70.4 million, of which, $35.6 million is attributable to McEwen Copper to advance Los Azules project. A few transactions this quarter to bolster our treasury, include a flow-through of $15.1 or $1.04 per share and an unsecured promissory note of %15 million.
We also amended repayment terms on our senior debt facility, deferring principal payment to August 2023 and the ultimate maturity to March 2025 given that further liquidity this year. We also ended the quarter with the stockpile of 36,000 tons of ore at an average gold grade at 2.6 grams per ton, ahead of the mill at our Fox Complex operations. We are continuing to manage our operating margins by reviewing capital expenditure, production costs, material contracts, management systems and procurement synergies between operations. And lastly, as most of you know, I suffer from brain aneurysm in December and through all odds, a lot of support from family, friends, McEwen Mining and the mining community in general. I'm thankful to be here speaking and I just got 100% recovered. On the back of this health scare, I've decided to retire from the Executive role and focus my time with my family and nonprofit work as well. Thank you. And I will now turn the call to Rory from operations review at the Fox Complex.
Rory Greyvensteyn Thank you Anna. The Fox Complex produced 7,700 gold equivalent ounces in Q1, with total cash costs and all in sustaining cost of $1,193 dividend and $1,729 per gold equivalent ounces sold respectively. [indiscernible] and a solid performance in Q1 in line with our budget. Challenges at the mill reduced our gold production in Q1, but as a consequence we not have considerable stockpile [indiscernible] that provides variety of flexibility to reduce costs in future quarters. Our team is implementing needed upgrades to the mote to insure it is capable of processing higher are production right from the Froome mine. Moving forward, in the remainder of 2022 in relation to additional screening at the mall we'll reduce crushing requirements. This will ensure the Fox Complex meet it’s guidance for 2022. Thank you. Adrian will further speak about operations at Gold Bar.
Adrian Blanco Thank you, Rory. Gold Bar achieved the production target for gold in Q1 at 6,300 ounces. The heap leached recovery was higher as compared to the 2021 feasibility study and the gold grade at the mine was also 8% better than expected. On the other hand we anticipated to have a high cash cost in Q1 as we began mining the Phase 2 of the Pick pit this year. These transition involved a high stripping ratio of almost six to one in the first quarter as compared to the four to one expected for the full year. In addition, we anticipated to lose a few days of production due to weather conditions in the early months of the year. We are finding presence of carbonaceous our since we began mining the Phase 2 off Pick. Preg-robbing carbon is not suitable for heap leaching. However, we have been successful to isolate such ore in order not to affect the gold recovery. In addition, the environmental permit approval for the Gold Bar South deposit was received in April and we are planning to begin the whole road construction this quarter and be ready for mining in the second half of 2022. We are anticipating a negative impact to production in Q2 from the ore losses to carbon. But we are planning to maintain our gold recovery high as seen in Q1 and we are also defining potential new sources of ore for the 2022 mine plan from the Atlas pit and old waste dumps, as well as advancing that readiness of the Gold Bar South deposit to begin mining in Q3. In addition, Gold Bar is implementing many actions to reduce cost and CapEx, for instance, the CapEx for the whole road construction and the heap leach expansion will be less than anticipated and our mining contractor is improving the product PBT of drilling and blasting since two months ago, which will certainly improve our cash per ounce going forward. I will now turn the presentation to Steve, who will talk about our exploration program.
Stephen McGibbon Thank you, Adrian. Our Q1 exploration investments in Ontario and Nevada totaled $3.2 million. The goal at each is to extend the life of our mines. At the Fox Complex near Timmins our stock property covers eight kilometers of the Destor-Porcupine Fault and includes three gold deposits that occur within a three kilometer if length that our open for expansion. For 2022 we have four key target areas near our Stock mill with excellent potential to materially grow mineral resources based on poorly tested vertical and lateral trends. At Stock we targeted near surface delineation of mineralization during the first quarter, believing a successful outcome could shorten the payback period for the Fox PPA delivered earlier this year. The remaining five kilometers at Stock is under explored, both to the east and west of the Stock Mine. Another target is based on historic drilling that intercepted multiple mineralized zone structures with graded of up to 16.5 grams per tonne located 1.5 kilometers west of the Stock West deposits. At Grey Fox post to our largest and highest grade mineral resources, attractive exploration targets include multiple intersections, drilled West of Whiskey Jack that we reported on in our April 25 press release, that included 7.29 grams per ton gold over 15.35 meters and 4.75grams per ton gold over 25.2 meters. At Gold Bar in Nevada, Q1 exploration activities focused on several areas. In the mine on Southwest Pick extension and Cabin North testing for extensions of the mineralization continued. The best of these oxide assays, included 1.93 grams per ton gold over 38.6 meters. Drilling is continuing at Pick. At the Atlas pit located three miles west of the Gold Bar Mine. We are following up on a hole that contained 3.1 grams per ton gold over 27 meters of oxide mineralization down dip to the east below the pit bottom. At our San Jose joint venture in Argentina, $1.7 million were spent in Q1 on a 100% basis of a $7 million exploration program for 2022.
Typical intercepts of high-grade gold and silver were encountered in multiple holes at the Celina and Celina Piso vein, and include 8.3 grams per ton gold over -- and 561 grams per tonne silver over 1.2 meters. A further 2,000 meters of resource delineation drilling will be conducted in Q2. The San Jose property surrounds Iman’s Cerro Negro mine and is host to high grade epithermal gold and silver deposits. At Los Azules in San Juan province Argentina, our exploration program has completed 11,500 meters year to date, weather permitting the drill program will continue until mid-June and then resume again in early October. This is drilling is confirming the mineralization of historic intercepts used for the 2017 PEA mineral resource estimate. In many instances persistent copper mineralogy incurred encouraged us to continue drilling beyond the planned hole depth and is often still apparent when the hole is stopped. Hole AZ22142 intersected 419.1 meters of 0.79% copper and included an interval comprising 104 meters of 1% copper in the supergene enriched zone and 46 meters of 1.59% copper in the hydrogen primary copper zone. Importantly, our updated geological model will reflect to some vertical structures and rock types that are key features controlling the distribution of mineralization. New to our program this year geologic modeling is being augmented and with the hyperspectral scanning program of all current and available historic core allowing for a level of refinement not captured in previous work. I will now turn the presentation to Michael, who will tell you more about our developments at Los Azules.
Michael Meding Thank you, Stephen. The Los Azules Copper project is located in San Jose province of Argentina, an mining province ranked highest for investment attractiveness in Latin America by the [indiscernible] Institute. According to Mining Intelligence, Los Azules is one of the top 10 largest undeveloped copper project by results. With GBP10.2 billion in the indicated category and GBP19.3 billion in the first category, assessment by the 2017 PA. Since that time expensive enterprise optimization work has been completed on potential [indiscernible] scale, lower costs and our footprint options reviewing opportunities to guide to drilling and technical workflows. In Q1 2022, McEwen Copper spent $9.8 million to advance the Los Azules Copper project, actively progressing drilling, road construction, technical studies and community engagements. Year to date 11,500 meters of drilling has been completed and approximately 13,000 meters of drilling is targeted to be completed by the end of June. The critical issue of road access to the site has been resolved. Los Azules is no longer remote and cut off from the world for six to seven months of the year, we have developed a second road that will allow us year-round access to the site. Is the significant advance because it will allow us to advance and complete our field work faster and at lower cost. Another exciting development is the completion of the enterprise optimization study conducted by Whittle Consulting of Australia who specialize in optimizing mine design by generating and evaluating a large number of different operating scenarios. Their work focused on the following objectives. Improved value, optimize scale, minimize risk and enable fast trade off analyzes of environmentally friendly green regenerative solutions. The analyzes indicated that there is potential to significantly increase the project value. The results as their work will be included in the updated PA to be completed in Q1 of 2023. I will now turn over to Rob. Thank you.
Rob McEwen Thank you, Mike. We have two executive searches underway as a result of some departures, and I wanted to note that, we're saying goodbye and thank you to two senior members of our team. As you've heard, Anna is retiring and Peter Mah, our Chief Operating Officer is stepping down to concentrate on family issues and other opportunities. In the interim we have engaged the services of Perry Ing, who is a former CFO of the company to step in during this period as we search for a new CFO. And to cover off on our Chief Operating Officer, we have a very good fortunate of having a Director, Bill Shaver, who has said that he would serve in that interim capacity and when I say we're fortunate, Bill has had 50 years in the mining industry, he was the Co-Founder of Dynetek, a very successful mining contracting firm. And so we have that covered off as we're searching for a new CFO -- CEO -- COO, sorry. There's is a lot of changes going on here. So -- and we feel very comfortable with that set up. This concludes our presentation. But before that, I'd like to ask Bill to make a comment or two about the operation.
Bill Shaver Yeah. Thanks very much, Rob and good morning everyone. For many of you on the call, you’ve probably heard about me at some point in your career and I'm happy to step in and help out over this interim period. Most of my background is in mining construction business and in running operations of the sites that McEwen has. So I'm really looking forward to being part of the process of engaging a new COO and also for helping the rest of the operations in any way I can. And to that extent I have now made a visit to Timmins a couple of times, also to Los Azules and actually just before the end of the year made a trip down to Gold Bar. So there'll be some visits to Gold Bar and Los Azules in the next month or so. But anyway, I'm looking forward to doing what I can to help out. Thank you.
Rob McEwen Thank you very much, Bill. Happy to have the onboard.
Joseph Reagor, ROTH Capital Partners Hey, Rob and team. Thanks for taking the questions. So first thing on Los Azules, obviously, it's a big part of the future value of the company, especially from your perspective, but what's the spending going to be like there for the rest of the year? It was pretty decent sized number in Q1. And I'm just trying to model out the rest of 2022.
Rob McEwen We're entering the winter season in Argentina right now. So a lot of that expenditure we've done to date has been associated with drilling and maintaining a large camp up there. I would expect that to be less and the money that we have in the treasury to take us through this year.
Joseph Reagor Okay.
Rob McEwen Drilling will resume expected in October.
Joseph Reagor Okay. So a little later in the middle two quarters and a little heavier at the end of the year?
Rob McEwen That's correct.
Joseph Reagor Okay. And then at Gold Bar with this carbon issue encountered, do you have an idea of what percentage of the Pick deposit might have this carbon in it so far?
Rob McEwen It's early. Adrain, do you want to jump in there?
Adrian Blanco Yes. Thank you, Rob. It's early to determine that number, certainly the presence of carbonaceous ore represents a concern to achieve the production for the second quarter. However, we are looking at ways to bring new sources of ore to the mine plan in 2022 from the [indiscernible] deposit and old waste dumps, so should be able to partially overcome this carbon issue.
Joseph Reagor Okay. Thanks for the color on those things, guys. I'll turn it over.
Rob McEwen Thank you.
John Moran, South Yeah. Hi miss in the Q1. I've been a shareholder for about 10 years, I have 400,000 shares, I have a series of questions, I'd like to ask short one at a time. First is, are there any institutional investors buying or selling recently? I'm asking that because I'm wondering if they are taking advantage of the low stock price to get a larger position.
Rob McEwen It's a good question. I don't have an answer for you. I can put it, there hasn't been conversation with the institutional investors recently that are saying they're buying. But you raised a good point, it's an attractive price to come in.
John Moran, South The next one. In a prior conference you mentioned that the Q1 copper might be worth about $3 and I know there is 69% that McEwen Mining has in it. And why do you think that's not factored into the stock price now.
Rob McEwen There are a couple of reasons. One, we just completed the second access to it. The drilling there has been some information coming out, but not a lot. And I guess more recently, there is some nervousness in the marketplace. It has been secured by some of the operating issues that we have in the gold and silver production area. [Multiple Speakers] the copper price is going up, Los Azules is getting it, the profile is growing a bit larger, it's Mining Intelligence. As you heard from Michael, it is viewed at the ninth largest undeveloped copper project in the world, not owned by a major Argentina. They're changing their tone and encouraging Mining, while their neighbors in Chile and Peru, the governments there are making it more difficult to want to invest there. Higher taxes, more regulations. It's emerging and I'm -- but I can’t explain why it's not trading and where we want it to.
John Moran, South Next one. Now that the prices dropped precipitously, how will be the delisting affect the company?
Rob McEwen Never having gone through a delisting. I don't know. I have to -- will be able to speculate. There are many exchanges that it could be traded on and it has the volume -- on currently has on New York. So we'll have to see. And that will depend on what the state of the equity markets are.
John Moran, South All right. Next one, not that you are, but if the company was sold today to some another company, what do you think it would approximately sold for. I'm asking that because, I'm wondering whether since my average basis is like $1.60. $1.70 it would be worth buying more.
Rob McEwen An excellent question. I wish I could see into the future. I don't have an answer for you. I'm sorry, John. Not that [indiscernible]
John Moran, South Okay. And the last one is, is there any chance that the company might become insolvent or go into bankruptcy?
Rob McEwen I guess there is always a possibility, but at the moment our liquidity is strong enough, we have assets that have value. I don't see that as a real possibility. Otherwise, we wouldn't have put in another $15 million.
John Moran, South Okay. All right, thank you so much. I really appreciate you're trying to answer these. I wish all the best.
Rob McEwen Thank you very much. Thank you for your question.
Marcus
Hi. This is Marcus calling in. Yeah, thanks for taking my questions. First one, you're expecting meaningful exploration spend at Fox for this year given that you've spent $1.7 million in Q1. Can you break out the remaining $8.3 by quarter for the remainder of the year? And then since we're halfway through Q2, what is the spend year-to-date, if possible?
Rob McEwen All right. I'll ask Stephen McGibbon, our Executive VP, Exploration.
Stephen McGibbon I'll answer that question with fairly broad strokes. So the $1.7 million spent in the first quarter is generally consistent with what would have been anticipated or what is anticipated based on our 2022 budget, which more or less [indiscernible] throughout the year with the flow through financing that was completed in March, we're now reviewing our program with the view of our plans through to the end of 2023 and that may impact planned spending in 2022 versus the original budget. And we're working through that process now and should have a clear answer on that before the end of the second quarter. I would anticipate likely looking to accelerate to some level our planned spending in 2022 versus the original budget.
Marcus Okay. And then for 2023, the $15 million, should we just sort of break that out in terms of divided by four for quarterly spend.
Stephen McGibbon At this point, I think that's probably the most reasonable view to take. Clearly spending is results dependent and we'll try to be nimble and be in a position to adjustments and accelerate if the opportunity presents themselves. For now I think it is [indiscernible]. Thank you.
Marcus Yeah. And then last question. I'm sorry. Go ahead. Rob.
Rob McEwen No, no, I didn't mean to interrupt your question.
Marcus Okay. Yeah, one more in. Just sort of speaking about exploration spending and given all the talk around inflation, how you're drilling costs doing? Have you seen any sort of price movements given recent fuel increases? And how is that reflected in these drilling expenditures.
Rob McEwen Drilling contracts were entered into late -- in the fall of 2021 and our overall costs in Q1 on a unit basis were in line with that. And just to throw a number out there, it would have impacted our costs less than 10% versus what we experienced in 2021. I think the greater challenge has been in our contractors being able to secure experienced personnel and manpower related, materials related issues that possibly represent of risk. But from a cost standpoint, they've been very much in line with our expectations.
Marcus Okay, fantastic. That's it from me. Thanks for taking my questions guys.
Rob McEwen Thank you.
Bill Powers, a private investor Hi, Rob. Thanks for taking my call today. This is very informative today. A few questions, I guess as far as the closing of the second tranche of the financing philosophy, I know you had previously mentioned that you were fairly close with, I guess, into one or more parties and I was wondering what you -- where that stands and what your thoughts are toward getting that closed or I guess opening it up at a later date?
Rob McEwen We may get to a point where we close it soon and open it up at a later date, and based on what we've done going forward. We've had a number of conversations, they seem very serious and it looked like they were about to close, but there is always another question and another question. So your suggestion or comment about closing it and saying, well, the next time we come back to the market, given the money we have will take us around for next year that -- we've advanced the projects significantly. So the price of entry will be higher.
Bill Powers Yeah, I mean -- just as a -- an observer of this, It seems as though -- substantially more drilling results between now and it's a little unfair to -- I don't know how to get to -- to lock in the same prices, what was previously offered when -- before the spend was done. But anyway that's -- I hope you can move that forward. It sounds like, given the results of some of your neighbors, it sounds like there should be sufficient interest in that I would think.
Rob McEwen I agree. There is some -- there have been some big drill results coming out of the province we're in.
Bill Powers Yes. And speaking with Anna, as far as I felt [indiscernible] put out results today that were off the chart as far as grade goes. When you are -- not that you could read into the future, but are there -- how similar -- what you're doing compared to what they had done or are you guys -- familiar with what the comparison goes as far as that goes.
Rob McEwen Well, we're not -- we're probably about 200 kilometers away from them, but with a long spine and in terms of what they're hitting. Steve, do you have knowledge of –
Stephen McGibbon Not of the press release today, but in general terms, higher [indiscernible] lower grade, but certainly there will be significant deep results from their drilling this year.
Bill Powers Okay. That's great, thank you for that. The second question I had is, how -- I know you recently put out some results as far as at Stock goes and how many -- and I think though it's trending in a positive direction. I guess how much more drilling is going to be needed before you could decide that these are going to be -- where you're drilling is going to be economic, is that, I guess, another six months or sometime next year or sooner.
Rob McEwen Our PDA was before starting the Stock West deposit. It was 144,000 ounces indicated and I believe that 111,000 inferred. So we do need to do drilling, which is part of our plan for this year to upgrade and to further just derisks the resource. So we want to try to move many of those inferred ounces indicated, but outside of that, the deposits are still open. The nature of these deposits are that you typically expect there to be vertical continuation or continuity to the mineralization that we haven’t fully tested. And as I alluded to, there are a significant number of kilometers on the Stock [indiscernible] what I characterize as quite underexplored. So, to me the -- and this is just my personal feeling is that, the PEA is the first step in the journey that I believe is going to ultimately realize a long term and meaningful material opportunity for the company after the Stock property. We've got three deposits, all of them open to depth. I believe there is a very good opportunity for a fourth to potentially be identified in drilling this year, but for now the drilling that we’ve planned for Stock West deposit in 2022 should significantly derisk that opportunity for us in a position to make to decisions about the future.
Bill Powers Okay, that's very helpful. One last question, as far as I noticed in the press release that the Gold Bar South is been permitted and it sounds like you're moving forward with the access or with the haul road. Is this going -- is the plan to have Gold Bar South produce along with Pick and some of the other pits that are already in production and/or is it going to be for production that solely come from Gold Bar South once it's up and running.
Rob McEwen It would be for all of the areas for mining, Bill. So Gold Bar South would be working in combination with the others.
Bill Powers Okay. And would that be additive to your current rate of production or would those be depleted down -- the others will be depleted down as Gold Bar South comes up.
Rob McEwen As you said, we are just compensating as the other ones are going down, Gold Bar is coming up.
Bill Powers Okay, that's all I had today.
Rob McEwen On your comments about Cerro. I mean I just saw their results, they are quite exceptional high gold values, copper and long intercepts. I don't know, Steve, could you just comment on some of the intercepts we've been getting at -- they've been more copper than gold in that.
Stephen McGibbon Yeah. As mentioned in the year in the presentation and in our press release last week, the majority of the holes that we're drilling and I'll characterize as in the core of the deposit. We've been drilling those holes 500 meters, 600 meters length and typically we're making a decision to start the hole, not on the absence of mineralization, but more on the kind of the progress, the drilling productivity of the driller that the progress slows too much and we decide we will start the hole for now and move on to another hole. So the nature of gold deposits are form that we expect mineralization will likely go much deeper and we will have exploration programs in the future to test that, but we've had drill intercepts of 400 meters to 500 meters approaching one gram per tonne at least in one of our holes -- I'm sorry 1% copper, I think it was 0.79% copper. So with intervals within those intercepts that are double that kind of grade, 1%, 1.5% copper or more. So the drill program we've conducted so far this year has demonstrated to us not just that the results from the past are being validated with the current drill program, but also that our understanding and expectations for the resource in time to be able to grow much more are supported by our understanding it and the work we've been doing on refining our [indiscernible].
Rob McEwen And there is some big differences between the locations between Cerro and our ourselves. And starting with elevation, we're probably 800 meters lower. We're not impacting glaciers, and easier to get into than some of the other copper deposits in the area, including Cerro. Thank you ladies and gentlemen. Wishing you well. Goodbye.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 23, 2022 3:28:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 25, 2022 2:08:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on May 31, 2022 13:20:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 6, 2022 7:16:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 13, 2022 0:07:47 GMT -5
McEwen Mining Announces AGM Voting Results and Reverse Split July 12, 2022
TORONTO, July 12, 2022 -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) ("MUX" or the "Company”) announces that it is proceeding with a 1-for-10 reverse split of the common shares of the Company ("the Reverse Split") with an effective date on or about July 26th, 2022. Notice has been provided to the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), and MUX's common shares are expected to begin trading on the NYSE and the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX"), on a consolidated basis, on or about July 26th, 2022.
At the MUX Annual Meeting of Shareholders, held on July 7th, 2022, the Company's shareholders approved the proposal to grant the Board of Directors the discretion to amend the articles of incorporation to effect a reverse split of the outstanding common stock on a ratio of not less than 1-for-5 and not more than 1-for-10. Additionally, the shareholders approved the proposal to amend the articles of incorporation to reduce the number of common stock authorized to be issued from 675 million shares to 200 million shares.
Following the Reverse Split, the number of outstanding common shares of the Company will be reduced from approximately 474 million outstanding common shares to approximately 47 million outstanding common shares. MUX's common shares will continue to trade on the NYSE and the TSX under the existing ticker symbols. Following the Reverse Split, the new CUSIP number for the Company's common shares will be 58039P305, and the new ISIN for the Company's common shares will be US58039P3055.
MUX's transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services ("Computershare"), will act as the exchange agent for the Reverse Split. On the effective date of the Reverse Split, Computershare will send instructions (a “Letter of Transmittal”) to shareholders who hold stock certificates regarding the exchange of old certificates for new certificates. Shareholders who hold their shares in brokerage accounts or "street name" are not required to take any action to effect the exchange of their shares. No fractional common shares will be issued in connection with the Reverse Split; any fractional shares will be canceled.
Election of New Director Mr. Ian Ball had been newly elected to the Company's Board of Directors. Ian has spent the majority of his professional career in the mining and natural resource sector. In executive roles he has been involved in companies focused on gold and silver exploration and development in North and South America as well as royalty businesses. He most recently served as the President and CEO of Abitibi Royalties, Inc., a Toronto-listed gold royalty company. He joined Abitibi in 2014 and served as an officer and director until 2021, when the company was acquired for $250 million. Prior to his tenure at Abitibi, Ian served as McEwen Mining's President.
AGM Voting Results At the annual meeting of shareholders held on July 7th, 2022, MUX shareowners voted to: Elect as directors: Robert McEwen, Allen Ambrose, Ian Ball, Richard Brissenden, Robin Dunbar, Dr. Donald Quick, Dr. Merri Sanchez, and William Shaver. Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. Approve the named executive officer compensation (on an advisory basis), and set the frequency with which shareholders are entitled to vote on compensation at every three years. Approve the proposal to grant the Board of Directors the discretion to amend the articles of incorporation to effect a reverse split of the outstanding common stock on a ratio of not less than 1-for-5 and not more than 1-for-10. Approve the proposal to amend the articles of incorporation to reduce the number of common stock authorized to be issued from 675 million shares to 200 million shares.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Jul 28, 2022 3:28:16 GMT -5
McEwen Mining: Reverse Split To Be Effective July 28th July 27, 2022
TORONTO, July 27, 2022 -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) announces that starting tomorrow the Company’s common shares are expected to begin trading on the NYSE and TSX after giving effect to the 1-for-10 reverse split previously announced on July 12th, 2022 (the “Reverse Split”). Following effectiveness of the Reverse Split the Company expects to regain compliance with NYSE continued listing requirements and remain listed on the NYSE.
Pursuant to the approval by the shareholders at the annual meeting of shareholders held on July 7th, 2022, the Company filed an Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation that served to: (i) effect a 1-for-10 Reverse Split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock on July 27, 2022 at 11:59 p.m., and (ii) effect the decrease in authorized capital from 675 million to 200 million shares of common stock.
As previously reported, no fractional shares will be issued in connection with the Reverse Split. Shareholders of record otherwise entitled to receive fractional shares of common stock will receive cash (without interest or deduction) in lieu of such fractional share interests. The Reverse Split will not alter the par value of the common stock or modify any voting rights or other rights or terms of the common stock. Except for any shareholders who receive cash in lieu of a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Split, the Reverse Split will affect all shareholders uniformly. Computershare Trust Company, N.A., the Company’s transfer agent, is acting as the exchange agent for the Reverse Split.
Computershare will send instructions (a “Letter of Transmittal”) to shareholders who hold stock certificates regarding the exchange of old certificates for new certificates. To exchange your stock certificates, you must follow the instructions contained in the Letter of Transmittal. Shareholders who hold their shares in brokerage accounts or "street name" are not required to take any action to effect the exchange of their shares.
Following the Reverse Split, the number of outstanding common shares of the Company will be reduced from approximately 474 million outstanding common shares to approximately 47 million outstanding common shares. MUX's common shares will continue to trade on the NYSE and the TSX under the existing ticker symbols subject to on-going satisfaction of continued listing requirements. Following the Reverse Split, the new CUSIP number for the Company's common shares will be 58039P305, and the new ISIN for the Company's common shares will be US58039P3055.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 4, 2022 7:44:33 GMT -5
McEwen Copper Los Azules Progress Report #4 Long intercepts with good grades 222.0 m of 0.95% Cu including 44.0 m of 1.38% Cu (AZ22158) 238.0 m of 0.58% Cu including 10.0 m of 1.10% Cu (AZ22161) 194.0 m of 0.56% Cu including 8.0 m of 1.04% Cu (AZ22163)
TORONTO, August 4, 2022 - McEwen Copper Inc., a subsidiary of McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX), is pleased to report the latest assay results from its Los Azules project, which continues to deliver long intercepts of good grades. The drill program underway has three important objectives: Improve confidence in the resource by converting Inferred mineral resources to the Indicated category; Accelerate project advancement with metallurgical, hydrological and geotechnical drilling and Test the limits of the depth extension of the higher-grade mineralization. Results from this drilling program will be used to update the 2017 Los Azules PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment). The updated version will be released in Q1, 2023. The 2017 PEA was calculated using prices of $3/lb copper, $1,300/oz gold and $17/oz silver price. It projected robust economics, driven by large operating margins, large annual production, a short payback period and long mine life (link to the report: www.mcewenmining.com/files/technical_reports/los_azules/LosAzulesPEA_Rev0_20171016.pdf). Drilling has halted for the winter and will resume in October when spring arrives in Argentina. Earlier this year, Mining Intelligence ranked Los Azules as one of the world’s top five largest undeveloped porphyry copper deposits that is not already owned by a major mining company. The opportunity to expand the deposit at depth remains open for further testing. While the median depth of drill holes within the Los Azules resource database is 175 meters (m), it is not uncommon for porphyry copper mineralization to extend well beyond a kilometer or more of depth. Numerous drill holes have encountered strong copper grades below the 2017 PEA pit bottom. Only three holes have been drilled to a depth of a kilometer and all encountered mineralization. The highest-grade mineral domains at Los Azules are clearly the hydrothermal and magmatic breccias and late‑stage quartz veins which can extend kilometres to depth. There are numerous examples of such deposits in Argentina and Chile. The most recent is Filo Mining’s spectacular assay results of earlier this year. The Filo deposit is 300 kilometres north of Los Azules, also in the San Juan province, Argentina. The deepest occurrence of a breccia at Los Azules is at a hole depth of some 810 m in drill hole AZ1299 and deepest occurrence of late-stage quartz veins is found at 990 m down the same hole. A dedicated exploration program associated with higher grade domains at Los Azules has not yet been conducted. Most holes drilled to date are vertical and intersect the breccias at very low angles. Improving our understanding of the nature and distribution of the highest-grade mineral zones at Los Azules is a priority for the upcoming drilling seasons. The most recent drill results are presented below in the cross-section Figures 1 to 4. These display the current inclined and historic vertical holes, with histograms of total copper content along their length, overlayed on a simplified interpretation of overburden, leached, enriched and primary mineral zones, and the 30-year pit shell (shown by green line), as defined by the 2017 PEA. Section 30-30', shown in Figure 1, includes hole AZ22158, with an attractive intercept of 222.0 m grading 0.95% Cu, and including an interval of 44.0 m grading 1.38% Cu. Partial results were reported in the Los Azules Progress Report #3 published on June 23, 2022. Hole AZ22166 was stopped at the arrival of winter and will be completed in spring.
Figure 1 – Cross-section 30-30’
Section 36-36’, shown in Figure 2, received eight new drill holes during the recent campaign. The final intercept reported was hole AZ22162, which targeted the gap between hole AZ22138 (522.1 m grading 0.42% Cu) and AZ22139. Hole AZ22162 returned 348.0 m grading 0.28% Cu, while also ending in enriched mineralization. It appears to correlate well with historic hole AZ0838 (188.3 m grading 0.27% Cu).
Figure 2 – Cross-section 36-36’
Cross Section 44-44' shown in Figure 3 presents hole AZ22163 (194.0 m grading 0.56% Cu). AZ22163 includes 8.0 m of high-grade 1.04% Cu and supports 146.0 m of high-grade 1.10% Cu reported in historic hole AZ0620. Hole AZ22167 (80.4 m grading 0.21% Cu) results are as expected and similar to the historic hole LA0402. Figure 3 - Cross-section 44-44’
Cross-section 48-48' shown in Figure 4, profiles three new holes. Hole AZ22149 (296.4 m grading 0.55% Cu including 54 m of 1.38% Cu), drilled just west of the center of the section, was released in our June 23 exploration update. Hole AZ22161, drilled east of the center of the section, with 238.0 m grading 0.58% Cu and including 10 m of 1.10% Cu, supports historic intercepts in adjacent holes AZ1060A (221.0 m grading 0.53% Cu) and AZ18136 (194.0 m grading 0.43% Cu), all below the 30-year pit shell, indicating significant potential for mineralization at depth. Holes AZ22147 and AZ22165 were drilled off the west and east flanks to delimit margins of the deposit and did not encounter significant mineralization.
Figure 4 - Cross-section 48-48’
Figure 5 - Locations of the cross-sections on the plan of the deposit
The Los Azules deposit is sequentially sub-divided into 50 m cross sections beginning at the southeast end of the deposit and progressing to the northwest. Section 36-36’ is approximately the mid-section of the deposit. As a matter of cross-referencing results presented in the Los Azules Progress Report #3 published on June 23, 2022, note that Section 36-36’ was previously identified as Section A-A’ and Section 48-48’ as Section C-C’. Section 40‑40’ identifies with Section B-B’ and was not included in this release as no new results have been added there. Drilling resumes in October, and the plan is to complete 45,500 m. Link to Drilling Results and Hole Collar Locations and Lengths for January to May 2022 at Los Azules: www.mcewenmining.com/files/doc_news/archive/2022/202208_LosAzules/2022_08_Los_Azules_Update_4.xlsx (alternatively see Tables 1 and 2 at the end of this press release).
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 10, 2022 2:53:29 GMT -5
McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) invites you to join our conference call on Thursday, August 11th, 2022, from 11:00 am EDT, where management will discuss our Q2 2022 financial results and project developments and follow with a question-and-answer session. Questions can be asked directly by participants over the phone during the webcast. The webcast will be archived on McEwen Mining’s website at www.mcewenmining.com/media following the call. Call into the conference over the phone: Please register here:conferencingportals.com/event/ZSafhHZiParticipants who cannot access the internet can dial-in using the numbers below:Participant Toll-Free Dial-In Number: 1 (888) 330-2398 Participant Toll Dial-In Number: 1 (240) 789-2709 Conference ID: 67121
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 11, 2022 6:02:13 GMT -5
McEwen Mining: Q2 2022 Results August 11, 2022
TORONTO, Aug. 11, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) today reported its second quarter (Q2) results for the period ended June 30th, 2022.
Fox Complex performed well, producing 11,200 GEOs, the highest quarterly production in over three years, at cash costs of $985 per GEO and AISC of $1,290 per GEO.
Average cash costs(2) per GEO sold from our 100%-owned mines in Q2 was $1,169, 15% below our guidance midpoint of $1,380 per GEO. Average all-in sustaining costs ("AISC")(2) per GEO sold from our 100%-owned mines was $1,549, 11% below our guidance midpoint of $1,740 per GEO.
Production was 27,600 gold ounces and 704,600 silver ounces, or 36,100 gold equivalent ounces(1) (GEOs)(see Table 1), compared to 40,700 GEOs during Q2 2021. San José mine delivered solid results producing 19,600 GEOs at cash costs and AISC per GEO sold of $1,144 and $1,468, respectively. Gold Bar mine progressed the development of the Gold Bar South deposit, which is expected to contribute to lower-cost production later this year and through 2023. Our consolidated net loss in Q2 was $12.4 million, or $0.26 per share (giving effect to the 1-for-10 reverse share split on July 28th), which relates primarily to $14.4 million investment in our Los Azules copper project, $4.8 million in other exploration and advanced projects, and a gross profit of $4.2 million from our operations.
Our 100%-owned mines generated a cash gross profit(2) of $7.7 million in Q2 and a gross profit of $4.2 million. Cash gross profit is calculated by adding back depletion and depreciation to gross profit.
Cash and cash equivalents at June 30th, 2022, totaled $47.8 million.
We are saddened to announce that Dr. Donald R. M. Quick, a Director of the Company and its predecessors since 2008, passed away in July following a brief illness. Dr. Quick made important contributions to the boards of McEwen Mining and Minera Andes during his 14 years with the companies. Among his many qualities, he was a great friend and colleague, and will be dearly missed.
A webcast will be held on Thursday, Aug 11th at 11:00 am EDT. Please see the details further below.
Operations Update
Fox Complex, Canada (100% interest) Fox produced 11,200 GEOs in Q2 at total cash costs and AISC of $985 and $1,290 per GEO sold, respectively. This compares to 7,100 GEOs at total cash costs and AISC of $917 and $1,088 per GEO sold, respectively, in Q2 2021. Fox achieved the highest quarterly production since Q3 2018 of 11,200 GEOs, as the mine rebounded from a slow start to 2022, resulting from mechanical issues at the mill and a COVID-related labour shortage. Fox production benefitted from the large stockpile accumulated during Q1 and increased during Q2, and the effects of the ongoing mill debottlenecking process. Mill throughput is expected to continue to improve during the remainder of the year resulting in strong H2 production. Drilling below the mineral resources envelop at Froome has been successful and is expected to extend the mine life. In Q2, we incurred $2.6 million for exploration. Our exploration spend at Fox for 2022 & 2023 is forecasted to be $10.0 million and $15.0 million, respectively. During the remainder of 2022, exploration will complete up to 39,000 m (128,000 ft) of drilling and will focus on: Continuing delineation and expansion of the Stock West deposit, particularly toward the West; Expansion of shallow mineralization identified near the Stock Mine; Test areas of high grade from 2021 drilling at the Gibson and Whiskey Jack targets at Grey Fox to potentially expand the resource; Follow up on deeper priority targets at the Stock property, where attractive results from initial drilling show significant potential. The objective of all our work is to continue to improve upon the Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the Fox Complex (see news release dated January 26, 2022). The PEA presents estimates for a positive business case for the Fox Complex expansion project, with potential average gold production of 80,800 gold ounces per year over nine (9) years, after the depletion of Froome. The economic analysis estimates an after-tax IRR of 21% at a gold price of $1,650 per ounce and average cash costs and AISC per ounce of gold sold of $769 and $1,246, respectively. Ongoing exploration is designed to reduce the funding requirements and improve the payback period by delineating additional resources in strategic locations to facilitate a greater degree of internal funding. Recent encouraging drill results at the Stock Property that may support improvement to the PEA include: • 5.47 g/t Au over 7.7 m true width (TW) (Hole SM22-070) • 6.62 g/t Au over 8.3 m TW (Hole SM22-090) • 5.62 g/t Au over 11.4 m TW (Hole SM22-089) Holes SM22-070 and SM22-090 intercepted shallower footwall green carbonate mineralization between 250 m to 300 m (800 to 1,000 ft) below the surface. Hole SM22-089 intersected mineralization 457 m (1,500 ft) below surface in the separate footwall grey carbonate host unit.
Gold Bar Mine, USA (100% interest) Gold Bar produced 5,100 GEOs in Q2 at total cash costs and AISC of $1,562 and $2,108 per GEO sold, respectively. This compares to 14,100 GEOs at total cash costs and AISC of $1,463 and $1,619 per GEO sold, respectively, in Q2 2021. Gold production continued to be below expectations due to the presence of carbonaceous material that is being treated as waste and lower contract mining rates resulting from a staffing shortage. During the quarter, 505,000 tonnes of mineralized material was mined but only 171,000 tonnes was processed, compared to 646,000 tonnes mined and 727,000 tonnes processed during the same period of 2021. However, heap leach recovery rates are outperforming our model, resulting in a potential increase in the leach pad inventory and assumed gold recovery. Drilling conducted at the Central Zone of the Pick deposit, designed to evaluate the presence of carbonaceous material, has encountered significantly less carbon; further metallurgical testing is underway. On April 1st, 2022, we received regulatory approval to amend the plan of operations to include the Gold Bar South (GBS) deposit. We are planning to start construction of the access road in Q3, and GBS is expected to contribute to production in Q4. GBS has positive attributes compared to the current mining areas, such as a much lower waste tripping ratio, oxide mineralization with no carbonaceous material, and a higher average gold grade partially offset by lower heap leach recovery. Most of the ore mined in 2023 is expected to be sourced from GBS. In Q2, we spent $1.2 million for exploration and conducted some 3,660 m (12,000 ft) of drilling, with a focus on drilling around the Pick and Atlas pits. At Pick, drilling targeted in-fill of the Phase 2 pit to improve the confidence in non-carbonaceous oxide mineralization. In addition, drilling targeted extensions of mineralization at the North pit wall along the controlling faults. At Atlas, drilling included a sonic program to evaluate mineral potential within the historic Atlas waste dump and targeted three attractive areas around the historic open pit. San José Mine, Argentina (49% interest) San José attributable production for Q2 was 11,100 gold ounces and 704,600 silver ounces, for a total of 19,600 GEOs. Total cash costs and AISC for the quarter were $1,144 and $1,468 per GEO sold, respectively. This compares to 18,200 GEOs at total cash costs and AISC of $1,105 and $1,500 per GEO sold, respectively, in Q2 2021. San José production recovered from COVID-19-related issues experienced in Q1. Despite the slow start to the year, the San José mine is expected to meet production guidance of 69,500 to 77,500 GEOs (49%). In Q2, 3,600 m (11,800 ft) of exploration drilling were completed around the mine area (Agostina and Ayelen SE veins), and 700 m (2,300 ft) were completed at the Ciclon project. Drilling highlights include 7.5 g/t gold and 84 g/t silver over 4.1 m (hole SJD-2468) and 6.9 g/t gold and 648 g/t silver over 1.5 m (hole SJM-594). An additional 2,000 m (6,600 ft) of exploration drilling is planned in Q3.
McEwen Copper (76% interest) The Los Azules project, located in San Juan, Argentina, is one of the world's largest undeveloped open-pit copper porphyry deposits. Surface drilling at Los Azules concluded in late May, with some 13,500 m (44,300 ft) completed to date in 2022. Three primary objectives of the program include: Improve confidence in the resource by converting Inferred mineral resources to the Indicated category; Accelerate project advancement with metallurgical, hydrological and geotechnical drilling and Test the limits of the depth extension of the higher-grade mineralization.
Results from this drilling program will be used to update the 2017 Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA). In the PEA, estimated Indicated and Inferred mineral resources were 10.2 and 19.3 billion lbs. of copper, respectively. Extensive enterprise optimization work is underway on potential larger scale, lower cost and lower carbon footprint alternatives. The updated study is planned to be released in Q1 2023. Future drilling will evaluate the potential to expand the deposit at depth. While the median depth of drill holes within the Los Azules resource database is 175 m (575 ft), it is not uncommon for porphyry copper mineralization to extend well beyond 1,000 m (3,280 ft) of depth. Numerous drill holes at Los Azules have encountered strong copper grades below the 2017 PEA pit bottom, with all three holes drilled to a depth of over one kilometer ending in copper mineralization. McEwen Copper spent $14.4 million in Q2 to advance the Los Azules project. On June 21st, 2022, McEwen Copper announced the closing of the second tranche of a private placement offering comprised of a $10 million investment by the Victor Smorgon Group advised by Arete Capital Partners, both of Australia, and $5 million from other investors, for total gross proceeds of $15.0 million. The amount raised in the first and second tranches of the private placement now stands at $55.0 million. McEwen Copper has built an experienced management team in Argentina to advance to a feasibility level of technical study after completion of the updated preliminary economic assessment. Planning is underway for the next drilling season that will start in Q4 2022.
NYSE Listing On July 28th a 1-for-10 reverse split of the Company’s common stock became effective on the NYSE and TSX exchanges. As a result, the Company has regained compliance with the NYSE’s continued listing standards.
Table 1 here provides production and cost results for Q2 & H1 2022 with comparative results for Q2 & H1 2021 and our guidance range for 2022.
Conference Call and Webcast Management will discuss our Q2 financial results and project developments and follow with a question-and-answer session. Questions can be asked directly by participants over the phone during the webcast. Thursday August 11 th , 2022 at 11:00 am EDT Webcast URL: HERE Call into the conference over the phone Please register here Participants who cannot access the internet can dial-in using the numbers below: Participant Toll-Free Dial-In Number: 1 (888) 330-2398 Participant Toll Dial-In Number: 1 (240) 789-2709 Conference ID: 67121
The webcast will be archived on McEwen Mining's website at www.mcewenmining.com/media following the call.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 13, 2022 5:11:45 GMT -5
Company Participants Rob McEwen – Chairman and Chief Owner Perry Ing – Chief Financial Officer William Shaver – Chief Operating Officer Stephen McGibbon – Executive Vice President-Exploration Michael Meding – Vice President, McEwen Copper and General Manager
Conference Call Participants Jacob Sekelsky – Alliance Global Partners May, for Heiko Ihle – H.C. Wainwright
Mark Ehlert – LendUS
Rob McEwen Thank you, operator. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome – the first quarter of this year was a lot weaker than our second quarter. Second quarter was much stronger. We had higher production and lower cost per ounce. The drivers of this improvement were our Fox Complex that delivered its best performance since 2018 and the San Jose mine, which bounced back sharply, delivering in Q2, what it should have done in Q1. Looking ahead, we expect Gold Bar South to be in production in the fourth quarter of this year, and it will be delivering more ounces, and lowering Gold Bar’s cost per ounce. Exploration at the Fox Complex has been successful, building the gold resources at Stock, and should result in a significant reduction in the payback period from its current six years towards our goal of less than three years for the FOX, PEA, which we published in January of this year. The PEA, I’d like to stress, outlines a longer mine life extending into the mid-2030s, and a higher average annual production of 80,000 ounces, which is almost twice this year’s guidance for production at Fox Complex. Progress at McEwen Copper’s Los Azules project has been substantial. During the year, a strong management team with extensive experience operating in Argentina has been assembled. Drilling, there has improved our knowledge of the deposit and will result in a big conversion of inferred resources into the indicated category. Multiple simulations have been conducted to optimize the mine planning. These results and other results will be included in the updated Los Azules PEA that will be released early next year. I also want to stress what we believed was very important to preserve, and that was our listing on the New York Stock Exchange, and that led to a 10-for-1 consolidation. I say the importance of maintaining it because 90% of our trading volume occurs on that exchange. Now I’d like to ask Perry to present our financials.
Perry Ing Thanks, Rob. Good morning, everyone. It’s a pleasure to be back at the McEwen Mining as CFO after several years away, and having the opportunity to rejoin a strong management team. Having joined halfway through the second quarter, I do observe that, obviously, the company experienced significant operating challenges during the first quarter as well as various other times during the COVID pandemic. But I do believe the company is now well positioned from a financial, operating and leadership perspective for success in the second half of the year and into the future. Looking at our results, I don’t intend to read out a lot of numbers, but I’ll just touch on our GAAP earnings. So starting with that, on a GAAP basis, we reported a consolidated net loss for the quarter of $12.4 million or $0.26 a share. That includes $19.2 million invested in exploration and advanced projects, of which $14.4 million relates to the Los Azules copper project. If you look at just our operating assets, we actually generated $4.2 million in positive gross profit from our operations. As Rob mentioned, we completed a share consolidation just recently, in July, and our results on a per share basis for the second quarter are retroactively reflects that 10-for-1 consolidation. Looking now at our gold – at our production for the quarter. Production improved significantly compared to the first quarter. Production was 27,600 ounces of gold and 704,600 ounces of silver for a total of 36,100 gold equivalent ounces. So this represents an increase of approximately 44% from the first quarter as we experienced COVID-related labor shortages at both the Fox Complex and San Jose mine during the first quarter. The improved throughput in the second quarter is reflected in our cash cost and all-in sustaining costs for the quarter, which were $1,169 and $1,549 per ounce, which were 15% and 11% below the midpoint of our annual guidance for the year. As Rob noted, the highlight was strong production from the Fox Complex of 11,200 gold equivalent ounces. Production was also very strong at the San Jose mine, which produced 19,600 ounces. The only disappointing result was from the Gold Bar mine, which produced 5,100 gold equivalent ounces for the quarter due to the continued presence of carbonaceous at ore. But as Rob noted, we have a plan in place to accelerate mining from the Gold Bar South project, and we believe we’ll show positive benefits from that by the fourth quarter. I’ll leave further discussion on this topic to Bill Shaver. And finally, looking at our treasury. Our cash and equivalent balance stood at $44 million, and including restricted cash at $48 million at June 30. This is down just over $10 million from the beginning of the year. But I’ll note that our accounts payable and accrued liabilities balance decreased by approximately $14 million since the beginning of the year. From a capital market standpoint, our primary activity during the quarter was the completion of a $15 million private placement by our McEwen Copper subsidiary in late June. So now McEwen Copper has raised $55 million of the intended $80 million first tranche financing. Following this transaction, McEwen Mining’s ownership of Los Azules is now – now stands at 76%. So with that, I’ll now turn the call over to Bill for a review of operations.
William Shaver Thank you very much, Perry, and good morning. I am also happy to have been called upon to join the McEwen management team as COO. I’ve been here about three months, and in that time, have visited all of our operations, including Mexico and Argentina, and have been to each of the operating entities several times. We are happy to report that Q2 has been a safe quarter with 1 minor medical aid involving a diamond driller who had a cut to his hand that required some stitches. I might just comment in my visits around to the various sites. I’m reasonably happy with state of our environmental, social and reclamation matters as well as our safety programs. At the Fox Complex, we had a relatively good quarter, producing 11,200 gold equivalent ounces of record, apparently for the best quarter in three years. The cost per ton and per ounce were in line with budgets and expectations, and the mine was significantly ahead of schedule and tons of ore produced and most of the other measures for development, production drilling and backfilling. Exploration is also confirming lower extension of the ore at the Froome deposit, which will extend the mine life into late 2024 and/or early 2025. We are also fully engaged in debottlenecking the process plant, which we hope will improve no throughput, improve reliability and reduce unanticipated downtime. To that end, we’ve installed a new screen tower in the month of July, and have purchased a rebuilt cone crusher to improve reliability in this portion of the plant. The screen will direct the pine ore that is already the right size directly to the ball mill, thereby passing the cone crusher and improving the performance of the cone crusher and allowing more time for maintenance of this part of the plant. At the same time, we’re improving maintenance capability of the plant personnel. All of these things will increase the mill throughput, which will result in more gold production at a lower cost as we move forward. At Gold Bar, we had a tough quarter due to the carbonaceous ore that Perry mentioned. This was encountered in the pit. This ore, which is preg-robbing, cannot be placed on the leach pad as it attracts and keeps gold captured in this material. This impacted our productions and costs for the quarter. We were able to mitigate this situation to some extent by pivoting to other ore sources. We did carry out a 10-hole drilling program on an very intense basis to try to quantify the carbonaceous material, and we now have the results of that study. And we feel we have the situation under control in terms of understanding where we cannot mine. And we see – but we do see the impact of this continuing into Q3 in terms of our production. Part of our strategy is to move ahead more quickly on the Gold Bar South project. To that end, we have all of the permits now in hand, and we’ll be starting the access road and site development this month. This will allow us to have ore production from Gold Bar South in Q4. And – as you may know, the grade at Gold Bar South is generally a little bit better. And of course, the ore is very clean of deleterious elements. The stripping ratio at Gold Bar South will be lower and the ore haul is shorter, although the recovery may be lower long-term. And we plan to mine as much ore from Gold Bar South in Q4, and continue mining into 2023. And the plan is to concentrate on the best grades possible in Q4 and into 2023. In Mexico, we have completed the leaching as planned in the month of July. And I would say I’m happy to say that we’re carrying on with the remediation plan for the waste dumps and other parts of the site. And this work is going well and looks very, very good. We also have come up with a different approach to the processing of the leach pad material with a traditional mill in a manner which will reduce the CapEx significantly, and basically make that a project that we should be able to finance from a mixture of some of our present financing, a little bit better production from some of our operations. And this will – we’re in the midst of completing a study on this, and we anticipate that this might start in 2022 – 2023, rather. So in summary, I’m relatively happy with our progress to date. We have a good dedicated group of people working hard to do a little bit better. We have some critical personnel holes that we need to fill, and there’s some more process driven discipline that we need in the organization, but we’re in the midst of putting that into place. So with that, I’ll thank you very much. And now I’ll turn it over to Steve for some exciting exploration results, both in Timmins and at Los Azules. Thank you.
Stephen McGibbon Thank you, Bill, and good morning, everyone. Our Q2 exploration investments in Ontario and Nevada totaled $3.8 million, and they’re generating exciting results and positioning us for a strong second half of the year. The goal at each is to extend the life of our mines and grow our mineral resource base. Firstly, at the Fox Complex near Timmins. True underground drilling has continued to produce positive exploration results, as Bill alluded to, and these are extending mineralization to depth. Recently, hole 225-L041-118, around 5.2 grams per tonne gold over 8.6 meters at 100 meters below the mine’s access ramp. We are drilling and delineating to depth with 2 drills at the 20 to 25 level in the mine. On surface, our stock property covers 8 kilometers or 5 miles of the Destor-Porcupine Fault Zone, and includes 3 gold deposits that occur within a 3-kilometer or 2-mile length that are open for expansion. In 2022, we have four key target areas near our stock property mill with excellent potential to materially grow mineral resources based on poorly tested vertical and lateral trends. During Q2, we continued drilling mineralization proximal to the past producing stock mine with a view that a successful campaign could shorten the payback period in the Fox PEA delivered earlier this year. We have confirmed multiple areas with attractive initial results that can be expanded with additional drilling from surface or in time from underground. Recently, our success included identifying a deeper mineralized body close to the Destor-Porcupine Fault Zone. Today, we reported on encouraging drill results at the Stock property hosted in our green carbonate or host that may support improvement to the PEA. These results included two holes, 5.47 grams per tonne over 7.7 meters true width, and 6.62 grams per tonne gold over 8.3 meters true width. These holes intercept mineralization at about 500 meters below surface. We have a third hole, pending results, that includes visible gold noticed while core logging. We anticipate reporting on these and other exploration results from Fox in a press release in the very near future. At Gold Bar, Q2 result activities focused on several areas in the mine on the Pick extensions to the north and infill of the Pick Phase 2 pit. At the Atlas pit, our highest grade past-producing open pit located 3 miles west of the Gold Bar mine, drilling got underway on three target areas proximal to the historic pit, including following up on hole OGB-010 drilled in 2021 that intersected 3.1 grams per tonne gold over 27 meters or about 90 feet at the East Atlas target. That drilling has been just completed, and we hope to be reporting on results in the near future as on. At San Jose, in Argentina, 3,600 meters of drilling were completed on the mine site exploration program and a further 700 meters of drilling at the Ciclon Este project located about 70 kilometers south of San Jose. Mine site drilling result highlights include 7.5 tonnes or – grams per tonne gold and 84 grams per tonne silver over 4.1 meters, and 6.9 grams per tonne gold and 648 grams per tonne silver over 1.5 meters. An additional 2,000 meters, or 6,600 feet of exploration drilling is planned in Q3. The San Jose property surrounds Newmont’s Cerro Negro mine and is host to high-grade epithermal gold and silver deposits. Finally, at Los Azules, our exploration program completed about 13,500 meters or more than 44,000 feet of drilling prior to the close of the field season in late May. All assay results from the exploration holes have been returned and are being included in the PEA update slated for early 2023. This drilling is confirming mineralization of historic intercepts using the 2017 PEA mineral resource estimate. Recently, return to assays include hole AZ22-158, which intersected 222 meters of 0.95% copper, including an interval comprising 44 meters of 1.38% copper in the supergene-enriched zone. Importantly, we believe we are meeting one of our primary goals of converting previous inferred mineral resources to indicated resources and thus improving our confidence in the ore body. Our drilling often extended to depth well below the 2017 PEA pit with mineralization that continued to the bottom of the completed holes, giving us more confidence that there is plenty of room for the resource to grow much more. I will now turn the presentation over to Michael, who will tell you more about our developments at Los Azules.
Michael Meding Thank you, Steve. The Los Azules project located in San Juan, Argentina is one of the world’s largest undeveloped open pit copper porphyry deposits. According to Mining Intelligence, we are a top 10 by resource. If you look at it, we are top five by resource not owned by a major. As Steve mentioned, we completed some 13.5 kilometers surface drilling with good results, as we have published in our latest press releases. Three primary objectives of the past and upcoming drilling program includes: to improve confidence in the resource by converting Inferred mineral resources to the Indicated measures category, accelerate project advancement with metallurgical, hydrological and geotechnical drilling, and to test the limits of the depth extension of the higher-grade mineralization. Results from this drill program will be used to update the 2017 preliminary economic assessment in which estimated indicated Inferred mineral results were 10.2 billion and 19.3 billion pounds of copper, respectively. The update of PEA study, as Steve mentioned, is planned to be released in the beginning of 2023. We have built a strong management team in Argentina, as already mentioned by Rob, that will support us going from the updated PEA into the preparation of a definitive feasibility study and demonstrates our confidence in the accelerated development of this project. As shown in our annual meeting presentation, we have seen significant mineralization below the prior pit outline and in our deeper vertical holes. Our existing geophysical work indicates promising targets to the Southwest and the Northeast of our main mineralization that we aim to test further in our upcoming drilling program, combined with infill resource drilling. There our aim is to convert resource to the measured category for the first five years of future production, and we are executing additional metallurgical testing to analyze the option of an initial long-life heap leach operation, which could significantly lower the required CapEx, logistics costs and environmental footprint, and should provide an attractive business case. We have brought together a world-class team, including seminal engineering, Bechtel, Stantec and most recently [indiscernible] to support the definition and development board for the PEA update. Work towards the development of the PEA basis has begun with the initiation of metallurgical testing program leveraging prior work and the completion of the geo metallurgical model to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the deposits. Extensive enterprise optimization work with middle consulting from Australia is underway on a potential, larger scale, lower cost and lower carbon footprint alternatives. Based on the new information from the completed drilling and geological logging, resource and geological modeling upgrades are being refined for the inclusion in the PEA. McLane Design, a renowned architectural design from the green architectural space, has also been working to assist in incorporating regenerative and sustainable design concepts already into the PEA at this point in time. As reported, Los Azules is now accessible during most of the year via two access roads, which will make further development safer and more cost effective. We have successfully used the Southern Access Road at the end of last season, and leveraged shared resource together with Altar from Aldebaran Resources and Glencore, El Pachón, which are neighboring projects. The company is currently preparing for the upcoming drilling season beginning of Q4 this year. Our road crew is already improving access to the project size for an early start. I will now turn back the presentation to Rob. Thank you.
Rob McEwen Thank you, Michael. I trust you will agree that our operating performance represents a big improvement over our past. In addition to our improving precious metal operations, you’ve heard from Michael is that there’s a lot of activity at Los Azules and McEwen Copper. And I’d just like to go over some numbers with you and illustrate why we believe that Los Azules represents a very large asset for us, and will play a big role in the future value of the company. So what’s Los Azules works? Well, one comparison could be with a project, a copper project in the same province in Argentina that sold earlier this year for $485 million. It’s called Los Azules – Josemaria. Josemaria is located at a higher altitude than us that are 900 meters higher. So they’re into an area that has potential problems with glaciers. The resource base of Los Azules is over twice the size of Josemaria. Los Azules’ copper grade is significantly higher than Josemaria’s. The projected CapEx of Los Azules is lower, and the NPV higher. Los Azules is closer to infrastructure such as highways and power grid. And according to Goldman Sachs, based on 2018 numbers, Los Azules was in the lowest cost quartile of the industry for undeveloped copper projects, and Josemaria was in the highest cost quartile. So I thought I’d look at it and say, well, if we were to look at that $485 million and say – discounted by 50%, and say that’s the value of it for McEwen Mining. And that would be – McEwen Mining owns 76% of McEwen copper right now. That – at a 50% discount of the $485 million, that would work out to a per share value of $3.88 a share. If you said, well, it’s not 50% discount, maybe it’s the same price. Los Azules is worth $485 million. Then there is a $7.78 value per share behind every share of McEwen Mining. And then if you said, well, it’s more than twice the size. It’s higher grade, it’s closer to infrastructure, and you get a 50% premium, then you have better than $11.60 a share value behind every share McEwen Mining for that 76% interest. So when you’re looking at McEwen Mining, we have exposure to two of the critical metals for the future. We have gold, which is the ultimate form of money. And we have copper, which is the metal of electrification of clean energy going forward. So what you get is 100,000 to 150,000 ounces of gold at an improving cost, plus 76% interest in one of the world’s largest undeveloped copper projects. And right now, we are trading well below the value of Los Azules contained in our company. I’m quite optimistic that we’re going to see improving results for our operations, and the advancement of Los Azules is quite exciting in terms of building value for all of us shareholders. I’d now like to open the session up to question and answers. And before you get any questions online, I have a number of them that have come in ahead of this call. So there’s – the first question comes from Angie’s and Christian [indiscernible] of Oregon. They say, we are long-time shareholders who want to know when you will declare regular dividends again with the investment in new mines behind us? What is the plan for sustained growing income that supports a dividend. I’m a big believer in dividends. And when we are in Goldcorp, we got to a point we are paying monthly dividends. We’re not at that point, yet. I think we’re a considerable distance from that, but we’re building our assets to get to that point in the future. The second question from Gillian Tessier. What is management planning to do in order to stop the slide in the stock? Well, I think we have better results this quarter, and we’re going to see continued improvements in our operations and continued growth in our copper and that should translate into an improving share price. John from British Columbia. Will the company need to do any financing for the remainder of 2022? I’ll ask Perry to jump in?
Perry Ing Sure, Rob. I think from the treasury side, I think on McEwen Mining, we’ve stabilized the balance sheet. So we don’t foresee any need for McEwen Mining to raise equity during the remainder of 2022. Obviously, for McEwen copper, it’s now completed a $55 million of the intended $80 million first tranche financing to advance the Los Azules copper project. So there’s a potential to execute that before the IPO. But other than that, no plans to raise financing.
Rob McEwen And another question for Perry. This is from Steve Ellis. What are the current projections on when the company will make a profit?
Perry Ing That’s a good question, Rob. Obviously, as McEwen Mining, the U.S. GAAP reporting company, we expense exploration. So as long as we’re consolidating the results of Los Azules and continuing to spend lots of money advancing the project. Those will always be deducted from the company’s actual profitable operations. So it’s really a bit of an accounting exercise, but I’ll say that the company’s operations as demonstrated this quarter were quite profitable.
Rob McEwen Thank you, Perry. Next question from Belgium. And I’m going to refer this to Michael. With the recent sharp decline in copper prices, how does management see the evolution of McEwen copper in the near future?
Michael Meding So we don’t build a mine based on a McEwen spot price. We look into the longer-term future. But even looking at today’s spot prices for copper, we think that the Los Azules project will be very profitable. At the moment, we use in our simulations, $3.25 for valuation. And looking forward into the electrification, and what is going on with greenification of our economies, we think there will be significant need for copper in the future, and this will be supported by the copper price, and there’s a significant upside potential for Los Azules. So we’re quite comfortable with regards to the Los Azules project at this point in time.
Rob McEwen Thank you, Michael. Marie, says, second question, how does management see the evolution of McKean Mining for the rest of this year and for the coming year? That’s an easy one. We see continued improvement in operations. As Michael said, we see the copper project growing in profile, and we’ll be delivering updated preliminary economic assessment early next year, and we’re driving towards – after that, a feasibility study on the project, where we think there’s – it will become a property that should attract significant attention. And just this morning, I saw someone commenting on the copper price and suggesting a $10 a pound that’s coming in the future. Operator, open for questions online.
Jacob Sekelsky, Alliance Global Partners Thanks for taking the question. Hey, Rob. So just looking at costs, I mean, they obviously decreased substantially quarter-over-quarter. Do you think there’s further room for improvement in the second half? Or should we expect levels to what we saw in Q2. I know it’s a difficult question with the inflationary environment, but any color there would be helpful.
Rob McEwen I’ll ask Bill to jump in there.
William Shaver Yes. So yes, that’s a good question. And I guess the – where we have to look to improve cost is improve production at the Fox complex. So if we look at our cost for Q2, we were slightly under our budget in terms of production, but right on target for cost per ounce and cost per ton. So if we can improve the ore production or the ore processing production, that will have a follow-on impact on our operating costs. So I guess in terms of that operation, it will lower the cost. In the third – in the – yes, in the third quarter, at Gold Bar, we hope to get back closer to our budget numbers. And so that – in terms of the production of coal. So that should help the cost per ounce at Gold Bar. And then the combination of those two will overall hopefully reduce the cost. And going forward, when we ramp up Gold Bar South, which has a little bit higher grade, shorter distance to the mill, a little bit lower recovery, lower stripping ratio, then that should help the overall operating cost. And again, I think as we move forward, the ore grade in some of the exploration work that Steve has been doing appears to be at least consistent with what we have seen in the mining operations up till now. So I think the road forward is around trying to improve each of our assets that are operating, and to look to the future expansion in any way that we can.
Jacob Sekelsky Okay. That makes sense. And sticking with Gold Bar South, can you maybe just touch on the number of ounces that you guys have in the mine plan for that area? And I guess, how long do you expect Gold Bar South to be the dominant source of feed at Gold Bar?
William Shaver So the total ounces in Gold Bar South recovered is something in the order of 120,000 ounces. And it should operate through 2023 and on into 2024. Based on the present data, it will – in terms of the resource and – that operation will end in 2024. But what we’re hoping is that once we get into the operation and see exactly where the ore is that we’re a bit optimistic that we’re going to find some more ore there. So once we get our teeth into Gold Bar South and understand how the all occurs and so on, there will be some exploration work that we have to do to understand the extensions of the ore to the north and south, and also downward to lower elevations, which – I would say, the north and south, we’re a bit more optimistic about than the possibility of the ore extending deeper. So I hope that answers your question to some extent.
Jacob Sekelsky That was helpful. That’s all for me. Thanks again.
May, for Heiko Ihle, H.C. Wainwright This is May calling in for Heiko. Thanks for taking our call today. So we’re looking at Fox, and you spent $2.6 million on exploration in the quarter. Extrapolating that to the year, we’re at $10.4 million. So right in line with your forecast of $10 million. And then next year, we’re looking at $15 million of spend. So a strong 50% increase. Can you provide a bit of color on where exactly those funds will be spent? And how much of the 50% increase is attributable to higher costs? And how many meters do you think you can drill in 2023?
Rob McEwen Steve, would you like to do…
Stephen McGibbon Yes. So I can certainly add color to that question. Firstly, drilling costs – if we look back a year ago, our two primary concerns with respect to drilling was: one, the availability of drills; and two, the likely cost increase in drilling in the future, late 2022, 2023. And what we’ve seen so far this year that drills generally have been more available than what we had felt a year earlier. Perhaps the drillers are increasing their capacity with more drills. And we found that our drilling costs are in line and specifically at Fox, below what we had budgeted for unit cost for the year. So that has been gratifying certainly for us. You mentioned the spend on the year-to-date for exploration. Our plan on surface at the Fox Complex for the second half of this year is to complete about 39,000 meters of drilling, and that will take for the most part, five drills drilling continuously, both at the Stock property and at the Fox – Black Fox property, primarily at Grey Fox. We – in order to complete our goals for 2023. A very important part of the program next year will be to ensure we’re prepared and actively drilling on targets that can typically only be drilled in winter often because of difficult conditions, and we’re beginning preparation for that part of our program next year. And on average, the exploration program this year has begun to migrate from delineation-related work focused on improving the payback on the PEA, in and around the Stock Mine and on the margins of Stock West. That drilling is continuing. But now we’re also migrating toward looking at a very attractive targets that we’ve been aware of and we have been planning to follow up in the future program, some of those targets will be deeper than have been drilled in the last year, 1.5 years, but also have the potential to – with success bring meaningful improvement to our resource base, either at Stock or on Grey Fox. So we believe the second half of the year is going to be quite an exciting one. We are accelerating our spend versus the first half of the year. And we expect the second half of the year, the spend will be in the order of about $7 million at the Fox Complex. And similarly, we’re – we expect to be ramping up drilling in time in Nevada as well. But specific to Fox, we are planning already for our winter drill program and expect to have quite an exciting program taking us through to the end of next year.
May, for Heiko Ihle, H.C. Wainwright Great. Thank you. That helps a lot.
Mark Ehlert, LendUS Okay. Thank you so much. Just a question for Rob. When you were going over the valuation and comparing it to Josemaria, were you talking about pre or post split value?
Perry Ing Hi, Mark. Rob had to step out of the room for – take a call. But maybe Stephen can answer these questions.
Stephen McGibbon Yes. So Rob’s numbers were split as reverse basis per share value.
Mark Ehlert Great. Thank you so much. I only asked because I know that it is highly sensitive to the price of copper. Just wanted to make sure. That’s all for me. Thank you all.
Perry Ing Thanks, Mark. As I mentioned, Rob, I had to step out of the room. But on behalf of the management team at McEwen Mining, thanks for joining the second quarter results call, and we look forward to speaking to you again in the future.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 18, 2022 2:48:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Aug 31, 2022 14:26:03 GMT -5
TORONTO, Aug. 31, 2022 -- McEwen Copper Inc., a subsidiary of McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX), is pleased to announce the closing of the third and final tranche of the previously announced private placement offering (the “Offering”) of up to 8,000,000 common shares of McEwen Copper Inc. priced at US$10.00 per common share. The third tranche is comprised of a $25 million investment by Rio Tinto’s copper leaching technology venture, Nuton (“Nuton” or the “Investor”), and $1.85 million from other investors. The total Offering has been increased to 8,185,000 common shares, with the amounts raised in the three tranches of the private placement totalling $81.85 million. McEwen Copper is well-funded to advance its Los Azules Project, located in the mining friendly province of San Juan, Argentina. The next milestones are the upcoming drilling season from October 2022 to June 2023, the completion of an updated preliminary economic assessment (PEA) in early Q1 2023, and the planned IPO of McEwen Copper in H1 2023. In connection with the Offering, McEwen Copper entered into a collaboration agreement with Nuton (the "Nuton Collaboration Agreement”) to advance our understanding of the potential application of heap leach technology at Los Azules, including the testing of Nuton® Technologies for compatibility with Los Azules copper mineralization. Leaching has many potential economic and environmental benefits over a conventional milling scenario, including lower water and energy consumption, no large tailings storage facility or dam, and typically lower capital and operating costs. McEwen Copper Chief Executive Rob McEwen said: “Los Azules is among the largest undeveloped copper assets in the world. We recognize the potential opportunity of using Nuton Technologies to produce copper in greater amounts, more rapidly, and with less impact on the environment and water resources. I trust that our relationship with Nuton and Rio Tinto will accelerate the process of realizing the enormous potential of Los Azules.” Rio Tinto Chief Executive Copper Bold Baatar said: “This agreement will allow us to evaluate the potential to commercially deploy Rio Tinto’s innovative Nuton Technologies for copper leaching in McEwen Copper’s planned development of Los Azules. Our Nuton Technologies have the capacity to unlock increased copper production for Rio Tinto and our partners, with a low carbon footprint and leading environmental performance.” The principal terms of the Nuton Collaboration Agreement include: Nuton will invest $25 million in McEwen Copper, acquiring 2.5 million common shares at $10.00 per common share, for post-closing ownership of 9.73%. McEwen Copper and Nuton will jointly undertake copper leach testing using Nuton Technologies with samples from Los Azules. McEwen Copper has agreed to grant exclusivity to Nuton for one year in the area of novel, patented or trade secret leaching technology, while it will continue its independent test work and studies using conventional leach technologies. Nuton will have the right to select one nominee who will be appointed as a director or observer to the Board of McEwen Copper. This right will continue for as long as Nuton holds greater than 7.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of McEwen Copper. McEwen Copper and its controlling shareholders will not complete a liquidity event (such as the planned IPO) until after March 31, 2023. McEwen Copper has agreed to limit related party transactions in certain situations until the earlier of the planned IPO (or alternative liquidity event) or Nuton ceasing to hold 7.5%. Customary standstill and lock-up agreement between the Investor and its affiliates and McEwen Copper and its affiliates. Other customary representations and warranties. About McEwen Copper McEwen Copper Inc. holds 100% interest in the Los Azules copper project in San Juan, Argentina and the Elder Creek project in Nevada, USA. McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE/TSX:MUX) owns a 68% share of McEwen Copper.
About Los Azules Los Azules was ranked in the top 10 largest undeveloped copper deposits in the world by Mining Intelligence (2022). Its current copper resources are estimated at 10.2 billion pounds at a grade of 0.48% Cu (Indicated category) and an additional 19.3 billion pounds at a grade of 0.33% Cu (Inferred category). About Nuton Nuton is an innovative new venture that aims to help grow Rio Tinto’s copper business. At the core of Nuton is a portfolio of proprietary copper leach-related technologies and capability – a product of almost 30 years of research and development. Nuton® Technologies offer the potential to economically unlock copper sulphide resources, copper bearing waste and tailings, and achieve higher copper recoveries on oxide and transitional material, allowing for a significantly increased copper production. One of the key differentiators of Nuton is the potential to deliver leading environmental performance, including more efficient water usage, lower carbon emissions, and the ability to reclaim mine sites by reprocessing mine waste.
About Rio Tinto Rio Tinto is the second largest mining and metals company in the world, operating in 35 countries, and producing the raw materials essential to human progress. It aims to help pioneer a more sustainable future, from partnering in the development of technology that can make the aluminum smelting process entirely free of direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, to providing the world with the materials it needs – such as copper – to build a new low-carbon economy and products like electric vehicles, charging infrastructure and smartphones. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Sept 6, 2022 6:09:36 GMT -5
McEwen Copper Options Elder Creek Project to Rio Tinto TORONTO, Sep 6, 2022 - McEwen Copper Inc., a subsidiary of McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX), is pleased to announce that it has entered into a binding term sheet with Kennecott Exploration Company (“KEX”), a subsidiary of Rio Tinto, for an option to earn a 60% interest in and joint venture the Elder Creek property in Nevada (see Figure 1) by spending US$18 million. The principal terms of the agreement are: KEX will have the right to earn a 60% interest in Elder Creek by investing $18 million over a maximum of seven years (the “Expenditure Commitment”). KEX will be the operator of the Elder Creek project during the term of the agreement. Following completion of the Expenditure Commitment, KEX and McEwen Copper will form an unincorporated 60:40 joint venture. Other customary representations, warranties and conditions. Figure 1 – Elder Creek property location map
McEwen Copper Inc. holds 100% interest in the Los Azules copper project in San Juan, Argentina and the Elder Creek project in Nevada, USA. McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE/TSX: MUX) owns a 68% share of McEwen Copper.
About Elder Creek This Project consists of 577 unpatented mining claims in Humboldt and Lander counties, Nevada. It is prospective for porphyry copper mineralization and well placed in a district hosting several large copper and gold mines, including Marigold, Lone Tree and Phoenix. McEwen Mining Inc. holds a 1.25% net smelter return (NSR) royalty on all the claims that comprise the Elder Creek property.
About Rio Tinto Rio Tinto is the second largest mining and metals company in the world, operating in 35 countries, and producing the raw materials essential to human progress. It aims to help pioneer a more sustainable future, from partnering in the development of technology that can make the aluminum smelting process entirely free of direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, to providing the world with the materials it needs – such as copper – to build a new low-carbon economy and products like electric vehicles, charging infrastructure and smartphones.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Sept 9, 2022 6:06:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Sept 15, 2022 9:15:17 GMT -5
McEwen Mining/McEwen Copper Rob McEwen, Chairman & CEO:
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Sept 20, 2022 13:27:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Sept 22, 2022 8:24:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Oct 5, 2022 4:35:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Oct 19, 2022 6:43:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Oct 29, 2022 3:54:16 GMT -5
Rob McEwen & Michael Meding EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN & CHIEF OWNER (RM), VICE PRESIDENT & GENERAL MANAGER (MM), MCEWEN COPPER, MCEWEN MINING interview
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Nov 2, 2022 5:20:27 GMT -5
MCEWEN MINING: Q3 2022 Results and Webcast TORONTO, November 2nd, 2022 - McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) will report Q3 2022 operating and financial results after the market closes on Friday, November 4th, 2022. We invite you to join our conference call on Monday, November 7th, 2022, from 11:00 am EST, where management will discuss our Q3 2022 financial results and project developments and follow with a question‑and‑answer session. Questions can be asked directly by participants over the phone during the webcast.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Nov 7, 2022 6:28:18 GMT -5
November 7, 2022 McEwen Mining: Q3 2022 Results
McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) reports its third quarter (Q3) results for the period ended September 30th, 2022.
“This year has been much better than the previous three! While we still have issues to resolve, such as increasing our treasury by producing more ounces at a lower cost, we can clearly see a brighter future. At the Fox Complex, where we have had a history of high operating cost/oz we are making good progress reducing our cost. I am pleased to say that in Q3 our cash cost/oz at Fox fell to $774, our lowest since mid-2018. This is well below the industry average. Our next important area to improve at Fox is the process plant (mill). Specifically, we need to increase the throughput because our mine is now producing more ore than our mill can process. As a result, we have a large surface stockpile of ore equivalent to more than two months of production.
At Gold Bar, we are looking forward to starting to mine our Gold Bar South (GBS) deposit this quarter. We are expecting to have a much lower cost/oz than our YTD cost because we will be mining higher grade ore at GBS, with half the strip ratio and no problematic carbonaceous material.
In Mexico, we recently acquired a complete process plant on very advantageous terms that will help significantly reduced projected capital requirements for our Fenix project. This acquisition has made Fenix more attractive to build and could provide a new long life mine for McEwen Mining.
The San José mine, where we have a 49% interest, put in a strong quarter and its exploration is continuing to extend its high-grade veins and discover new veins.
We completed an $82 million financing for McEwen Copper in a very tough equity market. Rio Tinto, the second largest mining company in the world, through its subsidiary Nuton, now owns 9.7% of McEwen Copper, as a result of its investment of $25M. Also, Nuton is testing the Los Azules copper mineralization to see if it can accelerate and increase copper recoveries. Another of Rio Tinto’s subsidiaries, Kennecott Exploration, signed an option to earn 60% interest in McEwen Copper’s other copper project, Elder Creek, by spending $18 million on exploration. Elder Creek is located in Nevada.
In July our shares outstanding underwent a 10 for 1 consolidation. This was an unfortunate but necessary action done to protect our listing on the NYSE, which is our principal exchange and where our trading volume is the highest.
Production guidance for 2023 is 150,000 to 170,000 gold equivalent ounces (GEOs).
Later in this release I will explain why I believe MUX is an attractive investment” said Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner.
A webcast will be held on Monday, Nov 7 th at 11:00 am EST . Management will discuss our Q3 financial results and project developments and follow with a question-and-answer session. Questions can be asked directly by participants over the phone during the webcast.
Monday November 7 th , 2022 11:00 am EST
Please register here: conferencingportals.com/event/ZSafhHZi Participants who cannot access the internet can dial-in using the numbers below Participant Toll-Free Dial-In Number: 1 (888) 330-2398 Participant Toll Dial-In Number: 1 (240) 789-2709 Conference ID: 67121
Selected Operational & Financial Information
Cash and cash equivalents at September 30th, 2022, totaled $54.9 million.
Q3 Production was 26,200 gold ounces and 852,200 silver ounces, or 35,700 gold equivalent ounces(1) (GEOs)(see Table 1), compared to 42,900 GEOs during Q3 2021.
YTD Production was 74,650 gold ounces and 1,894,100 silver ounces or 97,000 GEOs compared to 114,200 GEOs during 9 months to Sept. 30, 2021.
Revised guidance for 2022 production is 134,600-141,800 GEOs, reflecting a decrease of approximately 6,500 GEOs at Fox and 14,000 GEOs at Gold Bar due to carbonaceous material encountered throughout 2022, which should be alleviated with Gold Bar South beginning production, and an adjustment due to the gold:silver price ratio.
Average cash costs(2) per GEO sold from our 100%-owned mines (Fox & Gold Bar) in Q3 was $1,219, in-line with our guidance. Average all-in sustaining costs ("AISC")(2) per GEO sold from our 100%-owned mines was $1,659, slightly above our guidance midpoint of $1,475 per GEO.
Our 100%-owned mines generated a cash gross profit(2) of $5.8 million in Q3 and a gross profit of $1.5 million. Cash gross profit is calculated by adding back depletion and depreciation to gross profit.
Our consolidated net loss in Q3 was $10.5 million, or $0.21 per share, which relates primarily to $7.8 million spent on the Los Azules project, and $5 million on exploration and advanced projects at our mines. It is important to understand that MUX will continue reporting losses for some time because it is required to consolidate 100% of the expenses incurred by McEwen Copper for the development of Los Azules in its financial statements despite owning 68%.
Our exploration programs are focused on defining near-term mine resources that could extend our mine lives and contribute to future profitability. An update on our exploration activities will be released in the coming weeks.
Operations Update
Fox Complex, Canada (100% interest) Fox achieved the lowest quarterly cash cost since mid-2018 of $774 per GEO sold. We believe there is good potential to further reduce costs and increase production at Fox Complex by increasing mill throughput. We plan to start crushing at the Froome mine site prior to transportation to the mill, which should relieve stress on the primarily crushing circuit. In Q3, we incurred $2.7 million for exploration at Stock and at the Black Fox properties.
Gold Bar Mine, USA (100% interest) Gold production continued to be low due to the presence of carbonaceous material that is being treated as waste and lower mining rates resulting from a contractor staffing shortage. Development of the Gold Bar South deposit is underway. First ore is expected later in Q4. GBS has superior attributes compared to the current mining areas, because of its much lower waste stripping ratio, oxide mineralization with no carbonaceous material, and a higher average gold grade partially offset by lower heap leach recovery. Most of Gold Bar’s production in 2023 will be from GBS. In order to increase our mining rate, a new mining contractor has been engaged and mobilization of equipment has started with a staged ramp up expected to be fully implemented in January 2023. In Q3, we spent $1.1 million for exploration activities.
McEwen Copper (68% interest) McEwen Copper is a key component of MUX’s value proposition. The Los Azules project is one of the world's largest undeveloped open-pit copper porphyry deposits. During the quarter, study work continued in parallel with preparation for the new drilling season which started in mid-October.
The closing of the $81.85 million financing was a critical step to fund activities necessary to complete an updated PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment) for the Los Azules project. These activities included additional drilling, completing a new resource model, life of mine plan, baseline monitoring for environmental permitting, community development and relations, other technical work and general corporate purposes. McEwen Copper spent $7.6 million in Q3 to advance the Los Azules project. Publication of an updated PEA on the Los Azules copper project is planned for Q1 2023 and in Q2 an IPO is planned along with MUX completing a secondary financing reducing its interest to increase its treasury. In the 2017 PEA, Los Azules is designed as an open pit copper mine with a 36-year life. However, it is possible that Los Azules could become ultimately an even larger mine, with a longer life, since numerous drill holes have shown strong copper mineralization extending below the pit bottom. It is not uncommon for porphyry copper deposits such as Los Azules, to extend well below 1,000 meters (3,280 feet) depth. During this season’s drill program, two deep high-grade targets will be drilled.
Table 1 provides production and cost results for Q3 & 9M 2022 with comparative results for Q3 & 9M 2021 and our Revised guidance range for 2022.
Our El Gallo project produced 170 GEOs in Q3 2022, 900 GEOs in 9M 2022, 560 GEOs in Q3 2021 and 2,500 GEOs in 9M 2021. Residual heap leaching ceased in July 2022.
Table 1 Notes: 'Gold Equivalent Ounces' are calculated based on a gold to silver price ratio of 90:1 for Q3 2022, 83:1 for Q2 2022, 78:1 for Q1 2022, 73:1 for Q3 2021 and 68:1 for Q1 & Q2 2021. 2022 revised production guidance is calculated based on 85:1 gold to silver price ratio. Cash gross profit, cash costs per ounce sold, all-in sustaining costs (AISC) per ounce sold are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under U.S. GAAP. For definition of the non-GAAP measures see "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" section in this press release; for the reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the closest U.S. GAAP measures, see the Management Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2021 (as amended) filed on Edgar and SEDAR. Represents the portion attributable to us from our 49% interest in the San José Mine.
What might MUX be Worth?
“Value, like beauty, is frequently in the eye of the beholder. I am often asked what I think MUX is worth and I want to share my answer with you.
I have arrived at a high/low range of value for MUX by adding up the some of its parts. Here are the parts: MUX has a 68% interest in McEwen Copper, it owns 100% of three gold mines: Fox Complex, Gold Bar and El Gallo/Fenix, a 49% interest in the San José gold/silver mine, a portfolio of five royalties (NSRs) and a collection of exploration properties.
The operating challenges we faced in recent years have severely damaged our credibility with our shareholders and the market. As a result, few investors have taken a close look recently at our assets. If they did, I believe some would see the potential value that I see today. Yes, our cash is tight, our costs/oz are high and our mine lives are currently short, but that has been changing for the better. So let me show you my math and how I had arrived at a possible potential value for MUX of $8 to $30/share .
In this valuation estimate I have compared Los Azules to two copper projects, Josemaria and Filo, that are in the same province in Argentina as Los Azules. Compared to Los Azules these projects are located at substantially higher elevations, are at a greater distance from critical infrastructure (highways and power grid), have a smaller published copper resource base and copper grade, and they have public market values. Josemaria was purchased for $485M in April and Filo Mining has a market capitalization of $1.6B. The low end of the range is based on 50% of Josemaria’s purchase price and high end on Filo’s market capitalization.
For the valuation estimate of MUX’s gold and silver mining interests, we compared the average Enterprise Value (EV) per GEO production of five smaller producers. The low end of range is based on 50% of their multiple and the high end at par with their multiple. Please refer to the footnotes.
Table 2 Notes: McEwen Mining has 51 million fully diluted shares McEwen Mining owns 68.1% of McEwen Copper which owns 100% of Los Azules and Elder Creek Josemaria purchase price was $485 million. ($485M x 50% x 68.1%) / 51M Filo Mining market capitalization $1.6 billion. ($1.6B x 68.1%) / 51M Elder Creek value is based on earn-in ($18M / 60%) x 68.1% / 51M Royalties: 1.25% NSR on Los Azules and Elder Creek, plus three other royalties. Est. $35M / 51M Average peer group (Jaguar Mining, Silvercorp, Fortitude, Gold Resource, Endeavour Silver) EV/GEO multiple 2.14x higher than MUX Average peer group EV/GEO x 50%
As you can see, I believe there is considerable potential value in MUX, and that is a big reason why I have a personal financial commitment of $220M in MUX and McEwen Copper. Another way to look at MUX is that its current share price of $3.66 reflects the low end of potential value of the company’s ownership in McEwen Copper and you get all the other assets for free,” said Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner.
For the SEC Form 10-Q Financial Statements and MD&A refer to: www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000314203
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Nov 8, 2022 2:56:07 GMT -5
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) Q3 2022 Earnings Call
Company Participants Rob McEwen – Chairman and Chief Owner Perry Ing – Chief Financial Officer William Shaver – Chief Operating Officer Stephen McGibbon – Executive Vice President-Exploration
Michael Meding – Vice President and General Manager-McEwen Copper Conference Call Participants Jake Sekelsky – Alliance Global Partners Heiko Ihle – H.C. Wainright Joseph Reagor – Roth Capital Partners Mike Kozak – Cantor Fitzgerald John Tumazos – John Tumazos Very Independent Research
Rob McEwen Hello, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for joining us today. During Q3, we addressed a number of the overhanging concerns about McEwen Mining. First, the financing of McEwen Copper, we completed an $82 million financing in a really tough market. And not only did we complete it, but we had the second largest mining company in the world becoming a shareholder through its subsidiaries. We had high costs at our operations at Fox. And in the third quarter, we turned in operating costs. Cash costs per ounce below industry averages at $774 per ounce. At Gold Bar, we saw our production fall in the first half of the year as a result of carbonaceous ore and it resulted in unusually high cost, unacceptably high cost. We are opening up the Gold Bar South deposit and it has no carbonaceous ore, it has higher grade ore, and it's a lower strip, so we should be seeing lower cost production coming from there. We also had, in Mexico, it looked like we were coming to the end of the life of the mine. We did have a feasibility study there for a project called Fenix and we've improved the economics of it considerably with the purchase of a process plans on very advantageous terms. These issues all obscured the value of McEwen Mining in my mind. And with these resolved and a steady improvement going forward, I believe that the value of McEwen Mining will become more apparent. And after the presentations of my associates, I will talk about the value I see behind McEwen Mining. So I would now like to turn it over to Perry Ing.
Perry Ing Thanks, Rob. I'll provide a brief overview of our third quarter financial results. I'll start by stating that our 100% owned mines generated a cash gross profit of $5.8 million and a gross profit of $1.5 million. You can compare that to our reported GAAP loss of $10.5 million or $0.21 a share, which generally reflects the fact that the $7.6 million we invested in Los Azules along with $5.1 million on exploration and other projects is expensed rather than capitalized. As Rob mentioned, our results reflect a ten-for-one share consolidation that was completed in July during the quarter. Having completed that share consolidation, McEwen Mining has now regained full compliance with NYSE’s share price listing requirements. Looking at gold equivalent production just on a consolidated basis, production for the third quarter was 35,700 gold equivalent ounces, which was roughly equivalent to the production in the second quarter of the year and down approximately 16% from approximately 43,000 gold equivalent ounces produced in the third quarter of 2021. I'll have Bill Shaver talk about our production details, but overall, I'll characterize our quarter as generally being strong at Fox and San Jose. But continuing to experience challenges at Gold Bar as Rob alluded to. In terms of cash cost, as Rob stated earlier, we reported $774 as cash costs per ounce and all-in sustaining costs of $1,308 per ounce, driven by our strong performance from our underground operations which continues to produce or well ahead of current mills throughput. We were also assisted by a weaker Canadian dollar. The U.S. Canadian dollar exchange rate of approximately C$131, was about $0.05 weaker than the same period in 2021. Just as a detail on our production at Fox, if you look at our inventory balances are about $6 million. There's about a $6 million build in ore inventory stockpiles just in the third quarter alone. And that ore is that now sitting in surface stockpiles at our mill. So going forward, this should allow for some greater flexibility in our mind sequencing and some cost saving opportunities. In Nevada, looking at Gold Bar, our cash costs were $1,712 ounce and all-in sustaining at $2,049 an ounce, although these figures are down slightly from the first half of the year, they remain elevated compared to the prior year due to low production levels resulting from carbonaceous ore issues and are well above spot gold prices. We noted our mining contractor demobilized for the end of the quarter. We believe that this will have a limited impact on our cash flows, as we expect digital ounces and the leash pad and we expect to begin south production within the next quarter. Finally, looking at our 49% cone San Jose mine in Argentina, they generally had a good quarter with cash costs of $1,223 per ounce and all-in sustaining costs of $1,562 an ounce, which a significant improvement from the first half of the year where they experienced COVID related production issues as well as [Technical Difficulty] the San Jose mind during the quarter. But we are optimistic for the future depending on silver and gold prices. Finally, looking at our treasury, our cash equivalent balance stood at $55 million at the end of the quarter, which is roughly unchanged from the $54 million at the beginning of the year. As Rob noted, this included the completion of $82 million in private placements, of which approximately $42 million was completed during 2022 and 27 million during the quarter, primarily from subsidiary of Rio Tinto. Following that private placement, McEwen Mining – ownership McEwen Mining coffer was approximately 68%. So with that, I'll turn it over to Bill Shaver, our COO.
William Shaver Thank you very much. Perry, good morning, everyone. The third quarter was a reasonable quarter, though, not as good as we hoped it would be. We are making progress though at all operations to make our future brighter. On the safety front, we had a good quarter. We had one minor medical aid where a worker felt a neck pain while lifting an oxygen cylinder. On the environmental front, we had no environmental events to report in the third quarter. Also at the Fox Complex, the tailing management facility construction to raise all of the dams by approximately two meters was completed on time and on budget. Also at the Fox Complex, we had an excellent month in the mine producing ore containing 13,146 ounces versus a budget of 12,441 ounces. This raised the amount of stockpiled ore at the mine and at the milling process to 112,000 tons. This represents a value of approximately $10 million after milling cost and applied recoveries from the mill. Unfortunately, we have continued to have some mechanical issues in the Fox processing plant that have constricted the availability in the plant to approximately 77% for the quarter. So this has allowed this stockpiled ore to increase substantially over the quarter. In October, the plant availability was significantly better at 90% based on the nominal rate of 50 tons per hour or 1,200 tons a day. Thus the plant operated at approximately 1,100 tons a day. We produced 9,000 gold equivalent ounces in the quarter, but what we need to do is increase the rate in the processing plant so that we can decrease the amount of stockpiled or the mine itself is in a very sweet spot of the mining life where any mines find themselves from time to time and where we can produce more or then we can in fact process at this time. In order to address the situation, we are debottlenecking the process plant in a very systematic way, while at the same time reducing costs at the mine to stay within our cost per tonne budget. And we are being successful both in the mine and in the plant of keeping the cost as per our budgets. We will also install a crushing plant at the mine to relieve the stress on the front end of the plant. We hope that this will allow the ore to go reasonably quickly through the front end of the mill directly into the grinding and leaching circuits. We hope this will relieve the stress on the overall plant availability and improve throughput. At the Gold Bar mine in Nevada, we have come to a position where we have a better understanding of the carbonaceous minerals that occur in the ore and have a capacity to Rob or from the pregnant solution. This has complicated the mining process of separating ore and waste in the pit. However, we are getting this also under control. Gold Bar produced 7,200 ounces for the quarter. The Gold Bar South project, which we are in the midst of starting, was impacted by permitting delays of approximately two months. We will now see production from Gold Bar South in December. On a positive note, we have engaged a competent contractor who has completed the road to Gold Bar South over the last six weeks, so we will not lose any time on this front. We have also engaged a new contractor to operate the mine. This contractor is mobilizing equipment to the site this month to take over the work. This contractor has started the preliminary mining at Gold Bar South with the first row arriving at the site last week. At the same time, we have moved approximately 100,000 tonnes of ore that we had next to our crushing plant through the plant and onto the leach pad. We completed this in October and we now have that material under leach. We pour 2,500 ounces of gold in October and anticipate we will have 4,500 ounces over November and December. This will allow us to have positive cash flow in the fourth quarter of approximately $4.5 million. Going over to Mexico, we have been able to develop an approach to get the El Gallo project back in production. We will reprocess the heat leach pad, which has a grade of 0.6 grams per tonne to accomplish this as Rob had mentioned, we have acquired a 7,000 tonne per day gold processing plant, which operated recently at another mining operation in Mexico. This plant is approximately 150 kilometers away from our site and was pre-purchased recently on quite favorable terms. At El Gallo, we will assemble only the grinding cyclones and leaching portions of the plant and use the present El Gallo gold recovery circuit to operate the mining of this leach pad. Some minor changes in our permit are required and we are also making some final updates to the project evaluation analysis and some engineering and scheduling studies are being undertaken. The results of all of these will result in a favorable return on the project and a reasonably small capital cost of between $12 million and $15 million. We hope to have this plant running late next year or early in 2024. Thank you very much. I will now turn over to Steve for an update on our latest exploration results.
Stephen McGibbon Thank you, Bill, and good morning, everyone. I’m not going to quote grades and intercepts today but rather talk more about plans and opportunities coming in 2023 based on work completed in Q3 and Q4. I am happy to say we will release an exploration press release shortly for the Fox Complex. That release will update key results including a near surface discovery east of the mill at Stock and solid info results that highlight the quality of our Stock West deposit. We have very good early results at Grey Fox that are a follow-up to 2021 successes as well. Surface exploration in Nevada is near completion for the season and is just ramping up again at San José where spring in the Southern Hemisphere has begun. At the Fox Complex, we are drilling at both Stock and Grey Fox during Q4. Q1 2023 will be critical for us to explore along the Nighthawk Fault during our winter program. Nighthawk is a controlling structure to all previous discoveries at Stock. All discoveries have a near surface expression that will respond well to fire assay and other analyses. In fact, historically it may surprise you to hear that only about 5% of past production occurs on the prolific Destor Porcupine Fault Zone. Much of the remaining 95% occurs along secondary fault displays such as Nighthawk. Nighthawk has not been explored along the three kilometers west of Stock West for decades. Yet has exciting but limited near surface exploration results. Like a string of pearls, our winter program will be designed to signal the likely additional discoveries to be made along Nighthawk west of past discoveries. Systematic near surface drilling passing through the Nighthawk to the Destor Porcupine Fault Zone is the best way to determine where subsequent and more focused phases of drilling need to be placed. At Gold Bar in Nevada, the phrase boots on the ground best describes our Q3 work this summer. We utilized part of our geological teams from Argentina and Mexico to accelerate surface mapping on areas of the Gold Bar property that haven’t had boots on the ground in decades. That work will be completed in 2023 along with what we think will be a very strong overall exploration program. Drilling will begin in April. Mapping doesn’t have the [indiscernible] appeal of drill results, but this work is prioritizing targets having near-term oxide potential to support mining a stones drill from the leach pad south of current mining operations. Longer-term, similar host rocks and the key contact of the Gold Bar South deposit have been mapped and sampled elsewhere on the property and display strong alteration and rock chip sample grades. We see the geologic framework that hosts world class gold deposits at Cortez in place at Gold Bar. Our Bartine rock, the analog to Cortez’s Wenban 5 is virtually untested away from the Gold Bar mine as a deeper refractory target, particularly along the Wall Fault Corridor. The Wall Fault is a prominent structure associated with an extensive alteration, which we now believe is a southern extension of the Cortez Fault. Will 2023 be a watershed discovery year for exploration in Nevada and Ontario? That remains to be seen, but we have important programs proposed and are very excited by the near-term and medium-term potential. Thank you. Michael Meding now has our McEwen Copper update.
Michael Meding Thank you, Steve. I would love speak about McEwen Copper programs. McEwen Copper is a subsidiary of McEwen Mining, established in August 2021 an on older of the Elder Creek and the Los Azules copper. The Elder Creek property in Nevada consists of 577 unpatented mining plants. It’s perspective for porphyry copper mineralization and workplace in the district hosting several large copper and gold mines, including Nevada Gold Mine, Copper and Fenix. On September 6, 2022, McEwen Copper signing option to earn sheet with Rio Tinto’s subsidiary, Kennecott Exploration to earn a 60% interest in the other three properties in the Nevada [indiscernible], by investing $80 million in the next seven years. The Los Azules project is one of the top 10 world’s largest copper deficits measured by resource according to Mining Intelligence. As Perry mentioned before, McEwen Copper completed initial financing oversubscribed, which included $25 million investment by Nuton, Rio Tinto venture focused on innovative intelligent solution for copper projects. The proceed from the private placements are used for the Los Azules project to update our prior PEA addressing risks and opportunities and to advance the project towards a feasibility study to which we are looking to demonstrate our confidence in the accelerated development of the project. The use of funds includes acceleration drilling, any resource model, environmental permitting, community engagement, other technical work and general corporate purposes. So far in Q3, we spend $7.6 million on activities related to work growth, work of the drilling program, technical studies and convenient engagement. We are targeting access to decisively much of the year in order to accelerate exploration studies. And during Q3, we improved further our excavation mode in preparation for the early mobilization of the equipment and personnel to sites. The two roles of the site are aimed to provide median round access to adequately support the common phase of the project. With regard to the drilling program by September 26, all our free cash flow operational, several of drilling contractors were secured for the upcoming drilling campaign and mobilization was begun. We have built so far some 3.1 kilometers have completed already four holes and up six drills joining on the next. The resource drilling program aims to further our understanding of the deficits and to upgrade the payback period to measure classification. We are also drilling several deeper excavation modes with the aim to further expand this already significant resource. With regard to technical drillings, our team is well responding on the PEA schedule to all drilling end-to-end metallurgical testing from the 2017 and 2018 season together with the previous seasonal results. Work continues during the quarter on trade-off studies related to power supply inclusion of renewables, as well as to include further processing options, the design of future in-pit tailings and waste storage facilities. Hydro-geological assessments of historical information and the reestablishment of existing water monitoring locations for started. The preliminary written enterprise optimization completed in Q1 using existing information was further refined during Q2 and Q3. And this optimization study focused on the following objective, improve value by optimized scale and capital requirements, reduce complexity and to minimize risk. These analyzes continues to show that there potential to include several changes to previous limitations, which could create a significant increase in the value of the project and according to the included in the forthcoming PEA updates. Metallurgical testing continues and from preliminary metallurgical data has been received in Q3, both for flotation as well as the in-pit scenarios. Additional huge volumes planned for the drilling season, including environmental baseline work, a program designed to understand the hydrology to running the project and significant to your technical program to assist in the design of the pit resource. We are planning to issue the updated PEA in the first quarter of next year to deliver a scalable mine project, offering an attractive investment case for our shareholders. The preparation of the Exploitation Environmental Impact Report, which is basis for the environmental permit for future operations, has been evolved tonight [indiscernible] and the drafting is well underway to be presented to authorities here in Argentina in the first half of 2023. We believe that mine should support social economic development, as such, we have a dedicated community engagement team in Argentina for the Los Azules project. Our team maintains an accessible presence in the city of South Juan, as well as in municipality of Calingasta where the project is. The community engagement team drives our sustainability efforts and is focused on local procurement and employment, environments, health, education and security. In addition to the existing facilities in the town of Calingasta, a new community development office will be open during the month of November. At the moment, we directly employ 130 staff, out of which 98% are continuing, 17% are female, and there of more than 75% are professionals reflecting our commitment to workplace diversity and the offering of high quality jobs in South Juan. Thank you for your attention. I will turn the presentation back to Rob.
Rob McEwen Thank you, Michael. I believe the value of McEwen is considerably higher than our current share price. In fact, I think it’s worth somewhere between $8 to $30 a share. And this is arrived at by adding up this – it’s the value of its parts. And this value is the reason why I’ve made a personal financial commitment in McEwen Mining and McEwen Copper of over $220 million. I arrived at the $8 to $30 share value, as I said by adding up the estimated values of our assets. McEwen Copper with its Los Azules and Elder Creek property, our Gold & Silver Assets, and our portfolio of royalties. The math is set out at the end of today’s press release. The biggest leverage, I believe, will come from the recognition of the size and scale of Los Azules and that will be seen in our updated PEA, which we’re then going to push aggressively to produce a feasibility study in the following year and a half and the turnaround that’s occurring in our Gold & Silver Assets. Today, you can buy shares of McEwen Mining and essentially get the value at the low end of the value of Los Azules and all the other assets are for free. I’d now like to open the session for questions.
Jake Sekelsky, Alliance Global Partners Hi Rob and team. Thanks for taking my question. Are you able to provide any more color on the processing plant that you acquired in Mexico? I guess, maybe what you paid for it in the level of CapEx savings. Do you expect to realize that Fenix project?
Rob McEwen Sure. I’ll ask Bill to address that.
William Shaver So this process plant as I said earlier is a 7,000 ton a day plant that was used to operate a gold core Los Azules mine, that mine ran for approximately seven years. And that plant has been in Mexico moved from the gold core site for approximately five or six years. And the acquisition price was $2.8 million. I would suggest that the value of – if that plant was somewhere where you were going to build a 7,000 ton a day plant, then it would probably save you in the order of $40 million because the mine only operated for six or seven years, and so the plant is basically brand new.
Jake Sekelsky Okay. That’s helpful. And switching over to Fox. I mean, you mentioned that production was a bit lower due to some bottlenecking at the mill. And you touched on some of the steps you guys expect to take to rectify that. I mean, is that something we should expect to be flushed out in the fourth quarter? Or do you think catching the mill up to mining rates might take a bit longer?
William Shaver No. I mean, we’re doing and have been working on a number of things to improve the production and improve the availability of the mine. We’ve installed a new screening process. We’re in the midst of fixing some conveyor components. But I guess, what one has to understand is that plant has been there since some time in the mid-80s, and it was originally built with used equipment. So some of the equipment, especially on the front end of the plant the cone crushers and so on are pretty old, have done a lot of hard work over the years, and so just have poor availability. So we’re trying to do all of the things we can in order to help that situation. And ultimately, the best fix that we’re contemplating at this point is to continue operating that plant as best we can and make it as productive as possible. But the long-term solution is to improve the front end of that plant by, in fact, using some of this equipment that we bought in Mexico to try and upgrade the production from 1,100 or 1,200 tons a day up to something that’s reasonably higher. We haven’t come to decide what that number is, but it’s probably somewhere in the range of 1,600 to 2,000 tons a day. And then we would have the capability of running close to the same rate that the mine is running at, which at this point is something around 2,000 tons a day that we can produce out of the mine at the present time. So what we’ve done to kind of help that situation is to – we’ve reduced the development crews. And because the mine is kind of in that sweet spot of – with lots of headings and so on, although we’ve reduced the crew size by 50%, we’ve only managed to reduce the production by about 25%, because when you have more headings, you just make more footage and it’s effectively cheaper. So anyway it’s nice to have a big stockpile, but it’s not so nice to have a big stockpile when you’d rather have the cash. So we’re working through the process of trying to make it a better situation.
Jake Sekelsky Got it. Okay. That’s all for me. Thanks again.
Heiko Ihle, H.C. Wainright Hey, Rob. Thanks for taking my questions. So it’s seems like it’s a recurring theme in the Q&A today. For the process plant at Fox, you state in the release that we plan to start crushing at the front line prior to transportation to the mill. Is it fair to say that the crushing circuit is the only bottleneck? Or is this an issue with more like the entire plant? If maybe you could probably give a bit of color on what components are holding you back in excess of what was just set in response to the last question?
William Shaver Yes. So the back end of the plant, which is the leaching and the gold recovery is fine. The middle of the plant, which is the grinding circuit is probably okay. But it has three mills accomplishing the grinding task. So effectively that over time as that plant was increased in capacity, which I understand started at something like 500 tons a day, they added – the original ball mill was in placed, they added another ball mill, then they added a third ball mill. So what you have is a plant that has lots of operating entities. And of course, every time you look at the availability of a plant as you probably know, it’s the availability of each component in a series of components. And so if everything works at what one would anticipate, you would see in a mill, which is somewhere between 95% and 97% availability, when you multiply all those things together, you get down to into the 80% range. But the ball mills are still okay, because they’re – they do work. There’s not a lot of duplication there. But the front end of the plant is where most of the struggle is because the cone crusher is very old. When the plant was, I guess, changed or when there were components added to the plant, they really didn’t spend a lot of time thinking about how they were going to maintain them and how they were going to have access, both with cranes or with overhead cranes in order to get at these pieces of equipment. So every time when you go to fix something, it’s a relatively big ordeal. And some of the plant over the past number of years, I guess, the plant and maintenance was something that they’ve struggled with for some time. So we’re just systematically going through each part of the plant. We’ve changed the screen, we’ve changed some of the feeding arrangement. As you probably know, one of the primary crushers is associated with the old hoisting plant. And so all of those things are just don’t help when it comes to maintenance because of the number of components and the availability of each. So it’ll be a process, but everything that we’ve done so far seems to be helping. So this next step is get some material, crush down to a significantly smaller size so that it’s easier to feed through the front end of the plant.
Heiko Ihle That makes perfect sense, and I appreciate the comprehensive answer there. Just for clarification, something completely different. The surface stockpiles, do you have an idea as to their average grade? Is this just run a mill or…
William Shaver The average grade is 2.44.
Heiko Ihle We get a very specific answer. Thank you. And how much tonnage are you adding there right now per week or day or month or whatever?
William Shaver So I’m going to say, we’re adding somewhere between 7,000 and 12,000 tons a month, depending on what’s going on. And I may just go back to my previous answer, there’s two components to that stockpile. One is about 1.5 grams per ton, and the other is a little a bit over three grams per ton. And it’s split kind of 50:50 at this point with or that we’re adding as we move forward, we’ll be a little bit higher grade. So…
Heiko Ihle Got it.
William Shaver And what we’re doing, I guess is trying, because this grade is a little bit higher, that’s coming out of the mine now. We’re directing that directly from the mined to the process plant without it stopping in a stockpile.
Heiko Ihle Got it.
William Shaver So, yes.
Heiko Ihle And then I know it’s go sorry…
William Shaver Go ahead.
Heiko Ihle I know it’s rude to ask three questions. So I’m just going to make this very brief. Earlier on this call, you mentioned that stock exploration Q1 2023 is, and I’m using your word here, critical. How much do you expect to spend on exploration here in 2023 and maybe even in the first quarter? I mean, you were at 2.7 million for stock in Black Fox in Q3, can we just trendline that figure?
Perry Ing Sure, Heiko. We’ve got about a – I would say a global exploration budget of about 20 million for next year. So I would say nearly 80% of that is going to be directed at the Fox Complex. And I would say, Steve talked about, the winter drilling and work that he wants to do over the winter. So I would say generally it’s going to be phased fairly evenly throughout the year. But Steve can probably give a more nuanced answer.
Stephen McGibbon Yes, maybe, what I’ll add to that, thanks, Perry, is that we have a flow through commitment to complete in 2023. And so the upcoming first quarter is really our only winter program where we can attack targets that require winter conditions. And so I would say overall we can expect our first quarter spending to likely be higher than average quarterly spending for the rest of the year. Those numbers haven’t been finalized, but that’s kind of the bias I see developing.
Heiko Ihle Got it. Awesome. Thank you all so much. Stay well and I’ll talk to you soon.
Rob McEwen Thanks, Heiko.
Joseph Reagor, Roth Capital Partners Hey Rob and team. Couple of things, just kind of my more fine tuning questions. Previous two callers asked some detailed stuff that was good. But your guide for next year, what was the assumed gold to silver ratio for that?
Rob McEwen 85 to one.
Joseph Reagor Okay. And then, with the ongoing carbonation material problem, is there an expectation with the existing resource at Gold Bar that you guys will be providing an update there and also with the focus on Gold Bar South next year? The previous – I think mine plan called for something like 2.5 million to 2.9 million tons per year. Are we thinking a smaller number on an annual basis going forward?
Rob McEwen Well, yes, the – I don’t think we’re planning on a smaller number than we said before. The hope ourselves should – we should produce ore outer there at the rate that we have contemplated. And there is still some or that we will recover out of the pit and out of cabin. But for sure next year we will be concentrating on Gold Bar South.
Joseph Reagor Okay. And then on MSC and this probably good one for Rob. Net income year-to-date 9.4 million on a 100% basis. You guys have gotten less than 300,000 in dividends. At what point do you think, your partner will start, giving more cash out of that entity? I know the first half of the year was tough, but it’s been profitable despite that.
Rob McEwen So far they haven’t said they want to pay a dividend this year. That might change because they have some problems in Peru with two of their properties right now. But at the moment, Joe, we haven’t seen any indication they’re going to pay this year anything further.
Joseph Reagor And do you think that might change next year?
Rob McEwen Well, the year end is not the normal year end. It’s not December 31. It’s – I think it’s March, so you could see something in the first quarter.
Joseph Reagor Okay. All right. I’ll turn it over. Thanks guys.
Rob McEwen Thank you.
Mike Kozak, Cantor Fitzgerald Yes. Good morning or good afternoon, Rob and team. Just one question from me. Of the 55 million in cash that you’re reporting as of exit the third quarter. How much of that is within the McEwen Copper subsidiary and how much of that is any flow through dollars that might be left over from what you raised back and I think it was March?
Rob McEwen Hey, Mike. The vast majority is in McEwen Copper currently. So I’d say just north of 50 million. So the remainder, yes, I mean, the remainder would be McEwen Mining’s cash balance, which is below the net flow through raise.
Mike Kozak Got it. Okay. Yes, all my other technical questions have already been answered, so thanks. I’ll leave it there.
Rob McEwen Thank you.
John Tumazos, Very Independent Research Thank you for taking my question. So Rob, we know you’re passionate and a believer in all the assets you wouldn’t be managing the company, the way you are and investing the way you are, and you might be happily retired skiing somewhere if the projects weren’t so good. Is it a reasonable way to approach the risk profile of McEwen Mining that you’re going to invest in the projects. Maybe the exploration budget at 20 million could get bigger, but it’s probably not going to get smaller. And if there’s a bump in the road or the gold price falls or the copper price falls, probably Rob isn’t worried if the company’s $10 million or $20 million short, you’d just cut a check probably. You’re not worried. And if the people on the outside are worried, well, that’s just a buying opportunity.
Rob McEwen Yes.
John Tumazos Is it fair way to approach things?
Rob McEwen No, that’s a good way of looking at it John. The way I look at it.
John Tumazos I’m not trying to commit you, but I think people outside the company probably worry a lot more than you do. We get to gray hairs and you don’t.
Rob McEwen I don’t know about that. But no, I see a discernible turn in our precious metal operations, and I see very large leverage for a share price with the Los Azules asset that is continues to gain some recognition out there. I felt it was very obscured by the operating problems we experienced over the last several years. And now with copper taking the front stage on the electrification of transportation I have a lot of optimism there.
John Tumazos Thank you.
Rob McEwen Thank you everyone for joining the call.
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Nov 15, 2022 10:35:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Nov 22, 2022 8:04:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Nov 28, 2022 7:48:51 GMT -5
Good Grades Near Surface, High Grade at Depth November 28, 2022 Gold in the Sediments at Grey Fox TORONTO, November 28, 2022 - McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) is pleased to report that our ongoing exploration program has identified four new gold veins in the Grey Fox area within the Fox Complex. Drilling results reveal significant gold mineralization in veins within sedimentary rocks with good gold grades near surface and high-grade gold values encountered at depth. “What we find exciting about this discovery is that the host rock of these veins is very different than the host rock for 98% of Grey Fox’s estimated gold resources of 1.2 million ounces Indicated and 240,000 ounces Inferred. These newly discovered veins are in the sparsely explored sedimentary rocks. Such rocks are the same primary gold-bearing host rock as our Froome mine, 3 miles north of Grey Fox, and are also one of the important host rocks of some of the largest gold mines in Timmins, such as Newmont Mining’s Pamour, Hollinger and Dome mines,” stated Stephen McGibbon, SVP Exploration. At Grey Fox, gold zones are stacked parallel to a southeast-trending regional flexure in the Destor-Porcupine Fault Zone (DPFZ) (Figure 1). This important regional feature is associated with approximately 3.5 million ounces of gold (past production plus current mineral resources) in the immediate area of Grey Fox.
The four new Grey Fox - Gibson zone veins occur as shallow as 150 meters (m) below surface and, so far, have been traced down to 330 m. The drill core values (assays) are robust and include near surface intersections of 13.1 grams per tonne (g/t) gold (Au) over 7.3 m and 6.3g/tAu over 5.0 m; and at depth of 29.1 g/t Au over 1.8 m. The advantages of such a shallow location are reduced time and expense for establishing mineral resources and for future mine development.
In our 2021 drilling, hole 21GF-1333 assayed 5.6 g/t Au over 10.2 m in sediments, and 250 m to the southwest, hole 21GF-1356 assayed 5.2 g/t Au over 3.1 m core length also in sediments. Five drill holes from this year’s program have encountered high-grade intercepts or visible gold outside the boundary of our existing gold resources (Table 1). These collective results appear to be on strike and have opened a large corridor of prospective ground. Interpreted dimensions of the Gibson target area extends at least 475 m along strike and to at least 300 m depth. Such dimensions represent a meaningful opportunity for significant resource additions (Figure 2 and 3).
For Geologists Drilling has encountered multiple quartz veins hosting visible gold and up to 3% sulfides within sericite and carbonate-altered sediments. In some cases, the veins are brecciated and have crustiform (layered or void-filling) textures that are characteristic of Grey Fox. These observations support our interpretation that the veins are an extension of the Grey Fox deposit, are steeply NW-dipping and trending in a NE-SW direction.
Located within the Gibson target area is a surface ramp constructed more than 30 years ago that was used by a previous operator to take a bulk sample and recovered 2,900 oz from 8,500 tonnes with a reported grade of more than 10 g/t Au. The low gold price at that time likely discouraged further development. This area will be one of our exploration priorities in 2023.
Figure 2 – Plan View of Grey Fox - Gibson Target Area Including Historic Ramp
Figure 3 – Cross Section of Grey Fox - Gibson Target Area with Interpreted Vein Sets
|
|
|
Post by Entendance on Dec 9, 2022 3:32:08 GMT -5
(Bloomberg) -- McEwen Mining Inc. is planning to take its copper unit public next year, seeking to capitalize on growing demand for the wiring metal.
The company run by metals entrepreneur Rob McEwen is preparing an initial public offering for its McEwen Copper business in the first half of 2023, according to Michael Meding, who leads the unit. The company operates in Los Azules, one of the world’s biggest underdeveloped copper deposits.
“These are exciting times to be in mining and in Argentina,” Meding, who was previously at Barrick Gold Corp., said in a phone interview. There’s been increased interest from prospective investors who previously were less active in mining, he said.
McEwen Copper, which landed Rio Tinto Group venture funding in a recent private placement, would go public at a time when copper demand is accelerating while the industry’s production pipeline is running dry. The global shift away from fossil fuels has spurred demand for the metal that goes into electric vehicles and solar panels.
The company currently has eight rigs doing exploration and resource drilling at the Los Azules property in Argentina’s San Juan province. Meding expects to apply as early as mid-April for the environmental permit for exploitation. A feasibility study may be ready in 2024, at which time a development decision could be made.
Argentina’s government has made efforts to develop more of its vast deposits of lithium and copper, and San Juan in particular is becoming a hot-spot. Lundin Mining Corp. is also drilling large deposits in the province while Glencore Plc is accelerating feasibility work at its El Pachon project.
|
|